数据更新: 2026-06-09 187 条辩论记录
来源: SPRS Hansard · PAIR Search 中文摘要由 AI 辅助生成
🏛️

国会 AI 焦点

新加坡议会关于人工智能的第一手辩论记录,含 AI 提炼的中文摘要、议员立场分析与政策规律洞察。

先找到你要的辩论

先搜索,再按类型、议题、议员、年份或争议度收窄。

快捷筛选

按议题浏览

先从高价值入口进入完整档案。

档案概览

点击柱状图筛选该年。

记录总数
187
覆盖年份
2015-2026
更新日期
2026-06-09
类型分布
书面答复 68 / 动议 7 / 口头答复 53 / 预算辩论 59
历年辩论趋势

辩论记录

列表默认压缩;展开卡片或进入详情页看完整摘要。

第 15 届国会 信息发布

针对非自愿私密影像与性化深伪的"限时下架"措施,以及在全球范围内阻断访问的权限

Implementation of Stay-down Measures for Non-consensual Intimate Images and Sexualised Deepfakes under the Online Safety...

王诗尼女士(Rachel Ong)书面质询数字发展与信息部:(a) 被在线安全委员会(OSC)责令删除非自愿私密影像(含性化深伪)的平台,是否也须实施"限时下架"(stay-down)措施——如哈希比对——以阻止他人重新上传或再散布;(b) 鉴于"禁用访问指令"只对新加坡用户生效,OSC 有何权力防止此类内容在全球范围内仍可访问。部长杨莉明(Josephine Teo)答复:收到有效举报后,在线安全专员依法可责令在线服务提供商(OSP)...

政策信号: 新加坡对深伪与私密影像滥用的治理已从"能否下架"进入"如何防止再上传"的执行细节层面,但明确不把 stay-down 技术写死为强制义务,保留"只要平台达到禁用结果即可"的弹性;跨境可访问性仍是其单边执法难以彻底解决的结构性缺口。
展开摘要、立场与原文

王诗尼女士(Rachel Ong)书面质询数字发展与信息部:(a) 被在线安全委员会(OSC)责令删除非自愿私密影像(含性化深伪)的平台,是否也须实施"限时下架"(stay-down)措施——如哈希比对——以阻止他人重新上传或再散布;(b) 鉴于"禁用访问指令"只对新加坡用户生效,OSC 有何权力防止此类内容在全球范围内仍可访问。部长杨莉明(Josephine Teo)答复:收到有效举报后,在线安全专员依法可责令在线服务提供商(OSP)对新加坡用户禁用访问指定的有害内容,该指令可延伸覆盖平台上的相同副本;只要达到指令要求的结果,专员不会指定必须采用何种技术,违令即属犯罪。指令仅约束对新加坡用户的访问,但 OSP 可依其自身政策与社群准则移除对其他用户的访问。

要点
  • • 在线安全专员可责令平台对新加坡用户禁用访问指定有害内容,并可延伸覆盖平台上的相同副本
  • • 只要达到指令结果,不强制指定技术手段(如哈希比对);违令即属犯罪
  • • 指令仅约束对新加坡用户的访问,全球下架取决于平台自身政策
政府立场
政府以"结果导向、技术中立"的方式治理性化深伪等有害内容:赋予在线安全专员直接命令平台禁用访问、并覆盖相同副本的权力,但不锁定具体技术;在承认"禁用指令只及本地用户"这一司法边界的同时,把全球下架留给平台自律。
"在线安全专员依法可责令在线服务提供商对新加坡用户禁用访问指定的有害内容……只要达到指令要求的结果,专员不会指定必须采用何种技术。"
原文节选(英文)
Rachel Ong asked MDDI whether platforms directed by the Online Safety Commission to remove verified non-consensual intimate images, including sexualised deepfakes, must also implement stay-down measures such as hash-matching, and what powers the OSC has to prevent such content remaining globally accessible when disabling directions cover only Singapore users. Minister Josephine Teo replied that the Commissioner of Online Safety can direct Online Service Providers to disable Singapore users' access to specified harmful material, extendable to identical copies, without mandating specific technologies so long as the outcome is achieved; non-compliance is an offence. Directions apply only to access by Singapore users, though OSPs may remove content for others under their own policies.
第 15 届国会 信息发布

AI 生成媒体的水印与数字溯源标准、元数据保存与披露,及跨平台协调措施

Watermarking and Digital Provenance Standards for AI-generated Media, Metadata Preservation and Cross-platform Coordinat...

王诗尼女士(Rachel Ong)书面质询数字发展与信息部:在管理 AI 相关风险的测试标准与技术方案仍在演进之际,(a) 政府是否在研究 AI 生成媒体的水印或数字溯源标准;(b) 当局能否强制保存并披露可识别原始上传者的元数据;(c) 在各社媒与网站间正在考虑哪些跨平台协调措施。部长杨莉明(Josephine Teo)答复:政府持续跟踪识别 AI 生成内容的技术标准(含水印与数字溯源),并参与相关国际与行业平台,如成员超过 6,00...

政策信号: 新加坡对 AI 生成内容的治理停留在"观察 + 对接国际标准"阶段,刻意不抢先立单边水印标准,以免与全球互操作性脱节;这与其在深伪、选举等高危场景"该立就立"的果断形成对照——溯源技术未成熟前,不轻易上强制。
展开摘要、立场与原文

王诗尼女士(Rachel Ong)书面质询数字发展与信息部:在管理 AI 相关风险的测试标准与技术方案仍在演进之际,(a) 政府是否在研究 AI 生成媒体的水印或数字溯源标准;(b) 当局能否强制保存并披露可识别原始上传者的元数据;(c) 在各社媒与网站间正在考虑哪些跨平台协调措施。部长杨莉明(Josephine Teo)答复:政府持续跟踪识别 AI 生成内容的技术标准(含水印与数字溯源),并参与相关国际与行业平台,如成员超过 6,000 家、涵盖主要科技与 AI 公司的"内容来源与真实性联盟"(C2PA);随着技术与标准演进,将评估其在新加坡语境下的适用性,包括跨平台措施。若涉及刑事犯罪,警方有权依法要求平台披露信息以协助调查,包括可获得的上传者元数据与可识别数据。

要点
  • • 政府持续跟踪 AI 生成内容识别标准(含水印与数字溯源),尚未强制立标,而是随国际标准演进再评估适用性
  • • 深度参与"内容来源与真实性联盟"(C2PA,6,000+ 成员)等国际与行业平台
  • • 涉刑事犯罪时,警方可依法要求平台披露上传者元数据等信息
政府立场
政府在 AI 内容溯源上采取"跟随国际标准、暂不单独立标"的姿态:通过 C2PA 等联盟对接全球技术演进,把强制留给尚未成熟的标准成型之后;当下真正的强制手段来自刑事调查场景下的元数据披露权,而非普遍性的水印义务。
"政府跟踪识别 AI 生成内容技术标准(含水印与数字溯源)的发展……随着这些技术与标准持续演进,我们将评估其在新加坡语境下的适用性,包括跨平台措施。"
原文节选(英文)
Rachel Ong asked MDDI whether the Government is studying watermarking or digital-provenance standards for AI-generated media, whether authorities can compel preservation and disclosure of metadata identifying original uploaders, and what cross-platform coordination is being considered. Minister Josephine Teo replied that the Government tracks technical standards for identifying AI-generated content — including watermarking and digital provenance — and engages platforms such as the Coalition for Content Provenance and Authenticity (over 6,000 members), assessing applicability to Singapore as standards evolve. Where criminal offences are disclosed, the Police can require platforms to disclose information, including uploader metadata where available.
第 15 届国会 温和质询

监管高风险 AI 部署的关键风险阈值,及对全自动决策强制人工监督

Key Risk Thresholds to Regulate High-risk AI Deployments and Mandatory Human Oversight for Fully Automated Decisions

杨益财先生(Alex Yeo)就 NAIS 更新中"必要且有效时将监管或立法"一语,书面质询数字发展与信息部:(a) 哪些关键风险因素或阈值决定何时须对"高风险 AI 部署"进行监管;(b) 部门是否会对实质影响个人的全自动决策(如就业决定或高风险场景)强制要求"有意义的人工监督"。部长杨莉明(Josephine Teo)答复:与任何技术一样,是否监管取决于部署方式、可能造成的伤害性质,以及现有措施是否足以应对。她强调新加坡语境下许多...

政策信号: 面对"要不要给高风险 AI 划线"的直接压力,新加坡明确选择不预设通用阈值、不搞欧盟式风险分级,而是把 AI 风险拆进既有法律(就业、诈骗、选举)逐块处理,再以行业指引兜底。这是其区别于欧盟《AI 法》的核心路径:不立一部综合 AI 法,靠现有工具箱 + 分行业软法动态收紧。
展开摘要、立场与原文

杨益财先生(Alex Yeo)就 NAIS 更新中"必要且有效时将监管或立法"一语,书面质询数字发展与信息部:(a) 哪些关键风险因素或阈值决定何时须对"高风险 AI 部署"进行监管;(b) 部门是否会对实质影响个人的全自动决策(如就业决定或高风险场景)强制要求"有意义的人工监督"。部长杨莉明(Josephine Teo)答复:与任何技术一样,是否监管取决于部署方式、可能造成的伤害性质,以及现有措施是否足以应对。她强调新加坡语境下许多 AI 风险已被现有法律覆盖——用 AI 招聘仍须遵守即将出台的《职场公平法》,《网络犯罪危害法》让警方可阻断 AI 诈骗;现有措施不足且能设计出合适对策时,政府会及时立法(如《选举(网络广告诚信)(修订)法》)。这些法律再辅以分行业指引,如 MAS 就金融业《AI 风险管理指引》咨询、卫生部更新《医疗 AI 指南》(AIHGle 2.0)。政府将持续研究合适的 AI 监管姿态。

要点
  • • 是否监管取决于部署方式、伤害性质与现有措施是否足够——不设一刀切的"高风险"阈值
  • • 许多 AI 风险已被现有法律覆盖:《职场公平法》管 AI 招聘、OCHA 阻断 AI 诈骗、选举法禁深伪
  • • 以分行业指引(MAS 金融 AI 风险管理、卫生部 AIHGle 2.0)补充硬法
政府立场
政府拒绝为"高风险 AI"预设统一阈值或普遍性人工监督义务,坚持"按部署与伤害逐案判断、优先复用现有法律"的立场:先看《职场公平法》《网络犯罪危害法》等能否覆盖,不足时才立新法,并用分行业指引柔性收口。这是其"软法为主、必要才立硬法"打法在高风险 AI 上的具体表述。
质询立场
杨益财援引 NAIS 更新中"必要且有效时将监管或立法"的措辞,追问政府拿出可操作的"高风险 AI"判定阈值,并质询是否会对影响就业等个人重大权益的全自动决策强制人工监督——把"原则性表态"往"具体规则"方向推。
"在新加坡的语境下,许多人工智能(AI)风险已通过现有立法得到应对……现有措施被评估为不足、且能设计出合适对策时,政府会确保其及时落地。"
原文节选(英文)
Referring to the NAIS Update's "regulate or legislate where necessary and effective," Alex Yeo asked MDDI what risk factors or thresholds determine when a high-risk AI deployment warrants regulation, and whether the Ministry would mandate human oversight over fully automated decisions materially affecting individuals such as in employment. Minister Josephine Teo replied that the need to regulate depends on deployment, the nature of harm and whether existing measures are effective; many AI risks are already addressed by existing law (the Workplace Fairness Act, the Online Criminal Harms Act, the elections advertising law), complemented by sectoral guidelines such as MAS's AI Risk Management guidelines and MOH's AIHGle 2.0. The Government will continue to study the appropriate regulatory stance as the technology and risk landscape evolve.
第 15 届国会 信息发布

无遗嘱死亡数据,及整合 AI 工具提升遗嘱订立服务的可及性

Intestate Deaths Data and Integration of AI Tools to Improve Will-writing Accessibility

工人党议员严燕松(Gerald Giam)书面质询律政部:(a) 部门是否掌握过去五年每年无遗嘱(intestate)去世的新加坡公民与永久居民人数;(b) 是否计划整合人工智能工具,提升遗嘱订立服务的可及性。律政部长唐振辉(Edwin Tong)答复:律政部并不追踪无遗嘱去世人数。他鼓励公众订立遗嘱,并指出如今确有 AI 工具可协助起草遗嘱,但无论是否用 AI,公众都须谨慎,并寻求专业法律意见。政府已推动相关资源更易获取——近期在 M...

