口头答复 · 2019-09-02 · 第 13 届国会
强化新加坡科技人才核心
Hiring, Developing and Strengthening Singaporean Core
质询方关注在当前经济形势下,Tech@SG计划是否仍需继续以协助科技企业雇佣外籍人才。政府回应强调科技人才短缺的全球竞争,必须加快培养本地科技人才,同时通过培训和教育扩大人才池,确保新加坡在全球科技生态中保持竞争力。核心争议点在于如何平衡引进外籍人才与优先发展本地人才。
关键要点
- • 科技人才全球短缺
- • 加速本地人才培养
- • 科技企业需专业人才
加快培养本地科技人才,保持竞争力
质疑是否仍需依赖外籍人才
优先发展本地科技人才
"If Singapore sits back and does nothing, we will almost certainly be left behind."
参与人员(5)
完整译文(中文)
Hansard 英文原文译文 · 翻译日期:2026-05-02
13号议员郑德源先生询问贸易与工业部长,鉴于当前的经济状况以及我们对聘用、培养和强化新加坡核心人才的关注,是否还需要Tech@SG计划,该计划旨在协助科技公司聘用外国人才。
贸易与工业部长(陈振声先生)答:议长先生,深科技产业和公司是未来经济的关键。数字技术已经改变了我们的工作和生活方式。如今,科技公司是全球增长最快的公司之一,并在《财富》500强名单中占据越来越多的份额。新加坡必须发展我们的科技生态系统,乘势而上,为新加坡人创造更多机会。
人才是这一努力的关键。科技公司需要具备专业技能的专家。越来越多的公司基于人才的可用性而非传统因素如土地成本和可用性来做出投资决策。不幸的是,全球科技人才短缺,竞争激烈。法国六个月前全面改革了其法国科技签证,使科技人才更容易在法国工作。更近的例子是泰国今年推出了SMART签证计划,吸引高技能科技专业人士。
如果新加坡袖手旁观,几乎肯定会被落下。我们只有一个小窗口期来建立高端专业人才、初创企业和公司的关键群体。全球此类节点屈指可数。我们今天的表现将决定我们是否能成为科技枢纽。我们必须迅速行动。
不仅公司面临科技人才短缺,我们政府也在利用科技转型公共服务,更好地服务企业和市民。政府因此也在利用与公司相同的有限本地科技专业人才池。我们需要紧急扩大这一人才池。
我们正在加快培养科技人才的步伐,同时确保新加坡人始终处于核心地位。自独立以来,我们人才战略的第一要务就是发展本地劳动力。人民是我们最重要的资源,我们不遗余力地培养他们。为扩大科技人才池,我们迅速扩大本地科技专业人才的培养管道。目前,已有超过74,000个培训名额被TechSkills Accelerator(TeSA)计划占用或承诺,这约占全国ICT专业人员的三分之一。
我们的高等院校目前提供约200个全日制科技相关课程。2018学年,超过63,000名本地学生报名这些科技相关课程,政府投入约11亿新元资金。我们也在大力投资建设新能力,如网络安全和人工智能。这些努力将提升我们的科技技能和能力基础。
在发展基础的同时,我们也必须提升新加坡顶尖人才。我们通过全球创新联盟(GIA)等项目,将新加坡与全球领先的创新生态系统和关键市场连接起来。新加坡人和企业可以通过GIA获得海外经验,并与海外同行建立联系与合作。
但即使如此,科技人才的需求远远超过本地供应。这不仅是新加坡的问题,而是全球挑战。《海峡时报》最近报道,招聘公司Michael Page称,新加坡科技职位需求在过去12个月增长了20%,但供应短缺。公司也反馈我们缺乏经验丰富的软件工程师和产品经理。他们需要能够负责全球规模数字产品开发和推广的人才,而非仅负责产品特定组件。这些人才通常兼具技术领导力和商业敏锐度,能管理数百至数千人的大型科技团队,因稀缺而备受重视。
