MDDI 演讲稿 · 2026-01-29

部长杨莉明在NTUC LearningHub Human+研讨会2026上的演讲

部长杨莉明在NTUC LearningHub Human+研讨会2026上的演讲

Josephine Teo · 数码发展及新闻部长 · NTUC LearningHub Human+研讨会

要点

  • 新加坡推出《国家人工智能研发计划》,资助基础人工智能研究,涵盖「负责任人工智能」等核心课题。
  • 新加坡资讯通信媒体发展局《新加坡数字经济报告》显示,四分之三受访劳动者已在职场定期使用人工智能工具,其中85%反映生产力与工作质量有所提升。
  • 新加坡人在 ChatGPT 等人工智能平台上的人均使用率位居全球前列。
  • 谷歌 DeepMind 在新加坡的业务持续扩张,招募了包括参与训练 Gemini 模型的新加坡人 Yi Tay 博士在内的核心团队成员。
  • 政府倡导培养「双语人工智能人才」:劳动者须将深厚的领域专业知识(「母语」)与指挥人工智能系统、解读输出的能力相结合。
  • 人工智能应用的重心正从个人生产力工具转向由人工智能代理群体代劳,要求劳动者向编排者角色转型,如同指挥家统筹乐手。

完整译文(中文)

MDDI 英文原文译文 · 翻译日期: 2026-06-21

NTUC学习中心首席执行官 Jeremy Ong先生

劳工运动的姐妹们、兄弟们

同仁与朋友们,

引言

早上好,感谢邀请我出席Human+研讨会。

多年来,NTUC学习中心一直是培训和提升我国人力资源的重要伙伴,与政府、雇主及职总认可培训中心(TACs)携手合作。

我很高兴贵方正积极推动Human+计划,助力新加坡人在人工智能时代取得成功。

这与政府近年来系统性发展企业和劳动力人工智能能力的努力高度契合。

许多国家和组织在思考如何应对当前挑战与机遇时,都对我国的举措给予了关注。

上周的这个时候,我还在达沃斯出席世界经济论坛。

当然,毫不意外,地缘政治紧张局势成为焦点。

但我想与大家分享的是,外界对人工智能发展以及新加坡务实做法持续保持浓厚兴趣,包括我们如何装备国人以保持竞争力。

我们密切关注新兴趋势及当前对人工智能影响的各类评估。

其中一场讨论引起了我的注意。参与者包括Google DeepMind创始人Demis Hassabis(2024年诺贝尔化学奖得主)以及Anthropic公司创始人Dario Amodei。如有兴趣,YouTube上有他们对谈的视频。

这两位创始人兼首席执行官就人工智能可能对社会产生的影响展开了辩论。

他们谈到了经济体和劳动力市场保持适应性的重要性。

Demis一年多前曾到访新加坡,并与总理黄循财会面。在达沃斯,他向我介绍DeepMind在新加坡的业务发展良好。他们已招募了团队核心成员,其中包括一名新加坡人Dr Yi Tay,他参与训练贵方组织或许正在使用的Gemini模型。

我也与Dario进行了交流,这次谈话让我豁然开朗。

他告诉我,他利用年末假期撰写了一篇约两万字的文章,探讨人工智能带来的挑战,题为"技术的青春期"(The Adolescence of Technology)。

这篇文章是其此前文章"仁爱之机器"(Machines of Loving Grace)的续篇,后者聚焦于强大人工智能为人类带来的积极影响。

在这篇新文章中,Dario探讨了人工智能可能存在的阴暗面、相关风险以及我们可能的应对之策。

他提出,理解即将到来的人工智能进步规模与速度的一种方式,是想象明年世界某处突然出现一个"天才之国"——只不过这个"国家"实实在在地被容纳在一座数据中心之内。

这个约有5000万人口的"国家"里,每一个人都比任何诺贝尔奖得主、政治家或科技人才更具能力,且运作速度远超人类。

我认为,这样的未来即便只是以文字描述,也足以令人既充满希望,又心生恐惧。

我鼓励大家阅读这两篇文章,或者至少让Claude或ChatGPT为你做个摘要。

关于超强人工智能到来时间与风险的辩论,还将持续一段时间。

但有一点已然清晰。

我们必须为人工智能安全问题找到更好的答案,也必须学会如何以负责任的方式开发和部署人工智能。

我在此前多个场合谈到过新加坡在这方面的努力。

最近一次是上周六晚间,我发布了国家人工智能研发计划,该计划将支持人工智能基本问题的研究,包括"负责任的人工智能"。

我们也迫切需要培育新的劳动力能力,并熟练掌握与"数据中心里的天才之国"协作的方式。

与 AI 高效协作

我曾多次谈到 AI 放大人类能力的潜力,将其视为我们的"队友"。

我们希望塑造一种未来的工作形态——不是人类与 AI 对立,而是人类借助 AI 做得更好。

当重心已从个人使用 AI 提取生产力改进,转向大批 AI 智能体代表人类执行多项任务的前景时,这一点尤为重要。

当然,人类的角色也将随之演变。

软件开发领域已有先例,你们想必都有所耳闻。

如今,许多软件开发者不再编写大段代码。

取而代之的是,人类软件开发者以清晰的问题陈述来指挥编程助手,以批判性思维验证智能体的输出,并运用设计原则来协调系统。

这就好比一位指挥家站在乐手面前,告诉他们:"这里加快节奏,这里放柔音色,让音乐听起来舒缓悦耳。"

