口头答复 · 2025-04-08 · 第 14 届国会
金融科技平台消费者保护
Protection for Consumers of Fintech Platforms and Non-bank Institutions, and Regulations on Liquidity Levels and Responsible Marketing
议员质询金融管理局(MAS)如何确保金融科技平台及非银行机构维持流动性、管理资金提取风险,并加强零售投资者保护。政府回应指出相关投资平台受资本市场服务牌照监管,客户资产与平台资产隔离,提现按规定时间有序进行。政府强调近期提现激增事件中,平台的风险管理机制发挥了作用,但对部分即时提现及关联借记卡功能进行了限制,体现监管灵活性与风险防控的平衡。
关键要点
- • 投资平台受资本市场服务牌照监管
- • 客户资产与平台资产严格隔离
- • 提现功能受限以防风险扩散
强调监管机制有效保障消费者权益
加强金融科技平台风险监管
"The recent incident involving a surge in withdrawals from an investment platform illustrate that the safeguards worked as intended."
参与人员(4)
- Alvin Tan
- Mark Lee
- Minister of State for Trade and Industry
- Saktiandi Supaat
完整译文(中文)
Hansard 英文原文译文 · 翻译日期:2026-05-02
7 马克·李先生问总理兼财政部长:(a) 新加坡金融管理局(MAS)如何确保提供高收益投资产品的金融科技平台和非银行金融机构维持充足流动性并管理资金提取风险;(b) 鉴于近期金融科技公司面临的流动性挑战,MAS是否考虑采取额外保障措施以加强对零售投资者的消费者保护;(c) 有哪些措施确保公众充分理解使用非银行实体金融服务的风险,特别是提供投资相关产品的金融科技平台。
8 萨克蒂安迪·苏帕特先生问总理兼财政部长:(a) MAS采取了哪些措施确保金融机构和金融科技公司(FIFCs)就其产品和服务的变更提供清晰、准确和及时的沟通;(b) 有哪些措施鼓励FIFCs采用负责任的营销策略,避免对回报或利益作出过度承诺,避免向客户提供过于诱人的促销优惠;(c) MAS如何确保金融科技公司遵守与银行相同的风险管理和消费者沟通标准。
贸易与工业国务部长(陈振声先生)(代表总理兼财政部长) :议长先生,若获准,我想将第7和第8号问题一并回答,因为它们涉及类似议题。
议长 :请继续。
陈振声 :议长先生,作为数字顾问运营的投资平台,代表客户管理投资组合,须根据《证券与期货法》持有资本市场服务牌照(CMSL)。这些平台提供的投资组合投资于其他持牌基金管理公司的基金。根据法规要求,这些投资平台必须将客户资产合法隔离,并由持牌托管人妥善保管。
近期某投资平台出现大量提款事件,显示相关保障措施发挥了预期作用。客户资产与平台资产适当隔离,提款请求在标准基金赎回时间(三至六个工作日)内有序兑现。客户在三至六天内获得其投资的市场价值。
上述案例中,该投资平台提供了两个独特功能,并向客户重点宣传。第一,允许客户即时提款,设有每账户限额。第二,允许客户使用与其投资价值挂钩的借记卡消费。当这两项功能的使用率过高,平台难以支持时,均已停止。
这些功能的条件和限制,包括平台变更或停止功能的权利,均在产品条款中披露。然而,这些披露可能未能有效帮助客户全面理解产品。
虽然产品功能不总需监管审批,但针对影响公司运营的功能,法规要求必须有健全的风险管理和清晰披露。MAS正在根据这些要求审查该案例,并更广泛地研究如何确保投资平台有效执行这些要求。
同时,我们敦促客户在决定投资前,充分了解产品功能(包括关键条款和条件)及风险。如对产品功能不清楚,应寻求专业理财建议。我们也鼓励客户参考我们的MoneySENSE网站,了解投资时应注意事项。
议长 :马克·李先生。
马克·李(提名议员) :感谢国务部长陈振声的详尽答复,以及MAS在维护信任同时支持金融生态创新方面的持续努力。我认为近期金融科技事件表明,即使平台持有MAS牌照,许多零售用户可能并不清楚监管边界,甚至不了解产品风险,尤其是流动性和提款预期方面。
这不一定是监管失误,更像是沟通和认知挑战。正如陈振声国务部长所言,提供方确实包含免责声明,但零售用户仍将其产品与银行类产品混淆。我理解MAS通过MoneySENSE等举措推动金融素养。
但随着金融科技产品演进和营销策略日益复杂,一些消费者可能被品牌推广或平台设计吸引,尽管存在合法准确的披露。为此,我建议财政部考虑:第一,要求投资者在投资前必须阅读并确认一份强制性的通俗风险摘要;第二,加强公众对该类产品的教育;第三,鼓励行业制定更严格的营销和促销行为准则。
陈振声 :先生,感谢马克·李先生的补充问题。他提出了继续培育信任和维护创新的关键点,这正是我们对金融科技行业的努力方向。
这次事件表明,企业必须遵守监管要求:首先,建立健全的风险管理体系;其次,妥善披露产品及其对公司运营的影响。我们将详细审查该案例,并与平台及行业合作,确保更好地落实这些要求。
此外,关于金融产品的理解,随着市场推出更多产品,客户提升认知同样重要。我们将继续与各平台合作,促进产品理解;同时,敦促企业提高披露的清晰度和透明度,虽然已有披露,但仍可改进。
议长 :萨克蒂安迪·苏帕特先生。
萨克蒂安迪·苏帕特(碧山-大巴窑) :谢谢议长。我有两点补充问题,补充马克·李先生的发言。感谢国务部长和马克·李先生强调我们希望在金融领域鼓励创新和信任。
第一,MAS还能做些什么加强消费者金融素养?正如国务部长刚才提到,随着金融创新推进,类似情况会增多,是否可以简化零售投资者的投诉渠道,尤其是针对金融科技相关投诉?因为随着创新空间扩大,问题可能更复杂。
第二,随着金融机构和金融科技公司越来越多使用数字平台和基于人工智能(AI)的营销,MAS如何加强监管,确保这些技术不会被用来利用消费者偏见或掩盖风险?我认为这将变得更复杂。国务部长刚才提及部分内容,但针对金融科技领域的AI营销,我们如何加强监管?