政策信号: 新加坡把 AI 引入公共法律服务时坚持"工具辅助、人类把关":官方亲自下场做数字工具降低门槛,但同时反复设限——AI 生成的遗嘱只是参考、不能替代律师。这体现了政府在民生领域推广 AI 应用时"提效但不越界、鼓励但强调责任"的一贯尺度。
展开摘要、立场与原文

工人党议员严燕松(Gerald Giam)书面质询律政部:(a) 部门是否掌握过去五年每年无遗嘱(intestate)去世的新加坡公民与永久居民人数;(b) 是否计划整合人工智能工具,提升遗嘱订立服务的可及性。律政部长唐振辉(Edwin Tong)答复:律政部并不追踪无遗嘱去世人数。他鼓励公众订立遗嘱,并指出如今确有 AI 工具可协助起草遗嘱,但无论是否用 AI,公众都须谨慎,并寻求专业法律意见。政府已推动相关资源更易获取——近期在 MyLegacy@LifeSG 上推出"遗嘱学习工具",帮助公众在寻求法律意见前理解订立遗嘱的考量,并生成可作参考的"遗嘱准备模板";但强调这是教育工具,不能替代法律意见。政府将继续完善身后规划资源,包括"负责任地使用 AI 订立遗嘱"的信息。

要点
  • • 律政部不追踪无遗嘱去世人数
  • • 承认已有 AI 工具可协助起草遗嘱,但强调无论是否用 AI 都须谨慎并寻求专业法律意见
  • • 已在 MyLegacy@LifeSG 推出"遗嘱学习工具",定位为教育工具而非法律意见替代
政府立场
律政部对 AI 进入法律服务持"欢迎辅助、守住底线"的态度:承认 AI 可协助起草遗嘱、并已推出官方数字工具降低门槛,但反复强调这些只是教育与参考,不能替代专业法律意见,且要求"负责任地使用 AI"。
质询立场
工人党严燕松借"无遗嘱死亡"这一民生数据缺口,推动律政部把 AI 用于降低遗嘱订立门槛、提升可及性,把 AI 应用与普通公众的实际法律需求挂钩。
"如今确有可用于协助起草遗嘱的人工智能(AI)工具。然而,无论是否使用 AI,公众在订立遗嘱时都必须谨慎,并应寻求专业法律意见。"
原文节选(英文)
Workers' Party MP Gerald Giam asked the Ministry of Law whether it has data on intestate deaths of Citizens and Permanent Residents over the last five years, and whether it plans to integrate AI tools to improve will-writing accessibility. Minister for Law Edwin Tong replied that the Ministry does not track intestate deaths, encouraged the public to make wills, and noted that AI tools exist that might assist — but stressed care and professional legal advice whether or not AI is used. The Government has launched a Will Learning Tool on MyLegacy@LifeSG that generates a Will Preparation Template for reference, framed as an education tool and not a substitute for legal advice, and will continue improving resources including on the responsible use of AI in will-making.
第 15 届国会 信息发布

公立医院机器人部署、临床结果,及对医疗人力的长期影响

Public Hospital Robotics Deployment, Clinical Outcomes and Long-term Impact on Healthcare Manpower

朱倍玲医生(Choo Pei Ling)书面质询社会政策统筹部长兼卫生部长:(a) 目前有多少公立医院部署了(i) 手术机器人与(ii) 物流、清洁、协助病患等非临床服务机器人;(b) 这些机器人对临床结果、病患安全、员工工作量与生产力的实测影响。另问机器人与自动化对护理、专职医疗与支持岗位人力需求的长期影响,以及是否计划追踪并公布岗位重塑与生产力指标。卫生部长王乙康(Ong Ye Kung)答复:国立大学医院、新加坡中央医院、陈笃生医...

政策信号: 新加坡把医疗机器人放进"应对人力短缺"的战略框架,而非纯粹的技术升级:以"与传统手术结果相当"为安全底线稳步扩大手术机器人,同时把机器人明确定性为缓解护理与支持岗位人力压力的手段——回应了国会对"AI/自动化是否会冲击医疗就业"的关切,给出"补位而非替代"的官方定调。
展开摘要、立场与原文

朱倍玲医生(Choo Pei Ling)书面质询社会政策统筹部长兼卫生部长:(a) 目前有多少公立医院部署了(i) 手术机器人与(ii) 物流、清洁、协助病患等非临床服务机器人;(b) 这些机器人对临床结果、病患安全、员工工作量与生产力的实测影响。另问机器人与自动化对护理、专职医疗与支持岗位人力需求的长期影响,以及是否计划追踪并公布岗位重塑与生产力指标。卫生部长王乙康(Ong Ye Kung)答复:国立大学医院、新加坡中央医院、陈笃生医院等公立医院已部署机器人辅助手术(RAS)系统用于微创软组织手术;这些医院具备相应临床能力与足够病例量;就 RAS 适应症而言,临床结果与术后并发症迄今与传统手术相当。机器人与自动化有望提升运营效率、减轻员工工作量、改善病患照护;随着病患数量与工作量上升,合理使用此类技术有助于缓解医疗业(含专职医疗与支持岗位)的人力短缺;适当时机可委托开展详细的学术研究评估其影响。

要点
  • • NUH、SGH、陈笃生等公立医院已用机器人辅助手术(RAS)做微创软组织手术;临床结果与传统手术相当
  • • 机器人与自动化被定位为缓解医疗人力短缺、减轻工作量的手段,涵盖专职医疗与支持岗位
  • • 将在适当时机委托详细学术研究评估其对临床与人力的影响
政府立场
卫生部对医疗机器人持"审慎务实"的推进态度:在有临床能力与足够病例量的医院部署机器人辅助手术,并以"结果与传统手术相当"为安全背书;把机器人与自动化明确定位为应对医疗人力短缺、减负增效的工具,而非取代人力,并保留以学术研究评估长期影响的空间。
质询立场
朱倍玲医生把问题从"机器人有没有用"推进到"如何量化其影响":要求公布临床结果、病患安全、员工工作量数据,并追问机器人对护理与专职医疗人力需求的长期冲击,以及是否会建立岗位重塑与生产力的追踪指标。
"随着病患数量与工作量上升,合理使用此类技术有助于缓解医疗业(包括专职医疗与支持岗位)长期以来的人力短缺。"
原文节选(英文)
Dr Choo Pei Ling asked the Minister for Health how many public hospitals deploy surgical robots and non-clinical service robots, the measured impact on clinical outcomes, patient safety, staff workload and productivity, the long-term impact of robotics and automation on healthcare manpower, and whether indicators on job redesign and productivity would be tracked and published. Minister Ong Ye Kung replied that hospitals such as NUH, SGH and TTSH have deployed robotic-assisted surgical systems for minimally invasive soft-tissue surgeries, with outcomes so far comparable to conventional approaches; robotics and automation can improve efficiency, ease workload and help mitigate manpower shortages including in allied-health and support roles, with a detailed academic study of the impact possible at an appropriate juncture.
第 15 届国会 温和质询

调查针对新加坡印度裔社群的社媒帖文,及检讨抵御此类外部影响的国家框架

Probe into Social Media Posts that Targeted Singapore's Indian Community and Review of National Framework to Counter Suc...

人民行动党议员 David(Mr Darryl David)与官委议员梁国荣博士(Dr Neo Kok Beng)就 14 则针对印度裔社群、破坏多元文化的网络社媒帖文,口头质询国家安全统筹部长兼内政部长:调查是否显示这是某机构或组织有协调的行动、将采取何种行动,以及是否检讨抵御此类外部影响的国家框架、如何提升居民的辨识能力。内政部政务部长吴培源(Mr Goh Pei Ming)代部长答复:目前没有证据显示这是某个特定政府或组织的协调行...

政策信号: 新加坡把"AI 助长的外国信息操弄"正式纳入国家安全治理视野:一方面确认现有法律工具箱(OCHA、FICA、《维护种族和谐法》、POFMA)足以果断处置并将持续检讨更新,另一方面把重心前移到"全民信息韧性",显示政府对 AI 生成虚假内容的应对正从"事后封堵"转向"上游预防 + 公众免疫"。
展开摘要、立场与原文

人民行动党议员 David(Mr Darryl David)与官委议员梁国荣博士(Dr Neo Kok Beng)就 14 则针对印度裔社群、破坏多元文化的网络社媒帖文,口头质询国家安全统筹部长兼内政部长:调查是否显示这是某机构或组织有协调的行动、将采取何种行动,以及是否检讨抵御此类外部影响的国家框架、如何提升居民的辨识能力。内政部政务部长吴培源(Mr Goh Pei Ming)代部长答复:目前没有证据显示这是某个特定政府或组织的协调行动,相关内容很可能源自一个位于中国的平台后被转载;帖文企图挑起对印度裔社群的敌意、动摇多元种族模式,已被评估触犯《刑法》第 298A(a) 条,政府依据《网络犯罪危害法》(OCHA)发出"禁用指令",封锁新加坡用户对这 14 则帖文的访问。他指出,近年由人工智能(AI)驱动的不实内容渗入本地信息空间明显增多,尤其 AI 让制造此类帖文变得更容易,政府会仔细追踪每一起案例、调查背后是否有国家行为者介入,并动用 FICA、《维护种族和谐法》、POFMA、OCHA 等立法杠杆主动"向上游"应对(FICA 网络指令自 2024 年 7 月起首次启用且总体有效)。除立法外,政府通过国民教育与全面防卫、SG101 网站、国家图书馆的 S.U.R.E 计划,以及内政部 2025 年针对深伪视频与 AI 生成内容的宣传活动,培养能明辨、有韧性的民众——这被视为对抗分化最有效的防线。

要点
  • • 14 则针对印度裔社群的帖文无证据属特定政府或组织协调,内容很可能源自一个位于中国的平台后被转载
  • • 帖文被评估触犯《刑法》第 298A(a) 条,政府依 OCHA 发出"禁用指令"封锁新加坡用户访问
  • • 近年 AI 驱动的不实内容渗入本地信息空间明显增多,AI 让制造此类帖文更容易
  • • 政府握有 FICA、《维护种族和谐法》、POFMA、OCHA 等立法杠杆,FICA 网络指令自 2024 年 7 月起首次启用且总体有效
政府立场
政府对 AI 助长的外国干预与分化内容采取"果断执法 + 主动防御 + 全民韧性"三管齐下:以 OCHA、FICA 等既有杠杆果断封堵并强调法律须与时俱进,同时把培养能明辨、有韧性的民众视为最根本的防线,通过教育与宣传主动"接种免疫"。
质询立场
提问议员(David、梁国荣)追问:政府是否追踪未公开的潜在协调案例、此类案例是否在上升、若涉及国家行为者将如何应对;并质疑 FICA/POFMA/OCHA 等现行框架偏"事后反应",要求政府说明有哪些"预防性"举措及其成效如何衡量。
"我们注意到此类帖文数量有所增加,尤其是因为 AI 让制造这类帖文变得更容易……我们会非常仔细地追踪每一起案例,包括调查背后是否可能有国家行为者。"
原文节选(英文)
Darryl David and Dr Neo Kok Beng asked the Coordinating Minister for National Security and Minister for Home Affairs whether the 14 online posts targeting the Indian community were a coordinated effort, what action would follow, whether the national framework against external influence would be reviewed, and how residents could be equipped to discern such influence. Minister of State Goh Pei Ming replied that there is no evidence of a coordinated campaign by any government or organisation; the content likely originated from a China-based platform. The posts were assessed to breach section 298A(a) of the Penal Code, and Disabling Directions were issued under OCHA to block the 14 posts. He noted a rise in AI-enabled, inauthentic content in Singapore's infospace, said the Government tracks every case and investigates possible state actors, and set out legislative levers (FICA, the Maintenance of Racial Harmony Act, POFMA, OCHA) alongside public-education efforts — National Education and Total Defence, SG101, the NLB's S.U.R.E programme and a 2025 MHA campaign on deepfakes and AI-generated content — arguing that a discerning public is the most effective defence.
第 15 届国会 信息发布

过去三年 AI 诱发精神病的记录病例及应对 AI 相关心理健康问题的措施

Recorded Incidences of AI-Induced Psychosis in Past Three Years and Measures to Address AI-Related Mental Health Issues

工人党议员何廷儒(He Ting Ru)书面质询社会政策统筹部长兼卫生部长:卫生部是否注意到"AI 诱发精神病"(AI-induced psychosis)记录病例上升;若有,过去三年各年病例数为多少;以及部门如何与相关伙伴合作,更好地研究和应对这一问题。卫生部长王乙康(Ong Ye Kung)答复:国际上确有关于"密集使用人工智能可能引发心理紊乱"的报道,但这尚未成为确立的临床诊断;本地除少数零星个案外,并未观察到此类病例上升的明确趋...