这些当然需要更深厚的领域理解。正如指挥家未必精通某一具体乐器,但他需要理解音乐原理以及声音如何融合在一起,开发者同样需要能够与 AI 智能体和系统高效协作。这些领域我们才刚刚开始探索,还需摸索出一条让它们在未来切实运作的路径。

这些发展引出了一个问题:我们应当如何看待人类与 AI 高效协作?

这未必总能实现,但作为出发点,我们的取向应当是用 AI 来增强我们的能力,而非取代我们。

双语型 AI 人才

实现这一目标的方法之一,是熟练掌握与 AI 系统的协作——就像学会在专业领域有效沟通一样。

我们能贡献的是我们的"母语"——我们的领域知识,我们所掌握的、对 AI 而言仍具挑战性的知识与技能。

我们可以列举几类"母语"或领域专长——人力资源、制造业、法律和公共政策。精通自己的母语是基本要求。

新的要求是培养对 AI 协作的熟悉度或流利度——理解如何指挥 AI 系统、解读其输出,并将其能力融入我们的工作。

在这个意义上实现双语能力,有助于我们实现借助 AI 做得更好的目标,而非与之竞争。

价值在于能够运用 AI 与领域的双重流利度来变革流程、改善成果。

例如,在制造业中,一名具备足够数据科学和机器学习知识的工艺工程师,可以利用这些知识提高生产良率、减少材料浪费。

这种习得新流利度的努力并不容易,但也并非不可能。它需要不断学习与再学习——幸运的是,这对新加坡人来说并非全然陌生的做法。

整个 SkillsFuture 运动正是在这种精神下建立的。

甚至在此之前,新加坡人已经适应了历次技术主导的工作变革浪潮——计算机化、互联网、移动互联网。

同样,具备双语能力——兼通 AI 与领域知识——将有助于我们的人民像与队友协作一样与 AI 合作。这对新加坡而言可以成为一股强大力量,使我们的劳动力保持竞争力和市场地位。

毫无疑问,这需要付出相当大的努力。但我们的起点相当扎实。

在全球范围内,新加坡人是 ChatGPT 等 AI 平台人均使用率最高的群体之一。

这一趋势延伸至职场。

IMDA 近期发布的《新加坡数字经济报告》显示,受访工作者中四分之三已在工作中定期使用 AI 工具。

85% 的受访者表示生产力和工作质量有所提升。我们知道,进一步改善的空间仍相当大。

我们目前已在众多不同领域设立逾60个AI卓越中心,全面提升各方面的能力。

政府将继续协助企业和民众提升自身能力,有效地将AI作为协作伙伴加以运用。

NTUC培训中心的Human+计划与我们的规划高度契合,对此我深表感谢。

结语

如前所述,培训中心一直是我们在培训和提升人才技能方面不可或缺的伙伴。在我们致力于助力新加坡人在AI时代取得成功之际,其使命愈发重要。

新成立的领导力学院以及持续扩展的合作伙伴关系将是宝贵的资源。我鼓励工商界充分善用这些资源,以一切可能的方式强化自身的AI能力。

最后,再次感谢各位的邀请。

英文原文

MDDI 官网原始记录 · 抓取日期: 2026-06-21

CEO, NTUC LearningHub, Mr Jeremy Ong

Sisters and Brothers of the Labour Movement

Colleagues and friends,

Introduction

Good morning and thank you for inviting me to the Human+ Symposium.

For many years now, NTUC LearningHub has been a strong partner in training and upskilling our people – working with the Government, employers, and TACs.

I am glad that you are championing the Human+ initiative to enable Singaporeans to succeed in the age of AI.

This certainly aligns with the Government’s efforts in recent years, to systematically develop AI capabilities in our enterprises and workforce.

Many countries and organisations are taking note of our initiatives, as they consider their own responses to the present challenges and opportunities.

This time last week, I was still in Davos attending the World Economic Forum.

Of course, unsurprisingly, geopolitical tensions took centre stage.

But I should share with you that there was continued strong interest in AI developments and Singapore’s pragmatic approach, including how we equip our people to stay relevant.

We keep a close watch on emerging trends and current assessments of AI’s impact.

One such discussion caught my attention. It involved the founders of Google DeepMind Demis Hassabis (a 2024 Nobel Prize Winner for Chemistry) and the founder of a company Anthropic Dario Amodei. There’s a YouTube video of their exchange, in case you’re interested.

These two founder-CEOs had debated how AI could affect societies.

They spoke on the importance of economies and labour markets remaining adaptable.

Demis was in Singapore a little over a year ago and met Prime Minister Lawrence Wong. At Davos, he updated me that DeepMind’s presence in Singapore was growing well. They have recruited key members of their team. It includes a Singaporean, Dr Yi Tay, who helps to train the Gemini models, your organisations may be using.