议长先生,这是我们必须面对的现实,否则将失去竞争优势。我们需要用全球技能人才补充本地人才管道,以满足已在新加坡及计划引进的公司激增的需求。来自其他国家和国籍的员工也为新加坡人提供了在全球竞争团队中工作的机会,共同推动创新前沿。在多部门、跨学科和跨文化团队日益普遍的世界中,新加坡人必须学会与全球人才合作,这将提升他们作为员工的竞争力,使他们更受雇主青睐。
阿里巴巴、Grab、SAP和Taiger等公司计划在新加坡大幅扩张。许多公司表示,能够用全球人才补充本地劳动力对其快速按计划扩大运营至关重要。
这就是我们推出Tech@SG的原因,帮助快速成长的本地和外国科技公司在新加坡发展。该计划面向有能力和承诺在新加坡组建团队和开发产品的公司。公司必须在新加坡注册,拥有数字或科技产品,或基于专有技术、研究或硬件的商业模式。公司还需累计获得超过1000万美元风险投资,并在过去36个月内获得计划认可的风险投资机构资助。此举确保公司具备足够资源和国际化竞争准备。
Tech@SG将帮助这些公司组建全球竞争力团队,快速开发产品和国际化。此外,Tech@SG将提升新加坡科技人才质量,为我们的科技专家创造与全球顶尖人才合作的更多机会。
我们必须为这些快速成长的公司招聘所需技能做好准备。短期内,这些技能可能来自全球专业人士。但我们必须采取战略眼光,为新加坡人赢得长期回报。1960年代,我们对半导体产业采取了类似策略。当时,许多跨国公司来到这里,组建以外国人为主的核心团队。随着公司在新加坡扎根,他们迅速扩大本地员工队伍。仅三年内,新加坡首批三家半导体公司——国家半导体、飞兆半导体和德州仪器——创造了7000多个就业岗位。他们培养了一代专业人才,奠定了新加坡半导体产业的基础。
今天,我们有类似机会打造充满活力的科技行业,为新一代新加坡人创造新的激动人心的就业机会——但时间不多了。
我想举几个例子,说明新加坡人已开始受益。Visenze是一家由四位新加坡人创办的人工智能和图像识别公司,现雇佣60多名科技专业人士,组成多国团队开发和改进AI技术。国大计算机学院应届毕业生Abel Lim从团队中来自世界各地的同事那里学习将机器学习应用于现实问题。团队共同改进Visenze的算法。
另一个例子是万事达卡。万事达卡是一家跨国公司,正在新加坡引领支付解决方案和智能出行领域的新数字技术创新,依托人工智能。这些创新活动需要在新加坡团队中建立新能力。为此,公司推出了万事达卡毕业生计划,为新加坡员工提供轮岗、国际工作经验和导师指导,帮助他们掌握新技能,与全球高级专家共事。Seliyan Silvarajoo是该计划的参与者,曾是实习生,现为高级数字产品专家。他认为与全球多元团队合作的经历对其开发新产品至关重要。
除了万事达卡和Visenze,我们还有谷歌和脸书等数字巨头,为新加坡人创造良好机会。我们需要营造环境,让新加坡人向最优秀的人学习并茁壮成长。我们需要发展科技生态系统,为所有新加坡人创造激动人心的机会。这就是Tech@SG的意义。
议长先生,我想向议会保证,我们深知这一话题容易引发情绪反应,因为它关系到就业和我们希望建设的社会。
同时,政府一贯诚实面对新加坡人,从不回避解释挑战和分享为适应变化所需采取的措施。我们将始终把新加坡人置于一切工作的核心,继续全力发展每位新加坡人的潜能,使他们实现抱负,抓住新加坡及全球的机会。
然而,我们不能走其他国家设立壁垒、采取内向保护主义路线的老路,不仅在贸易上,在人才方面亦是如此。那样只会伤害新加坡,而新加坡过去54年的成功正是建立在开放和勇于为国家做必要事情的基础上。为此,我们将继续为每位新加坡人尽最大努力,同时不断努力将新加坡带入下一个阶段,以世界为后盾,拓展贸易和人才。
西海岸选区议员郑德源:感谢部长的回应和Tech@SG的理由。我有三个追加问题。
首先,Tech@SG计划中的公司是否仍需遵守公平考虑框架以及人力部三方联盟(TAFEP)推行的“三弱”审查?
第二,负责推行Tech@SG的机构是否考虑利用人力部的能力转移计划,将部分知识转移、技能转移和能力转移给新加坡人?
