MDDI 演讲稿 · 2025-10-15

Josephine Teo 部长在 Meta Llama 孵化器演示日的开场致辞

Josephine Teo 部长在 Meta Llama 孵化器演示日的开场致辞

Josephine Teo · 数码发展及新闻部长 · Meta Llama孵化器演示日

要点

  • Meta 骆驼孵化器计划(Llama Incubator Programme)为参与者提供先进语言模型的访问权限及 Meta 与合作伙伴的工程资源和专业知识,以降低新加坡企业开展 AI 实验的门槛。
  • 新加坡《国家 AI 战略》于 2019 年首次发布,从供需两端确立了推动工业界、政府与研究界 AI 采用的抓手,AI 的普及程度已从小众领域走向社会主流。
  • 陆路交通管理局(LTA)开发了符合《指令手册 8》(IM8)要求的漏洞评估与渗透测试报告工具,使信息安全人员得以专注于威胁猎取,且该工具可在各政府机构复用。
  • 政府的开源贡献包括完全开源的 AI 测试框架与软件工具包 AI Verify,以及向合作国家分享新加坡数字经济与数字社会建设经验的「新加坡数字门户」(Singapore Digital Gateway)。
  • 部长张思乐归纳出五类高价值 AI 应用场景:「三个 P」——个性化(personalisation)、规划(planning)、预测(prediction);以及「两个 A」——自动化(automation)与异常检测(anomaly detection)。
  • 「廊 AI」(Lorong AI)是每周三定期聚会的 AI 从业者社群,被列为从业者共享经验、缩短学习曲线的重要平台资源。

完整译文(中文)

MDDI 英文原文译文 · 翻译日期: 2026-06-21

早上好。祝贺所有在Meta Llama孵化器计划中获奖及参与的人士顺利完成课程。同时也感谢Meta与我们合作,共同推动新加坡的AI应用。

在参观展台、聆听演讲的过程中,我不禁感受到一种进步的气息。AI在新加坡曾经还是边缘话题,如今已日益融入主流。

让我解释一下为何我认为这一点如此重要。

在我过去担任人力部或财政部职务期间,我们关注的问题之一,是如何让技术渗透到整个经济活动的各个层面。

除非技术能够真正渗入社会的每一个角落,否则受益者只会是少数群体。前沿企业总能善用新技术,而经济体系中最边远的部分往往会被落下。

一旦发生这种情况,经济虽然仍在运转,却无法发挥其全部潜力;它无法像涨潮托举所有船只那样,同等地提振所有企业。

然而,技术扩散说起来容易,做起来难。要使AI这样的通用技术得以广泛扩散,需要许多深思熟虑的干预举措。

这也是我和我的团队在主管新加坡国家AI战略时的优先事项之一。我们确定了一系列推动因素,以激活产业、政府和研究社群的活动,因为归根结底需要有需求存在。我们不能只做供给侧的事,却没有人真正使用现有的资源。

《国家AI战略》第一版发布于2019年。但如果回顾其发布后所展开的各类活动,可以说当时的AI应用仍相当小众。我们看到医疗、金融服务、交通及物流领域出现了局部应用,但并不普遍,尚未进入主流。

时至今日,AI已成为主流,这一事实难以忽视。几乎找不到哪个场合完全不提"AI"这个词。

就连几周前我在勿洛心脏地带参加的社区黑客马拉松上,基层志愿者们也在尝试运用AI,为居民带来更好的惠民服务,并协助他们处理日常生活事务。

无论是在中央商业区还是心脏地带,AI已成为新加坡不可或缺的一部分。

我们能走到今天,有赖于像你们这样拥抱这一理念的开发者,以及Meta和其他在新加坡建立战略布局的公司所形成的伙伴关系。

除了进入主流,AI的应用类型也愈加多样。今天展示的案例彰显了AI运用方式日益深入的成熟度——提升企业实力、满足合规要求,以及帮助他人。

例如,Straits Interactive构建了一套产品,赋能非技术专业人员从AI技术中获益,旨在实现技术的民主化,惠及更广泛的生态系统。

另一个例子是LTA开发了一款漏洞评估与渗透测试报告工具——该工具符合《指令手册第8册》(IM8)¹的要求——从而使信息安全人员能够将精力集中于威胁狩猎等更重要的工作,进而更好地保障系统安全。同样的工具也可供其他政府机构的同事使用,因为他们都必须遵从IM8。

