AI Influence Profile

Wan Rizal

Government

13
Parliamentary speeches
0
Policies championed
0
AI videos

Positioning

Member of Parliament. Spoke in 13 AI-related parliamentary debates (2022–2026), most often on AI in Public Sector and AI Economy & Industry.

Parliamentary AI record (13)

By year 2026 · 3 2025 · 2 2024 · 3 2023 · 3 2022 · 2
By topic AI in Public Sector · 8 AI Economy & Industry · 7 AI & Employment · 6 AI in Education · 6 AI Governance & Regulation · 5 AI in Healthcare · 5 AI & National Security · 3 AI Infrastructure & Research · 3 AI Safety & Ethics · 1

Outcomes and Effectiveness of AI-related SkillsFuture Programmes

2026-04-07 · Parliament 15

AI & Employment AI in Education

Dr Wan Rizal asked in writing whether the Ministry of Education tracks two hard metrics for participants in AI-related SkillsFuture programmes: employment in AI-related roles within six months, and median wage change within 12 months of completion. Minister for Education Desmond Lee replied that for placement programmes such as the SkillsFuture Career Transition Programmes (SCTPs), SkillsFuture Singapore (SSG) tracks placement rates: of the 8,000 learners who completed ICT-related SCTPs between June 2022 and March 2025, 44% found new roles or employment within six months (as of 30 September 2025). Wage outcomes are not tracked, on the grounds that multiple factors affect wages. Shorter courses are generally not tracked for placement; instead, SSG collects learner feedback through the TRAQOM survey on programme quality and perceived outcomes, published on the MySkillsFuture portal. The exchange exposes a tension: government investment in AI skills training is substantial, but effectiveness measurement still leans on subjective feedback rather than the employment and wage data the MP sought.

MCCY Committee of Supply 2026 — Preparing Malay/Muslim Community for AI Economy

2026-03-05 · Parliament 15

AI Economy & Industry AI in Education

In the MCCY Committee of Supply debate, several Malay/Muslim MPs focused on the community's readiness for the AI economy. MP Saktiandi Supaat argued that AI transformation strategy must ensure children and youth not only use technology but create value with it, citing a Sec 4 student who is curious about AI but lacks deeper understanding. MP Wan Rizal addressed youth transitions from higher education into the AI-driven labour market. The debate referenced the National AI Council, National AI Mission and AI Champions programme as creating new opportunities for Malay/Muslim businesses, while asking: is the community ready to step into this new world?

MOM Committee of Supply 2026 — AI, Workforce & Career Resilience

2026-03-03 · Parliament 15

AI & Employment AI in Public Sector

The MOM Committee of Supply debate was the centrepiece for AI and workforce issues in the Budget. Minister Tan See Leng framed AI as transforming the nature of work — not only what jobs people do, but how work is organised, skills are built, and careers evolve. Key threads: (1) AI as a gamechanger that can augment or displace workers depending on how jobs are redesigned; (2) SkillsFuture participation exceeding 600,000, with 458,000+ Singaporeans using SkillsFuture credits; (3) reframing "job redesign" as "human-with-AI job redesign", using design thinking to combine AI with human judgement, empathy and creativity; (4) mid-career PMEs face the highest risk and need career health to become mainstream, preventive and personalised; (5) generative AI poses higher risk to white-collar work than to manual / dexterity-based roles. MPs' threads: Industry Transformation Maps (ITMs), forward-looking when introduced in 2016, must be sharpened to give clear direction on AI-driven business process redesign, workforce-transition timelines and credible pathways into new roles; Ms Yeo Wan Ling argued the 2026 expansion of the Non-traditional Sources Occupation List (NTS-OL) must be coupled with productivity-linked conditions — structured training of locals, skills transfer from foreign workers, and job redesign; NMP Assoc Prof Terence Ho warned of an "AI divide" and proposed free or subsidised time-limited access to premium AI tools (the US$20–30/month tier) for mature workers, with longer-term subsidies for lower-income Singaporeans; Assoc Prof Jamus Jerome Lim cautioned that agentic AI threatens entry-level positions and called for institutionalising the GRIT programme as a national on-the-job training subsidy.

Addressing Teachers' Stress Levels and Supporting Their Mental Well-being

2025-11-04 · Parliament 15

AI Governance & Regulation AI in Education AI in Healthcare AI in Public Sector

MPs raised teachers' high stress levels and mental-health support, with concern over the low share of young teachers and their non-teaching workload. The Education Minister stressed the noble responsibility of the teaching profession, acknowledged heavy workload, and committed to reviewing and improving the allocation of non-teaching tasks to safeguard teacher well-being. The central debate is how to effectively reduce teacher load and retain young teachers.