第三,在就业市场前景不确定且相当黯淡的情况下,我们重点是帮助和支持新加坡人。我想知道是否有或将设立对Tech@SG的控制措施,以确保本地专业人士不会受到损害或不利影响?
陈振声:议长先生,针对三个问题答复如下。
第一个问题的答案是肯定的。我们正与人力部密切合作,公平考虑框架适用于新加坡所有公司和个人。
第二个问题:我们确实考虑了能力转移计划。这是我们提升专业知识的多种工具之一。我们将继续使用,并在有机会时加大力度。但正如我所说,尽管我们尽快培养人才,仍不足以满足增长的需求。我们必须确保不失去专业人才、初创企业和公司,快速形成关键群体。
第三点,正因经济前景不确定,我们加快步伐,确保培育下一代公司。目前,这属于我们帮助公司转型和扩大市场的精准措施。虽然整体经济增长约为0%至1%,但并非所有行业都如此。全球电子业低迷、批发零售和部分精密工程行业拖累了整体数字。
另一方面,金融服务、ICT和许多高科技行业表现良好。这就是为什么我们在提升底层的同时,绝不能限制顶层。我们必须尽力帮助当前增长最快、受全球科技人才短缺影响的公司,包括许多ICT和人工智能公司,确保Tech@SG计划为他们提供最佳成功机会,不让他们输给其他国家的竞争者。
郑德源:请部长澄清。Tech@SG针对科技行业。贸易与工业部是否考虑或正在考虑将类似计划推广至其他行业?因为不仅ICT行业需要外国专业人才,金融业或其他专业服务业也需要数据分析、数据科学等专业人才,这些行业对新加坡今年及未来的经济增长贡献显著。
陈振声:答案是肯定的。我们愿意考虑如何与其他全球人才短缺的行业合作。但我要澄清,我们谈论的不是S准证持有者,也不是普通EP持有者,而是能够管理数百至数千程序员的人才。这些人具备管理全球数百至数千人团队的专业知识,且极度短缺。
为了说明竞争有多激烈——中国作为世界人口最多的国家,也有“千人计划”,吸引全球顶尖人才回国助力。如果中国、法国和泰国都在做,我们可以理解全球人才的极度短缺。因此,尽管各国都在尽力培养人才,也都在争夺现有的人才。
阿裕尼选区议员Pritam Singh:我有一个追加问题。几年前,有一项提升新加坡人在金融行业领导职位比例的举措。政府是否有类似计划针对Tech@SG?部长提到高等院校的学生人数,但在更上游的岗位任用方面,政府是否有相关规划?毕竟这是一个长期过程。
陈振声:感谢Pritam Singh议员提及金融行业。这是我们做事的好例子。发展金融业时,初期确实缺乏专业人才。我们引进了具全球视野和经验的专家。随着时间推移,我们逐步实现专业人才本地化,在金融管理局领导下取得显著成就。我们将继续努力,绝不满足于现状,确保本地人才进入高层领导岗位。
我们对所有新兴行业都抱有同样的精神。这也是我刚才回答郑德源议员问题时提到公平考虑框架(即“三弱”审查)的原因。我们希望每家公司在成长过程中,意识到本地化人才和能力建设的责任。我们不羞于向全球最佳学习,但同时确保新加坡人有机会向他们学习,掌握技能,甚至超越。这必须继续是新加坡的方式。这也是我们1960至70年代建设半导体产业的做法,未来不会改变。
英文原文
SPRS Hansard 原始记录 · 抓取日期:2026-05-02
13 Mr Patrick Tay Teck Guan asked the Minister for Trade and Industry in light of the current economic conditions and our focus on hiring, developing and strengthening the Singaporean Core, whether there is a need for the Tech@SG programme which facilitates technology firms in the hiring of foreign talent.
The Minister for Trade and Industry (Mr Chan Chun Sing) : Mr Speaker, Sir, deep tech industries and companies are the lynchpin for the future economy. Digital technologies have transformed the way we work and live. Today, technology companies are among the fastest growing in the world and occupy an increasing share of the Fortune 500 list. Singapore must develop our tech ecosystem and ride this growth, to create more opportunities for Singaporeans.
