# 强制新加坡网络平台纳入安全始于设计原则以防止儿童性剥削

- 日期: 2026-09-09
- 收录: 2026-09-26
- 相关方: Ms Elysa Chen · Ms Rahayu Mahzam
- 来源: https://sprs.parl.gov.sg/search/#/sprs3topic?reportid=oral-answer-4191
- sgai: https://sgai.md/zh/debates/oral-answer-4191/
- 许可：sgai 自产内容（摘要、译文、分析）CC BY 4.0，署名并链接 sgai.md 即可；逐字原文（国会记录、演讲、字幕、政策原文）© 原权利人，仅供引用。条款：https://github.com/meltflake/sgai/blob/main/DATA-LICENSE.md

## 为什么重要

政府正检讨是否将 AI 聊天机器人、通讯和游戏服务纳入网络安全监管，X 已被置于加强监管

## 摘要

议员陈诗韵（Ms Elysa Chen）询问数字发展与信息部长：网络平台是否将被强制纳入安全始于设计原则以防止儿童性剥削。数字发展与信息部政务部长拉哈尤·玛赞（Ms Rahayu Mahzam）答复：根据资讯通信媒体发展局（IMDA）的《网络安全行为准则》，指定社交媒体服务和应用商店已须主动侦测并迅速移除儿童性剥削内容，这与安全始于设计原则一致；IMDA 在 2026 年 3 月 31 日的评估报告中发现 X 存在严重缺陷，已将其置于加强监管之下。补充提问中，陈诗韵追问通讯服务、游戏平台及 AI 陪伴应用是否会被纳入。拉哈尤表示政府正检讨是否把 AI 聊天机器人、通讯和游戏服务纳入监管，准备就绪后公布；她并澄清网络安全委员会（OSC）只处理由受害者触发的个案，不是平台设计的主动监管者。

## 要点

- 根据 IMDA《网络安全行为准则》，指定社交媒体服务和应用商店须主动侦测并迅速移除儿童性剥削和性虐待活动，例如网络诱骗
- 这些服务还须建立系统和流程，减少新加坡用户接触包括儿童性剥削材料在内的有害内容，政府认为这与安全始于设计原则一致
- IMDA 在 2026 年 3 月 31 日发布的网络安全评估报告中发现 X 在侦测和移除儿童性剥削材料方面存在严重缺陷，已向其发出警告信并将其置于加强监管
- 政府正检讨是否将监管范围扩大至 AI 聊天机器人、通讯和游戏服务，准备就绪后公布细节
- 网络安全委员会（OSC）自 2026 年 6 月起运作，只处理受害者触发的个案，并非平台设计的主动监管者；平台设计要求由 IMDA 通过《社交媒体服务准则》执行

## 全文

8 号，陈诗韵女士询问数字发展与信息部长：(a) 在新加坡运营的网络平台是否将被要求纳入安全始于设计（safety-by-design）原则，以防止儿童性剥削；(b) 若否，原因为何；(c) 鉴于其他地方已有国际标准，部方何时会强制规定此类保障措施。

数字发展与信息部政务部长（拉哈尤·玛赞女士）（代数字发展与信息部长）：议长先生，根据资讯通信媒体发展局（IMDA）的《网络安全行为准则》，指定的社交媒体服务和应用商店须主动侦测并迅速移除其平台上的儿童性剥削和性虐待活动，例如以儿童性虐待为目的的网络诱骗。

此外，这些服务须建立系统和流程，以减少新加坡用户接触有害内容，包括儿童性剥削材料。这些要求与安全始于设计原则一致，该原则要求平台建立主动保障措施、预防伤害，而不是在伤害发生后才作出反应。

IMDA 也定期评估指定平台遵守各自《网络安全行为准则》的情况。在 2026 年 3 月 31 日发布的最新一期指定社交媒体服务网络安全评估报告中，IMDA 发现 X 在主动侦测和移除其平台上儿童性剥削和性虐待材料的措施方面存在严重缺陷。IMDA 向 X 发出警告信，并将其置于加强监管之下，以追究其责任、要求其纠正严重缺陷。

议长：陈女士。

陈诗韵女士（碧山－大巴窑）：感谢政务部长。《行为准则》目前只对指定的社交媒体和应用分发服务施加防范儿童性剥削的义务。我想问，出现诱骗和不请自来接触风险的通讯服务和游戏平台，例如 Roblox 和 Minecraft，是否会被纳入范围？指定的标准又是什么？

我还想问第二个补充问题。人工智能（AI）陪伴应用和对话代理如今与未成年人进行长时间的私密互动，但它们并不在两份《行为准则》的范围内。请问这类服务是否会被指定，是否会承担与社交媒体服务相同的侦测和举报义务？

最后，网络安全委员会（OSC）自 2026 年 6 月起已开始运作。我想问，它是否会获得明确授权，执行防范儿童性剥削的安全始于设计标准？实施时间表又可能是怎样的？

