口头答复 · 2023-04-21 · 第 14 届国会
新加坡人工智能监管框架
Regulatory Framework for Artificial Intelligence Governance in Singapore
质询方关注新加坡是否借鉴欧盟和中国的AI监管框架，重点领域及立法时间表。政府回应介绍现有的《AI治理模型框架》和AI Verify工具，强调持续审视监管策略，并计划发布个人数据保护指导。质询方进一步关注AI诈骗等具体风险，政府指出AI技术多样性，强调区别对待不同AI技术的必要性，体现审慎推进监管的态度。
关键要点
- • 支持负责任AI发展
- • 已有AI治理框架
- • 关注AI诈骗风险
审慎推进AI监管，持续评估调整
关注AI诈骗等具体保护措施
完善AI伦理与数据保护
"AI is a group of technologies. Currently, there is a lot of excitement around ChatGPT."
参与人员（3）
- He Ting Ru
- Janil Puthucheary
- Senior Minister of State for Communications and Information
完整译文（中文）
Hansard 英文原文译文 · 翻译日期：2026-05-02
19 何庭如女士询问通讯及资讯部长，鉴于欧盟和中国拟议中的人工智能（AI）治理监管框架，(a) 新加坡目前的人工智能监管方法是否正在审查中；(b) 目前在该领域是否有任何优先考虑的监管领域；以及 (c) 预计何时会引入相关监管措施。
通讯及资讯高级国务部长（Janil Puthucheary 博士）（代通讯及资讯部长） ：议长先生，新加坡支持负责任地开发和部署人工智能（AI），以便公众能够在值得信赖和安全的环境中享受其带来的益处。
我们已推出多种工具以帮助实现这些目标。其中一个例子是《人工智能治理模型框架》。如星展银行、汇丰银行、Visa 和微软等公司已采用该框架，以解决部署人工智能解决方案时的关键伦理和治理问题。另一个工具是 AI Verify，这是一套自我测试框架和工具包，用于展示负责任的人工智能部署，已吸引超过 500 家公司的关注。[ 请参阅《通讯及资讯高级国务部长澄清》，官方报告，2023 年 4 月 21 日，第 95 卷，第 101 期，书面声明更正部分。]
个人数据保护委员会将在今年内根据《个人数据保护法》发布《人工智能系统中个人数据使用咨询指南》。
我们通过《人工智能与数据伦理使用咨询委员会》以及《全球人工智能伙伴关系》与业界和国际同行就人工智能相关问题进行交流。
类似于我们监管数据使用、网络安全、虚假信息和网络危害的方式，我们将继续审查技术现状、监管方法及其有效性，以维护数字发展中的信任与安全。
议长先生：何庭如女士。
何庭如女士（盛港选区）：谢谢议长先生。我有一个简短的追加问题。鉴于人工智能的快速发展及其可能不同于传统技术的特殊性质，我想了解是否有更具体的方案或保护措施，以防范基于人工智能的诈骗，例如语音克隆？这些措施是否正在考虑中？预计何时实施？
Janil Puthucheary 博士：议长先生，感谢何女士的提问。我借此机会指出，她的问题中存在一个假设，即人工智能是“单一事物”，而公众和评论员常常如此看待它。
人工智能是一组技术。目前，大家对 ChatGPT 十分关注，它是基于机器学习技术的大型语言模型的一个例子。关于我们应如何应对人工智能的影响，其影响在不同领域会有很大差异，监管方式也会因人工智能工具所依赖的不同组成部分而异。
当议员问及我们将如何保护公民免受与人工智能相关的诈骗时，这不一定需要专门针对人工智能的监管，而是需要通过我们打击诈骗、反欺诈、网络安全和刑事活动的努力来应对。我们在议会中的同事们也曾谈及此事，我们将继续努力解决相关问题。
同样，当我们谈论数据、网络安全、网络危害和虚假信息时，这些并非与人工智能无关，因为人工智能相关工具可能会影响这些领域，并可能给公众带来危害。
我想向议员保证，我们认同这些关切，我们确实需要应对技术的使用方式，确保技术及其空间值得信赖，并促进有益于所有人的举措发展，这其中包括保护公民免受诈骗及相关努力，无论是否与人工智能有关。
英文原文
SPRS Hansard 原始记录 · 抓取日期：2026-05-02
19 Ms He Ting Ru asked the Minister for Communications and Information in view of the proposed regulatory frameworks for artificial intelligence (AI) governance in the European Union and China (a) whether the current approach to AI regulation in Singapore is being reviewed; (b) whether there are any areas in the field that are currently being prioritised for regulation; and (c) what is the anticipated timeline for the introduction of any regulation.
The Senior Minister of State for Communications and Information (Dr Janil Puthucheary) (for the Minister for Communications and Information) : Mr Speaker, Singapore supports the responsible development and deployment of artificial intelligence (AI), so that its benefits may be enjoyed in a trusted and safe manner.
We have introduced tools to help us achieve these goals. One example is the Model AI Governance Framework. Companies such as DBS, HSBC, Visa and Microsoft have adopted this framework to address key ethical and governance issues when deploying AI solutions. Another tool is AI Verify, a self-testing framework and toolkit to demonstrate responsible deployment of AI. It has attracted the interest of over 500 companies. [ Please refer to " Clarification by Senior Minister of State for Communications and Information ", Official Report, 21 April 2023, Vol 95, Issue 101, Correction By Written Statement section. ]
The Personal Data Protection Commission will issue Advisory Guidelines on the Use of Personal Data in AI Systems under the Personal Data Protection Act within the year.
We engage our industry and international counterparts on AI-related issues through our Advisory Council on Ethical Use of AI and Data as well the Global Partnership on AI.
Similar to how we regulate data use, cybersecurity, misinformation and online harms, we will continue to review the state of the technology, our regulatory approach and its effectiveness, in order to uphold trust and safety in digital developments.
Mr Speaker : Ms He Ting Ru.
Ms He Ting Ru (Sengkang) : Thank you, Mr Speaker. Just a quick supplementary question. Given the rapid development of AI and the specific nature of AI which might be different from more traditional technologies, I was just wondering whether there was anything more particular or specific schemes or any protections to be put in place to protect citizens against AI-powered scams, for example, voice cloning, and whether these are actually being considered and what is the expected timeline for implementation.
Dr Janil Puthucheary : Sir, I thank Ms He for her questions. I would take this opportunity to point out that in her questions is an assumption that AI is "one thing", and this is something that the public and commentators often treat it as.
AI is a group of technologies. Currently, there is a lot of excitement around ChatGPT, which is an example of a large language model based on machine learning techniques. When it comes to the issues of how we should deal with the impact of AI, its impact is going to be quite different in different domains and the impact is going to be quite different in how we regulate it, depending on the various components of what the AI tool rests on.
When the Member asks about what we will do to protect citizens from scams related to AI, it is not necessarily something that we need to be specific about AI regulation, it is something that we need to deal with in terms of our scam efforts, our initiatives around fraud and cybersecurity and criminal activity. And our colleagues in this House have spoken about that and we will continue to address that.
Similarly, when we talk about what we are doing around data, cybersecurity, online harms and misinformation, it is not that that is separate from what we are doing with AI, because those are things that AI-related tools may influence and may subsequently introduce harms to our public.
I just want to reassure the Member that we agree with the concerns, that we do have to address how technology is being used, make sure that the technology and the technological spaces are trusted and allows the development of initiatives that will benefit all of us and this includes protecting citizens from scams and efforts associated with that, whether AI-related or not.