국방 및 국민 복무 회고

SAF50

Mr Sitoh Yih Pin (Potong Pasir) : Madam, I beg to move,

"That the total sum to be allocated for Head J of the Estimates be reduced by $100".

Madam, 2015 marks both SG50 as well as SAF50. Last month, MINDEF kicked off the first in a series of commemorative events with SAF50@Vivo. I would like to begin by asking the Minister for Defence to share with the House his thoughts on the significance of SAF50 and what the Singapore Armed Forces (SAF) intend to do to honour the contributions of our SAF pioneers?

Madam, last year, I encouraged people to sign up as an SAF Volunteer in this House. I am happy to hear from SAF that since then, some 800 persons have applied to be SAF volunteers under the SAF Volunteer Corps, or SAFVC Scheme. Around 50 successful applicants will begin their Basic Training as early as next month.

We should be happy and proud that so many have come forward to take part in the SAF-VC and to share in the National Service experience and make their own National Service commitment.

Madam, National Service is almost as old as the nation itself. It began when then Defence Minister Dr Goh Keng Swee moved the Second Reading of the National Service (Amendment) Bill in March 1967. He also announced that 9,000 males born between 1 January 1949 and 30 June 1949 would be called up for National Service. By mid-April 1967, more than 90% of the 9,000 males eligible for National Service had registered.

You may think this was Singapore National Service Version 1.0. I think many in this House, including myself when I found out, will be surprised to know that this is actually National Service Version 2.0.

National Service 1.0 began as early as 1952, when the National Service Bill was tabled on 4 March. At the Second Reading of the Bill, then Acting Colonial Secretary Andrew Gilmour explained to the Legislative Council that the main purpose of the Bill was to give the Government the power to introduce National Service whenever necessary in order to meet the defence needs of Singapore and to ensure that the responsibility of defending the Colony could be spread fairly among the population.

Page: 95

National Service Volunteer Corps

The National Defence Ordinance came into effect on 1 March 1954 and the colonial Government then tried calling up 1,000 youths through a ballot after some 24,000 eligible persons were registered. This attempt did not go smoothly as some 500 Chinese High school students demonstrated against the new law on 13 May 1954. They clashed with the Police. This incident later came to be known as the National Service Riots of 1954.

Madam, what is the main lesson we can learn from the failed Nation Service Version 1.0? The first and main lesson is that people who perform National Service must believe in defending something that belonged to them. The Colony then belonged to the British, not to the youths who were called up.

As Second Minister for Defence Chan Chun Sing said weeks ago, "The most powerful weapon that Singapore and SAF have is not something that we buy overseas, not something that we can build, but something in our hearts. It is the desire and the willingness to fight for our independence, to remain independent so that we can determine our destiny for years and generations to come". National Service Version 1.0 failed because the most powerful weapon, the heart, was not there. Version 2.0 succeeded because we were independent and our heart was, therefore, in the right place.

Many will also believe that the SAF-VC scheme is also SAF Volunteer Corps Version 1.0. Actually, it is not even Version 2.0 but probably Version 3.0. Version 1.0 can be found when the People's Defence Force (PDF) Bill was passed on 30 December 1965, shortly after Independence. Three months later, some 3,200 males had volunteered to join the PDF. This was before National Service was introduced in the form as we know it today. But given our small population, a volunteer PDF cannot adequately meet the defence needs of Singapore and, hence, Dr Goh had to introduce "modern" National Service Version 2.0 in 1967.

And even when we introduced National Service in 1967, there was also a Volunteer Scheme of sorts that started in tandem. Many skilled individuals volunteered to help to kick-start the SAF's development of capabilities. One example is the SAF Medical Corps which began in the 1960s with many volunteer doctors and nurses who need not have done National Service. The Medical Corps is now a professional branch of SAF, highly trained and equipped to perform difficult missions in many parts of the world, as we have seen when they are deployed in many disaster relief and rescue missions.

Madam, but its leadership began as a largely volunteer one. Many of them are now in their 70s and 80s, and some have sadly passed on. The Minister of Defence will be familiar with some of these giants in the medical field, such as the late Dr Jimmy Choo, Dr Earl Lu and Dr Richard Yung, our previous Permanent Secretary and Director of Medical Services, Dr Kwa

Page: 96

Soon Bee and many others. I hope that even as MINDEF honours our Pioneer National Servicemen as part of SG50, we also remember these pioneer volunteers that helped to shape SAF in its formative years.

Goodwill from SAF Overseas Missions

Madam, let us now also revisit what is the stated mission of MINDEF and SAF.

"The mission of MINDEF and the Singapore Armed Forces is to enhance Singapore's peace and security through deterrence and diplomacy, and, should these fail, to secure a swift and decisive victory over the aggressor."

4.45 pm

Logically, the first mission of SAF must be to act as a deterrent. Would-be aggressors are deterred from attacking us because of a strong SAF. The second mission of SAF is the terrible task of destroying our enemies as quickly and comprehensively as possible when war starts.

As opposed to soft power, which I had talked about earlier, SAF is the rawest and most obvious form of hard power we have. But it can also be a tool for soft power.

Diplomacy is soft power in action. As stated in the mission of MINDEF and SAF, diplomacy helps to enhance peace and security. The SAF has done this many times in the past through our overseas missions. Examples include helping our Thailand and Indonesia neighbours during the 2004 Tsunami, earthquake relief efforts in New Zealand in 2011, the flood relief efforts in Kelantan, Malaysia, late last year, as well as our Navy helping Indonesia in the recent tragic Air Asia QZ8501 crash in search and rescue.

These are important missions where our SAF has contributed significantly in many ways that are beyond the obvious. These missions contribute to better mutual understanding, respect and trust. Countries and armed forces that go through hardship together and, hence, understand, respect and trust each other more are less likely to go to war with each other. It is in our self-interest to be a good neighbour. It is part and parcel of the SAF mission of engaging in diplomacy so as to secure our peace and stability.

At this juncture, I would like to ask if the Minister for Defence can share with the House the experiences that the SAF has learnt from its overseas missions.