政策信号: 新加坡卫生部门尚未把"AI 诱发精神病"纳入正式统计或诊断框架,采取"监测优先、暂不立规"的姿态,把 AI 心理健康风险定位为需持续观察的新兴议题,而非既成的公共卫生问题。
展开摘要、立场与原文

工人党议员何廷儒(He Ting Ru)书面质询社会政策统筹部长兼卫生部长:卫生部是否注意到"AI 诱发精神病"(AI-induced psychosis)记录病例上升;若有,过去三年各年病例数为多少;以及部门如何与相关伙伴合作,更好地研究和应对这一问题。卫生部长王乙康(Ong Ye Kung)答复:国际上确有关于"密集使用人工智能可能引发心理紊乱"的报道,但这尚未成为确立的临床诊断;本地除少数零星个案外,并未观察到此类病例上升的明确趋势。不过他强调,AI 与数字媒体可能带来的健康风险是"真实的关切",卫生部正对此密切监测。这一问答把"AI 心理健康风险"首次摆上国会台面:反对党推动政府正视并量化新兴风险,政府则以"尚非临床诊断、本地无明显趋势"审慎回应,同时不否认风险、保留持续监测的空间。

要点
  • • "AI 诱发精神病"目前尚非确立的临床诊断
  • • 本地除少数零星个案外,未见此类病例上升的明确趋势
  • • 卫生部将 AI 与数字媒体的潜在健康风险视为"真实关切",正密切监测
政府立场
卫生部对"AI 诱发精神病"持审慎观察态度:不将其认定为已确立的临床诊断,强调本地无明确上升趋势,但承认 AI 与数字媒体的心理健康风险真实存在,将持续密切监测。
质询立场
工人党何廷儒推动政府正视并量化 AI 相关精神健康风险,要求披露过去三年的病例数据,并说明跨伙伴的研究与应对机制。
"国际上虽有关于密集使用 AI 可能引发心理紊乱的报道,但这并非确立的临床诊断……我们正密切监测,因为 AI 与数字媒体带来的潜在健康风险确实值得关切。"
原文节选(英文)
Ms He Ting Ru asked the Coordinating Minister for Social Policies and Minister for Health three related questions: whether the Ministry is aware of increasing recorded incidences of artificial intelligence (AI)-induced psychosis; if so, the number of cases in each of the past three years; and how the Ministry is working with relevant partners to better study and tackle this issue. Mr Ong Ye Kung replied that there are international reports about psychological disturbances potentially related to intensive AI use, but that this is not an established clinical diagnosis. Other than a few anecdotal cases, no clear trends that such cases are on the rise have been observed locally. Nonetheless, the Minister said the Ministry is monitoring the matter closely, because the potential health risk posed by AI and digital media is of real concern.
第 15 届国会 信息发布

one-north 人工智能园区的能耗预测与能效措施

Energy Consumption Projections of AI Park at one-north and Energy Efficiency Measures

工人党议员陈立峰(Dennis Tan)就 one-north 新建人工智能(AI)园区的资源消耗,书面质询数字发展与信息部:园区满负荷运营时的年度电力与水耗预测为多少;部门如何衡量国家 AI 计划(National AI Missions)下企业的软件级能效;以及政府是否会强制大型 AI 模型披露能耗强度,以缓解对全国能源需求的反弹效应。部长杨莉明(Josephine Teo)答复:one-north 的 AI 园区并非数据中心园区,...

政策信号: 新加坡倾向以行业国际标准、绿色软件指南与《数字基础设施法案》的数据中心能效门槛来约束 AI 能耗,监管重心落在基础设施层而非模型层,暂不对单个大型模型施加强制能耗披露义务。
展开摘要、立场与原文

工人党议员陈立峰(Dennis Tan)就 one-north 新建人工智能(AI)园区的资源消耗,书面质询数字发展与信息部:园区满负荷运营时的年度电力与水耗预测为多少;部门如何衡量国家 AI 计划(National AI Missions)下企业的软件级能效;以及政府是否会强制大型 AI 模型披露能耗强度,以缓解对全国能源需求的反弹效应。部长杨莉明(Josephine Teo)答复:one-north 的 AI 园区并非数据中心园区,而是面向不断壮大的 AI 开发者与解决方案商社群的聚集地,预计其年度电力与水耗将与榜鹅数码园区等技术密集型工业园相当。她强调新加坡致力于可持续地推进 AI 能力——国家 AI 研发计划已将"资源高效型 AI"列为研究重点;绿色 AI 软件目前仍属新兴领域、尚无国际公认标准,信息通信媒体发展局(IMDA)正与绿色软件基金会合作制定新的"软件碳强度"ISO 标准方法论,并通过"绿色软件试验"与新发布的《企业实用绿色软件指南》推动算力的高效利用;数据中心方面则依托 IMDA 的"绿色数据中心路线图",部门将通过正在与业界磋商制定的《数字基础设施法案》引入数据中心基线能效标准。

要点
  • • one-north AI 园区定位为 AI 开发者与方案商聚集地,非数据中心园区,能耗预计与榜鹅数码园区相当
  • • 国家 AI 研发计划已将"资源高效型 AI"列为研究重点
  • • IMDA 正与绿色软件基金会合作制定"软件碳强度"ISO 标准,并推《企业实用绿色软件指南》
  • • 政府将通过《数字基础设施法案》为数据中心引入基线能效标准
政府立场
政府认为 one-north AI 园区能耗可控(对标现有技术密集型园区),主张以"资源高效型 AI"研究、绿色软件国际标准与《数字基础设施法案》的数据中心能效门槛来管理 AI 的能源足迹,暂不单独强制大型模型披露能耗强度。
质询立场
工人党陈立峰推动量化披露:要求公开园区满负荷能耗预测、建立软件级能效衡量方法,并强制大型 AI 模型披露能耗强度,以防 AI 扩张抬高全国能源需求的反弹效应。
"one-north 的人工智能园区并非数据中心园区,而是面向不断壮大的 AI 开发者与解决方案商社群的聚集地。"
原文节选(英文)
Mr Dennis Tan Lip Fong asked the Minister for Digital Development and Information three related questions about the new artificial intelligence (AI) park at one-north: the projected annual electricity and water consumption at full capacity; how the Ministry would measure software-level energy efficiency for firms under the national AI Missions; and whether the Government would mandate energy-intensity disclosures for large-scale AI models to mitigate any rebound effect on national energy demand. Mrs Josephine Teo replied that the planned AI park is not a data centre park but is designed to be a hub for a growing community of AI developers and solution providers, so its annual electricity and water consumption is expected to be comparable to other technology-intensive industrial estates such as the Punggol Digital District. She added that Singapore is committed to advancing its AI capabilities sustainably: under the National AI Research and Development plan, resource-efficient AI has been identified as a research priority, which together with close monitoring of practices elsewhere will inform appropriate policy measures. On software, she noted that green or energy-efficient AI software is still a nascent field with no internationally recognised standard today; the Infocomm Media Development Authority (IMDA) is working closely with the Green Software Foundation on the methodology for the new Software Carbon Intensity ISO standard, and in the meantime promotes the efficient use of computing resources through initiatives such as the Green Software Trials and the recently launched Practical Green Software Guide for Enterprises. On data centres, she said steps had been taken to improve sustainability through IMDA's Green DC roadmap, and that the Ministry will introduce baseline energy-efficiency standards for data centres through the Digital Infrastructure Act, which is being developed in consultation with the industry.
第 15 届国会 信息发布

自动驾驶车辆商业化上路前的可量化安全指标及规范AI决策的标准

Quantifiable Safety Metrics and AV Standards Governing AI Decision-Making Prior to Commercial Deployment on Public Roads

议员Alex Yeo书面询问代交通部长:陆路交通管理局(LTA)的两阶段部署就绪评估中是否有自动驾驶车辆(AV)必须达到的具体、可量化的安全指标;这些标准是什么;以及在首批商业AV获准上路前,《技术参考68》(TR 68)是否会进一步加强,或是否会出台一套规范AI决策协议的正式AV标准。代部长Jeffrey Siow答复:AV部署就绪评估框架规定了技术性能和公众接受度指标,AV须先达标才能载客并逐步过渡到无人驾驶运营,具体包括在实际部署...

政策信号: 新加坡的AV监管走渐进路线:以个案授权和性能指标把关,而非预先制定AI决策的硬性标准,TR 68复审预示商业化前规则将更新但节奏由监管方掌控。
🎙️ Mr Alex Yeo · Mr Jeffrey Siow
展开摘要、立场与原文

议员Alex Yeo书面询问代交通部长:陆路交通管理局(LTA)的两阶段部署就绪评估中是否有自动驾驶车辆(AV)必须达到的具体、可量化的安全指标;这些标准是什么;以及在首批商业AV获准上路前,《技术参考68》(TR 68)是否会进一步加强,或是否会出台一套规范AI决策协议的正式AV标准。代部长Jeffrey Siow答复:AV部署就绪评估框架规定了技术性能和公众接受度指标,AV须先达标才能载客并逐步过渡到无人驾驶运营,具体包括在实际部署路线上累计足够的无需安全员干预的行驶里程,以及在授权地理围栏区域内应对各种交通场景的能力。作为AV行业指南的《技术参考68》上次更新是在2021年,目前正在复审;在此期间,AV部署将继续沿用现行授权制度。答复未列出具体量化阈值,也未承诺在商业部署前出台规范AI决策的正式标准。

要点
  • • 部署就绪评估含技术性能与公众接受度两类指标
  • • 要求在部署路线累计足够的无安全员干预里程
  • • 《技术参考68》2021年最后更新,目前正在复审
  • • 复审期间AV部署沿用现行授权制度
政府立场
政府认为现行部署就绪评估框架和授权制度足以保障AV安全,《技术参考68》正在复审,暂不另行出台规范AI决策的正式标准。
"作为新加坡AV行业指南的《技术参考68》上次更新是在2021年,目前正在复审。"
原文节选(英文)
Mr Alex Yeo asked the Acting Minister for Transport (a) whether the Land Transport Authority (LTA) has specific, quantifiable safety metrics in the two-stage Deployment Readiness Assessment that autonomous vehicles (AVs) must meet; (b) if so, what these standards are; and (c) whether Technical Reference 68 will be further enhanced, or a formal set of AV standards that governs artificial intelligence decision-making protocols will be introduced, before the first commercial AVs are allowed on the roads. Mr Jeffrey Siow replied that the deployment readiness assessment framework for autonomous vehicles sets out technical performance and public acceptance metrics that must be met before the AVs are allowed to take passengers and eventually progress to driverless operations. These include clocking sufficient distance within the actual deployment route without the need for intervention by safety operators, and the ability to handle various traffic scenarios presented within the authorised geo-fenced area. On standards, the Acting Minister said that Technical Reference 68, which serves as guidelines for the AV industry in Singapore, was last updated in 2021 and is currently being reviewed. In the meantime, AV deployments will continue under the existing authorisation regime. The written answer did not enumerate specific quantitative thresholds for the technical performance or public acceptance metrics, and did not commit to introducing a formal set of AV standards governing AI decision-making protocols before the first commercial AVs are allowed on public roads.
第 15 届国会 信息发布

学校使用AI工具的数据保护标准及AI对学生学习成效影响的评估

Data Protection Standards for AI Tools Usage in Schools and Assessing AI's Impact on Student Learning Outcomes

议员Eileen Chong Pei Shan就学校使用AI工具向教育部长提出两项书面询问:一问学校在指导学生使用非新加坡学生学习平台(SLS)托管的AI工具时须遵循哪些最低数据保护标准、学生为完成课业使用此类工具前是否需要家长知情或同意、以及如何监督合规情况;二问教育部关于AI对学生学习影响研究的范围(覆盖的教育阶段和测量的学习成效指标)、研究结果的发布时间表,以及结果将如何用于制定或修订AI教育战略。教育部长李智陞的书面答复未展开实...

政策信号: 学校AI工具的数据保护与学习成效评估已成为国会高频议题,教育部选择以统一口径集中回应,显示其AI教育政策仍在研究先行、谨慎披露的阶段。
🎙️ Ms Eileen Chong Pei Shan · Desmond Lee
展开摘要、立场与原文

议员Eileen Chong Pei Shan就学校使用AI工具向教育部长提出两项书面询问:一问学校在指导学生使用非新加坡学生学习平台(SLS)托管的AI工具时须遵循哪些最低数据保护标准、学生为完成课业使用此类工具前是否需要家长知情或同意、以及如何监督合规情况;二问教育部关于AI对学生学习影响研究的范围(覆盖的教育阶段和测量的学习成效指标)、研究结果的发布时间表,以及结果将如何用于制定或修订AI教育战略。教育部长李智陞的书面答复未展开实质内容,仅指这些问题已由教育部在2026年5月6日对第2至5号口头议会询问的答复中一并处理,并请议员参阅《官方报告》第96卷第30期口头答复部分"监测小学生使用AI"一节。该答复反映家长关切的数据保护与学习成效问题已在前一日的口头质询中集中回应。

要点
  • • 议员追问非SLS托管AI工具的最低数据保护标准与家长同意要求
  • • 同时询问AI学习影响研究的范围、发布时间表和战略用途
  • • 教育部长书面答复仅援引5月6日口头答复,未给新内容
  • • 相关回应见《官方报告》第96卷第30期"监测小学生使用AI"
政府立场
教育部认为相关数据保护与AI学习影响问题已在2026年5月6日对口头询问的集中答复中处理,书面答复仅作援引而不再另行展开。
"这一问题已由教育部对2026年5月6日第2至5号口头议会询问的答复处理。"
原文节选(英文)
Ms Eileen Chong Pei Shan asked the Minister for Education two written questions on the use of AI tools in schools. First, she asked (a) what minimum data protection standards schools are required to apply when directing students to use AI tools not hosted on the Singapore Student Learning Space; (b) whether parental notification or consent is required before students use such tools for school-assigned work; and (c) how compliance with these standards is monitored. Second, she asked (a) what is the scope of the Ministry's study on the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on students' learning, in terms of education levels covered and learning outcomes measured; (b) what is the expected timeline for findings to be published; and (c) how the findings will be used to inform or revise the AI in education strategy. Mr Desmond Lee replied that these questions had been addressed by the Ministry of Education's answer to oral Parliamentary Question Nos 2 to 5 on 6 May 2026, and referred the Member to "Monitoring AI Use by Primary School Students", Official Report, 6 May 2026, Vol 96, Issue 30, Oral Answers to Questions section. The written reply itself provided no further substantive details on data protection standards, parental consent requirements, compliance monitoring, or the scope and timeline of the Ministry's study; the full government response on these matters is recorded under the oral answer delivered the previous day.
第 15 届国会 实质辩论

人工智能(AI)转型不容无就业式增长(主辩论)

An Artificial Intelligence (AI) Transition with No Jobless Growth (Main Debate)

5月6日国会续辩职总秘书长黄志明提出的"人工智能转型不容无就业式增长"动议,约20名议员发言,是第15届国会迄今最具分量的AI辩论。动议要求承认AI的经济变革力量,把增长锚定在公平、韧性与人人有机会,装备工人与企业,确认新加坡不容无就业增长。执政党与工运议员聚焦岗位重设计、公司培训委员会(CTC)与新设的三方就业理事会;工人党议员全数支持动议但另提结构方案:严燕松倡全民AI股权基金(成年公民每年500新元分红加在职培训基金),Andre...