Talent is critical in this effort. Tech companies require experts with specialised skills. Increasingly, companies are basing their investment decisions on the availability of talent instead of traditional factors such as the cost and availability of land. Unfortunately, there is a global shortage of tech talent, and competition is intense. France overhauled its French Tech Visa six months ago to make it easier for tech talent to work in France. Closer to home, Thailand introduced a SMART visa programme this year to attract highly skilled tech professionals.
If Singapore sits back and does nothing, we will almost certainly be left behind. We have only a small window to build a critical mass of high-end professionals, start-ups and companies. There will only be a few such nodes globally. How we do today will decide whether we make it as a tech hub, or not. We must move fast and move now.
It is not only companies which are facing a shortage of tech talent. Our Government is also using technology to transform our public services and serve businesses and citizens better. The Government is therefore tapping on the same limited pool of local tech professionals as our companies. We need to urgently expand this pool.
We are accelerating our efforts to develop our tech talent while ensuring that Singaporeans remain at the core of our efforts. The first prong of our talent strategy, ever since we achieved Independence, has been to develop our local workforce. Our people are our most important resource and we spare no effort in nurturing them. In our efforts to widen our tech talent pool, we have been rapidly scaling up our local pipeline of tech professionals. Today, more than 74,000 training places have been taken up or committed under the TechSkills Accelerator (TeSA) and this will amount to about one-third of our ICT professionals across the country.
Our Institutes of Higher Learning offer around 200 full-time tech-related courses today. In Academic Year 2018, there was an enrolment of more than 63,000 locals in these tech-related courses, which received about $1.1 billion in Government funding. We are also investing significantly in building new capabilities such as cybersecurity and artificial intelligence. Together, these efforts will increase our baseline of tech skills and capabilities.
As we develop our base, we must also stretch the top of our Singaporean crop. We have connected Singapore to the world to secure frontier opportunities for Singaporeans through programmes such as the Global Innovation Alliance (GIA). The GIA is a global network connecting Singapore to leading innovation eco-systems and key markets around the world. Singaporeans and businesses will be able to gain overseas experience, and connect and collaborate with their overseas counterparts through the GIA.
But even these efforts are insufficient because the demand for tech talent is far outstripping the local supply. This is not just a Singapore issue; it is a global challenge. The Straits Times recently reported that recruiting firm Michael Page said that the demand for technology jobs in Singapore rose by 20% in the last 12 months but there is a shortage of supply. Companies have also given our agencies feedback that we lack experienced software engineers and product managers. They are looking for people who can take charge of the development and roll-out of digital products at a global scale, instead of only working on specific components of the product. These are often people that can marry both technical leadership and commercial acumen, manage larger tech teams in the hundreds and thousands, and are highly valued because they are in short supply.
Mr Speaker, Sir, this is the reality which we will have to face or we risk diminishing our competitive edge. We need to complement our local pipeline with skilled workers from all around the world to meet the surging demand from companies that are already in Singapore and companies that we want to bring to Singapore. The presence of workers from other countries and nationalities also provides opportunities for Singaporeans to work in globally competitive teams and advance the frontiers of innovation together. In a world where multi-sectoral, cross-discipline and cross-cultural teams are increasingly common, Singaporeans must learn how to work with people from all around the world. This will increase their competitiveness as individual employees and make them more attractive to employers.
Alibaba, Grab, SAP and Taiger are examples of some companies which have plans to expand significantly in Singapore. Many of these companies have shared that the ability to complement their local workforce with global talent is essential for them to quickly scale their operations in accordance to their plans.
This is why we launched Tech@SG to help fast-growth tech companies, both local and foreign, to grow in Singapore. This programme is intended for companies with the commitment and ability to build teams and products in Singapore. They will have to be incorporated in Singapore, have a digital or technology offering or have a business model built around proprietary technologies, research or hardware. Companies would also need to have secured more than US$10 million in Venture Capital (VC) funding cumulatively and have received funding from a Programme-recognised VC in the past 36 months. This will ensure the companies would have sufficient resources and readiness to internationalise and compete.
Tech@SG will enable such companies to put together globally competitive teams to develop their products and internationalise quickly. In addition, Tech@SG will raise the quality of tech talent in Singapore and create more opportunities for our tech experts to team up with the best from around the world.