Page: 97

Of course, there are limits to how much or how frequent we can deploy our SAF assets in such missions. The first restriction or precondition is that other countries must welcome and invite us, as we make the first effort to offer our assistance. The second consideration is that as a largely conscript army, we must be conscious that we do not expose our National Service boys to unnecessary and great risk.

Even so, I would encourage the Minister for Defence to consider putting MINDEF and SAF on a more pro-active footing. We may not even need to wait for a crisis or disaster to take part in humanitarian efforts. As we celebrate SG50 and the hallowed institution of National Service, and as SAF develops and matures, it is also time to actively develop the third stated mission of MINDEF and SAF – which is diplomacy.

[(proc text) Question proposed. (proc text)]

The Chairman : Dr Lim Wee Kiak, you have two cuts. Please take them together.

Regional Defence Diplomacy

Dr Lim Wee Kiak (Nee Soon) : Madam, Singapore's security is inexplicably tied to our relations with our neighbours. It is, therefore, important for us to understand our neighbours' military and defence abilities and plans. In recent years, there have also been talks of an arms race going on in ASEAN. Perhaps largely fuelled by territorial disputes, some countries in the region have begun to import more arms, submarines, in particular.

What is the annual growth of our neighbours' defence budgets in absolute and in percentage terms over the past few years? Does the Minister think that there is an ongoing arms race going on in the ASEAN region? Should we be concerned? What is the state of our bilateral defence relationships with our immediate neighbours?

Additionally, what confidence-building measures has MINDEF taken to forge good, enduring defence relationships with our neighbours? I am heartened to note that just recently, Minister Ng Eng Hen has signed a Letter of Intent with Malaysia's Minister for Defence to enhance cooperation on military and defence matters. We need to develop trust and understanding between neighbours. I believe we can look forward to similar levels of affirmations and friendship with other ASEAN neighbours in the days ahead.

International Defence Diplomacy

Madam, major powers like the United States (US) and China play an important role in the security and stability of our region. In recent years, both countries have increased their military presence in this region and particularly in the South China Sea. The US will reportedly

Page: 98

deploy four warships to Singapore by 2018 and this has been envisioned to be on a rotational basis.

The days of the Cold War would seem to be gradually warming up from Europe to Asia. I envisage it is a matter of time before the Russians start eyeing this region. They have been courting China and India so as not to be left out in the cold, except that, for now, they are pre-occupied with events in Europe.

There is a criss-cross of defence arrangements between individual ASEAN countries and the US, and certainly among ASEAN countries as well. What are the implications of this growing military presence of the US and China on the strategic defence arrangements and architecture in our region? Should we expect to host a greater foreign military presence in the near future in our region? How will this affect our defence diplomacy within the region and with the major powers that we host?

Maintaining and advancing defence relationships with the major powers are important for security and diplomacy. Joint training, in particular, will be mutually beneficial and highly enriching for our own defence forces, and I hope we can seek to achieve more of such arrangements. How has MINDEF continued to advance our defence relationships with the major powers?

International and Regional Security

Ms Ellen Lee (Sembawang) : Chairman, the measure of a responsible member country in the international community is its willingness to share the burden of international and regional security. Singapore is physically small, and a "little red dot" as we are called. But since Independence, we have been consistent in our efforts to do what is in our interests as well as within our means to collaborate on security and humanitarian initiatives sanctioned by the United Nations (UN). Last year was singular in the number of terrorist, epidemic and climate issues that confronted the world.

What impact do these have on the Ministry of Defence (MINDEF)'s role? Can MINDEF provide an update on its contributions to international and regional security, for instance, fighting the ISIS threat, countering piracy in regional waters and providing disaster relief?

Military Diplomacy

Mr Low Thia Khiang (Aljunied) : Madam, despite long-running talks about implementing the Declaration on the Conduct of Parties in the South China Sea and even an agreement over a Code for Unplanned Encounters at Sea, there remains no binding arrangement to manage and reduce friction in East Asia's maritime domain. In fact, there seems to be

Page: 99

persistent friction over the South China Sea.

The issues have the potential to affect regional stability and Singapore's continued prosperity. Singapore needs to navigate carefully among the different positions of the US, China and our neighbours. MINDEF's defence diplomacy and outward engagement in conjunction with other agencies can have important consequences for Singapore's national security and interests.

I would like to better understand how MINDEF's current and planned defence diplomacy efforts could bring concrete benefits to Singapore's national security.

The Defence Minister spoke about the need to tackle the hard security challenges and to deliver concrete outcomes at last year's Shangri-La Dialogue. There, he also discussed the ASEAN Defence Ministerial Meeting-Plus framework, and further highlighted a Bruneian plan for a government-to-government hotline and a Vietnamese proposal for a "no first use of force" agreement. Would the Minister provide an update on these proposals, how they concretely aid our national security, and how the Government has responded?

Beyond these proposals, what other initiatives is MINDEF currently undertaking? How does MINDEF intend to reduce uncertainties, enhance understanding and improve coordination in the region and beyond through defence diplomacy, apart from conferences and meetings?

Fight against Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS)

Mr Pritam Singh (Aljunied) : In November last year, the Minister announced that MINDEF would be joining a US-led coalition against ISIS by contributing a KC-135 Aerial Refuelling tanker, and an imagery analysis team to the war effort. The Minister clarified earlier this year that SAF has sent a needs assessment and survey team and a liaison officer to facilitate planning and coordination between SAF and coalition forces.

In view of the evolving nature of the threat, I would like to ask the Minister whether Singapore will seek to contribute to this international effort in areas where it has specific value-add capabilities. For example, we have religious rehabilitation as a more unique contribution, apart from hardware and analytical capabilities that can also be contributed by other allies.

Secondly, I would like to enquire how MINDEF plans to manage the prospect of Mission Creep, leading SAF to commit more in-theatre forces in the fight against ISIS, than is the case

Page: 100

currently.

Finally, I would like to find out what the Ministry is doing to work with our immediate ASEAN neighbours to develop an ASEAN response to the ISIS threat, thereby promoting confidence building and military-to-military cooperation between our neighbours with the attendant benefit of a more united and safer ASEAN, in addition to the promotion of greater security integration between ASEAN member states, particularly, our closest neighbours, Malaysia and Indonesia.