陈振声 :先生,我们会采取上述所有措施。首先,消费者教育是重点。关于客户投诉,我鼓励消费者如有投诉,向MAS反映,MAS会全面处理。
其次,我们与行业紧密合作,例如金融科技公司和新加坡金融科技协会。我们有空间与他们合作,鼓励平台提升标准,更好披露产品特征。
第三,关于技术应用,我们需在金融创新与监管行为之间取得平衡。重要的保障措施之一是,该案例中的公司持有CMSL基金管理牌照。消费者可查阅金融机构目录,了解哪些公司受监管,也可参考投资者警示名单。
针对该公司及其CMSL牌照,法规要求客户资金与公司资金隔离。这意味着客户投资受到保护,客户提款请求能有序处理,因为客户资金由独立托管人保管,必须保持完整,且不得用于偿付公司债务。
因此,我们有教育、有良好的监管框架和执行措施,这将帮助我们培育充满活力的金融科技生态,同时确保保护消费者利益。
英文原文
SPRS Hansard 原始记录 · 抓取日期:2026-05-02
7 Mr Mark Lee asked the Prime Minister and Minister for Finance (a) how does MAS ensure that financial technology platforms and non-bank financial institutions offering high-yield investment products maintain sufficient liquidity and manage fund withdrawal risks; (b) whether MAS is considering additional safeguards to enhance consumer protection for retail investors engaging with such platforms, given recent liquidity challenges faced by fintech firms; and (c) what measures are in place to ensure that the public fully understands the risks of using financial services from non-bank entities, particularly fintech platforms offering investment-linked products.
8 Mr Saktiandi Supaat asked the Prime Minister and Minister for Finance (a) what steps is MAS taking to ensure financial institutions and fintech companies (FIFCs) provide clear, accurate and timely communication regarding changes to their products and services; (b) what measures are in place to encourage FIFCs to adopt responsible marketing strategies, avoid overpromising on returns or benefits and avoid offering overly attractive promotional offers to customers; and (c) how does MAS ensure that fintech companies adhere to the same standards of risk management and consumer communications as banks.
The Minister of State for Trade and Industry (Mr Alvin Tan) (for the Prime Minister and Minister for Finance) : Mr Speaker, with your permission, may I take Question Nos 7 and 8 together please, as they touch on similar issues.
Mr Speaker : Please go ahead.
Mr Alvin Tan : Mr Speaker, investment platforms operating as digital advisers that manage investment portfolios on behalf of customers are licensed as Capital Markets Services Licensees (CMSLs) under the Securities and Futures Act. They offer portfolios which are invested into funds managed by other licensed fund management companies. These investment platforms are required by regulation to keep customers' assets legally separate and safekept by licensed custodians.
The recent incident involving a surge in withdrawals from an investment platform illustrate that the safeguards worked as intended. Customers' assets were properly segregated from the platform and requests for withdrawal were redeemed in an orderly manner, within the standard fund redemption timeframe of three to six working days. Customers received the market value of their investments within the typical three to six days.
In the specific case I mentioned above, the investment platform offered two unique features, which they marketed prominently to customers. First, it offered instant withdrawals for customers, up to a limit per account. Second, it allowed customers to spend on a debit card that was linked to the value of their underlying investments. The platform stopped both these features when the high usage of both these features became unsustainable for it to support.
The conditions and limitations of these features, including the ability of the investment platform to vary or stop these features, were disclosed in the product terms and conditions. However, these disclosures may not have been effective in providing customers a full understanding of the product.
While product features do not always require regulatory approval, there are regulatory requirements in place for robust risk management and clear disclosures, especially where they impact a firm's operations. The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) is reviewing this particular case against these requirements, as well as, more generally, how to ensure investment platforms implement these requirements effectively.