We must be prepared for these fast-growth companies to recruit the skills they most require. In the short term, these skills may come from global professionals. But, we must take a strategic view on this to reap the long-term rewards for Singaporeans. We did so for the semi-conductor industry in the 1960s. At that time, many multinationals in the industry came here and set up their core team which comprised mainly foreigners. Over time, as these companies anchored themselves in Singapore, they began to rapidly grow their local pool of employees. In a span of just three years, the first three semiconductor companies in Singapore – National Semiconductor, Fairchild and Texas Instruments – created more than 7,000 jobs. They have also grown an entire generation of specialists and professionals in this area that enabled the semi-conductor industry of Singapore today.
Today, we have a similar opportunity to create a vibrant and dynamic tech sector, generating new and exciting job opportunities for yet another generation of Singaporeans – but time is running out.
I would like to highlight some examples where we can already see the benefits to Singaporeans. Visenze, an AI and image recognition company founded by four Singaporeans, now hires more than 60 tech professionals to form multinational teams that develop and improve their AI technology. Abel Lim, a recent graduate from NUS' School of Computing, learns about applying machine learning to real-life problems from colleagues in his team who come from around the world. Together, their team makes improvements to Visenze’s algorithms.
Another example would be Mastercard. Mastercard is an MNC currently spearheading the creation of new digital technologies in payment solutions and smart mobility in Singapore, powered by artificial intelligence. These innovative activities require new capabilities that would need to be built up in the Singapore team. To that end, the company introduced the Mastercard Graduate Programme that offers Singaporean employees a structured programme of rotations, international work experience and mentorship opportunities. These equip them with new skills and allow them to work alongside senior experts from around the world. Seliyan Silvarajoo is one such Singaporean who has undergone this programme. He started out as an intern at Mastercard and is now a senior digital product specialist. Seliyan counts his experience learning from and working with a global and diverse team as critical to preparing him for his role in developing new and exciting products.
Besides companies like Mastercard and Visenze, we have a good stable of companies like the digital giants Google and Facebook that create good opportunities for Singaporeans. We need to be able to create an environment for Singaporeans to learn from the best and to thrive. We need to grow our tech ecosystem and create exciting opportunities for all Singaporeans. This is what Tech@SG is about.
Mr Speaker, Sir, I would like to assure the House that we are deeply cognisant of the fact that this topic can be easily stirred up because of the emotions involved and because it concerns the jobs and the kind of society we want to build in Singapore.
At the same time, this is a Government that has always sought to be honest with Singaporeans and has never shied away from explaining our challenges and sharing what needs to be done in order for us to grow and adjust to changing realities. We will never stop putting Singaporeans at the heart of everything we do and will continue to develop every Singaporean to their fullest potential so that they can fulfil their aspirations and seize opportunities in Singapore and beyond.
However, we must not go down the path of other countries who have started to put up barriers and take an inward-looking, protectionist approach, not just to trade but including talent. Doing so, we will only hurt Singapore whose success over the last 54 years has been built on our openness and courage to do what is necessary for our country. To this end, we will continue to do our best for each and every Singaporean while continuously building on our efforts to take Singapore into the next lap with the world as our hinterland for trade and talent.
Mr Patrick Tay Teck Guan (West Coast) : I thank the Minister for his response and the rationale of Tech@SG. I have three supplementary questions for the Minister.
Firstly, whether such companies in the Tech@SG programme will still be subjected to the Fair Consideration Framework as well as the triple-weak scrutiny which the Tripartite Alliance for Fair and Progressive Employment Practices (TAFEP) by MOM is rolling out.
The second question: whether the agencies concerned – rolling out Tech@SG – considered leveraging on MOM's Capability Transfer Programme to roll out some of these knowledge transfer, skills transfer and capability transfer to Singaporeans?
Thirdly, amidst this sense of uncertainty and quite dismal outlook in terms of the employment and job market, I think our focus is on helping, supporting and assisting fellow Singaporeans. I just wonder whether there are controls in place or will there be controls that will be instituted on Tech@SG to make sure that our local PMEs are not compromised or prejudiced against?