Defence Spending

Mr Seah Kian Peng (Marine Parade) : Madam, our defence budget for FY2014/2015 hit a record high of $12.56 billion. This marked an increase of 3.2% from 2013. Arms spending alone was $12.2 billion last year, compared to $8.6 billion in 2004.

Our defence expenditure has increased steadily by about 4% a year since 2008. The steady spending on our defence is necessary for our national security, which is becoming ever more important. Terrorism has become a very real issue, and tensions between countries all over remain a concern. Besides continuing to maintain good ties with countries, Singapore needs to continue building up its own defence capability and security in order to deter would-be aggressors.

Looking across the Causeway, our neighbour, Malaysia, had recently announced that their National Service programme for 2015 would be suspended as part of measures to cut costs. While our budget for MINDEF has sometimes come under criticism, not spending enough on our national defence and, hence, compromising our national security is unthinkable.

While Singapore may have the highest defence spending in Southeast Asia, other countries in the region of Asia have also increased their defence spending and any cut-down on Singapore's spending seems likely to have implications.

Madam, I understand that our defence expenditure includes investments in human capital, operating and development expenditure, and investments in new capabilities. Could MINDEF provide an overview of how spending is allocated across these three areas?

I have spoken in my main speech about MINDEF being a crucial public space in Singapore. Can the Minister tell me if MINDEF has a way of tracking the social capital it has built up over the years? And if not, can it explore a way of doing so? I am always amazed at the reunions – involving the boys – that old school alumni have. Can MINDEF consider also

Page: 101

providing support for such efforts and perhaps have them in camps? I think this would bring communities together and that is another way we can build a closer and more inclusive society.

Optimising Resources and Productivity

Dr Lim Wee Kiak : Madam, MINDEF has been allocated the largest amount of expenditure for this year's Budget. And MINDEF is also the custodian of the largest amount of public land and public sector manpower. I believe the Ministry would have mapped out plans and strategies for the utilisation of these resources given to the Ministry.

I would like to ask what MINDEF is doing to ensure that these resources, both fiscal and manpower, are adequately and properly deployed. Can the Minister share with the House what is in the pipeline for the next five years?

MINDEF has always taken innovation and productivity seriously. In the past years, the Ministry has received regular recognition for cost-saving solutions and innovative ideas, and I congratulate the staff for these achievements. I would like to ask if the Minister can share some of the recent productivity measures that MINDEF is exploring and how successful these measures are.

Defence Expenditure and Savings

Mr Pritam Singh : The Minister for Defence has previously stated in Parliament that in the coming years, the rise in MINDEF's expenditure will largely correspond with the rise in inflation. This year, however, MINDEF's budget for FY2015/2016 is 5.7% higher than the year before.

I recall the presentation at the COS last year by the Defence Minister on the likely shape of the SAF in 2030 with larger capacity Landing Ship Tanks (LSTs), next generation fighter aircraft and the intention to transfer more of the Army's traditional fighting units into mobile platforms as possible changes to the order of battle of the SAF.

5.00 pm

Is the increase in this year's defence budget attributable to platforms that MINDEF intends to purchase in the years to come and, if not, how does the Ministry account for the rise in expenditure from the past year?

Page: 102

Secondly, in view of maintaining fiscal prudence at the national level, would MINDEF consider including more cost-saving measures as a key criterion for defence purchases, as exemplified by the announcement of the induction of the Aerostar, which was widely reported in the local media to have reduced MINDEF's operating expenditure footprint for the task at hand by 29%.

Finally, I would like to enquire about MINDEF's plans to operationalise the suggestion, most recently made by Malaysia as the current Chair of ASEAN, for the establishment of an ASEAN Peacekeeping Force. What is the current thinking of MINDEF about this idea?

The Chairman : Mr Alvin Yeo not in the Chamber, Assoc Prof Fatimah Lateef.

The Transformation of SAF

Assoc Prof Fatimah Lateef (Marine Parade) : Madam, the SAF commenced its 3rd Generation Transformation in the early 2000s to ensure that it will remain a highly capable, relevant and respected defence force. The changes have been progressive and positive, preparing the force to handle challenges and eventualities in today's ever-changing climate, which remains volatile and fluid, day by day and month by month.

The developments have been in both the areas of hardware and also software, which definitely have to go hand in hand in any transformation process.

Besides investments in technology, machinery, weaponry, IT and also transportation, the training, growth and development of the personnel and also recognition are important.

Challenges of the future, such as our rapidly decreasing birth rate and ageing population as well as handling of emerging security threats will have to be dealt with as well. As we mark SAF's 50th year and move into the future, can the Minister provide an update on SAF's transformation plans to ensure that we continue to be an effective fighting force capable of handling any threats to our little red dot?

Mdm Speaker : Minister for Defence.

The Minister for Defence (Dr Ng Eng Hen) : Mdm Chair, first, let me thank Members for their useful questions and enlightened comments, many of which I share. This is a special year because as many Members have said, 2015 is the Golden Jubilee of our Independence as well as 50 years of SAF since its inception. As many Members of this House have pointed out, it is an appropriate occasion for us to look back, examine our roots and collectively see

Page: 103

what we have achieved and, more importantly, also look forward.

And if you look at our founding generation and what they went through, they went through three, I would say, bitter periods. First, was the British surrender of Singapore to the Japanese and the subsequent occupation; then, Konfontasi; and then, the fight against the communists. Just one challenge would have been severe but we have Pioneers who went through all three. For this reason, the bitter lessons that they learnt, forged in them an epiphany and the fierce determination that only with a strong defence could Singapore safeguard its sovereignty because, without this strong defence, Singaporeans would never be able to chart our own destiny.

As a small country with limited manpower, I believe that most Singaporeans today understand that this strong defence can only be built up and maintained with a strong and heavy commitment of financial resources and, above all, the efforts and sacrifices of our National Servicemen.

We have said it time and again, but it bears repeating: if Singaporeans cannot or do not defend Singapore, no one else would. And in this, our Golden Jubilee year, I am sure that I speak on behalf of all the Members in this House to affirm our strong and continued commitment to defend our country.