At the same time, we urge customers to fully understand the features, including key terms and conditions, and risks of a financial product, before deciding to invest in it. Customers should also seek professional financial advice on the suitability of a product if they are unclear of its features. We also encourage customers to refer to our MoneySENSE website to learn more about what to look out for in an investment.
Mr Speaker : Mr Mark Lee.
Mr Mark Lee (Nominated Member) : I thank the Minister of State Alvin Tan for the detailed reply and MAS' ongoing efforts to uphold trust while supporting innovation in our financial ecosystem. I think the recent fintech incident illustrates that even when a platform is MAS-licensed, many retail users may not clearly understand the regulatory boundaries or even the product risk, particularly in relation to liquidity and withdrawal expectations.
It is not necessarily a regulatory lapse, but I think a communication and perception challenge. And like what the Minister of State Alvin Tan has said, the provider did include disclaimers, but retail users still conflated the offering with bank-like products. And I understand, like what the Minister of State Alvin Tan has said, MAS has worked through initiatives, like MoneySENSE, to promote financial literacy.
But as fintech products evolve and marketing strategies become more sophisticated, some consumers may be drawn in by branding promotional hooks or platform design despite the presence of legally accurate disclosure. To address this, can I suggest the Ministry consider the following: first, requiring a mandatory plain language risk summary before investors proceed and with the user's acknowledgement; second, strengthening public education on such products; and third, encouraging perhaps tighter industry-led codes of conduct on marketing and promotions?
Mr Alvin Tan : Sir, I thank Mr Mark Lee for his supplementary question. I think he made a really good point about the need to continue to foster trust and also to uphold innovation – and that is what we are trying to do with the fintech sector.
I think this particular episode has shown, in fact, that it is important for companies, and in fact, there are regulatory requirements, as I mentioned in my original reply for companies: first, to put in place these robust risk management practices; and second, to properly disclose their products and the features of their products as they impact the firm's operations.
So, we will do that. We will review this particular case in detail and work with platforms, work with the industry to ensure how to better implement these within these requirements that we have set out earlier on.
The additional part is also with regard to financial understanding of these products. And I think as more products are being introduced to the market, it is equally important for customers to be savvy about these. And we will continue to work with different platforms to promote the understanding of these products; but at the first base, to work with firms like the ones that I mentioned, the broader industry, to say, I think you need to make your disclosure just a little bit clearer and upfront. It is already there, but I think they can do more.
Mr Speaker : Mr Saktiandi Supaat.
Mr Saktiandi Supaat (Bishan-Toa Payoh) : Thank you, Mr Speaker. I just have two supplementary questions to add to what Member Mr Mark Lee has spoken about. I thank the Minister of State and also Member Mark Lee for highlighting the innovation that we want to encourage in Singapore in the financial sector and the trust element.
The first supplementary question is, what more can MAS do to strengthen consumer financial literacy, which was highlighted just now by the Minister of State. But I think my question is, there is going to be more of these going forward as we push towards innovation in the financial sector, so whether we can streamline the complaints channel for retail investors and especially for fintech-related grievances. Because this is going to get a bit more complex as we allow some innovation space.
Second, in terms of the increasing use of digital platforms and artificial intelligence (AI)-based marketing by financial institutions and fintech companies, is there a way that MAS can share how it can enhance its oversight to ensure such technologies are not used to exploit consumer biases or obscure risks going forward? I think it is going to get a bit more complex. The Minister of State shared it somewhat just now, but I think with AI-based marketing, especially on the fintech side, how can we enhance our oversight?
Mr Alvin Tan : Sir, we will do, I think, all of the above. Primarily, I think, consumer education is one. For customer complaints, I encourage the consumers and customers, if you do have complaints, to please raise them with MAS. MAS looks into these complaints holistically.
Second, we work very closely with the industry, for example, the fintech firms and the Singapore FinTech Association. I think there is scope for us to work closely with them to see how we can encourage these platforms, as I mentioned in my early reply to Member Mark Lee, to raise the standards and also to better disclose these product features.
Thirdly, I think with regard to more implementation of technology, I think we need to balance between financial innovation as well as regulatory conduct. And I think what is also important is one particular safeguard in this space. If you look at some of the safeguards for this particular case, this particular firm had a CMSL licence for fund management. Consumers can also look into the financial institutions directory to look at which firms and which financial institutions are regulated, and also, consult the Investor Alert List.
But with regard to this particular firm and the CMSL licence, if you look at it carefully, there is a requirement for the segregation of customer funds. So, a segregation of customer funds from the company's money. And that means that there is a segregation where customers' investments are safeguarded. And that is why when customers are requesting for withdrawal, there is an orderly withdrawal because these customer funds are placed under independent custody. They must remain intact – it is a requirement under the CMSL licence – and they cannot be used to meet the firm's liability at any point of time.
So, we have education, we have a good regulatory framework and also implementation. I think these will help us to foster a vibrant fintech ecosystem while making sure that we protect consumers' interests.