政策信号: AI就业冲击已升为国家级议程:政府明确以三方机制而非立法保障应对AI转型,公共资助将与工人成果挂钩,求职者援助计划门槛与裁员通报制度料将检讨增强。
展开摘要、立场与原文

5月6日国会续辩职总秘书长黄志明提出的"人工智能转型不容无就业式增长"动议,约20名议员发言,是第15届国会迄今最具分量的AI辩论。动议要求承认AI的经济变革力量,把增长锚定在公平、韧性与人人有机会,装备工人与企业,确认新加坡不容无就业增长。执政党与工运议员聚焦岗位重设计、公司培训委员会(CTC)与新设的三方就业理事会;工人党议员全数支持动议但另提结构方案:严燕松倡全民AI股权基金(成年公民每年500新元分红加在职培训基金),Andre Low主张无收入上限的裁员保险、再培训税收抵免与"AI收益审计",Kenneth Tiong呼吁高端AI工具全民可及。人力部长陈诗龙驳斥工人党方案是"和解金"而非赋权,引人力部调查称采用AI企业仅约6%裁员,承诺研究提高求职者援助收入门槛并推动更早裁员通报。朝野最终均表态支持动议。

要点
  • • 约20名议员发言近7小时,朝野全数表态支持动议,但在政策工具上针锋相对
  • • 工人党提全民AI股权基金(成人每年500新元分红)与无收入上限裁员保险
  • • 陈诗龙引人力部调查:采用AI企业仅约6%裁员,七成已见生产力提升
  • • 政府允研究提高求职者援助收入门槛,推动雇主在员工离职前通报裁员
政府立场
政府拒绝以现金再分配为主的保障路线,坚持"投资于人":通过技能与劳动力发展局、三方就业理事会和企业劳动力转型配套让工人随AI增长共同进步,承诺"保不住每一份工作,但会保护每一个工人"。
质询立场
工人党议员支持动议本身,但批评现行求职者援助计划门槛过低、递减设计逼工人仓促就业,主张无收入上限的裁员保险、全民AI股权基金、再培训税收抵免与强制性AI转型通知等结构性保障。
"你们两位的提案都不是赋权。在我看来,那是一种和解金——认定大规模岗位流失不可避免,我们能做的最多只是减轻冲击。"
原文节选(英文)
Parliament resumed debate on NTUC Secretary-General Ng Chee Meng's motion calling on the House to recognise AI's transformative power, anchor AI-enabled growth in fairness, resilience and opportunity for all, equip workers and enterprises, and affirm that Singapore must not have jobless growth because every worker matters. Around twenty MPs spoke. NMP Mark Lee urged a single front door for enterprise AI grants and a shift to place-and-train; Mr Saktiandi Supaat warned of a divide between AI haves and have-nots. Ms Yeo Wan Ling said union ground work showed bus captains spend only about 20% of their day driving, so job redesign must rest on actual workflows. Workers' Party MPs supported the motion while proposing alternatives. Mr Gerald Giam proposed a National AI Equity Fund paying a $500 annual dividend to every adult citizen plus an on-the-job mastery fund, financed by a corporate tax rise on firms with profits above $100 million and a larger draw on net investment returns. Mr Andre Low argued the tapering, $5,000-capped Jobseeker Support scheme pushes workers into the first job rather than the right one, urging WP's redundancy insurance paying 40% of last-drawn salary with no ceiling, a retraining tax credit and an annual AI gains audit. Mr Kenneth Tiong called for universal premium AI agent access and a 90-day transition notice. Ms He Ting Ru cited IMF estimates that 77% of Singapore's workforce is highly exposed to AI; Assoc Prof Jamus Lim warned of a graduate hiring slowdown. Labour MP Patrick Tay urged raising the Jobseeker Support ceiling to the PME median of $8,400. Responding, Minister of State Jasmin Lau said companies receiving public support must deliver worker outcomes; Senior Minister of State Desmond Tan detailed NTUC's AI-Ready SG, with 3,800 Company Training Committees and 50% subsidies on 21 AI tools. Manpower Minister Tan See Leng rejected the WP's payout-centred proposals as a settlement rather than empowerment, citing MOM's survey that only about 6% of AI-adopting firms cut headcount; he committed to study raising the Jobseeker Support threshold, sought retrenchment notification by workers' last day, and confirmed six months of free premium AI tools with selected SkillsFuture courses. Every speaker, including all WP members, declared support for the motion.
第 15 届国会 实质辩论

不容无就业增长的人工智能(AI)转型(辩论总结)

An Artificial Intelligence (AI) Transition with No Jobless Growth (Debate Conclusion)

"AI转型不容无就业增长"动议辩论5月6日进入收尾。澄清环节中,工人党议员刘吴扬强调强社会安全网与鼓励国人拥抱AI并非零和;严燕松为其"全国AI公平基金"辩护,称该基金不是"对失败的补偿"、近半资金将直接投资工人技能,并追问政府如何让工人结构性分享AI生产力红利,人力部长陈诗龙回应分享方式是"实际收入的提升",新加坡劳动力发展局(SWDA)将设明确KPI,把企业劳动力培训配套与职位重设计同实际工资和职业发展挂钩。工人党Kenneth T...

政策信号: 动议一致通过确立"AI增长不容无就业化"为跨党派共识,但政府偏好三方协作与培训路径、回绝结构性财富分享机制的立场,与反对党的制度化保障主张之间的张力,将持续塑造就业法修订与AI补助计划的设计。
展开摘要、立场与原文

"AI转型不容无就业增长"动议辩论5月6日进入收尾。澄清环节中,工人党议员刘吴扬强调强社会安全网与鼓励国人拥抱AI并非零和;严燕松为其"全国AI公平基金"辩护,称该基金不是"对失败的补偿"、近半资金将直接投资工人技能,并追问政府如何让工人结构性分享AI生产力红利,人力部长陈诗龙回应分享方式是"实际收入的提升",新加坡劳动力发展局(SWDA)将设明确KPI,把企业劳动力培训配套与职位重设计同实际工资和职业发展挂钩。工人党Kenneth Tiong质疑技能创前程课程质量、主张普及前沿AI工具;Mark Lee则质疑其"AI裁员90天强制通知"提案在渐进式转型下难以操作。杨涴凌追问AI补助是否强制绑定职位重设计,政务部长Jasmin Lau表示方向已定、细节将与三方伙伴商定。黄志明总结这场历时7小时18分钟、24场发言的辩论,支持把求职者援助计划合格门槛升至PME中位月入约8,400新元,表明职总对援助形式持开放态度,动议最终获国会一致通过。

要点
  • • 辩论历时7小时18分钟、24场发言,动议最终获国会一致通过
  • • 陈诗龙:SWDA将设KPI,把培训配套与职位重设计同实际工资挂钩
  • • 工人党坚持AI公平基金、裁员保险、90天AI裁员通知等结构性方案
  • • 职总支持把JSS合格门槛升至PME中位月入约8,400新元
政府立场
政府承诺不把AI增长的结果交给市场决定:公共支持将附带工人结果预期,并通过SWDA的KPI让AI红利以实际收入提升和职业发展的形式分享给工人,而非建立结构性财富再分配基金。
质询立场
工人党议员主张更结构性的保障——全国AI公平基金、裁员保险、AI裁员90天强制通知与可申诉机制——并认为强社会安全网正是国人敢于冒险拥抱AI机遇的前提,而非与之对立。
"全国AI公平基金不是对失败的补偿,而是为安心与成功提供所需的保障。"
原文节选(英文)
Debate on the Motion resumed on 6 May 2026 with a round of clarifications. Mr Andre Low (WP) welcomed Minister of State Jasmin Lau's position that automation and augmentation are not mutually exclusive, and pressed Minister Tan See Leng on his characterisation of WP proposals, arguing that strong social safety nets are precisely what enable Singaporeans to take risks and embrace AI. Mr Gerald Giam (WP) defended his proposed National AI Equity Fund — one limb giving workers a direct stake in prosperity, the other, nearly half the fund, investing in skills and on-the-job training — and asked how the Government would move from discretionary spending to a structural sharing of AI wealth. Dr Tan See Leng replied that sharing would come through real income improvement, with SWDA setting clear KPIs tying the Enterprise Workforce Training Package and job redesign to real wages and career progression. Mr Kenneth Tiong (WP) questioned whether SkillsFuture enrolment is a reliable proxy for seriousness, citing residents unimpressed with course quality; Dr Tan replied that the aim is to bring as broad a segment of the population as possible to "base camp". Ms Yeo Wan Ling asked whether job redesign would be an explicit condition of AI grants and what worker outcomes would be tracked; Ms Lau said the direction is committed but details would be discussed with tripartite partners. Mr Mark Lee challenged Mr Tiong's proposed 90-day mandatory notice for AI-driven role elimination as operationally ambiguous when transformation is gradual and task-based; Mr Tiong pointed to an adjudicative process, citing a court case in Hangzhou. Wrapping up after 24 speeches and over seven and a half hours, Mr Ng Chee Meng addressed Members' contributions across his four practical moves, supported raising Jobseeker Support eligibility to the PME median income of about $8,400 as called for by Mr Patrick Tay, said NTUC is not wedded to any particular form of support in response to Mr Low's redundancy insurance proposal, and declared that "this House stands with you". After a final exchange with Mr Giam on wage support for on-the-job training, the question was put and agreed to.
第 15 届国会 信息发布

AI 研发药物的监管框架及其对临床试验的影响,以及国家患者数据保护措施是否充分

Regulatory Framework for AI-developed Drugs and Implications on Clinical Trials, and Adequacy of Data Protection Safegua...

叶汉荣议员书面询问社会政策统筹部长兼卫生部长:卫生部是否研究过 AI 研发药物能否缩短或绕过临床试验;若可以,AI 药物的审批与传统药物有何不同;现行哪些法规管辖 AI 医疗创新;以及当 AI 为产品概念化而调用国家患者数据时,现有个人数据保护与网络安全措施能否防止数据泄露。卫生部长王乙康答复:AI 研发药物与传统药物必须满足同样的国际质量、安全和疗效标准,不存在捷径;卫生科学局的监管思路与美国 FDA、欧洲药品管理局等国际机构一致,这...