Today, Singaporeans can have the quiet confidence that after many decades of steady investment into our defence capabilities, SAF is a strong and capable military, able to protect our interests and borders. Beyond SAF and our NSmen, the message of Total Defence, that we are as strong as we are united, has also taken root in the community.

Many Members – Mr Sitoh, Dr Lim Wee Kiak, Assoc Prof Fatimah and Mr Pritam Singh – have asked how the SAF stands today and what it will be like in the future.

First, how does the SAF stand today. I think we can be confident objectively because we have consistently benchmarked the SAF with militaries from other advanced countries. We test our systems through realistic training and real operations. We have conducted four Exercise Forging Sabres in the United States in the last decade. And every year, we go to Australia to conduct Exercise Wallaby since the year 2000. There, we put our soldiers and platforms through rigorous and realistic test scenarios, including our unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) and F-15 and F-16 fighters, Apache helicopters, high mobility artillery rocket systems (HIMARS) and naval ships. The exercise scenarios are complex. They require high levels of integration in every exercise. I am happy to report that after each exercise, our overall systems are validated and we learn important lessons to bridge the gap.

Page: 104

When I say that our overall systems are validated, it tells us that our command and control systems are responsive and coherent. We can close the loop on what we see and how we want to effect a response.

Beyond exercises, the SAF has also actively contributed to missions that have strengthened international peace and security as well as Humanitarian Assistance and Disaster Relief (HADR). Mr Sitoh Yih Pin spoke about this.

We had some 15,000 Servicemen who were deployed to Iraq and Afghanistan for 10 years, between 2003 and 2013. They were there a long time as part of the multi-national stabilisation reconstruction efforts. We have also deployed Servicemen to the Gulf of Eden to support counter-piracy efforts since 2009 and commanded three times the combined task force. Recently, SAF ships and aircraft were deployed for the AirAsia crash and there the SAF men on board the MV Swift Rescue located the fuselage. The Army was also deployed in Kelantan and, with water purification teams, they supplied potable water for Malaysian flood victims.

Whether it was for exercises or real operations, they validate our readiness and professionalism and they provide invaluable experience to our Servicemen and also enhance our ability to operate with our key partners. Through both of these exercises and real operations, the SAF has shown that it can move decisively as one integrated professional force and succeed in the mission and tasks assigned.

Members here have asked for an update on what else we are doing for the SAF. Dr Lim Wee Kiak asked about this for the next five years. We will continue upgrading the SAF's capabilities at a steady pace. From next year, the Navy will start replacing its patrol vessels with new littoral mission vessels. Similarly, the Army will use new Protected Response Vehicles. This is in place of the V200. Some older NSmen here would have used it. Others would not know what I am talking about, but the V200s are quite ancient, and so we will use the new Protected Response Vehicles.

Our Super Puma helicopters – Members of this house will be more familiar with those – have been in service for almost 30 years. They need replacements and we will carry this out over the next decade.

Beyond upgrading specific platforms, as Mr Pritam Singh mentioned, SAF needs to remake itself in response to a changing landscape from new security threats. This was eloquently put by Assoc Prof Fatimah Lateef. Looking ahead, in our Golden Jubilee year for SAF50, what do we expect the SAF to be able to respond to, what is its core mission, how does it shape itself to respond to threats that threaten Singapore and Singaporeans? We

Page: 105

may compartmentalise, but threats that threaten Singapore and Singaporeans do not come with necessary clear labels. That is the core question we have to ask.

Externally, the SAF has to contend with cyber threats and the growing use of disinformation in warfare. And the landscape is emerging. In the recent UNIX Security Conference, which I attended last month, there were many sessions on "hybrid warfare", which integrates the use of conventional and unconventional tools of warfare by state and non-state actors.

What is hybrid warfare? It is a "sexy" term, but what is it? Singaporeans can understand it easily, because it is the exact antagonist of Total Defence which we started some decades ago. Hybrid warfare is an orchestrated campaign to fracture the solidarity of the target nation through undermining its defences in civil, economic, social, psychological and military measures.

I want Members to listen to the chilling words of the Chief of General Staff of the Russian Federation General Valery Gerasimov: "The very rules of war have changed. The role of non-military means of achieving political and strategic goals has grown and, in many cases, they have exceeded the power of force of weapons in their effectiveness."

Non-military means have exceeded the power of force of weapons. He continues, "The focus of applied methods of conflict has altered in the direction of the broad use of political, economic, informational, humanitarian and other non-military measures, applied in coordination with the protest potential of the population."

He continues, "All this is supplemented by military means of a concealed character, including carrying out actions of informational conflict and the actions of special operations forces. The open use of forces, often under the guise of peace-keeping and crisis regulation, is resorted to only at a certain stage, primarily for the achievement of final success in the conflict."

Clinical but chilling. Why? Because this textbook description of hybrid warfare was played out with orchestral precision in the annexation of Crimea and the recent unrest in Ukraine, where subversion and subterfuge were conducted through flesh and blood provocateurs as well as through disinformation on social media to cause disunity and dissent among the target populations, before military force was applied.

There is another example of hybrid warfare. This is the radicalising effect of Al Qaeda and then ISIS. Some Members have asked about ISIS and how we respond to it. But it is

Page: 106

another facet of hybrid warfare, if you look at it closely. And this time, by non-state actors.

Tens of thousands of foreign fighters have been radicalised by ISIS' false ideology and have headed for Iraq and Syria. They may carry out violent attacks when they return to their home countries.

The examples of Ukraine and ISIS have added urgency to many countries in studying their defences against such campaigns of hybrid warfare orchestrated by external adversaries. So, challenges, as we see them, are not neatly compartmentalised as we say. I understand Mr Pritam Singh's point when he asked, "What is our core mission? When do you know it is mission creep?"

It is a difficult question. But at the centre of it, if it threatens Singapore and Singaporeans, even if it comes in uncommon or unconfined labels, we will have to respond to it.

5.15 pm

The concept of hybrid warfare is as old as war itself and that is why we launched Total Defence in 1984. What is new is the amplification of disinformation due to social media. No country, including Singapore, is immune to disinformation war and SAF will have to raise capabilities to detect and counteract such threats in the cyber and infomation domains.