I also caught up with Dario, and the conversation with him crystallised something for me.

He told me that he spent his year-end vacation writing a 20,000-word essay on the challenges brought about by AI, titled “The Adolescence of Technology”.

This is a follow-up to his previous essay “Machines of Loving Grace”, which focused on the upsides of powerful AI for humanity.

In this recent essay, Dario deals with the possible dark sides of AI, the risks, and our possible defences.

He suggests that one way to understand the scale and speed of upcoming AI progress is to imagine that a “country of geniuses” materialises somewhere in the world next year. Except that this “country” is contained in a data centre, literally.

Everyone in this “country” of around 50 million would be more capable than any Nobel Prize winner, statesman, or technologist, and operate much faster than humans.

I think, such a future, even if described only in words, inspires both hope and fear.

I would encourage you to read both essays, or minimally to get Claude or ChatGPT to summarise them for you.

The debate on the imminence and risks of very powerful AI will continue a while more.

But one thing is already clear.

We must find better answers to questions about AI safety. We must also learn how to develop and deploy AI in responsible ways.

I have on previous occasions spoken on Singapore’s efforts on this front.

Most recently, last Saturday evening, I launched the National AI R&D Plan, which will support research in fundamental issues in AI, including ‘Responsible AI’.

There is also urgency for us to grow new workforce capabilities, and become adept at partnering with “country of geniuses in a datacentre”.

Working Effectively with AI

I have spoken in the past about the potential of AI to amplify human capabilities, acting as our ‘teammate’.

We want to shape a future of work that is not about humans versus AI, but about humans doing better with AI.

This is especially relevant when the centre of gravity has shifted from extracting productivity improvements through individual use of AI, to the prospect of contingents of AI agents carrying out multiple tasks on behalf of humans.

Naturally, the role of humans will evolve.

There are already examples from the field of software development. You must have heard of them.

Many software developers today no longer write long chunks of code.

Instead, human software developers direct coding assistants with clear problem statements, validate output from agents with critical thinking, and use design principles to orchestrate systems.

It’s like a conductor standing in front of musicians, telling them “Here is where you increase the tempo, here is where you soften the tone, so that the music comes across as soothing and melodious.”

These, of course, require a deeper domain understanding. Just as a conductor does not necessarily play any particular instrument very well, he needs to understand the principles of music and how the sounds come together, Developers will need to be able to collaborate effectively with AI agents and systems too. These are fields that we are only beginning to discover, and have to figure a way out to make them work in the future.

Such developments lead to the question of how we should think of humans working effectively with AI?

It may not always be possible, but as a starting point, our orientation should be to use AI to augment our capabilities, rather than replace us.

Bilingual AI Talents

One way of achieving this is becoming fluent in working with AI systems – just like learning how to communicate effectively in a specialised domain.

What we bring to the table is our “mother tongue” – our domain knowledge, what we know and can do that remains challenging for AI.

We can point to several types of “mother tongues” or domain expertise – HR, manufacturing, law, and public policy. Being good in our mother tongue is a baseline requirement.

The new requirement is developing familiarity or fluency in AI collaboration – understanding how to direct AI systems, interpret their outputs, and integrating their capabilities into our work.

Becoming bilingual in this sense helps us achieve our aim of doing better with AI, instead of competing against it.

The value comes from being able to use fluency in AI and domains to transform processes and improve outcomes.

For example, in manufacturing, a process engineer who knows enough data science and machine learning, can use them to increase production yields and reduce material wastage.

This effort of acquiring new fluency is not easy but neither is it impossible. It requires learning and re-learning, a practice that is, fortunately, not entirely new to Singaporeans.

The entire SkillsFuture movement is built in this spirit.

Even before that, Singaporeans had adjusted to previous waves of technology-led changes to work – computerisation, the internet, mobile.

Being bilingual – with fluency in AI and domains – will similarly help our people work with AI like teammates. This can be a formidable force for Singapore, to remain relevant and competitive as a workforce.

Undoubtedly, this will take considerable effort. But we are working from fairly good foundations.

Globally, Singaporeans are one of the highest per capita users of AI platforms like ChatGPT.

This extends to the workplace.

IMDA’s recent Singapore Digital Economy Report showed that three in four workers surveyed are already using AI tools regularly at work.

85% reported improvements in productivity and work quality. We know the headroom for further improvements is quite high.

We now have more than 60 AI Centres of Excellence uplifting our capabilities across many different sectors.

The Government will continue to help our businesses and people upgrade themselves and utilise AI effectively as a teammate.

NTUC LearningHub’s Human+ initiative is very much aligned with our plans, and I thank you for it.

Conclusion

As noted earlier, LearningHub has been an invaluable partner in training and upskilling our people. Its mission is even more important now as we seek to enable Singaporeans to succeed in the age of AI.

The new Leadership Academy and expanded partnerships will be useful resources. I encourage our business community to take full advantage of them to strengthen your AI capabilities in every possible way.

On that note, thank you once again for inviting me.