政策信号: 新加坡在 AI 医药监管上选择与 FDA、EMA 等国际机构对齐的"同一标准"路线,强调 AI 提升研发效率但不松动安全证据门槛,体现稳健而非激进的医疗 AI 监管取向。
展开摘要、立场与原文

叶汉荣议员书面询问社会政策统筹部长兼卫生部长:卫生部是否研究过 AI 研发药物能否缩短或绕过临床试验;若可以,AI 药物的审批与传统药物有何不同;现行哪些法规管辖 AI 医疗创新;以及当 AI 为产品概念化而调用国家患者数据时,现有个人数据保护与网络安全措施能否防止数据泄露。卫生部长王乙康答复:AI 研发药物与传统药物必须满足同样的国际质量、安全和疗效标准,不存在捷径;卫生科学局的监管思路与美国 FDA、欧洲药品管理局等国际机构一致,这些机构已就 AI 在药物研发中的负责任使用提出关键原则。患者数据受到包括《个人数据保护法》在内的现有数据保护和网络安全措施的有力保护,政府将持续监测发展并按需强化保障。答复确认了"同一标准"原则——AI 不改变药物审批的证据门槛。

要点
  • • 叶汉荣问 AI 研发药物能否缩短或绕过临床试验
  • • 王乙康:AI 药物与传统药物须满足同一国际质量安全疗效标准
  • • 卫生科学局监管思路与美国 FDA、欧洲药品管理局对齐
  • • 患者数据受《个人数据保护法》等现有保障有力保护
政府立场
AI 研发药物不享有审批捷径,必须与传统药物满足同一国际质量、安全与疗效标准,患者数据已有有力保护并将按需强化。
"无论是 AI 研发还是传统研发的药物,都必须满足同样的国际质量、安全和疗效标准。"
原文节选(英文)
Mr Yip Hon Weng asked the Coordinating Minister for Social Policies and Minister for Health whether the Ministry has studied if AI-developed drugs can shorten or bypass clinical trials; if so, how the regulatory approval of AI-developed drugs would differ from conventional products; what regulations currently govern AI healthcare innovations; and whether existing personal data protection and cybersecurity safeguards can prevent data leakage when AI accesses national patient data for product conceptualisation. Mr Ong Ye Kung, the Minister for Health, replied that both artificial intelligence-developed and conventionally developed drugs must meet the same international standards of quality, safety and efficacy. The Health Sciences Authority's regulatory approach is aligned with that of international agencies, such as the US Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency, which have outlined key principles on the responsible use of AI in drug development. On the data protection questions, the Minister stated that patient data is robustly protected, including when it is used for AI development. Existing data protection and cybersecurity safeguards, including those under the Personal Data Protection Act, ensure that patient confidentiality is maintained and that the data is protected. He added that the Government will continue to monitor developments and strengthen its safeguards as needed. The reply gave no indication of any separate or expedited approval pathway for AI-developed drugs: the same evidentiary requirements, including clinical trials, apply regardless of how a drug candidate was discovered or designed, and Singapore's regulator will track how international counterparts evolve their principles for AI in drug development.
第 15 届国会 温和质询

深度伪造检测器 INDEPTH 面向公众开放前的准确率基准与责任框架,及在 ScamShield 中集成实时媒体验证

Accuracy Benchmarks and Liability Frameworks for Intelligence Deepfake Detector Before Public Rollout and Integrating Re...

工人党议员林瑞莲书面询问数字发展与信息部长:智能深度伪造检测器 INDEPTH 从公共部门使用转向公众使用前,须满足什么技术准确率基准或责任框架;政府是否会在 ScamShield 应用中试点验证 API,为公民提供可疑媒体的实时风险评分。部长杨莉明答复:INDEPTH 是专为政府机构设计的深度伪造检测平台,不打算向公众开放;公开其检测能力不符合公共利益,因为恶意行为者可能利用这些信息。关于 ScamShield,她说明该应用可拦截已核...

政策信号: 政府在深度伪造防御上坚持"能力保密"路线:检测工具留在政府内部、不向公众下放,公民端防护走 ScamShield 渐进强化与公众教育,而非提供检测即服务。
展开摘要、立场与原文

工人党议员林瑞莲书面询问数字发展与信息部长:智能深度伪造检测器 INDEPTH 从公共部门使用转向公众使用前,须满足什么技术准确率基准或责任框架;政府是否会在 ScamShield 应用中试点验证 API,为公民提供可疑媒体的实时风险评分。部长杨莉明答复:INDEPTH 是专为政府机构设计的深度伪造检测平台,不打算向公众开放;公开其检测能力不符合公共利益,因为恶意行为者可能利用这些信息。关于 ScamShield,她说明该应用可拦截已核实的诈骗电话、过滤诈骗短信,并允许用户查验和举报含深度伪造等篡改痕迹的可疑来电、消息及链接;政府将继续强化其检测能力和公众教育,但现阶段无计划开发实时风险评分的验证 API。张力在于:反对党要求把政府级检测工具下放给公众,政府以安全保密为由拒绝。

要点
  • • 林瑞莲问 INDEPTH 开放公众使用前须满足什么准确率与责任框架
  • • 杨莉明:INDEPTH 专供政府机构,公开检测能力恐被恶意利用
  • • ScamShield 已可举报含深度伪造痕迹的可疑消息和链接
  • • 现阶段无计划在 ScamShield 开发实时风险评分验证 API
政府立场
INDEPTH 定位为政府机构专用平台、不向公众开放,以免恶意者利用其检测能力信息;公众反诈依托 ScamShield 现有功能持续强化,暂不开发实时风险评分 API。
质询立场
工人党林瑞莲主张让公众也能获得深度伪造检测能力,要求明确 INDEPTH 公众化的技术与责任门槛,并建议在 ScamShield 试点实时验证 API。
"公开其检测能力不符合公共利益,因为恶意行为者可能利用这些信息。"
原文节选(英文)
Ms Sylvia Lim asked the Minister for Digital Development and Information what technical accuracy benchmarks or liability frameworks the Intelligent Deepfake Detector (INDEPTH) must meet before it is transitioned from public service use to public use, and whether the Government will pilot a verification API within the ScamShield app to provide citizens with real-time risk scores for suspicious media. Mrs Josephine Teo, the Minister for Digital Development and Information, replied that INDEPTH is a deepfake detection platform designed specifically for Government agencies and is not intended for public use. She stated that it is not in the public interest to reveal its detection capabilities, as malicious actors may exploit such information. On the second question, the Minister explained that the ScamShield app was developed by Open Government Products in collaboration with the National Crime Prevention Council and the Singapore Police Force to protect the public from scams. It blocks scam calls from numbers verified by the authorities and filters scam SMSes. It also allows users to check and report suspicious calls, messages — such as SMS, WhatsApp and Telegram — and website links, including those that may show signs of digital manipulation, such as deepfakes. The Government will continue to strengthen ScamShield's existing scam detection capabilities and reporting channels, and will step up public education to better protect users from evolving scam tactics. However, there are no plans at this juncture to develop a verification API within the ScamShield app to provide real-time risk scores for suspicious media.
第 15 届国会 温和质询

确保面向公众的自主 AI 代理具备实质性人类问责,及高风险行业转向强制治理的路径

Ensuring Meaningful Human Accountability for Public-facing Autonomous AI Agents and Pathways to Mandatory Governance in...

工人党议员林瑞莲就《代理式 AI 示范治理框架》发布后续书面询问数字发展与信息部长:在没有明确披露要求的情况下,部门如何确保与公众交互的自主 AI 代理具备"实质性人类问责";什么样的触发条件会促使该框架从自愿性准则转为高风险行业的强制性标准。部长杨莉明答复:框架为机构部署代理式 AI 提供指引——高风险或不可逆的操作不得在无人审核下执行,机构应设置需人工批准的检查点或行动边界;框架同时强调对用户透明,例如预先声明用户在与代理交互及其能...

政策信号: 新加坡对代理式 AI 延续"软法先行"路线:以示范框架设定人工审核与透明度预期,依靠行业监管机构和国际实践迭代,强制监管的门槛刻意留白,保留政策弹性。
展开摘要、立场与原文

工人党议员林瑞莲就《代理式 AI 示范治理框架》发布后续书面询问数字发展与信息部长:在没有明确披露要求的情况下,部门如何确保与公众交互的自主 AI 代理具备"实质性人类问责";什么样的触发条件会促使该框架从自愿性准则转为高风险行业的强制性标准。部长杨莉明答复:框架为机构部署代理式 AI 提供指引——高风险或不可逆的操作不得在无人审核下执行,机构应设置需人工批准的检查点或行动边界;框架同时强调对用户透明,例如预先声明用户在与代理交互及其能力和数据访问权限。她表示代理式 AI 的应用场景和保障仍在演变,政府将与行业监管机构观察各行业部署实践、借鉴国际经验、按需调整框架——未给出从自愿转向强制的触发条件。张力在于:反对党追问治理硬化的明确路径,政府保持"观察—调整"的弹性立场。

要点
  • • 林瑞莲追问自主 AI 代理如何落实"实质性人类问责"
  • • 框架要求高风险或不可逆操作必须经人工审核批准
  • • 框架强调预先告知用户在与 AI 代理交互及其权限
  • • 政府未给出自愿框架转为强制标准的具体触发条件
政府立场
代理式 AI 治理现阶段以自愿性框架引导——高风险操作须人工审核、对用户保持透明,政府与行业监管机构持续观察部署实践并按需调整,暂不设定转为强制标准的触发条件。
质询立场
工人党林瑞莲质疑无披露要求下"实质性人类问责"难以落实,要求政府明确框架从自愿准则升级为高风险行业强制标准的触发条件。
"不应允许高风险或不可逆的操作在没有人工审核的情况下执行。"
原文节选(英文)
Ms Sylvia Lim asked the Minister for Digital Development and Information, following the launch of the Model AI Governance Framework for Agentic AI, how the Ministry intends to ensure "meaningful human accountability" for autonomous AI agents that interact with the public in the absence of explicit disclosure requirements, and what triggers would necessitate transitioning the Framework from a voluntary code to enforceable standards for high-risk sectors. Mrs Josephine Teo, the Minister for Digital Development and Information, replied that the Model Artificial Intelligence Governance Framework for Agentic AI sets out guidance for organisations to ensure meaningful human accountability in deploying agentic AI. Organisations should not allow high-stakes or irreversible actions to take place without human review; appropriate actions therefore include identifying checkpoints or action boundaries that require human approval. The Framework also emphasises transparency towards users, such as declaring upfront that users are interacting with agents, as well as the agents' capabilities and data access. The Minister noted that agentic AI use cases and the appropriate safeguards are still evolving. Hence, together with sector regulators, the Government will continue to monitor how various sectors deploy agentic AI and put these principles into practice, and will continue to consult and learn from best practices internationally, making adjustments to the framework as necessary. The reply did not specify any concrete triggers that would convert the voluntary framework into enforceable standards for high-risk sectors, leaving the pathway from guidance to regulation open-ended.
第 15 届国会 温和质询

对AI生成的政治深度伪造视频的评估及POFMA与OCHA下的监管介入门槛

Assessment of AI-generated Deepfake Political Videos and Regulatory Intervention Thresholds under POFMA and OCHA

工人党议员林瑞莲书面询问数字发展与信息部长:政府在判定涉及政治公职人员的AI深度伪造视频"明显属于伪造"、无需援引《防止网络虚假信息和网络操纵法》(POFMA)发出指示之前,是否对弱势群体做过测试;以及此类视频须造成何种程度的公众混淆,才会触发《网络犯罪危害法》(OCHA)下的主动干预。部长杨莉明答复:POFMA下部长可对在新加坡传播且涉及公共利益的虚假事实陈述发出更正指示,包括深度伪造视频;OCHA下政府可在合理怀疑网络活动涉及附表一...

政策信号: 政府在深度伪造监管上坚持个案裁量而非量化门槛,并把媒体素养教育置于与立法同等的位置,短期内不会为干预设定硬性标准。
展开摘要、立场与原文

工人党议员林瑞莲书面询问数字发展与信息部长:政府在判定涉及政治公职人员的AI深度伪造视频"明显属于伪造"、无需援引《防止网络虚假信息和网络操纵法》(POFMA)发出指示之前,是否对弱势群体做过测试;以及此类视频须造成何种程度的公众混淆,才会触发《网络犯罪危害法》(OCHA)下的主动干预。部长杨莉明答复:POFMA下部长可对在新加坡传播且涉及公共利益的虚假事实陈述发出更正指示,包括深度伪造视频;OCHA下政府可在合理怀疑网络活动涉及附表一所列罪行、或为诈骗及恶意网络活动做准备时,指示平台屏蔽新加坡用户访问。她强调政府对有害内容做整体评估,干预不取决于单一因素;并称公共教育与立法同等重要,列举IMDA"数字技能为生活"框架和SG数字办公室面向年长者的生成式AI工作坊。

要点
  • • 林瑞莲问:判定深伪视频"明显伪造"前是否测试过弱势群体
  • • 杨莉明:POFMA可发更正指示,OCHA可令平台屏蔽访问
  • • 政府整体评估有害内容,干预不取决于任何单一因素
  • • IMDA数字技能框架与年长者生成式AI工作坊承担公共教育
政府立场
政府认为现有POFMA与OCHA框架足以应对深度伪造视频,干预基于个案整体评估而非单一量化门槛,公共教育与立法同等重要。
质询立场
林瑞莲质疑政府在不动用POFMA时是否实际验证过弱势群体的辨别能力,并要求政府明确OCHA主动干预所需的公众混淆门槛。
"因此,公共教育举措与立法同等重要,有助于我们的人民在上网时更加警惕、更有辨别力。"
原文节选(英文)
Ms Sylvia Lim asked the Minister for Digital Development and Information (a) whether the Government does testing on vulnerable groups before determining that AI-generated deepfake videos involving political office-holders are so obviously fabricated that directions under the Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act 2019 (POFMA) are unnecessary; and (b) what threshold of public confusion arising from such videos must be met before a proactive intervention under the Online Criminal Harms Act 2023 (OCHA). Mrs Josephine Teo replied that under POFMA, a Minister can issue a Correction Direction if a false statement of fact has been communicated in Singapore and it is in the public interest to issue it, and that this includes online falsehoods communicated via deepfake videos. Under OCHA, the Government can issue directions to online service providers to disable Singapore users' access to online content or activity when there is reasonable suspicion that the activity is in furtherance of a specified criminal offence under the First Schedule of OCHA, or when there is suspicion or reason to believe that the activity is preparatory to the commission of a scam or malicious cyber activity; this includes deepfake images and videos. The Minister said the Government assesses harmful online content holistically and determines the appropriate response based on a range of factors for each case and the legal conditions under the relevant legislation, so that intervention is not determined by any single factor alone. She acknowledged that there are segments of society who may be less confident in their ability to discern between fact and falsehood online, and said public education initiatives are therefore as important as legislation. The Digital Skills for Life framework, developed by the Infocomm Media Development Authority, equips Singaporeans with skills to identify and respond to false and misleading content, while the SG Digital Office runs Gen AI workshops for seniors covering how to stay safe and smart online against AI-generated misinformation.
第 15 届国会 温和质询

监管智能眼镜与AI可穿戴设备以防止隐蔽录制和未经同意的数据收集

Regulating Smart Glasses and AI Wearables to Prevent Covert Recording and Unconsented Data Collection

工人党议员严燕松书面询问数字发展与信息部长:部里是否会出台新规,要求智能眼镜配备可视指示灯以防止在公共场所偷拍;以及如何确保个人使用的AI可穿戴设备不会在未经周围非用户明确同意的情况下大规模采集生物特征或环境数据。部长杨莉明答复:《个人数据保护法》(PDPA)下,组织(包括为商业目的创作内容的个人)须对个人数据的收集和使用负责,拍照、录像或录音适用同样的规则和原则,与设备形态无关。虽然PDPA一般不要求在公共场所拍摄前征得同意,但组织对...