Beyond hybrid warfare, the unrest in Ukraine and its impact on the rest of Europe hold other salutary lessons for Singapore. Let me describe to you what was last year's mood at the Munich Security Conference. This was in 2014. Last year's conference was centred on peace after War World II, 70 years of peace. There was an air of celebration, and rightly so. The Cold War had ended. Russia was integrated into Europe and the global economy. The European Union (EU) had expanded and more states were joining in, not only to the EU but even asking to join NATO. There were even questions asked about the relevance of NATO. So, there was an air of festivity, actually, last year.

Indeed, for the last decade, many countries in Europe had reduced defence spending to "reap the peace dividends". Some had even scrapped or suspended military conscription, their version of national service. Then in March last year, just two months after the Munich Security Conference, the unimaginable occurred – Crimea was annexed. Alleged rebels attacked and seized key buildings and military bases in key cities in Crimea and Eastern Ukraine, and these rebels include "little green men", masked unidentified soldiers armed with Russian equipment. At the same time, Russia assembled a sizeable force at the Ukrainian border, which senior Ukrainian officials estimated to comprise over 80,000 troops

Page: 107

and 270 tanks, amassed at the border.

Decades-old formale treaties and pledges were broken, basically torn up, not worth the paper they were printed on. Fundamental assumptions about peace in Europe were overturned. And this year's Munich Security Conference, when I read it, there was a phrase that was declared deafeningly "Peace in Europe is broken"; all within the span of one year. The impact on small states in Europe is even more ominous and threatening.

A recent Financial Times article last month, on 25 February, was headlined "Russia fears lead Lithuania to reinstate military draft". The small Baltic states, of which Lithuania is one of them, are the closest geographically to Russia. The article continued, "Lithuania is reinstating military conscription in a dramatic move that underscores the anxiety among the Baltic states about Russia's intentions".

These states are concerned that what happened to Crimea will occur to them and they are no longer confident about their future. Lithuania had, in fact, just suspended their form of national service only in 2009; that is, six years ago, because it assumed that the neighbourhood was safe. Now, Lithuania is frantically trying to raise a bigger army. Earlier this year, the Lithuanian government issued an instruction manual to schools and the general public on what to do in case of an invasion. The Baltic states are scared stiff that what happened in Crimea and Ukraine could also happen to them. Lithuania is not very big – three million people but much larger than us.

Singapore, like the Baltic states, is a small country. I think we do well to heed the cautionary tales from their experience. Never take our peace for granted. It can only be purchased through the collective commitment of our NSmen and all Singaporeans. Never weaken the strong defence that we have built up over the years through neglect or complacency. The time to build up a strong defence is during peace. A strong deterrence is Singapore's best defence. All these you have heard and time and time again.

When danger is upon you, as it is precipitously for the Baltic states, it will be too little and too late to build up a defence. And contrary to expectations that peace and stability that one enjoys today will last, things can go wrong very quickly. As I said, in one year, the mood is completely reversed.

As long as we have the support of the Government and our people, the SAF will discharge its responsibilities fully to protect our home and its people. The SAF will be very clear-eyed about our potential threats and challenges. We do not assume any neat packages and we are remaking ourselves to be more effective in the future. Some Members mentioned Singapore's demographic trends, Assoc Prof Fatimah Lateef, in particular, over

Page: 108

the long term. Yes, the SAF will have to operate with a leaner manpower pool without any loss of effectiveness. Whether it is measured by the ability to manoeuvre, fire-power, new capabilities, the restructured SAF, even though it is leaner, will be more potent and versatile. And we have been able to do this because we have used advanced technologies.

We talked about productivity and defence spending. When it comes to productivity, I will tell you that the SAF feels it the most acutely, not only because we want to, but this is the reality that we face with a shrinking NS pool. It is forced upon us. Our manpower supply is not as elastic as the civilian side of the house. So, each time a new platform is planned, in fact, one of the key questions is: how can I do it with fewer people and, if not as effective, more effective?

For example, our unmanned aerial vehicle systems can already stay airborne for more than 24 hours. On land, the army uses robots to defuse explosives in some situations. It is also studying the use of more unmanned ground vehicles to conduct security patrols, for example. Out at sea, unmanned surface vessels may, in the future, patrol our congested waterways. If we can do it without manned ships, why not? These advanced technologies have greater precision, endurance and use less manpower and allow us to remain potent with a leaner force.

The SAF will further leverage new technologies to respond to security challenges, whether it is external, internal, whether they come in neat packages or are amorphous. New units for cyber defence are being raised. Better capabilities using infocomm technology, robotics and artificial intelligence are in the pipeline for testing and integration into the existing systems.

But even with the most advanced technologies and equipment, we constantly remind ourselves that our people remain our greatest and indispensable asset. It is. And many Members of this House have said so and I agree with you that our people are, ultimately, what makes the difference – the strong fighting spirit of our soldiers, airmen and the sailors as well as the quality of leadership that will allow the SAF, as Mr Sitoh rightly pointed out, to deter aggression and, when that fails, prevail over potential aggressors.

We must continue to sustain this strength into the future. We cannot build an effective force without capable and committed Servicemen, particularly NSmen, who form the bulk of the SAF's fighting force. We are implementing the recommendations by the Committee to Strengthen National Service. Second Minister Chan Chun Sing will elaborate on this but just let me highlight two significant proposals that are progressing well.

Page: 109

First, we said that we will reduce the waiting times for NS enlistment to not more than six months after the completion of their post-secondary education, and we are on track.

Second, the SAF Volunteer Corps has attracted many responses and we are on track to take in this inaugural batch this year.

While NSmen form the backbone of the SAF, we need to ensure that we have adequate SAF regulars to train units and build capabilities. I announced during the Committee to Strengthen National Service (CSNS) that we are stepping up recruitment for more trainers and, again, we are on track to double the number of regular trainers at the Basic Military Training Centre from the middle of this year. The SAF is also recruiting more women as regulars, as more opportunities open up in different vocations because we use advanced platforms.