Mr Chan Chun Sing : Mr Speaker, Sir, let me respond to the three questions.
The answer to the first question is a definite yes. We are working closely with MOM, the Fair Consideration Framework applies to everyone and every firm in Singapore.
The second question: did we consider the Capability Transfer Programme? Yes, that is one of the various instruments that we use to level up our own professional knowledge. We will continue to do that and where there are opportunities, we will even step up our gear to do that. But having said that, as I have explained, even though we are churning out as many people as we can, as fast as we can, it is still not sufficient to meet the growing demand. We must make sure that we do not miss the boat by losing the professionals, the start-ups and the companies for us to form a critical mass quickly.
On the third point, it is precisely because of the uncertainties with the economic outlook that we have stepped up our gear to make sure that we build the next generation of companies in this sector. At this point in time, I would say that this forms part of our overall surgical measures to help our companies transform and expand their market presence. At this point in time, the average of the economy may be about 0% to 1% percent growth but that does not mean that every sector is between 0% and 1% percent growth. We know that the current numbers are dragged down by the global electronics downturn, the wholesale and retail trade, and some of the precision engineering sectors.
On the other hand, our economy is growing well in the financial services, the ICT and many of the high-tech industries. This is why we must make sure that while we try to lift the bottom, we must never cap the top. We must make sure that we can do all we can to help those companies that are growing the fastest at this point in time, suffering from the global shortage of tech talent, including many of our ICTs and AI companies, to make sure that the Tech@SG programme will give them the best chance possible to succeed and will not make them lose out to other companies from other countries who are competing for the global talent at this point in time.
Mr Patrick Tay Teck Guan : I would like to ask the Minister for a clarification. Now, we are doing Tech@SG for the tech sector. Will MTI consider or is it in the works to considering other sectors as well? Because it is not just the ICT sector that needs foreign expertise or even data analytics, data science expertise; it could be the financial sector or many other professional services, and all these contribute quite significantly this year and, moving forward, to the economic growth of Singapore.
Mr Chan Chun Sing : The answer is yes. We are open to considering how we can work with the other sectors who are short of these talent at the global level. But I want to clarify. We are not talking about S Pass holders, we are not even talking about the average EP holders. We are talking about people who can manage programmers by the hundreds and thousands. These are the people who know and have the expertise to manage global teams of the hundreds and thousands of people, and these are in critical shortage.
Just to put in context how tough this competition is – China, the most populous country in the world, even China has a 千人计划 to attract the best from around the world to go back to China and help. If China, France and Thailand are all doing this, we can understand how critically short we are at the global level. So, while everybody is trying to churn out as many as they possibly can within the time, everyone is also fighting for the available talent at this point in time.
Mr Pritam Singh (Aljunied) : Just one supplementary question for the Minister. A few years ago, there was an initiative to increase the number of Singaporeans or work towards increasing the number of Singaporeans in leadership positions in the financial sector. Is there a similar parallel initiative that the Government has in mind for Tech@SG? I think the Minister raised some numbers about the number of students in our Institutions of Higher Learning. But more upstream, in terms of taking on roles, since this is a long runway that we are looking at, does the Government have any plans in that regard?
Mr Chan Chun Sing : I thank Mr Pritam Singh for raising the financial sector. In fact, that is a very good example of how we do business. When we grew our financial sector, there will obviously be areas where we initially lack the expertise. We brought in people and experts who are globally attuned and have the exposure. Over time, we progressively make sure that those expertise is localised and we have achieved much in the financial sector, under the leadership of MAS. We will continue to do this because we will never stay static and we will never say that we have done enough to get our locals into the top leadership positions.
This is exactly the same spirit that we intend to do for all the new sectors. That is why, just now, in answering Mr Patrick Tay's question, I talked about the Fair Consideration Framework – what Mr Patrick Tay called the "triple-weak". We want to make sure that every company, as they grow, are conscious of their responsibility to localise the talent and also to build up the capabilities within Singapore. That is how, progressively, we are not shy to learn from the best in the world. But as we learn from the best in the world, we want to make sure that our people have the best opportunities to learn from them, acquire those skills and maybe even go beyond. This must continue to be the Singapore way. This was how we built up the semi-conductor industry in the 1960s and 1970s and that will not change.