政策信号: 面对AI可穿戴设备带来的新隐私风险,新加坡选择依托技术中立的现有法律而非设备专属立法,监管重心放在数据的后续使用而非采集端硬件。
展开摘要、立场与原文

工人党议员严燕松书面询问数字发展与信息部长:部里是否会出台新规,要求智能眼镜配备可视指示灯以防止在公共场所偷拍;以及如何确保个人使用的AI可穿戴设备不会在未经周围非用户明确同意的情况下大规模采集生物特征或环境数据。部长杨莉明答复:《个人数据保护法》(PDPA)下,组织(包括为商业目的创作内容的个人)须对个人数据的收集和使用负责,拍照、录像或录音适用同样的规则和原则,与设备形态无关。虽然PDPA一般不要求在公共场所拍摄前征得同意,但组织对个人数据的后续使用或披露(包括用于AI功能)必须出于合理目的并遵守其他适用法律。她还指出,未经同意录制、分享或滥用私密内容可能构成《刑法》《防止骚扰法》下的刑事罪行,《网络安全(救济与问责)法》也可追究网络内容创作者对受害者造成伤害的责任。答复未承诺出台针对智能眼镜的设备专属新规。

要点
  • • 严燕松提议要求智能眼镜配备防偷拍可视指示灯
  • • 杨莉明:PDPA规则技术中立,与设备形态无关
  • • 公共场所拍摄一般无需同意,但后续AI用途须合理合法
  • • 刑法、防骚扰法及网络安全法可追责滥用私密内容者
政府立场
政府认为PDPA及刑法等现行法律技术中立、足以覆盖智能眼镜和AI可穿戴设备,暂不出台设备专属的新监管要求。
质询立场
严燕松主张为智能眼镜引入录制可视指示等新规,以防止公共场所偷拍及对旁观者生物特征数据的大规模无授权采集。
"无论设备形态如何,拍照、录像或录音都适用同样的规则和原则。"
原文节选(英文)
Mr Gerald Giam Yean Song asked the Minister for Digital Development and Information (a) whether the Ministry will introduce new regulations for visual indicator requirements for smart glasses to prevent surreptitious recording in public spaces; and (b) how the Ministry ensures that AI-enabled wearable devices used by individuals do not facilitate the mass collection of biometric or environmental data without the explicit consent of non-users in the vicinity. Mrs Josephine Teo replied that under the Personal Data Protection Act (PDPA), organisations, including individuals creating content for commercial purposes, are accountable for how personal data is collected and used, and that the taking of photographs or the making of video or audio recordings is subject to the same rules and principles regardless of the form factor of the device. She noted that while the PDPA generally does not require consent to be sought from persons for photography or recording in public spaces, organisations must ensure that any subsequent use or disclosure of the personal data, including for artificial intelligence features, is for a reasonable purpose and complies with any other applicable laws. Regardless of the capacity in which they are acting, individuals should also note that non-consensual recording, sharing or other misuse of intimate or private content may constitute criminal offences under existing laws, including the Penal Code and the Protection from Harassment Act. Under the Online Safety (Relief and Accountability) Act, creators of online content may also be held accountable for harms caused to victims. The Minister did not announce any new device-specific regulations, such as mandatory recording indicators, for smart glasses or AI wearables.
第 15 届国会 温和质询

评估AI对劳动者竞争力与就业能力的影响及对受影响员工的针对性扶持措施

Assessment of AI Impact on Worker Competitiveness and Employability, and Targeted Support Interventions for Affected Wor...

工人党议员何廷儒就AI对劳动力市场的冲击向人力部长提出两项书面询问:一问AI技能薪资溢价的最新评估及其在行业和资历层面的差异,二问最易被取代的职业评估,以及对文员、后台和入门级知识型岗位员工的针对性干预。部长陈诗龙答复:人力部数据显示,资讯通信、金融服务和专业服务领域的PMET(专业人士、经理、执行员与技师)近年裁员率相对较高,但这反映的是持续重组而非PMET需求萎缩;由于企业AI应用仍处早期,人力部没有AI技能薪资溢价的数据。扶持措施...

政策信号: 政府承认尚无AI对薪资和岗位影响的量化数据,政策重心放在普及AI技能与工具使用,以"提升劳动者"而非"限制企业重组"应对AI冲击。
展开摘要、立场与原文

工人党议员何廷儒就AI对劳动力市场的冲击向人力部长提出两项书面询问:一问AI技能薪资溢价的最新评估及其在行业和资历层面的差异,二问最易被取代的职业评估,以及对文员、后台和入门级知识型岗位员工的针对性干预。部长陈诗龙答复:人力部数据显示,资讯通信、金融服务和专业服务领域的PMET(专业人士、经理、执行员与技师)近年裁员率相对较高,但这反映的是持续重组而非PMET需求萎缩;由于企业AI应用仍处早期,人力部没有AI技能薪资溢价的数据。扶持措施包括:新加坡劳动力局的职业转换计划帮助文员和后台岗位员工转入前景更好的职位,毕业生行业实习计划为未就业应届毕业生提供结构化工作经验;精深技能发展局正在简化AI学习路径;今年晚些时候,参加合格AI培训课程的新加坡人将获得六个月高级版AI工具的免费使用权。政府表示将持续监测劳动力市场并动态调整支持。

要点
  • • 资讯通信、金融与专业服务PMET裁员率较高,官方归因于重组而非需求萎缩
  • • 人力部无AI技能薪资溢价数据,称企业AI应用仍处早期
  • • 职业转换计划、毕业生行业实习计划针对文员后台岗位与应届生
  • • 今年起合格AI课程学员可免费用六个月高级版AI工具
政府立场
政府认为PMET裁员上升反映重组而非需求萎缩,将通过职业转换、毕业生实习、AI学习路径和免费AI工具等组合措施帮助劳动者保持竞争力。
质询立场
何廷儒关注文员、后台和入门级知识型岗位面临的AI取代风险,要求政府给出薪资溢价与高危职业的量化评估及针对性干预。
"今年晚些时候,参加合格AI培训课程的新加坡人将获得六个月高级版AI工具的免费使用权,以培养熟悉度并让他们在真实场景中练习应用这些工具。"
原文节选(英文)
Ms He Ting Ru asked the Minister for Manpower two written questions: first, the Ministry's latest assessment of the salary premium for workers with AI skills in Singapore, including how it varies by sector and seniority, and what further steps will be taken to ensure Singaporean workers acquire these skills and remain competitive; second, the Ministry's latest assessment of the top occupations at risk of displacement, and what targeted interventions are being considered to address employability concerns, especially for workers in clerical, back-office and entry-level knowledge roles. Dr Tan See Leng replied that the Ministry of Manpower's data shows that professionals, managers, executives and technicians (PMETs) in the information and communications, financial services and professional services sectors have seen relatively higher retrenchment incidence in recent years compared to other sectors and occupation groups, and that higher incidence of retrenchment indicates ongoing restructuring rather than a contraction in PMET demand. MOM does not have data on salary premiums for AI skills, as AI adoption by companies in Singapore is still at an early stage, and salaries depend on many factors beyond AI proficiency, including sector, experience and market conditions. On support measures, the Minister cited Workforce Singapore's Career Conversion Programmes, which support individuals, including those in clerical and back-office roles, to pivot into new job roles with good longer-term prospects, and the Graduate Industry Traineeship scheme, which provides fresh graduates who have not found full-time jobs with structured, industry-relevant work experience. SkillsFuture Singapore is making AI learning pathways easier to navigate so working adults can identify courses suited to their proficiency levels and sought by employers. Later this year, Singaporeans who take up eligible AI training courses will receive six months complimentary access to premium versions of AI tools. The Government will continue to monitor labour market trends closely and calibrate support as jobs evolve.
第 15 届国会 实质辩论

不容无就业增长的人工智能(AI)转型(动议提出)

An Artificial Intelligence (AI) Transition with No Jobless Growth (Motion Moved)

全国职工总会(NTUC)秘书长黄志明(惹兰加由议员)5月5日晚提出"AI转型不容无就业增长"国会动议(联署人:Mark Lee、萨克蒂安迪、杨涴凌),要求国会确认AI驱动的增长必须以公平、韧性和人人有机会为锚,新加坡不能出现"无就业增长"。他援引NTUC调查(五分之一受访者把工作保障列为首要担忧、56%的PME自认需提升技能)说明工人焦虑,并提出四项实际举措:建立立足本地的劳动力市场情报与前瞻系统;通过企业培训委员会(CTC,2019年...

政策信号: 劳工运动主动为AI时代重订"经济进步、工人共进"的社会契约,预示新加坡将以三方机制为核心载体,把就业结果与工人保障内嵌进国家AI增长议程而非事后补救。
展开摘要、立场与原文

全国职工总会(NTUC)秘书长黄志明(惹兰加由议员)5月5日晚提出"AI转型不容无就业增长"国会动议(联署人:Mark Lee、萨克蒂安迪、杨涴凌),要求国会确认AI驱动的增长必须以公平、韧性和人人有机会为锚,新加坡不能出现"无就业增长"。他援引NTUC调查(五分之一受访者把工作保障列为首要担忧、56%的PME自认需提升技能)说明工人焦虑,并提出四项实际举措:建立立足本地的劳动力市场情报与前瞻系统;通过企业培训委员会(CTC,2019年以来已设立逾3,800个、惠及逾30万工人)支持企业携工人转型,并提议与全国雇主联合会(SNEF)在三方就业理事会下共同推广;扩大AI-Ready SG等培训路径(目标未来数年逾100万个培训名额);以及让被裁员工有尊严地重新站起,包括裁员前向政府提前通报、把技能创前程求职者援助计划(JSS)覆盖面从月入中位数约5,000新元上调至PME中位收入水平。发言结束后辩论延至次日继续。

要点
  • • 动议四点:承认AI变革力、增长须公平、装备工人与企业、不容无就业增长
  • • NTUC调查:五分之一受访者最忧工作保障,56%的PME认为需提升技能
  • • CTC自2019年已逾3,800个、惠及30万工人,提议与SNEF共同全国推广
  • • 建议JSS覆盖面从月入中位数约5,000新元上调至PME中位收入水平
政府立场
政府已由总理亲自主持全国人工智能理事会、在财政预算案中承诺支持工人和企业适应AI经济,并与劳资双方成立三方就业理事会推动企业转型、职位重设计与工人过渡。
"不是用AI取代工人,而是让AI为所有工种、所有企业的工人服务。"
原文节选(英文)
At 8.29 pm on 5 May 2026, Mr Ng Chee Meng (Jalan Kayu), Secretary-General of NTUC, moved a Motion — also standing in the names of Mr Mark Lee, Mr Saktiandi Supaat and Ms Yeo Wan Ling — that the House recognise the transformative power of AI to drive Singapore's next phase of economic development, anchor AI-enabled growth in fairness, resilience and opportunity for all, equip workers and enterprises to seize new opportunities, and affirm that Singapore must not have jobless growth. Speaking to anxious young graduates, mid-career PMEs and blue-collar workers, he noted that AI is automating routine junior tasks even as it creates new roles; one in five NTUC survey respondents cited job security as their top concern, and 56% of PMEs felt they needed to upskill. He outlined four practical moves. First, build a Singapore-specific system of labour-market intelligence and foresight, combining trade association insights, enterprise data and union sensing. Second, enable enterprises — especially SMEs, which employ about 70% of the workforce — to transform with AI in ways that benefit workers, scaling the Company Training Committee model (more than 3,800 CTCs since 2019, benefiting over 300,000 workers) jointly with SNEF under the new Tripartite Jobs Council; he cited Tan Tock Seng Hospital's AI-enabled PreSAGE fall-risk monitoring system as an example of AI augmenting nursing work. Third, help workers seize new opportunities through e2i's AI Career Coach, NTUC LearningHub skills pathways and AI-Ready SG, which has put more than 4,000 workers through AI training since February, with plans to scale to over one million training places. Fourth, enable displaced workers to bounce back with dignity: advance notification of retrenchments to the Government before the last working day, early deployment of career support through 27 National Career Centres, and expanding SkillsFuture Jobseeker Support coverage from the roughly $5,000 median income closer to PME median income levels. Declaring that "in Singapore, every worker matters", he begged to move; the debate was then adjourned to the next sitting day.
第 15 届国会 温和质询

检讨 2012 年个人数据保护法以应对 AI 生成的推断或衍生数据的使用

Review of Personal Data Protection Act 2012 to Address Use of Inferred or Derived Data Generated by AI

工人党议员陈立峰书面质询数字发展与信息部:是否打算检讨 2012 年《个人数据保护法》(PDPA),以应对推断或衍生数据——包括 AI 生成的行为画像——的使用;若是,检讨将遵循什么原则。部长杨莉明答复:PDPA 下关于可识别个人的数据即属个人数据,机构对其持有或控制的此类数据负有保护义务,也涵盖机构在业务中从个人数据衍生的数据;个人数据保护委员会(PDPC)已发布 AI 推荐与决策系统个人数据使用咨询指引,原则包括仅用于正当商业目的、...