A number of Members here have asked questions on defence spending – Mr Seah Kian Peng, Dr Lim Wee Kiak, Mr Pritam Singh. They are very observant and they have asked whether we have noticed that defence spending in Southeast Asia has gone up. Indeed, it has. Southeast Asia's defence spending has increased, as a block, by about 150% in nominal terms over the last decade. It translates to an annual growth rate of about 11%. China's defence spending has more than quadrupled over the same period.

Defence spending in Asia, as a whole, has continued to rise. We are monitoring this trend closely. We are not responding to it in sharp rises because, as we have often said, we want to avoid sharp increases or dips in our defence spending. Despite this general trend, our approach is still to plan long term, maintain our defence expenditure steadily. As Members have said, over the last decade, our defence expenditure has grown by 4% nominally, on average, and more or less kept pace with inflation.

Mr Pritam Singh asked why this year it has jumped by 5.7%. I will respond to that by sharing that when we plan, we plan over a longer-term horizon, not year on year, but over a five- to-10-year period. It allows us to make sure that you do not adjust suddenly, whether it is manpower training or platform acquisition. It is actually also productive. By that, I mean that because you plan over a longer-time horizon, it allows you very smart opportunity buys. We do not buy a platform when it is just new. Even if we buy a new platform, we watch for it, when the price comes down, and before it is too few and production goes down and the price goes up again. It allows us to plan when to acquire.

I thank Members for reminding MINDEF that we need to be prudent in the use of our resources. We are aware that we spend the largest proportion as a single Ministry, and we will be prudent. The default for MINDEF and SAF is to upgrade existing platforms rather than

Page: 110

buy new ones – that is a default – unless only new equipment provides clearly superior and needed capabilities.

Let me give an example. We recently upgraded our Mine Counter-Measure Vessels. We did not buy new ones, we upgraded them, because they are more productive and can integrate with unmanned water systems. As a result, the mines can be cleared up to five times faster.

Not only with financial resources, but I take the point from Members, including the point made by Dr Lim Wee Kiak, whether we have been prudent in our land use. We recognise that land in Singapore is precious and, therefore, we use technologies to intensify land use. Some Members may have visited but, if you have not, we would like to arrange a visit to the Multi-Mission Range Complex.

For some of the men in this House, you would remember the old SAF Training Institute had a number of ranges. It was flat, but what we did was we put them all together in high-rise and there are seven ranges in one. In the same space that is occupied by one, there are seven ranges. You would remember during your SAF days that you had to wait till night to do night shooting. Now we just switch off the lights and you can do the night shooting. Another example, and this is a big one, is the relocation of Paya Lebar Air Base (PLAB) into an expanded Changi Air Base East and Tengah Air Base.

MINDEF and SAF proactively and carefully studied this option because we knew that land was precious. As a result, we will free up 800 hectares of land for alternative use and, beyond that, remove the height restrictions on developments around PLAB. We are very conscious and, where we can, we will intensify, relocate, and this includes training for SAF soldiers overseas. But – and it is an important "but" – I will tell Members of this House openly, there is a minimum required to house our defence assets, to train our soldiers in Singapore and to ensure the defence integrity of our defence capabilities.

Let me say that again – there is a minimum. It is not just, "You have so much, this is so much land, can you squeeze within a single plot?" Beneath a certain size, we lose the coherence of the defence system.

5.30 pm

I welcome the questions by Members on the external environment because, even as we focus on the SAF internally, we have to pay attention to our geopolitical environment and defence ties with other countries. Dr Lim Wee Kiak, Ms Ellen Lee, Mr Pritam Singh and Mr Low Thia Khiang talked about this. Mr Low asked, beyond the Shangri-La Dialogue and

Page: 111

ASEAN Defence Ministers Meeting (ADMM), what is Singapore doing and how much more can Singapore do.

Sometimes, I wish that we could do more than we want. But we are a small country and we need to build strong partnerships to bring about a more secure regional environment. We never over-stretch our perception of our own size, potency or force. At the end of the day, we say it and say it time and again so that it becomes trite, but it is true – we never forget we are a small country, we are a red dot, a small one; we hope a shining red dot, but it is still a small one.

And so, we have to build strong partnerships and, in the 70 years after the end of World War II, the US' presence in Asia has promoted regional stability and prosperity. For this reason, that is why Singapore facilitates the US' presence here. We allow them to use PLAB and Changi Naval Base for transit. The second US Navy Littoral Combat Ship arrived in Singapore recently, rotating through its deployment.

In addition, our close relationship with the US affords us access to high-end defence systems, as well as the training space in the US. I talked about the high mobility artillery systems. Some Members who were previous artillery chaps would know how many men it needed to set up the artillery. It was a slog and you have to respond. About 12 men, they tell me. But now, the new systems, from the US, operate with three men in front of the truck – 70 kilometres, high precision, shoot and scoot.

Our defence relations with China are excellent and we acknowledge China's desire to play a peaceful and constructive role in this region. Reflecting this close relationship, Chinese Defence Minister Chang Wanquan and I jointly issued a press release during my visit there in November last year to enhance our defence interactions and to commemorate the 25th anniversary of Singapore-China diplomatic ties this year. We had joint exercises. It was quite a sight to see People's Liberation Army (PLA) troops on one side and SAF troops on the other charging up the hill, taking an objective together. The Chinese do some things quite in style. They have large operating training grounds where you can sit and see the mass. We do not have that; we do not have the space. It was a very good interaction.

We actively engage our closest neighbours, Malaysia and Indonesia. We share many common interests to build understanding and mutual respect. The SAF was among the first to assist our neighbours in the search for MH370 and QZ8501, as well as provide assistance during the floods in Malaysia a few months ago. Our defence relations with both countries are strong and we frequently interact military to military.

Page: 112

Indonesian Defence Minister Ryamizard chose Singapore as his first stop among ASEAN for his introductory visit in January. Recently, as Dr Lim Wee Kiak pointed out, I hosted Defence Minister for Malaysia Hishammuddin and we signed a Letter of Intent together. And we will do more with Indonesia and Malaysia – they are our closest neighbours. We will step up our coordinated naval patrols with Indonesia, Malaysia and other littoral states because there is piracy and sea robbery in our regional waters.

