口头答复 · 2026-05-06 · 届国会 15

针对传播 AI 伪造真人淫秽图像的报警情况

针对传播 AI 伪造真人淫秽图像的报警情况

深度伪造与虚假信息 AI 治理与监管 争议度 2 · 温和质询

工人党 Sylvia Lim 询问内政部:2025 年收到多少宗关于传播 AI 伪造真人淫秽图像的报警、其中多少涉及教育机构内"同学对同学"、以及受害者能期待怎样的后续处理。代表内政部答覆的高级政务部长 Sim Ann 坦言:警方并不单独统计淫秽物品案件中有多少涉及 AI 伪造真人图像。警方接报后会照常侦查——讯问被告与证人、检视数字鉴证证据;涉及未成年受害者会通知家长/监护人,并向需要心理支持的受害者提供受害者关怀服务;若伪造图像在网上流传,警方可依据《在线刑事危害法令》(OCHA) 向网络服务商发出指令,封锁新加坡用户访问。Lim 追问三点:(1) 受害者反映报警后被警方建议改走《防止骚扰法令》(非逮捕性罪行),这是否警方默认做法;(2) 经议员申诉后警方协助下架图像,这是否常规;(3) 《刑事法典》377BD、377BE 等条文本可作为逮捕性罪行处理,何时会这样定性并以起诉为目标侦办。Sim Ann 答:没有"默认走某条路"一说,一切视案情事实而定,若事实构成《刑事法典》下传播私密图像的罪行,警方就会据此行动;网上流传的图像在侦查中一旦掌握,警方可向服务商发指令封锁。

关键要点

  • 警方不单独统计涉 AI 伪造真人淫秽图像的案件数
  • 可依 OCHA 向网络服务商发指令封锁新加坡用户访问
  • 走《防止骚扰法令》还是《刑事法典》逮捕性罪行视案情而定
  • 未成年受害者通知家长并提供受害者关怀服务
政府立场

按案情事实定罪定路径,依 OCHA 封锁 + 刑事法典追责并行

质询立场

质疑警方默认引导走非逮捕性的《防止骚扰法令》,促请按逮捕性罪行起诉

政策信号

AI 深伪性影像执法:无统计专项、无固定法律路径,依个案事实裁量

“If the AI-generated obscene images are circulating online, the Police may issue directions under the Online Criminal Harms Act to online service providers to disable Singapore users' access to them.”

参与人员 (2)

完整译文(中文)

Hansard 原始记录 · 2026-06-02

工人党 Sylvia Lim 询问内政部:2025 年收到多少宗关于传播 AI 伪造真人淫秽图像的报警、其中多少涉及教育机构内"同学对同学"、以及受害者能期待怎样的后续处理。代表内政部答覆的高级政务部长 Sim Ann 坦言:警方并不单独统计淫秽物品案件中有多少涉及 AI 伪造真人图像。

警方接报后会照常侦查——讯问被告与证人、检视数字鉴证证据;涉及未成年受害者会通知家长/监护人,并向需要心理支持的受害者提供受害者关怀服务;若伪造图像在网上流传,警方可依据《在线刑事危害法令》(OCHA) 向网络服务商发出指令,封锁新加坡用户访问。

Lim 追问三点:(1) 受害者反映报警后被警方建议改走《防止骚扰法令》(非逮捕性罪行),这是否警方默认做法;(2) 经议员申诉后警方协助下架图像,这是否常规;(3) 《刑事法典》377BD、377BE 等条文本可作为逮捕性罪行处理,何时会这样定性并以起诉为目标侦办。

Sim Ann 答:没有"默认走某条路"一说,一切视案情事实而定,若事实构成《刑事法典》下传播私密图像的罪行,警方就会据此行动;网上流传的图像在侦查中一旦掌握,警方可向服务商发指令封锁。

英文原文

SPRS Hansard 原始记录 · 抓取日期:2026-06-02

1 Ms Sylvia Lim asked the Coordinating Minister for National Security and Minister for Home Affairs (a) how many police reports were received in 2025 concerning the circulation of AI-generated fake obscene images of real persons; (b) what proportion of these cases involved perpetrators and victims who were fellow students in educational institutions; and (c) what can victims or complainants expect in follow-up actions by the police.

The Senior Minister of State for Home Affairs (Ms Sim Ann) (for the Coordinating Minister for National Security and Minister for Home Affairs) : Sir, the Police do not track how many of the obscene materials cases it investigates involve AI-generated images of real persons.

Where there is a report relating to any obscene material, the Police will conduct investigations, including through interviewing the accused and other witnesses, and examining any digital forensic evidence that may be available. For cases involving young victims, the Police may notify the parents or guardians. The Police will also offer victim care services to victims who require psychological support.

If the AI-generated obscene images are circulating online, the Police may issue directions under the Online Criminal Harms Act to online service providers to disable Singapore users’ access to them.

Mr Speaker : Ms Lim.

Ms Sylvia Lim (Aljunied) : Thank you, Sir. I have three supplementary questions for the Senior Minister of State. The first is that in some cases that I have come across, I was told by the victims that they reported to Police that their images had been artificially created and put up on porn websites, and the Police had advised them to take action under the Protection from Harassment Act, as it is a non-arrestable offence. I would like the Senior Minister of State to clarify whether this is actually the default position of the Police in such reports.

Second, to be fair to the Police, in the cases that I know of, after we appealed for the victim, the Police actually assisted to have the images removed. So, that is very helpful and of most concern to the victims. I would like to ask whether that is something that the Police does ordinarily from most of these reports.

The third question is, I believe that under the Penal Code, there are actually some arrestable offences that would actually cover some of the conduct – for example, being in possession of intimate images and so on, under section 377BD and 377BE. So, I would like to ask when the Police would classify the case under these arrestable offences and investigate with the view to prosecution.

Ms Sim Ann : Sir, I believe that the first and the third supplementary questions from the Member are related. I would say that if the facts of the case are such that it warrants taking action under the Penal Code for offences relating to the circulation of intimate images, the Police will do so. So, it is not that there is a default position to go a certain route – everything depends on the facts of the case as disclosed.

In terms of what happens to the images that are, say, circulating online, as I have also shared in the main reply, where there are obscene images circulating online, and which, in the course of investigation, or due to the report, it is known, the Police may issue directions to the online service providers to block access of Singapore users to them.