政策信号: 新加坡在 AI 时代的数据保护上延续“现行法 + 软性指引”路线,短期内不会为 AI 推断数据单独修法。
展开摘要、立场与原文

工人党议员陈立峰书面质询数字发展与信息部:是否打算检讨 2012 年《个人数据保护法》(PDPA),以应对推断或衍生数据——包括 AI 生成的行为画像——的使用;若是,检讨将遵循什么原则。部长杨莉明答复:PDPA 下关于可识别个人的数据即属个人数据,机构对其持有或控制的此类数据负有保护义务,也涵盖机构在业务中从个人数据衍生的数据;个人数据保护委员会(PDPC)已发布 AI 推荐与决策系统个人数据使用咨询指引,原则包括仅用于正当商业目的、收集限于所需。答复实质上否定修法迫切性——政府认为现行定义已覆盖衍生数据,辅以软性指引即可,而议员指向的 AI 行为画像新型风险未获专门立法回应。

要点
  • • 政府认定 PDPA 现有定义已涵盖业务过程中衍生的个人数据
  • • PDPC 已发布 AI 推荐与决策系统个人数据使用咨询指引
  • • 指引原则:仅用于正当商业目的、收集限于所需
  • • 未承诺针对 AI 行为画像启动 PDPA 修法检讨
政府立场
政府认为 PDPA 对个人数据的现有定义已覆盖机构在业务中衍生的数据,配合 PDPC 的 AI 咨询指引即可应对,无需立即修法。
质询立场
工人党议员陈立峰认为 AI 生成的推断数据和行为画像构成新型风险,应通过检讨 PDPA 给予专门立法回应。
"这也涵盖机构在业务过程中从此类个人数据衍生出的关于该个人的数据。"
原文节选(英文)
Mr Dennis Tan Lip Fong asked the Minister for Digital Development and Information (a) whether the Ministry intends to review the Personal Data Protection Act 2012 to address the use of inferred or derived data, including behavioural profiles generated by Artificial Intelligence systems; and (b) if so, what principles will guide such a review. Mrs Josephine Teo replied that under the Personal Data Protection Act, data about an identifiable individual is considered personal data, and an organisation has obligations to safeguard such data in its possession or control. She stated that this also covers data about the individual that an organisation derives in the course of business from such personal data — meaning that, in the Government's reading, inferred and derived data already fall within the statute's existing protections rather than sitting in a legislative gap. The Minister further pointed to the Advisory Guidelines on the Use of Personal Data in Artificial Intelligence (AI) Recommendation and Decision Systems published by the Personal Data Protection Commission. These guidelines set out principles to guide organisations and consumers on the responsible collection and use of personal data in AI systems, such as using data only for legitimate business purposes and limiting data collection to what is needed. The answer did not commit to a review of the Act itself, nor did it set out principles for any future review, resting instead on the position that the current statutory definition of personal data, supplemented by PDPC's advisory guidelines, already addresses AI-generated inferred and derived data including behavioural profiles.
第 15 届国会 信息发布

AI 普及对初级律师培养管道的冲击及一年制执业培训框架能否弥补成长断层

Impact of AI Adoption on Junior Lawyer Training Pipelines and Addressing Developmental Gaps Through One-year Practice Tr...

工人党非选区议员刘吴扬(Low Wu Yang Andre)书面询问律政部长:律所大规模采用 AI 后,初级律师赖以磨练专业判断力的研究、起草等常规工作量是否会萎缩,政府是否评估过这一风险;以及新修订律师资格制度下的一年制执业培训框架是否专门针对此风险设计。律政部长唐振辉(Edwin Tong)未作实质答复,表示律政部将把这一问题与其他同主题国会问题合并,在下次适当时机以口头答复方式统一回应,并指引参阅 2026 年 5 月 6 日《官...

政策信号: 法律行业 AI 冲击已进入国会议程,政府选择以合并口头答复统筹回应,显示律政部正将 AI 对律师培养的影响纳入整体性政策叙事而非零散作答。
展开摘要、立场与原文

工人党非选区议员刘吴扬(Low Wu Yang Andre)书面询问律政部长:律所大规模采用 AI 后,初级律师赖以磨练专业判断力的研究、起草等常规工作量是否会萎缩,政府是否评估过这一风险;以及新修订律师资格制度下的一年制执业培训框架是否专门针对此风险设计。律政部长唐振辉(Edwin Tong)未作实质答复,表示律政部将把这一问题与其他同主题国会问题合并,在下次适当时机以口头答复方式统一回应,并指引参阅 2026 年 5 月 6 日《官方报告》中"AI 使用导致律所工作量减少及相关使用指引"一文。背后的张力在于:AI 自动化正侵蚀法律行业传统的学徒式训练路径,而政府对培训管道断层的系统性评估尚未公开。

要点
  • • 工人党议员问 AI 是否削减初级律师赖以成长的研究起草类工作
  • • 并问一年制执业培训框架是否专门应对此风险
  • • 律政部长唐振辉表示将与同主题问题合并口头答复
  • • 实质回应见 2026 年 5 月 6 日合并答复文件
政府立场
律政部不单独书面作答,将把该问题与其他同主题国会问题合并,在下次适当时机统一口头答复。
质询立场
工人党议员刘吴扬质疑 AI 普及正在掏空初级律师的传统训练路径,要求政府说明风险评估及新培训框架的针对性。
"律政部将就此国会问题,连同已就该主题提出的其他国会问题,在下次适当时机提供口头答复。"
原文节选(英文)
Mr Low Wu Yang Andre asked the Minister for Law whether the Ministry has assessed the risk that widespread AI adoption in law firms will reduce the volume of routine work, such as research and drafting, through which junior lawyers have traditionally developed professional judgment; and whether the new one-year practice training framework under the revised admission process is designed to address this risk specifically. The question reflected a concern that as law firms deploy AI tools to automate legal research, document review and first drafts, the apprenticeship pathway through which trainees historically acquired core professional skills could be hollowed out, leaving developmental gaps in the profession's training pipeline. Mr Edwin Tong Chun Fai, the Minister for Law, replied that the Ministry of Law would provide an oral reply to this Parliamentary Question, together with other Parliamentary Questions which had been filed on the same topic, at the next available opportunity. He referred Members to the consolidated response titled "Workload Reduction at Law Firms from AI Use and Guidelines for Such Use", published in the Official Report of 6 May 2026 (Vol 96, Issue 30), in the section for Written Answers to Questions for Oral Answer not Answered by End of Question Time. The substantive assessment of AI's impact on junior lawyer training, and of whether the one-year practice training framework is designed to mitigate that impact, was therefore deferred to the combined oral reply rather than answered individually in this written answer.
第 15 届国会 温和质询

政府安全机构使用的第三方预测分析或数据融合软件算法的独立审计与验证

Independent Audits and Verification of Algorithms Used in Third-party Predictive Analytics or Data-fusion Software Utili...

工人党议员刘吴扬就政府安全机构使用第三方预测分析和数据融合软件提出书面质询:这些机构是否对底层算法进行独立审计?政府能否在依赖此类软件作出行动决策前独立验证其方法论?国家安全统筹部长兼内政部长尚穆根答复称,内政部已建立覆盖 AI 工具开发与使用的治理框架,所有预测分析和数据融合软件——包括第三方供应商提供的底层算法——都须按该框架评估,并针对具体用例实施风险评估与缓解措施;AI 应用部署前后均进行独立评估和审计以确保合规。这一问答触及安...

政策信号: 新加坡将安全领域的第三方 AI 采购纳入部门级治理框架管理,倾向内部审计而非公开外部验证机制。
展开摘要、立场与原文

工人党议员刘吴扬就政府安全机构使用第三方预测分析和数据融合软件提出书面质询:这些机构是否对底层算法进行独立审计?政府能否在依赖此类软件作出行动决策前独立验证其方法论?国家安全统筹部长兼内政部长尚穆根答复称,内政部已建立覆盖 AI 工具开发与使用的治理框架,所有预测分析和数据融合软件——包括第三方供应商提供的底层算法——都须按该框架评估,并针对具体用例实施风险评估与缓解措施;AI 应用部署前后均进行独立评估和审计以确保合规。这一问答触及安全机构算法决策的问责难题:反对党推动外部可验证性,政府则强调内部治理框架已足够覆盖,但未披露审计主体与方法细节。

要点
  • • 内政部设有覆盖 AI 工具开发与使用的治理框架
  • • 第三方供应商的底层算法同样须按框架评估
  • • 按具体用例实施风险评估与缓解措施
  • • AI 应用部署前后均进行独立评估和审计
政府立场
政府认为内政部现有 AI 治理框架加上部署前后的独立评估与审计,足以管控第三方算法在安全行动中的使用风险。
质询立场
工人党议员刘吴扬质疑政府能否在依赖第三方算法作出行动决策前独立验证其方法论,推动更强的外部审计问责。
"在 AI 应用部署前后都会进行独立评估和审计,以确保合规。"
原文节选(英文)
Mr Low Wu Yang Andre asked the Coordinating Minister for National Security and Minister for Home Affairs two related questions about the algorithmic tools used by Government security agencies: first, whether agencies that use third-party predictive analytics or data-fusion software conduct independent audits of the underlying algorithms; and second, whether the Government is satisfied that it can independently verify the methodology of such software before relying on it for operational decisions. Mr K Shanmugam replied that the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) has an AI governance framework on the development and use of AI tools. All predictive analytics and data-fusion software used by the ministry, including underlying algorithms supplied by third-party vendors, are evaluated on this framework, so that externally procured algorithms are subject to the same governance treatment as internally developed tools. Beyond the framework-level evaluation, risk assessment and mitigation measures are applied to manage risks arising in specific use cases. Finally, independent assessments and audits are performed both before and after deployment of each AI application to ensure compliance with the framework. The Minister's answer did not name the bodies that conduct these independent assessments, nor describe the audit methodology, but confirmed that verification is built into both the pre-deployment evaluation stage and the post-deployment operation stage of MHA's use of predictive analytics and data-fusion software.
第 15 届国会 信息发布

评估当前网络安全战备能否应对不断演变的威胁并兼顾行动安全

Assessing Adequacy of Current Cybersecurity Readiness against Evolving Threats while Ensuring Operational Security

议员沙拉尔·塔哈以地缘政治紧张、网络行动日益成为混合冲突手段为背景,书面质询政府是否评估新加坡网络威胁暴露已上升,以及如何在不损害行动安全的前提下保护关键信息基础设施、政府系统、企业和个人抵御包括 AI 攻击在内的演变威胁。数字发展与信息部长杨莉明答复:新加坡作为金融枢纽和数字经济体是高价值目标;关键系统受《网络安全法》更高标准约束;网络安全局(CSA)将更新标准,并向关键系统业主提供专有威胁检测系统以应对高级威胁行为者和 AI 赋能威...

