AI Influence Profile

Lim Sun Sun

Government

3
Parliamentary speeches
0
Policies championed
0
AI videos

Positioning

Member of Parliament. Spoke in 3 AI-related parliamentary debates (2019–2020), most often on AI & Employment and AI Economy & Industry.

Parliamentary AI record (3)

By year 2020 · 1 2019 · 2
By topic AI & Employment · 2 AI Economy & Industry · 2 AI Governance & Regulation · 2 AI in Education · 1 AI in Healthcare · 1 AI in Public Sector · 1 AI Infrastructure & Research · 1 AI Safety & Ethics · 1

Committee of Supply – Head Q (Ministry of Communications and Information)

2020-03-03 · Parliament 13

AI Governance & Regulation AI Economy & Industry AI & Employment AI in Education

MPs raised data-sharing, privacy protection, design-thinking innovation, and AI ethics frameworks in the digital transformation, focusing on Singapore's challenges with limited data scale and SME digitalisation capability. The government addressed digital trade agreements, data privacy principles, and innovation-driving measures, emphasising the development of an AI ethics framework. The core debate: balancing data sharing with privacy protection and lifting local-firm digital capability.

Committee of Supply - Head Q (Ministry of Communications and Information)

2019-03-04 · Parliament 13

AI Safety & Ethics AI Economy & Industry AI & Employment AI Infrastructure & Research

MPs raised challenges for Singapore firms — especially SMEs — in digital transformation, focusing on helping them overcome funding, technology, and talent adaptation issues. The government emphasised the importance of the digital economy for lifting productivity and responding to population ageing, supporting firm innovation and capability-building. The core debate: practical SME digitalisation difficulties and the effectiveness of government support.

Preventive Measures Implemented Following Data Leak Involving Persons with HIV

2019-02-12 · Parliament 13

AI Governance & Regulation AI in Healthcare AI in Public Sector

MPs asked about specific preventive measures following the HIV data leak affecting 14,200 patients — data access permissions, leak tracking, psychological protection of victims, and addressing social discrimination. The government must respond on how to prevent further spread, protect patient rights, and maintain public trust in HIV testing. The core debate: data-security gaps, transparency, and social discrimination.