🇸🇬 Singapore AI Observatory Dashboard
Data updated: 2026-05-02
Six dimensions on Singapore AI: strong investment, governance, and infrastructure; low talent self-sufficiency and limited frontier research are structural weaknesses. Numbers and editorial interpretation are shown side by side — readers decide.
International Anchors
Investment Intensity
Is the government willing to spend?
Talent Pipeline
Are there enough people, and how self-sufficient is the supply?
Compute Stack
Can it run frontier models?
Industry Adoption
Are enterprises actually using AI?
Research Quality
Is original research coming out?
Governance Influence
Is Singapore writing the rules?
Singapore Consensus on AI Safety signed by 11 countries (incl. US and China); ASEAN Guide on AI Governance adopted by all 10 ASEAN states (drafted under Singapore's lead); AI Verify Foundation cited globally; REAIM co-hosted; ISESEA held twice — Singapore is a rule-maker, not a rule-taker, with influence well above its size. Full participation in Bletchley, Seoul, and Paris AI Safety Summits; MAS Project MindForge has 24 institutions + the four major cloud vendors; UN Independent International Scientific Panel includes Singapore.
Method: Each dimension shows headline numbers + third-party rankings + target progress + trend + editorial interpretation — no overall grade. Full methodology →