MyRepublic的AI协作员也对智能体系统进行了探索,用于跟进销售线索、拓展业务范围,同时保持人工监督,而非取代人类。

这些都是应对现实问题的理念付诸实践的有益案例。它们标志着我们AI应用之旅中一个极为重要的拐点——AI应用已从边缘走向主流。

维护一个开放源代码触手可及的环境同样至关重要,因为并非所有机构都拥有相同的资源来开展实验。

实验需要勇气,但更重要的是,需要资源。Llama孵化器计划提供的不仅是进入先进模型的通道,还有Meta及其合作伙伴所带来的工程资源、知识与洞见。

政府在开放源代码方面必须言行一致。

我们的贡献包括AI Verify。这是一个完全开源的测试框架与软件工具包。下载次数越多、使用越广泛,我们积累的知识与理解就越丰富,改进空间也就越大。

最近,我还发布了新加坡数字网关(Singapore Digital Gateway)。这是一种将新加坡建设数字经济与数字社会的经验向世界各地同行开放共享的方式,因为我们常常被邀请分享这些经验。

最后,我想回应我们时不时会遇到的一些论调。我们偶尔会看到一些给AI应用泼冷水的报告,例如,一些知名机构谈论AI实验如何失败,以及AI未能产生企业所期望的回报。这些意见有其公正之处,但也反映出实验本身有多么不易。

然而与此同时,我们必须不断学习,必须积累能力。即便是通用技术,其效益的实现也需要时间。

有一句话常被提及——电气化技术在19世纪末就已出现,但工厂直到20世纪20年代才真正用上电力。为何需要这么长时间?

原因在于工厂内置了使用旧技术的系统,需要围绕这些系统寻找出路。他们还需要在每个关键节点上找到新的突破。我相信AI也会经历同样的过程。

当研究表明AI应用被视为徒劳无益之举时,我们也能从中汲取重要教训。我们需要找到实验方式的最佳平衡点,以建立长期能力,并建立一种信念——实验是认真严肃的,不应轻易放弃。

纵观通过此类孵化器以及我们的AI卓越中心涌现出的应用案例,它们大致归属于五个类别——即我所称的"三个P"和"两个A"。

AI可以大展身手的三个P是:个性化(personalisation)、规划(planning)和预测(prediction)。

两个A分别是自动化(automation)与异常检测(anomaly detection),即AI扫遍海量数据、从中识别可疑项目的能力。

如果我们能够建立共识,接受实验并不总能产生我们期望的结果,但我们将在理解问题方面不断精进,并积累能力,使各组织未来在AI领域取得成功,那么我们终究有所收获。

我并不因为那些表明AI应用不会产生成效的研究而感到悲观。这些研究说明,我们达到理想效果的次数还不够多。但这不是放弃的理由,而是加倍投入的理由。

最后,在所有这些实验过程中,我们不独自前行至关重要。积极与社群中的人互动非常重要,因为你将从他们的经验中汲取大量养分。

例如,我们有Lorong AI——一个每周三聚会的AI从业者社群。社群中的某位成员或许已经比你更接近答案。通过融入AI社群,你可以大幅缩短自己的学习曲线。

随着这一AI社群不断壮大,我们将更有把握巩固整体经验,使AI应用不再局限于边缘地带,而是进入主流,成为我们提振经济、保持新加坡竞争力的核心所在。

谢谢。

¹《指令手册第8号》(IM8)是指一套供所有政府机构使用的政府政策,旨在保护信息通信技术与智能系统(ICT and SS)资产。

英文原文

MDDI 官网原始记录 · 抓取日期: 2026-06-21

Good morning. Congratulations to all winners and participants on completing Meta’s Llama Incubator Programme. I also want to thank Meta for partnering with us to promote AI adoption in Singapore.

As I was going through the exhibition booths and listening to the presentations, I couldn't help but feel a sense of progress. AI, which used to be on the fringe in Singapore, is increasingly in the mainstream.

Let me explain why I think this is so important.

In my previous roles, be it in the Manpower or Finance Ministry, one of our concerns was how technology could be diffused into the whole spectrum of economic activities.

Unless technologies percolate into the corners of society, only a narrow group will benefit. Frontier companies can always be expected to make the most of new technologies, and it is always the far reaches of the economy that get left behind.

When that happens, the economy continues to chug along, but it does not realise its full potential; it does not uplift all companies the same way as the rising tide lifts all boats.

But diffusion of technology is easier said than done. For a general-purpose technology like AI to be diffused, many thoughtful interventions are required.

That was one of our priorities for my team and me looking after the National AI Strategy in Singapore. We identified a suite of enablers to drive activity in the industry, government and research communities because ultimately there needs to be demand. We can’t just do things on the supply side but no one is really using what’s available.

The first edition of the National AI Strategy was in 2019. But if we were to look at the kind of activities that took place after its publication, it is fair to say that AI adoption then was still quite niche. We saw pockets of adoption in healthcare, financial services, transport and logistics, but it was not widespread. It hadn't entered the mainstream.

