AI Influence Profile

Leon Perera

Government

9
Parliamentary speeches
0
Policies championed
0
AI videos

Positioning

Member of Parliament. Spoke in 9 AI-related parliamentary debates (2019–2023), most often on AI Economy & Industry and AI & Employment.

Parliamentary AI record (9)

By year 2023 · 4 2020 · 3 2019 · 2
By topic AI Economy & Industry · 8 AI & Employment · 5 AI Governance & Regulation · 4 AI in Public Sector · 4 AI Infrastructure & Research · 3 AI Safety & Ethics · 3 AI & National Security · 2 AI in Education · 2 AI in Healthcare · 2

Supporting Healthcare

2023-05-10 · Parliament 14

AI Economy & Industry AI in Education AI in Healthcare AI Infrastructure & Research

The debate focused on continuing support for healthcare beyond the pandemic, with particular emphasis on mental health in academia. MPs noted that academic pressure drives high rates of anxiety and depression among researchers and graduate students, calling for attention to mental health. The government did not respond directly. The core debate: balancing academic performance pressure with mental-health protection.

Committee of Supply – Head S (Ministry of Manpower)

2023-03-01 · Parliament 14

AI Economy & Industry AI & Employment AI in Public Sector

MPs raised the impact of an ageing workforce and demographic shifts on Singapore's economy, noting that some sectors have a high share of older workers and may face rapid future labour outflow. They emphasised challenges from tech change and shifting work attitudes, urging attention to flexible work arrangements. The government did not respond directly. The core debate: how to manage employment-structure adjustment from ageing and technological change.

Committee of Supply – Head Q (Ministry of Communications and Information)

2023-02-28 · Parliament 14

AI Governance & Regulation AI Safety & Ethics AI Economy & Industry AI & National Security

MPs asked how Singapore balances data use with user protection in the digital economy, focusing on online-safety legislation progress and regulation of emerging areas like the metaverse. They stressed that rules must protect users without stifling innovation, especially SME digitalisation. The government's response is not yet detailed in the excerpt. The core debate: balancing the digital economy with cybersecurity.

Committee of Supply – Head K (Ministry of Education)

2023-02-28 · Parliament 14

AI Economy & Industry AI & Employment AI in Education AI in Public Sector

MPs raised the education budget and career-guidance support, emphasising educators' contributions during the pandemic and the importance of future skills development. They proposed stronger career counselling for youth and working adults and broader use of SkillsFuture Credit for lifelong learning. The government has not yet responded in this excerpt. The core debate: how to better support youth career development and skills matching.

Use of CPF Contribution History in 2020 as Alternative Criteria to Determine Eligibility for GST Vouchers

2020-11-04 · Parliament 14

AI Economy & Industry AI & Employment AI in Public Sector

An MP asked whether 2020 CPF contribution records could replace 2018 income and other criteria for GST Voucher eligibility, especially for low-income self-employed people. The government replied that GST Voucher eligibility uses a comprehensive Assessable Income (AI) measure; CPF records only reflect part of income. Flexible appeal mechanisms and pandemic-specific support are in place to keep assistance targeted. The core debate: whether eligibility criteria should be adjusted to reflect the pandemic's impact. (Note: "AI" here refers to Assessable Income, not artificial intelligence.)

Consideration to Formulate Regulations Binding on Artificial Intelligence Systems Deployed Locally

2020-03-04 · Parliament 13

AI Governance & Regulation AI Safety & Ethics AI Economy & Industry AI & National Security

An MP asked whether the government is considering binding regulations on locally deployed AI systems to ensure ethical and safe use. The government replied that AI is still nascent and there are no immediate legislative plans, but multiple initiatives are in place to promote safe and ethical use — the Model AI Governance Framework, the ethics advisory council, and related research — and it will keep tracking global developments to balance regulation with innovation.

Committee of Supply – Head V (Ministry of Trade and Industry)

2020-03-02 · Parliament 13

AI Governance & Regulation AI Economy & Industry AI & Employment AI Infrastructure & Research

MPs asked whether government support for firms going international is adequate, particularly in emerging and frontier markets. They stressed the pandemic underscores the importance of market diversification and focused on how government economic agencies and business chambers help firms navigate a complex international environment. The core debate: the strength of government support and the effectiveness of market-diversification strategy.

Committee of Supply - Head Q (Ministry of Communications and Information)

2019-03-04 · Parliament 13

AI Safety & Ethics AI Economy & Industry AI & Employment AI Infrastructure & Research

MPs raised challenges for Singapore firms — especially SMEs — in digital transformation, focusing on helping them overcome funding, technology, and talent adaptation issues. The government emphasised the importance of the digital economy for lifting productivity and responding to population ageing, supporting firm innovation and capability-building. The core debate: practical SME digitalisation difficulties and the effectiveness of government support.

Preventive Measures Implemented Following Data Leak Involving Persons with HIV

2019-02-12 · Parliament 13

AI Governance & Regulation AI in Healthcare AI in Public Sector

MPs asked about specific preventive measures following the HIV data leak affecting 14,200 patients — data access permissions, leak tracking, psychological protection of victims, and addressing social discrimination. The government must respond on how to prevent further spread, protect patient rights, and maintain public trust in HIV testing. The core debate: data-security gaps, transparency, and social discrimination.