As Mr Low Thia Khiang said, the ADMM and the Shangri-La Dialogue are important platforms. They allow us space beyond which small countries find hard to give voice, to put things on the table, to ask questions that concern our collective security; and also, importantly, to encourage militaries from all these countries to build understanding. Without understanding, there can be miscalculations and misunderstandings.

I will tell Members that the militaries of Northeast Asian countries rarely speak to one another. They do not meet. That is not healthy; and can be actually very dangerous. And it is very dangerous. When Brunei hosted ADMM, we encouraged Brunei to hold 18-nation exercises, and we helped, supported and facilitated. Just imagine 4,000 troops from 18 countries, the Chinese sent their Peace Ark, the Indian sent their ships, Japan sent their ships; and they were deployed across -decks. Soldiers from different countries, including the US, went to one another's decks of ships, and exchanges built. At the very least, it built some understanding, even more than that, for some, it built trust. It reduces the risk of miscalculation.

It may not be headline-grabbing. We may not be able to issue headline news every time we meet, but that would be unrealistic. Defence diplomacy is slow; sometimes, it is laborious, just like most diplomacy. We should not mistake it to think that because we are just meeting and there are no "announceable" outcomes, that you are not being productive. Patience, slow cultivation provide us more space; it actually wins friends and builds that understanding.

It is important to reduce tensions in the South China Sea because it is in our backyard. In May next year, we expect ships, aircraft and personnel from ASEAN and our "plus" partners to participate in another major exercise on maritime security and counter-terrorism. We have something which is extra; we can get the militaries to exercise together. That is what we are trying to push. This practical cooperation is timely and relevant, especially in the face of increased terror threats from ISIS. Mr Pritam Singh asked if ASEAN can issue something in common – and he is right. It is very useful. This is what the Chairman, Malaysia, wants to do. Members would have read the newspapers and would know that Malaysians are in Iraq and Syria. Indonesia's Chief of Defence came to Singapore and he said that he was worried what the fighters would do when they come back to their homeland. It is a real and present threat. It is a core mission for our security forces.

Page: 113

This is what we do at the Shangri-La Dialogue as well. Last year, we had 26 ministerial-level delegates and participants from 35 countries. We do not expect to have "announceables" and deliverables every year. But when they happen, it can be quite impactful. The combined patrols in the Straits of Malacca – a few years ago, the Straits of Malacca was put in the Lloyd's List's risk category equivalent to war-risk zones. Insurance premiums had gone up. You had to pay as if you had ships going through the same risk as in the war-risk zones. At that time, Prime Minister Najib was the Defence Minister and he mooted this idea in the Shangri-La Dialogue of combined maritime-air patrols, eyes in the skies, and, subsequently, joint Malacca Straits patrols in your own sovereign waters. It brought piracy down and Lloyd's delisted the area.

We will do more and play a constructive role in regional security as Members have asked us to. That is why we have set up the Information Fusion Centre and the Changi Regional HADR Coordination Centre – this is something that Mr Sitoh Yih Pin asked. He asked if we could accelerate our defence diplomacy. I am happy to update that China, France, Thailand and Brunei have accredited liaison officers to this regional HADR Coordination Centre, while Australia and Laos have established operational linkages.

Madam, let me, finally, provide details on this year's National Day Parade (NDP). It is special but the NDP will also be very special. I know there will be questions asked later. Let me give Members some heads-up. It is a very significant year; in fact, our Golden Jubilee year. Looking back 50 years, Singapore has been blessed and we have much to celebrate together.

NDP 2015 will remember our historical roots; we will remember from whence we came. That is why we are doing it at the Padang. We will recount our collective achievements as a nation and look forward to a shared progressive future for all Singaporeans.

So, appropriately, the NDP will take place at the Padang. Why? Because that is where our first NDP in 1966 took place. Read Mr Lee's account of that particular parade in his memoirs, stirring account, of challenges, what happened. We were thinking, as you know, every year, we have an NDP theme. What would be an appropriate theme for our Golden Jubilee? We have thought hard, the Organising Committee, and when I read to you the theme, you would say it is a good choice. The theme is "Majulah Singapura" – Onward Singapore. It reprises the clarion call to all Singaporeans, a call made to all Singaporeans when we were a poor nation at Independence, beset on all sides – whether they were problems of inadequate jobs, housing, education, basic necessities of life.

Listen to our debates in Parliament now. As they say, they are good problems. Just imagine Parliament then at our Independence – problems aplenty, resources very little, if any. And that was the context in which Majulah Singapura was a rallying cry to all of us to move forward as one people to overcome our challenges and more, and we have succeeded.

Page: 114

So, NDP will tell this story, as far as possible, to remind us from whence we came, to recognise the contributions of our Pioneer Generation and our leaders in nation-building.

There have been many calls – you can imagine the NDP Organising Committee gets many requests, suggestions and calls. One of them I feel particularly – it is important for us to try to accede to, to agree to – that is, to allow as many Singaporeans as possible to share in this historic 50th NDP, because the next Golden Jubilee will be 2065. So, this one, we really want to allow as many people as possible to share in that experience.

But you know the Padang, there is a limited number of people who can watch the show. But I am happy to announce that the NDP Organising Committee has changed the format somewhat so that as many people as possible can share in this moment on 9 August 2015. We want to make this Golden Jubilee Celebration special for as many Singaporeans as possible. What do I mean? With your permission, Mdm Chair, may I show you what I mean?

The Chairman : Yes, please. [ Slides were shown to Hon Members .]

Dr Ng Eng Hen : First of all, every Singaporean household, yes, I mean every Singaporean household, 1.2 million Singaporean households, whether in the HDB or private estate, will receive an NDP Funpack. So, even if they cannot come to the Padang or the areas around the Bay, which I will explain, they can watch at home, wave the same banner, slap the same clappers all over the island.

Second, we will open up discrete areas around the entire Marina Bay, so that more people can congregate and enjoy NDP15 in person. You look at the slide, you start at the Padang – its capacity is about 26,000. But we are opening up the floating platform where we had last year's NDP. That can hold 25,000. One Fullerton can hold about 10,000; the Promontory, 20,000; the MBS Event Plaza, 30,000; Gardens by the Bay, 40,000.