Committee of Supply – Head J (Ministry of Defence)

2025-03-03 · Parliament 14

AI Governance & Regulation AI & National Security AI in Public Sector

MPs asked about the changing international security environment and its impact on Singapore's defence budget, focusing on US-China tensions, the wavering rules-based order, and regional security risks. The government stressed the importance of defence and the SAF for national security and called for sustained, strong defensive capability to handle complex and shifting global conditions. The core debate: the stability of international alliances and how Singapore should adjust its defence strategy.

Committee of Supply – Head O (Ministry of Health)

2024-03-05 · Parliament 14

AI Governance & Regulation AI in Healthcare AI in Public Sector

MPs asked MOH about progress and scale-up of hospital-at-home services and whether MediShield Life and MediSave can support home-care claims. They also questioned whether current Activities of Daily Living (ADL) assessment criteria are reasonable, calling for more flexible consideration of patient need. The core debate: whether home-care coverage and subsidy mechanisms are sufficient to support patients and their families.

Debate on Annual Budget Statement

2024-02-26 · Parliament 14

AI Governance & Regulation AI Economy & Industry AI & Employment AI in Public Sector

The debate centred on Budget 2024, with questions on government transparency, social fairness, and retirement security. The government adopted some opposition proposals, such as a temporary unemployment assistance scheme. The core debate: whether the government is genuinely open to diverse views, and how to narrow the gap between ideals and reality.

Building an Inclusive and Safe Digital Society

2024-01-10 · Parliament 14

AI Economy & Industry AI in Healthcare AI Infrastructure & Research AI in Public Sector

MPs raised a trust crisis and cybersecurity challenges in the digitalisation drive, stressing growing online harms like scams. The government cited Singapore's digital-economy progress and forward-looking infrastructure, committing to a whole-of-nation approach to digital risk. The core debate: balancing digitalisation with public safety and trust.

Supporting Healthcare

2023-05-10 · Parliament 14

AI Economy & Industry AI in Education AI in Healthcare AI Infrastructure & Research

The debate focused on continuing support for healthcare beyond the pandemic, with particular emphasis on mental health in academia. MPs noted that academic pressure drives high rates of anxiety and depression among researchers and graduate students, calling for attention to mental health. The government did not respond directly. The core debate: balancing academic performance pressure with mental-health protection.

Committee of Supply – Head K (Ministry of Education)

2023-02-28 · Parliament 14

AI Economy & Industry AI & Employment AI in Education AI in Public Sector

MPs raised the education budget and career-guidance support, emphasising educators' contributions during the pandemic and the importance of future skills development. They proposed stronger career counselling for youth and working adults and broader use of SkillsFuture Credit for lifelong learning. The government has not yet responded in this excerpt. The core debate: how to better support youth career development and skills matching.

Students Using Artificial Intelligence Technologies for Exams and Assignments

2023-02-06 · Parliament 14

AI Safety & Ethics AI Economy & Industry AI & Employment AI in Education

MPs asked about ChatGPT and similar AI's impact on student coursework and exams, cheating concerns, and the educational response. The Education Minister replied that AI brings opportunities and challenges, MOE provides teacher guidance and resources, and supports reasonable AI use while emphasising mastery of fundamentals — preventing over-reliance and cheating. The core debate: balancing AI-assisted learning with prevention of academic misconduct.

Committee of Supply – Head Q (Ministry of Communications and Information)

2022-03-04 · Parliament 14

AI Governance & Regulation AI Economy & Industry AI & National Security AI Infrastructure & Research

MPs asked how the government balances investment in digital infrastructure and tech innovation (6G, Web 4.0) with digital inclusion of vulnerable groups to prevent a widening digital divide. They focused on the timeliness and proportionality of digital regulation, especially in emerging areas like crypto and the metaverse. The government must balance economic vitality with social cohesion, making sure the whole population stays included and safe.

Committee of Supply – Head J (Ministry of Defence)

2022-03-03 · Parliament 14

AI & Employment AI in Healthcare AI & National Security AI in Public Sector

MPs asked MINDEF about progress on updating the medical classification system, focusing on how to make operational-fitness assessment and job matching more thorough. The government replied that the system aims to lift HR efficiency by combining servicemen's skills with their professional background. The core debate: how to make assessment thorough and ensure skills are properly matched in deployment.