Fast forward to today. it is hard to ignore the fact that AI has become very mainstream. There are very few gatherings that you would go to that the term “AI” is not mentioned at all.

Even in the community hackathon that I attended in a few weeks ago in the heartlands at Bedok, the grassroots volunteers were also experimenting with the use of AI to bring about better benefits for the residents and help them with their day-to-day lives.

It has become very much a part of the Singapore landscape, whether you are in the Central Business District or the heartlands.

The fact that we have come this far is thanks to developers like you, who have embraced the idea, and because of the partnerships with Meta and other companies that have grown a strategic presence in Singapore.

Beyond going mainstream, there are also many different kinds of AI applications. The examples we see today show the growing sophistication in how AI can be used - to uplift businesses, fulfil compliance requirements, and help others.

For example, Straits Interactive built a suite of offerings to empower non-tech professionals to benefit from AI technology, which is meant to be democratising and useful to the wider ecosystem.

Another example is how LTA built a tool on vulnerability assessment and penetration testing reporting - which complies with the Instruction Manual 8 (IM8)¹ - thus enabling information security staff to focus on more important work like proper threat hunting and to secure our systems better. The same tool can be used to help colleagues in other government agencies, because they all have to comply with IM8.

MyRepublic’s AI Co-worker also experimented with agentic systems to follow up on sales leads and broaden its business base, while at the same time while keeping the human in the loop, not replace them.

These are good examples of ideas that are being implemented to deal with real-world issues. They signal a very important point of inflection in our AI adoption journey, where AI adoption has gone from the fringe to mainstream.

It is also still important for us to uphold an environment where open source is available because not all organisations will have the same access to resources to experiment.

Experimentation takes courage, but very importantly, it takes resources. The Llama incubator programme makes available not just access to an advanced model, but also the engineering resources, knowledge and insight that Meta, together with your partners, have brought to the table.

The Government has to walk the talk when it comes to open source.

Our contribution includes AI Verify. It is a testing framework and software toolkit that is completely open source. The more it is downloaded, the more it is used, the more knowledge and understanding that we have, and the more it can be improved.

Recently, I also launched the Singapore Digital Gateway. This is a way of open sourcing Singapore’s experiences in building up a digital economy and digital society with our colleagues around the world, as we are often asked to share our experiences.

Finally, I'd just like to respond to readings that we may encounter from time to time. Every now and then, we would come across a report that pours cold water on AI adoption. For example, distinguished organisations talking about how AI experimentation is failing, and AI is not producing the returns that the companies would like to see. These are fair comments, but they also reflect just how difficult experiments could be.

Yet at the same time, we have to learn. We have to acquire capability. Even for a general-purpose technology, it takes time for its benefit to be realised.

It's been often said – electrification was available from the late 1800s, but factories did not really use electricity until the 1920s. Why did it take so long?

It's because factories had embedded systems using older technology; they need to work around these systems. They also needed to find new breakthroughs at each juncture. I believe this will be the same for AI.

There are also important lessons to be taken away when studies show that AI adoption seen as a fool's errand. We need to find the sweet spot in the way we experiment, to build long term capabilities, and a sense of trust that the experimentations are serious and should not be given up on easily.

Looking at the use cases that have emerged through incubators like this and through our AI Centres of Excellence, they fall broadly into five categories - what I call the three P's and two A's.

The three Ps where AI can be put to very good use are personalisation, planning and prediction.

The two A's are automation and anomaly detection, that is the ability for AI to trawl through tons of data to find items that seem suspicious.

If we could build a case to accept that the experimentation may not always produce the results that we want, but we will get better at understanding the problem and build capabilities that enable the organisations to achieve success in AI in the future, we will still have gained something.

I'm not pessimistic because of all the studies that suggest that AI adoption will not yield results. It means that we haven't gotten it right as many times as we would like. But it is not a reason to give up. It is a reason to double down.

Finally, in all of these experimentations, it is important that we do not journey alone. It is important to engage people who are in the community because you will learn so much from their experiences.

For example, we have Lorong AI which is a community of AI practitioners that gathers every Wednesday. It's possible that someone in the community has gotten a closer answer than you have. You can then shorten your learning curve by being plugged into an AI community.

As this AI community continues to strengthen, we have a much better chance of solidifying this whole experience and making AI adoption not just at the fringe but in the mainstream, at the front and centre of how we uplift our economy and keep Singapore competitive.

Thank you.

¹Instruction Manual 8 (IM8) refers to a set of government policies used by all government agencies to safeguard Infocomm Technology and Smart Systems (ICT and SS) assets.