# 為藉助生成式 AI 尋求宗教解答的穆斯林提供指引 - 日期: 2026-09-09 - 收錄: 2026-09-26 - 相關方: Mr Saktiandi Supaat · Dr Wan Rizal · Mr Zaqy Mohamad - 來源: https://sprs.parl.gov.sg/search/#/sprs3topic?reportid=oral-answer-4195 - sgai: https://sgai.md/zh-tw/debates/oral-answer-4195/ - 許可：sgai 自產內容（摘要、譯文、分析）CC BY 4.0，署名並連結 sgai.md 即可；逐字原文（國會記錄、演講、字幕、政策原文）© 原權利人，僅供引用。條款：https://github.com/meltflake/sgai/blob/main/DATA-LICENSE.md ## 為什麼重要 MUIS 將升級 MuslimSG 並培訓宗教師使用生成式 AI，但未接受設專門單位巡查網上宗教錯誤資訊的建議 ## 摘要 議員安迪（Mr Saktiandi Supaat）詢問代主管回教事務部長：新加坡伊斯蘭宗教理事會（MUIS）是否會發布指引，幫助藉助生成式 AI 獲取宗教解答的穆斯林核實答案。代主管回教事務部長扎吉哈（Mr Zaqy Mohamad）答覆：生成式 AI 可補充宗教學習，但不應作為宗教指引的主要來源，複雜問題應請教合格宗教師；MUIS 已通過星期五講道、公開講座和 MuslimSG 平臺傳達這一資訊。補充提問中，安迪要求提供核查 AI 答案的渠道，扎吉哈表示 MUIS 正研究升級 MuslimSG 以便公眾接觸宗教師，部分宗教師已受 AI 培訓。議員文禮佳（Dr Wan Rizal）建議設專門單位主動搜尋網上宗教錯誤資訊，扎吉哈認為網際網路過於龐大、演算法難以監管，重點應是提升民眾辨識風險的能力。 ## 要點 - 政府立場：生成式 AI 和網路平臺可補充宗教學習，但不應作為宗教教導或指引的主要來源，複雜宗教問題應請教合格宗教師 - MUIS 已通過星期五講道、公開講座和 MuslimSG 平臺傳達這一資訊，並將通過社交媒體和社群夥伴提供實用指引，加強數字宗教素養 - MUIS 正研究升級 MuslimSG 平臺，提高接觸宗教師的便利性，未來可能使其更具互動性 - 部分宗教師已接受培訓，以瞭解 AI 的影響及如何更好地使用 AI；公眾可通過宗教師認證計劃網站聯絡宗教師 - 扎吉哈前一天宣佈成立的網路委員會也負責研究網路來源和網路傷害帶來的新興風險 - 對設專門單位巡查網上宗教錯誤資訊的建議，代部長認為網際網路過於龐大、演算法難以監管，應著重識別主題並提升民眾辨識風險的能力 ## 全文 12 號，安迪先生詢問代主管回教事務部長：新加坡伊斯蘭宗教理事會（MUIS）是否會發布指引，幫助使用生成式人工智慧及其他網路來源獲取宗教解答的穆斯林，對照權威來源核實這些答案，並瞭解何時、何處應請教合格的宗教師（asatizah）。 代主管回教事務部長（扎吉哈先生）：議長先生，生成式人工智慧（GenAI）和網路平臺能讓資訊與知識更易獲取，從而對宗教學習起到補充作用。然而，它們不應被當作宗教教導或指引的主要來源，尤其是在需要學術詮釋和語境理解的複雜宗教問題上。在這些情況下，應當請教合格的宗教師或其他值得信賴的知識來源。 新加坡伊斯蘭宗教理事會（Majlis Ugama Islam Singapura，簡稱 MUIS）一直通過星期五講道、公開講座和 MuslimSG 平臺強化這些資訊。MUIS 將繼續努力，通過社交媒體和我們的社群夥伴網路提供實用指引，以加強數字宗教素養。 議長：安迪先生。 安迪先生（碧山－大巴窯）：謝謝議長先生。我有兩個補充問題。感謝代部長的答覆。尋求宗教指引的人即使獲得了參考資料，也未必具備核實 AI 生成答案的知識。因此，我的第一個補充問題是：MUIS 能否加強現有渠道，讓公眾可以提交這類答案供核查，例如由合格的宗教師核查，並及時得到回覆，特別是涉及家庭或個人決定等與宗教問題相關的重要決定時？ 第二個補充問題是：正如您所提到的，一些穆斯林或馬來族/穆斯林的宗教資訊大多來自網上，其中包括可能不常參加清真寺活動或宗教課程的人，MUIS 將如何確保指引能夠觸及他們？例如，MUIS 今後是否會提供實際例子，幫助他們識別哪些 AI 生成的答案需要核查、哪些需要由合格的宗教師核查？ 扎吉哈先生：謝謝議長先生。這些確實是合理的問題，也是令人關注的問題，不僅穆斯林社群關注，我認為更廣泛的社會也關注，即如今人們如何消費來自世界各地的內容。影響也來自全球各地。 因此，我認為問題實際上在於，我們如何讓不僅是信眾（Jemaah），還有整個穆斯林群體（ummah），乃至更廣泛的國民，更好地認識到需要提高警覺、能夠核查資訊，無論是宗教內容還是其他內容。我認為，歸根結底，這是我們作為一個國家需要努力的事情。 有兩點：第一，關於議員問我們能否讓平臺更易使用，答案是肯定的。我們在提高資訊的可及性、例如接觸宗教師的便利性方面，確實還有改進空間。這是 MUIS 正在研究的一個領域，即升級 MuslimSG 平臺。 我們相當密切地關注生成式 AI。因此，我們正在教育甚至提升許多宗教師的能力，讓他們更熟悉生成式 AI 和新的數字工具。其中一些人已接受培訓，以更好地瞭解 AI 的影響或如何更好地使用 AI，因為歸根結底，他們必須作出解釋。 第二，我認為更廣泛的問題是，我們如何讓穆斯林社群更好地利用各種平臺，包括實體和網路平臺。因為我認為，我們看待宗教教育必須採取全面的方式，兼顧實體領域和數字領域。如今宗教師是可以接觸到的，大家可以通過宗教師認證計劃（Asatizah Recognition Scheme）網站聯絡他們。當然，如果有任何疑慮或需要任何宗教指引，也可以通過 MUIS 聯絡我們。今後在升級 MuslimSG 時，我們或許可以讓它更具互動性，也更便於社群使用。 我認為，歸根結底，這是我們非常清楚的一個領域，尤其是在設法接觸可能受到影響的年輕人方面，特別是存在激進化風險，甚至所謂“ajaran sesat”即錯誤教義的風險。 在宗教師群體中，我認為關鍵在於能夠把當今許多人從海外教士或穆夫提那裡獲得、接收或受其影響的一些複雜問題放到具體語境中理解。我認為這些都是重要方面，我們需要能夠幫助社群把許多這類教義重新放回新加坡的語境中理解。 因此，有許多層面需要努力，我們今天也正在努力。但我向議員保證，這是我們正在關注的領域。我昨天宣佈成立的網路委員會，也負責研究來自網路來源和網路傷害的一些新興風險。我們確實在關注這個問題，既著眼於現狀，也主動審視新興風險。 議長：文禮佳醫生。 文禮佳醫生（惹蘭勿剎）：先生，感謝代部長分享我們希望如何與社群聯絡的做法。但我覺得我們的做法相當被動防守。能否在 MUIS 內設立一個專門單位，在宗教錯誤資訊在社群中傳播開來之前，提前在網際網路上搜尋這類資訊？ 扎吉哈先生：感謝議員的提問。首先，我認為在理想狀態下，你會有無限的資源來做這件事。因為網際網路非常龐大，很難找出每一個網站或每一個出現的來源。總體而言，更重要的是我們找出主題，那些能引起人們共鳴的主題；有時這些主題能引起共鳴，但同時可能是錯誤的，或者沒有結合新加坡的語境。我們必須解釋其中一些教義。 例如，幾年前曾發生一些事件，有人擔心是否可以祝福他人“聖誕快樂”，能不能這樣祝福別人？因此，某些違背包容精神、多種族主義以及我們多宗教環境的主題，必須加以處理。 因此，我們應該主動處理其中一些主題和我們看到的新興風險，尤其是讓人們對網路傷害保持警覺。因為這些未必來自網站。生成式 AI 也不是來自網站；它來自從不同網站彙集內容的演算法，因此很難監管演算法。 歸根結底，這與我們昨天在本院談到的風險相同，即可能有自封的網紅也在提供資訊。因此，問題不在於把守資訊從哪裡來，而實際上也在於給我們的人民“打預防針”，讓他們懂得如何識別風險，幫助家長認識孩子身上正在發生的風險。更大的圖景是，我們如何幫助新加坡人，尤其是新加坡穆斯林，把許多來自外部的教義放到我們自己多種族、多宗教的語境中理解。 因此，我們需要在不同層面上努力。當然，今後我們會與社群合作。 ## Hansard (original, English) © Parliament of Singapore — reproduced for reference only. 12 Mr Saktiandi Supaat asked the Acting Minister-in-charge of Muslim Affairs whether MUIS will issue guidance to help Muslims who use generative AI and other online sources to provide religious answers, to verify such answers against authoritative sources and to know when and where to consult qualified asatizah. The Acting Minister-in-charge of Muslim Affairs (Mr Zaqy Mohamad) : Mr Speaker, generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) and online platforms can complement religious learning by making information and knowledge more accessible. However, they should not be relied upon as the primary source of religious instruction or guidance, particularly on complex religious matters that require scholarly interpretation and contextual understanding. In these situations, a qualified asatizah, or other trustworthy sources of knowledge, should be consulted. The Islamic Religious Council of Singapore (Majlis Ugama Islam Singapura or MUIS) has been reinforcing these messages through Friday sermons, public talks and the MuslimSG platform. MUIS will continue efforts to deliver practical guidance through social media and our network of community partners to strengthen digital religious literacy. Mr Speaker : Mr Saktiandi Supaat. Mr Saktiandi Supaat (Bishan-Toa Payoh) : Thank you, Mr Speaker. I have two supplementary questions. I thank the Acting Minister for his reply. Someone seeking religious guidance may not have the knowledge to verify an AI-generated answer, even when the references are provided. So, my first supplementary question is, could MUIS strengthen its existing channels so that members of the public can submit such answers for checking, for example, by qualified asatizah and receive timely responses, particularly on matters affecting important decisions related to religious questions on family or personal decisions. The second supplementary question is how would MUIS ensure that the guidance reaches Muslims or Malay/Muslims who obtain most of the religious information online, as you mentioned, including those who may not regularly attend mosque programmes or religious classes? Will there be, for example, practical examples that MUIS may do, going forward, to help them recognise when an AI-generated answer needs to be checked and which ones would need to be checked by a qualified asatizah? Mr Zaqy Mohamad : Thank you, Mr Speaker. Those are certainly valid questions and something that is of concern, not just to the Muslim community, but I think the wider community, in terms of how one consumes content today, which is available worldwide. The influences come from global influences as well. So, I think, the issue is really about how we make our not just Jemaah, but ummah also, in terms of the wider citizen pool, better understand the need for being more aware to be able to check information, whether religious content or otherwise. I think, ultimately, that is something that we need to work on as a country. Two things: one, to the Member's question of can we make our platforms more accessible, the answer is certainly. There is certainly room for us to improve accessibility to information, accessibility to asatizah, for example. This is one area in which MUIS is looking into, in terms of upgrading the MuslimSG platform. GenAI is something that we look quite closely at. So, we are educating and even upgrading many of our asatizah to be more familiar with GenAI and new digital tools. Some of them have already undergone training to better understand the effects or how to use AI better, because ultimately, they do have to explain. Secondly, I think the wider issue is how do we get the Muslim community to better engage the platforms, both physical and online platforms. Because I think the way we look at religious education has to be a holistic approach, both in the physical realm and digital