AI Influence Profile
Charlene Chen
Positioning
Member of Parliament. Spoke in 6 AI-related parliamentary debates (2025–2026), most often on AI Safety & Ethics and AI Governance & Regulation.
Parliamentary AI record (6)
Ensuring Safety of Frontier AI Models Deployed in Singapore, and Setting Up Framework for Tracking and Reporting Serious AI Incidents
2026-10-07 · Parliament 15
Dr Charlene Chen, Mr Alex Yam, Dr Choo Pei Ling and Mr Yip Hon Weng asked the Minister for Digital Development and Information about the AI Safety Institute's ability to independently test frontier AI models, cross-sector incident-reporting frameworks, and the resilience of government systems following an unauthorised-access incident involving an autonomous AI agent in Australia. Senior Minister of State Tan Kiat How replied, on the Minister's behalf, that existing cybersecurity, data protection and critical-information-infrastructure frameworks already apply to agentic AI systems, that the Government is trialling responsible agentic AI deployment through GovTech and other agencies, and that these frameworks are under review for strengthening, without committing to a specific threshold or timeline for mandatory frontier AI safety testing.
Assessment of Singapore's Digital Systems' Resilience Against Agentic AI Behaviours
2026-10-06 · Parliament 15
Ms Valerie Lee, Mr Saktiandi Supaat, Mr Fadli Fawzi and other MPs asked the Minister for Digital Development and Information about the Singapore AI Safety Institute's testing capabilities, the follow-up to Singapore's endorsement of the international call to control frontier AI models, and safeguards against agentic AI risks in the Public Service. Mrs Josephine Teo replied that Singapore takes a risk-based, multi-layered approach, that AISI is building technical capabilities to evaluate advanced AI systems, and that no agency has so far received a report of a cyberattack involving an unsupervised AI agent.
Safeguards and Roadmap for Introducing and Monitoring AI Use by Primary School Students
2026-05-06 · Parliament 15
Several MPs (Charlene Chen, Kenneth Tiong, David Hoe and others) jointly questioned MOE on the safeguards and roadmap for introducing AI from primary school. Education Minister Desmond Lee answered four questions together, setting out MOE's "Four Learns" framework — learn about AI, learn to use AI, learn with AI and, most importantly, learn beyond AI. The calibrated roadmap: Primary 1–3 covers AI literacy only (awareness of AI's presence) with no work requiring direct AI use; from Primary 4, once pupils have foundational literacy, numeracy and executive-functioning skills, they may use purpose-built educational AI tools with built-in guardrails under teacher supervision (e.g. the writing assistant LEA and Maths LEA in the Student Learning Space), which are designed not to spoon-feed answers and to redirect off-task pupils "Socratically". A mandatory 10-hour "Code for Fun" programme (coding, computational thinking, AI basics) starts from Primary 4, with optional five-hour "AI for Fun" modules on generative AI and computer vision. Pupil data is anonymised and not used to train external models; commercial off-the-shelf tools require checks that inputs contain no personally identifiable information. On research, A*STAR's SG-LEADS longitudinal study (data collection from 2027) will track how children's AI use affects learning and well-being, alongside short-term school-based studies. Kenneth Tiong pressed MOE using Sweden's Karolinska Institute conclusion that "digital tools impair rather than enhance student learning" and Sweden's 2023 reversal of digitalisation (over €200m to reintroduce physical textbooks); Desmond Lee replied that Sweden had gone all-digital from age five and then fully reverted to analog, whereas Singapore takes a blended approach — keeping physical textbooks and teacher-centric teaching, treating AI as a tool, and crucially distinguishing general-purpose AI from purpose-built educational AI, since failing to do so would risk the wrong policy of not using AI at all. On parental opt-out: SLS classroom tools that are part of teaching cannot be opted out of, but externally-brought-in tools requiring consent will not be used without it. Eileen Chong raised the "equity paradox" — that more disadvantaged children with less adult supervision at home may lean on AI more, eroding the very cognitive development it is meant to support; the Minister called this an "evergreen" concern, to be met through internalised AI literacy and home-school-community partnership.
Use of AI Chatbots for Counselling and Mental Health Support by Teenagers and Young Adults
2026-02-27 · Parliament 15
MP Dr Charlene Chen asked how the government is monitoring teen use of AI chatbots for mental health counselling and how it protects vulnerable users. Senior Minister of State for Health Dr Koh Poh Koon replied that AI chatbots are now ubiquitous, making tracking impractical. He stated clearly that generative AI chatbots are not suitable substitutes for qualified mental-health providers because of risks of misinformation and inappropriate responses that could cause harm. Young people turn to them for anonymity and 24/7 availability. The government's strategy: promote legitimate alternatives (mindline 1771, mindline.sg, CHAT), and require app stores under the Code of Practice for Online Safety to implement age assurance by end-March 2026.
Update on Jobs Transformation Maps and Support Available for Mid-Career Employees and Sectors Undergoing Restructuring
2025-11-04 · Parliament 15
Questions focused on the latest progress of Jobs Transformation Maps, support for mid-career employees adapting to industry shifts, and assistance for workers in restructuring sectors. The government replied that 19 JTMs have been launched, covering about 1.7 million workers, and that career conversion programmes help mid-career workers reskill while industry insights drive upskilling and job redesign in restructuring sectors. The core debate: how to effectively implement JTM recommendations so mid-career and restructuring-sector workers transition smoothly.
Regular Curriculum Reviews and Industry Consultation to Align Students' Skills with Future Economy Needs
2025-09-23 · Parliament 15
An MP asked how MOE ensures regular curriculum updates to match future economic needs, especially in digitalisation, sustainability, and healthcare. MOE replied that it uses regular reviews, industry consultations, and teacher industry stints to keep content tracking industry developments — school curricula are reviewed every 6–8 years, IHL curricula more frequently, and priority areas like AI update faster. The core debate: whether update frequency matches industry needs.