拉哈尤·玛赞女士：议长先生，我们理解议员对这一问题的关切。关于第一和第二个问题，这些也是我们关注的事项。我们定期检讨现有网络安全措施的范围，确保对儿童的支持和保护足够广泛。这是我们加强新加坡网络安全工作的一部分。

这也包括是否将我们的监管范围扩大到其他类型的网络服务，例如议员提到的 AI 聊天机器人、通讯和游戏服务，我们正在检讨这方面。准备就绪后，我们会公布更多细节。

关于 OSC 的问题，我想在此作个澄清。OSC 的职能不同。就此而言，是由 IMDA 根据《网络安全行为准则——社交媒体服务》，即我们所说的《社交媒体服务（SMS）准则》，与指定的社交媒体服务合作。《SMS 准则》要求指定的社交媒体服务落实网络安全措施，包括应对儿童性剥削的保障措施。

进一步澄清 OSC：它是受害者就特定网络伤害寻求救济的渠道。网络安全专员有权向平台发出指示，但这些指示是针对个案的，因为必须由受害者触发。它并不是平台设计的主动监管者。不过，他们已与主要网络服务提供商接触，并将继续与它们密切合作，确保网络伤害，包括基于图像的儿童虐待，得到及时处理。

## Hansard (original, English)

© Parliament of Singapore — reproduced for reference only.

8 Ms Elysa Chen asked the Minister for Digital Development and Information (a) whether online platforms operating in Singapore will be required to incorporate safety-by-design principles to prevent child sexual exploitation; (b) if not, why not; and (c) when will the Ministry mandate such safeguards, given that international standards are already in place elsewhere.

The Minister of State for Digital Development and Information (Ms Rahayu Mahzam) (for the Minister for Digital Development and Information) : Mr Speaker, under the Infocomm Media Development Authority's (IMDA's) Codes of Practice for Online Safety, designated social media services and app stores are required to proactively detect and swiftly remove child sexual exploitation and abuse activity on their platforms, such as online grooming for child sexual abuse.

Additionally, these services are required to put in place systems and processes to mitigate Singapore users' exposure to harmful content, including child sexual exploitation material. These are aligned with safety-by-design principles that require platforms to build proactive safeguards and prevent harm, rather than react to the harm that occurs.

IMDA also regularly assesses the designated platforms' compliance with their respective Codes of Practice for Online Safety. In the latest Online Safety Assessment Report for designated social media services published on 31 March 2026, IMDA found serious weaknesses in X's measures to proactively detect and remove child sexual exploitation and abuse material on its platform. IMDA issued a Letter of Caution to X and placed it under Enhanced Supervision to hold it accountable to rectify its serious weaknesses.

Mr Speaker : Ms Chen.

Ms Elysa Chen (Bishan-Toa Payoh) : I thank the Minister of State. The Codes of Practice currently impose child sexual exploitation duties only on designated social media and app distribution services. I wanted to ask whether messaging services and gaming platforms, such as Roblox and Minecraft, where grooming and unsolicited contact risks arise, will be brought within scope and what criteria govern designation?

I also wanted to ask a second supplementary question. Artificial intelligence (AI) companion applications and conversational agents now sustain prolonged, private interactions with minors. Yet they fall outside both Codes of Practice. May I ask whether such services will be designated and whether they will carry the same detection and reporting obligations as social media services?

Last, the Online Safety Commission (OSC) has been operational since June 2026. I would like to ask whether it will be given an explicit mandate to enforce safety by design standards against child sexual exploitation and what might the timeline be for such an implementation?

Ms Rahayu Mahzam : Mr Speaker, we appreciate the Member's concerns on this issue. In relation to questions one and two, these are things that we are also concerned with. We are regularly reviewing the scope of our current online safety measures to ensure that the support and the protection for children is extensive. It is part of our efforts to enhance online safety in Singapore.

This also includes whether to extend our regulatory ambit to include other types of online services, such as what the Member mentioned – the AI chat bots, messaging, gaming services and we are reviewing this. We will announce more details when we are ready.

With regard to the question on the OSC, I would like to just make a clarification here. The OSC serves a different function. For this purpose, it is IMDA, which works with the designated social media services under the Code of Practice for Online Safety – Social Media Services, what we call the Social Media Services (SMS) Code. The SMS code imposes requirements on the designated social media services to put in place online safety measures, including safeguards to address child sexual exploitation.

So, just to expand the clarification on the OSC, it is an avenue for victims to seek relief for specified online harms. The Commissioner of Online Safety is empowered to issue directions to platforms, but these are in response to individual cases, because it has to be triggered by the victims. It is not a proactive regulator of platform design. But they have engaged with major online service providers and will continue to work closely with them to ensure that online harms, including image-based child abuse, are addressed in a timely manner.