realm. The asatizahs today are accessible, you can reach them via the Asatizah Recognition Scheme website. But certainly through MUIS, reach out to us if there are any concerns or any religious guidance that you seek. This is one area in which, perhaps, in the future as we upgrade MuslimSG, we could make it more interactive and more accessible for the community. I think, ultimately, that is one area in which we are very cognisant about, in trying to reach out to the young especially, who may be influenced, especially where you have the risk of radicalisation and even what we call "ajaran sesat" or false teachings. Within the asatizah community, I think the ability to contextualise some of the complex issues today that many get or receive or are influenced by from overseas clerics or Muftis. I think those are important aspects, in which we need to be able to help the community also contextualise many of these teachings back into the Singapore context too. So, there are many layers that need to be worked on and that we are working on today. But I assure the Member that this is one area that we are looking at. And the online committee that I announced yesterday is also tasked to look into some of these emerging risks that come from online sources and online harms. We are certainly looking at it, both from a present state, and as well as proactively, looking at emerging risks too. Mr Speaker : Dr Wan Rizal. Dr Wan Rizal (Jalan Besar) : Sir, I thank the Acting Minister for sharing approaches on how we want to connect with the community. But I feel that what we do is pretty defensive. Is there some way we could create a dedicated unit, somewhere in MUIS, to comb the Internet and search for such religious misinformation in advance, before it gains traction to the community? Mr Zaqy Mohamad : I thank the Member for his question. First, I think in an ideal state, you would have unlimited resources to do that. Because the Internet is very vast. It is very difficult to pick up every single site or every single source that comes along. Overall, what is more important is that we pick out themes, themes that resonate with people and sometimes, these are themes that resonate, but at the same time, may be false or not contextualised to Singapore's context. And we would have to explain some of these teachings. For example, there were incidents a few years ago, where there were concerns of whether you should be able to wish others "Merry Christmas", can you wish someone that? So, certain themes which goes against the spirit of inclusivity, multi-racialism, our multi-religious context, have to be addressed. So, we should proactively work on some of these themes, emerging risks that we see, and especially in terms of being able to keep people aware of online harm. Because they may not necessarily come from sites. GenAI does not come from sites as well; it comes from algorithms that are pulled together from different sites, so it is very difficult to police algorithms. Ultimately, it is also about the same risk as we spoke about yesterday in this House, where you could have a self-styled influencer giving information too. So, it is not about guarding where the information comes from, but it is really also about inoculating our people, in terms of how to recognise the risk, helping parents to recognise the risk with what is going on with their kids. The broader picture is how do we help Singaporeans, especially Singaporean Muslims, contextualise many of these teachings, from outside, into our own multiracial, multi-religious context too. So, there are different layers at which we need to work on. And certainly, we will work with the community as we move forward.