口头答复 · 2021-01-04 · 第 14 届国会

TraceTogether数据使用法律保障

Legal Provisions and Safeguards in Using TraceTogether Data

AI 治理与监管AI 与国家安全AI 与公共部门AI 战略 争议度 4 · 激烈争议

议员质询TraceTogether数据是否会用于刑事调查及相关法律保障。政府回应称警方可依刑事程序法获取数据,且设有严格访问权限和处罚措施保护数据安全。争议焦点在于数据是否仅限于防疫用途,及使用于刑事调查是否影响公众信任和应用率。

关键要点

  • 警方可依法获取数据
  • 数据访问权限严格
  • 担忧影响公众信任
政府立场

数据仅限授权用途,严防滥用

质询立场

担忧隐私保护与信任下降

政策信号

强化数据使用法律监管

"The Government is the custodian of the TT data submitted by individuals, and stringent measures are in place to safeguard this personal data."

参与人员(4)

完整译文(中文)

Hansard 英文原文译文 · 翻译日期:2026-05-02

15号,Christopher de Souza先生询问内政部长,TraceTogether数据是否会被用于刑事调查,如果会,使用这些数据的法律条款和保障措施是什么。

内政部国务部长(Desmond Tan先生)(代内政部长答复):议长先生,新加坡警察部队根据《刑事诉讼法》(CPC)有权获取任何数据,包括TraceTogether或TT数据,用于刑事调查。

政府是个人提交的TT数据的保管者,并采取严格措施保护这些个人数据。这些措施的例子包括仅允许授权人员访问数据,仅将数据用于授权目的,并将数据存储在安全的数据平台上。根据《公共部门(治理)法》,未经授权而鲁莽或故意泄露数据或滥用数据的公职人员,可能面临最高5000新元罚款或最高两年监禁,或两者并罚。

议长:Christopher de Souza先生。

Christopher de Souza先生(荷兰-武吉知马选区):先生,感谢国务部长的答复。在调查中,有嫌疑人也有证人。那么,如果TraceTogether信息被用作证人信息,鉴于其私密性质,如果调查没有结果或调查结束,是否有可能删除这些信息?我想区分嫌疑人与证人。

Desmond Tan先生:数据只会从个人处获取。在刑事案件中,如果有嫌疑人和证人,我们会从证人处提取数据。然而,对于嫌疑人或正在接受调查的个人,为了安全起见,不会从他们处提取数据。

议长:Gerald Giam先生。

Gerald Giam Yean Song先生(亚逸选区):先生,我们都知道有效的接触者追踪是控制COVID-19传播的关键,使用TraceTogether的人越多越好。我们应不断寻找方法消除自愿使用TraceTogether应用的障碍。那么,如果人们怀疑他们的TraceTogether数据被用于接触者追踪以外的用途,这是否会导致采纳率低于预期?

我相信国务部长知道,即使用户安装了该应用,也可以阻止应用使用,例如交换接近信息。那么,我的问题是,既然政府表示可能会将TraceTogether数据用于警方调查,这是否违反了TraceTogether隐私声明,该声明称与卫生部共享的任何数据仅用于可能暴露于COVID-19的人员的接触者追踪?

Desmond Tan先生:感谢议员的提问。TraceTogether的设计和实施是为了接触者追踪和抗击COVID-19疫情。

我们不排除在公民安全受到影响或曾经受到影响的情况下使用TraceTogether数据。这同样适用于所有其他数据。授权警察人员可根据我之前提到的《刑事诉讼法》获取这些数据,用于刑事调查和保护公民安全。

但除此之外,TraceTogether数据确实仅用于接触者追踪和抗击COVID-19疫情。

英文原文

SPRS Hansard 原始记录 · 抓取日期:2026-05-02

15 Mr Christopher de Souza asked the Minister for Home Affairs whether TraceTogether data will be used for criminal investigations and, if so, what are the legal provisions and safeguards in using such data.

The Minister of State for Home Affairs (Mr Desmond Tan) (for the Minister for Home Affairs) : Mr Speaker, the Singapore Police Force is empowered under the Criminal Procedure Code or CPC to obtain any data, including TraceTogether or TT data, for criminal investigations.

The Government is the custodian of the TT data submitted by individuals, and stringent measures are in place to safeguard this personal data. Examples of these measures include only allowing authorised officers to access the data, using such data only for authorised purposes and storing the data on a secured data platform. Under the Public Sector (Governance) Act, public officers who recklessly or knowingly disclose the data without authorisation or misuse the data may be liable to a fine of up to $5,000 or imprisonment of up to two years, or both.

Mr Speaker : Mr Christopher de Souza.

Mr Christopher de Souza (Holland-Bukit Timah) : Sir, I thank the Minister of State for his response. In an investigation, there are suspects and there are witnesses. So, in the event that the TraceTogether information is used of a witness, would there be a possibility of deletion of this information, by virtue of its private nature, if the investigation does not yield anything or the investigation comes to a close? I am wanting to draw a distinction between the suspect and a witness.

Mr Desmond Tan : Data will only be taken from the individual. In a criminal case where there is a suspect and a witness, we will extract the data from the witness. However, for individuals who are suspects or are under investigation, the data will not be extracted from them, for the purpose of security.

Mr Speaker : Mr Gerald Giam.

Mr Gerald Giam Yean Song (Aljunied) : Sir, we all know that effective contact tracing is key to containing the spread of COVID-19 and that the more people use TraceTogether, the better. We should always be looking for ways to remove the impediments to voluntary adoption of the TraceTogether app. So, if people suspect that their TraceTogether data is being used for anything other than for contact tracing, would this not lead to a lower than expected adoption rate?

And I am sure that the Minister of State is aware that users can prevent the app from being used, for example exchanging proximity information, even if they have it installed. So, my question is, now that the Government has said that they might actually use the TraceTogether data for Police investigations, does this not violate the TraceTogether privacy statement, which says that any data shared with MOH will only be used solely for contact tracing of persons possibly exposed to COVID-19?

Mr Desmond Tan : I thank the Member for the question. TraceTogether is conceived and implemented for the purpose of contact tracing and for fighting the COVID-19 pandemic.

We do not preclude the use of TraceTogether data in circumstances where citizens' safety and security are or have been affected. This applies to all other data as well. Authorised police officers may invoke the Criminal Procedural Code, as I had mentioned earlier, to obtain this data for the purpose of criminal investigation and for the purpose of protecting the safety and security of our citizens.

But otherwise, TraceTogether data is indeed to be used only for contact tracing and for the purpose of fighting the COVID-19 situation.