政策信号: AI 赋能攻击已被正式纳入新加坡国家网络防御的威胁模型,监管重心从关键基础设施向政府供应链和消费级设备逐层下沉。
展开摘要、立场与原文

议员沙拉尔·塔哈以地缘政治紧张、网络行动日益成为混合冲突手段为背景,书面质询政府是否评估新加坡网络威胁暴露已上升,以及如何在不损害行动安全的前提下保护关键信息基础设施、政府系统、企业和个人抵御包括 AI 攻击在内的演变威胁。数字发展与信息部长杨莉明答复:新加坡作为金融枢纽和数字经济体是高价值目标;关键系统受《网络安全法》更高标准约束;网络安全局(CSA)将更新标准,并向关键系统业主提供专有威胁检测系统以应对高级威胁行为者和 AI 赋能威胁;GovTech 将要求管理关键系统的政府供应商满足 Cyber Trust Mark;家用路由器强制标准从标签计划一级升至二级,并拟扩展至 IP 摄像头。政府承认即使防御最佳仍须对 AI 网络威胁保持警惕。

要点
  • • 关键系统业主将获政府专有威胁检测系统,应对 AI 赋能威胁
  • • 管理关键系统的政府供应商须满足 Cyber Trust Mark 要求
  • • 家用路由器强制标准从标签计划一级升至二级,拟扩展至 IP 摄像头
  • • CSA 的 CISO-as-a-Service 为中小企业提供网络安全顾问
政府立场
政府认为新加坡保持着稳健且自适应的网络安全态势,但承认面对包括 AI 赋能攻击在内的演变威胁必须持续升级标准、检测能力和供应商义务。
"然而,即使拥有最好的防御,我们也必须对不断演变的威胁——包括 AI 赋能的网络威胁——保持警觉和戒备。"
原文节选(英文)
Mr Sharael Taha asked the Minister for Digital Development and Information, in light of rising geopolitical tensions and the increasing use of cyber operations as part of hybrid conflict, whether the Government assesses that Singapore's cyber threat exposure has heightened, and how it assesses Singapore's overall cybersecurity readiness in safeguarding critical information infrastructure, Government systems, businesses and individual residents against evolving threats, including AI-enabled attacks, without compromising operational security. Mrs Josephine Teo replied that Singapore's position as a major financial hub and digital economy makes it an attractive target for malicious actors, with the Cyber Security Agency of Singapore (CSA) regularly updating the public through SingCERT advisories and the Singapore Cyber Landscape publication. Critical systems are held to higher cybersecurity standards and obligations under the Cybersecurity Act, while capability investments such as CSA's Cybersecurity Development Programme strengthen the talent pipeline and national exercises like Exercise Cyber Star enhance operational readiness across public and private sectors. As threats evolve, CSA will review and update cybersecurity standards and obligations, and the Government will help owners of critical systems detect advanced threat actors and AI-enabled threats, including by equipping them with proprietary threat detection systems. For Government systems, GovTech will introduce more stringent cybersecurity and data protection obligations for vendors, such as requiring those managing critical systems and sensitive Government data to meet Cyber Trust Mark requirements. For businesses, CSA's CISO-as-a-Service programme gives small and medium enterprises access to cybersecurity consultants. For citizens, home routers must currently meet Cyber Labelling Scheme Level 1 requirements, which will be raised to Level 2, and similar standards are being explored for IP cameras. The Minister concluded that Singapore maintains a robust and adaptive posture but must remain vigilant against evolving threats, including AI-enabled cyber threats.
第 15 届国会 温和质询

AI 相关技能创前程课程的成效与效果

Outcomes and Effectiveness of AI-related SkillsFuture Programmes

万里扎议员书面质询教育部是否追踪 AI 相关技能创前程课程学员的两项硬指标:结业六个月内是否进入 AI 相关岗位,以及结业 12 个月内工资中位数变化。教育部长李智陞答复:对安置型课程如职业转换计划(SCTP),精深技能发展局(SSG)追踪安置率——2022 年 6 月至 2025 年 3 月完成 ICT 相关 SCTP 的 8,000 名学员中,44% 在六个月内找到新岗位(截至 2025 年 9 月 30 日);但未追踪工资结果,理...

政策信号: 新加坡的 AI 技能再培训体系在产出问责上仍偏软性指标,就业转化与工资增益的硬数据缺口正成为国会关注点。
展开摘要、立场与原文

万里扎议员书面质询教育部是否追踪 AI 相关技能创前程课程学员的两项硬指标:结业六个月内是否进入 AI 相关岗位,以及结业 12 个月内工资中位数变化。教育部长李智陞答复:对安置型课程如职业转换计划(SCTP),精深技能发展局(SSG)追踪安置率——2022 年 6 月至 2025 年 3 月完成 ICT 相关 SCTP 的 8,000 名学员中,44% 在六个月内找到新岗位(截至 2025 年 9 月 30 日);但未追踪工资结果,理由是影响因素多元。短期课程一般不追踪安置结果,仅靠 TRAQOM 学员调查收集质量与自评成效反馈,公开于 MySkillsFuture。张力在于:政府对 AI 技能培训投入巨大,效果衡量却以主观反馈为主,缺乏议员要求的就业与工资硬数据。

要点
  • • 8,000 名 ICT 相关 SCTP 结业学员中 44% 六个月内找到新岗位
  • • SSG 不追踪 SCTP 学员工资结果,理由是影响因素多元
  • • 短期课程一般不追踪就业安置结果
  • • TRAQOM 调查收集学员反馈并公开于 MySkillsFuture 平台
政府立场
政府认为以安置率加学员反馈调查的组合已足以衡量 AI 相关培训成效,工资追踪因干扰因素过多而不可行。
"在 2022 年 6 月至 2025 年 3 月间完成 ICT 相关职业转换计划的 8,000 名学员中,44% 在结业六个月内找到了新岗位或就业。"
原文节选(英文)
Dr Wan Rizal asked the Minister for Education, regarding participants in AI-related SkillsFuture programmes, whether the Ministry tracks (i) employment in AI-related roles within six months of completion and (ii) median wage change within 12 months of completion. Mr Desmond Lee replied that the Ministry of Education and SkillsFuture Singapore (SSG) adopt a variety of quality and outcome metrics to assess the effectiveness of SkillsFuture-funded Continuing Education and Training (CET) programmes, including those that equip learners with AI-related skills. For placement programmes, such as the SkillsFuture Career Transition Programmes (SCTPs), SSG tracks placement rates: of the 8,000 learners who completed their ICT-related SCTP between June 2022 and March 2025, 44% found new roles or employment within six months of completion, as of 30 September 2025. The Ministry has not tracked the wage outcomes of these SCTP learners, as multiple factors can affect their wages. SSG generally does not track the placement outcomes of shorter courses, which are intended to equip learners with up-to-date skills so they can remain relevant and perform better in their current roles rather than transition to new jobs. Beyond placement outcomes, SSG tracks learner feedback through the Training Quality and Outcomes Measurement (TRAQOM) survey, which covers programme quality and perceived outcomes, including whether the training has helped individuals become more effective at their jobs, improve their work performance or take on enhanced responsibilities. The TRAQOM ratings of each course, including AI-related courses, are published on the MySkillsFuture portal to guide learners in selecting suitable training programmes.
第 15 届国会 温和质询

能源危机、AI 数据中心需求与就业前景的冲击

Energy Crisis, AI Data-Centre Demand and the Impact on Hiring Prospects

Yio Chu Kang 议员 Yip Hon Weng 与 Bukit Panjang 议员 Liang Eng Hwa 询问中东冲突引发的能源危机如何冲击招聘前景。人力部长 Tan See Leng 称劳动市场暂时稳健,但企业转趋谨慎——未来三个月有意招聘的企业比例从 2 月的 54.6% 跌至 3 月的 44.6%,4 月初现企稳。被问到长期结构性影响时,他指危机会加速既有结构转型(供应链多元化、数字化),并直接点出 AI 的能源...

政策信号: AI 算力被正式纳入国家能源与就业战略:政府把 AI 数据中心的能源需求视为产业转型与人力规划的核心变量,而非边缘议题
展开摘要、立场与原文

Yio Chu Kang 议员 Yip Hon Weng 与 Bukit Panjang 议员 Liang Eng Hwa 询问中东冲突引发的能源危机如何冲击招聘前景。人力部长 Tan See Leng 称劳动市场暂时稳健,但企业转趋谨慎——未来三个月有意招聘的企业比例从 2 月的 54.6% 跌至 3 月的 44.6%,4 月初现企稳。被问到长期结构性影响时,他指危机会加速既有结构转型(供应链多元化、数字化),并直接点出 AI 的能源含义:"随着 AI 普及,驱动数据中心和高算力需求将需要更多能源,能源已成为新货币。"Choo Pei Ling 追问劳动力规划是否正适应贸易碎片化、技术变革与产业重组叠加的长期不确定,部长以"斩钉截铁的肯定"回应,并提及连续两天合计逾 12 小时(其中谈 AI 七小时)的相关辩论。

要点
  • • 招聘意向企业比例从 2 月 54.6% 跌至 3 月 44.6%,4 月初企稳
  • • AI 普及推高数据中心算力的能源需求,"能源是新货币"
  • • 危机加速供应链多元化、数字化与 AI 采纳等既有结构转型
  • • 人力规划明确调整以应对技术变革与产业重组叠加的长期不确定
政府立场
劳动市场暂稳但企业谨慎;视危机为加速 AI 采纳与能源转型的结构性催化,并据此重塑长期人力规划,能源被定位为支撑 AI 算力的"新货币"
"And with the move towards a pervasive adoption of AI, there will be a need for even more energy to drive the data centres and the high compute requirements of these AI data centres. Energy is really the new currency and it is existential for all of us."
原文节选(英文)
Mr Yip Hon Weng (Yio Chu Kang) and Mr Liang Eng Hwa (Bukit Panjang) asked the Minister for Manpower to assess how the energy crisis triggered by the Middle East conflict was affecting hiring prospects — for graduates and mid-career entrants, on entry-level job creation and job-search duration, the sectors most affected, and what further measures were being considered. The Minister for Manpower, Dr Tan See Leng, addressing both questions together, said energy-intensive and outward-oriented sectors saw the most impact, compounding pressures on export-oriented sectors already hit by trade fragmentation. While the labour market remained resilient for now, firms had grown more cautious: the proportion intending to hire in the next three months fell from 54.6% in February 2026 to 44.6% in March, with early signs of stabilisation in April. Jobseekers could tap Workforce Singapore and SkillsFuture Singapore services. Asked by Mr Yip whether firms were shifting hiring preferences between local and foreign workers, Dr Tan said no such shift had been seen and that resident employment continued to grow in Q1 2026. On Mr Liang's question about permanent structural changes and new opportunities, Dr Tan said it was premature to conclude, but the crisis would likely accelerate shifts already underway — supply-chain diversification and digitalisation — noting Parliament had spent seven hours the previous day on AI adoption, the energy transition and energy resilience. With pervasive AI adoption, he said, even more energy would be needed to drive data centres and their high compute requirements: "energy is really the new currency." Dr Choo Pei Ling (Chua Chu Kang) asked whether workforce planning was being adapted for persistent structural uncertainty from overlapping trade fragmentation, technological change and sectoral restructuring; Dr Tan replied "a resounding yes," referencing the Economic Strategy Review and over 12 hours of recent debate on preparing and investing in workers.

分析视角

从完整档案中提炼出的解释层。

💡 核心洞察

数据主权成核心议题

重要

随着AI产业发展,数据主权和防止外资垄断成为持续关注焦点,政府强调国际合作与安全防护并重。

新加坡AI经济与数据主权,AI企业收购与本地人才保障

劳动力转型政策深化

重要

政府推动包容性劳动力转型,支持中年员工再培训及技能转移,回应AI替代与互补争议。

AI对中小企业劳动力影响研究,就业转型图及中年员工支持

AI教育多元融合

教育政策强调分龄AI使用指导、脑科学融合及多元教学法,平衡学术严谨与创新能力培养。

分龄生成式AI使用框架,脑科学与自适应AI教育合作,PSLE学术严谨与AI技能平衡

监管机制趋于灵活

AI企业并购采用自愿申报,监管强调创新与竞争平衡,存在监管充分性争议。

Meta收购Manus的监管评估

AI伦理与透明度提升

针对AI生成内容声明及广告规范,政府推动指引更新,兼顾消费者保护与行业创新。

物业代理AI编辑图像声明

医疗AI预防性应用加速

重要

卫生部推出ACE-AI工具预测慢性病风险,强调'AI增强而非AI决定'原则,BRCA基因检测补贴与MediShield Life扩展标志医疗AI进入实质部署阶段。

2026卫生部供给委员会辩论:ACE-AI工具部署、BRCA1/2基因检测补贴

技能培训资金支持不足

AI相关培训课程参与度提升,资金支持及课程定制仍为争议焦点,政府持续优化。

SkillsFuture AI培训参与率及支持,扩展SkillsFuture信用涵盖AI工具订阅

📈 政策演变脉络

点击任意时期,筛选该阶段的辩论记录。

⚡ 反复争议焦点

点击任意争议焦点,筛选相关辩论。

⚖️ 核心政策张力

创新速度 vs 监管安全

鼓励快速创新与市场活力
vs
强调风险控制与公平竞争
当前平衡: 采用灵活监管,鼓励自愿申报

数据开放 vs 数据主权

推动国际数据合作与共享
vs
防范外资垄断与数据流失
当前平衡: 强调数据安全与国际合作并重

AI替代 vs 劳动力转型

AI替代部分岗位提升效率
vs
保障就业,支持再培训转岗
当前平衡: 推动包容性转型与技能提升

教育公平 vs 创新能力培养

注重学术严谨与核心能力
vs
强调探究式与协作式创新学习
当前平衡: 融合多元教学,兼顾公平与创新

资金支持 vs 培训课程定制

增加资金支持扩大培训覆盖
vs
优化课程内容满足多样需求
当前平衡: 持续优化课程与资金配置

🎙️ 关键议员档案

点击任意议员卡片,筛选该议员参与的辩论。

📡 政策信号追踪

点击任意信号,筛选该政策信号首次出现的年份。

继续探索