All in, we think the entire area can accommodate more than 150,000. And in some of these sites, we will place giant LED screens so that viewers can watch the show and all of them will be able to watch the aerial displays live and the fireworks. The fireworks for NDP 2015 will be largest ever, as well as the aerial display will the largest ever. I would not be a spoiler, but it will be spectacular.

There will be many sights to behold and for Singaporeans to remember. And where possible, the march-past, the contingents as well as the mobile column, will make their way to some of these locations around the Bay area.

Page: 115

5.45 pm

The cost of the NDP at one site in previous years, which Members have asked about in this House, has been about $20 million. This includes the cost of logistics equipment for the rehearsals over a span of six to eight months: the four National Education (NE) shows, the preview shows and the actual show itself, which, in previous years, had about 5,500 participants and 25,000 onsite. The scale, of course, in NDP 2015 is much larger; many more folds than in previous years. There will be 7,000 participants, twice as many ticketed spectators; there will be the large crowds around the Bay and thousands of Singaporeans are expected to join in not only at Marina Bay but TV viewers – an estimated two million TV viewers at home. The cost of the NDP 2015 at the Padang alone is about the same as in previous years. But because of these additional sites, new facilities, it will increase the total cost of the NDP in our Golden Jubilee Year to about twice that of previous NDPs. So, it is about twice. In addition, the 1.2 million fun packs will cost an additional $10 million, part of which will be supported by corporate sponsors.

We are planning an NDP that allows all Singaporeans to celebrate together. But let me touch on two important points before the facilities overwhelm us.

First and foremost is safety. With large crowds expected, I would like everyone at the NDP to pay attention to their personal safety and that of others around them. We are working with the Ministry of Home Affairs, but we need members of the public to take personal responsibility, too. If everyone follows instructions, the risk of mishaps will be reduced.

Second, civility and cleanliness. Even as we celebrate NDP this year, even as we do it as one people to reflect on how much we have achieved together, we certainly do not want to diminish this by finding on the next day the whole of Marina Bay area littered. It will be a sad testimony to us as a people if you cannot even clean up after yourself. Organisers will provide more rubbish points, but I am flagging this out now, safety and cleanliness, so that it can enter our collective consciousness and aspirations for National Day.

Mdm Chair, with the strong commitment of NSmen and their families, employers and the community, the SAF will continue to safeguard Singapore's Independence and sovereignty on this SAF50 and our Golden Jubilee. We will do it so that our future generations may also enjoy the peace and security that we enjoy today.

Page: 116

NSmen Operational Readiness and Safety

Dr Intan Azura Mokhtar (Ang Mo Kio) : Madam, our NSmen take their role in serving the nation and in remaining operationally-ready seriously and with pride. They have done well and contributed with all their hearts and minds. These include our Malay soldiers who have achieved honours and recognition in the SAF based on their own merits and abilities. They have been deployed to various vocations and units within the SAF and have done well.

The extensive deployment of our Malay soldiers in the SAF is, in part, due to the continuous effort of the Malay PAP Members of Parliament in engaging the community and the Government. I am glad the Government and the SAF have taken much of the feedback from the Malay PAP Members of Parliament and made positive changes over the years. I am confident that we will continue to forge ahead and progress in this regard as our NSmen and soldiers ready themselves operationally to defend Singapore.

[The Deputy Speaker ( Charles Chong) in the Chair]

The implementation of the new three-station Individual Physical Proficiency Test (IPPT) has generated interest in the physical fitness of our NSmen which remain critical for the SAF's operational readiness and effectiveness.

Would MINDEF be able to update how it is helping in ensuring our NSmen remain physically fit and operationally ready? In addition, the safety of our NSmen remains a concern, especially among parents, even though MINDEF has taken steps to improve SAF's safety systems and make them more robust. Can MINDEF provide an update on its efforts to strengthen training and operational safety?

SAF Volunteer Corps

Mr Alex Yam (Chua Chu Kang) : Dr Goh Keng Swee said in 1976 that, "The security of every society must always depend, more or less, upon the martial spirit of the great body of the people."

Our SAF is the representation of that martial spirit of our people. For the last 50 years, it has been a bulwark against aggression from external parties. While challenges have evolved, our need for defence is perhaps even stronger today than ever before due to the now asymmetrical threats.

Our demographic challenge weighs heavy on us as we seek to maintain a well-disciplined effective armed forces. It is with this that I firmly welcome the introduction of the SAF Volunteer Corps. I have asked for a number of updates in 2014 and welcome the

Page: 117

progress made with the launch of the SAFVC applications in October 2014.

SAFVC provides opportunities for the broader Singapore community to make their contributions to defence. Colonel Mike Tan, Commander SAF VC, in his invitation to volunteers, said that many work tirelessly to ensure the peace and security of Singapore, calling it "a noble and onerous duty".

Therefore, I seek the Ministry's update on the progress made in the recruitment of volunteers, the profiles and eligibility of those who have volunteered, as well as how training will be conducted. Have there been any challenges in the process and what safeguards are there to ensure that safety and security are not compromised?

Mr Low Thia Khiang (Aljunied) : Sir, the application for SAF Volunteer Corps (SAFVC) opened on 13 October 2014. I would like to ask the Minister for an update on the number of applications received and accepted so far, and the estimated expenditure for SAFVC in its first year of operation.

I would also like to know whether deploying volunteers alongside our NSF, NSmen and regulars pose security risks for SAF. Will the security vetting be sufficiently thorough, especially with regard to the period of time when the applicants were residing outside Singapore?

Volunteers need only to do two weeks of BMT, seven days' qualification course training and are liable to be called up for seven days a year. Will the reduced training time be sufficient? Will it cause grievance for our NSmen? For example, the length of training that is required for a security trooper should be the same, regardless of whether it is performed by a volunteer or an NSmen. Otherwise, our NSmen will wonder why they need to spend more time training for the same role or whether every part of the training is really necessary.

The issue of equity in treatment between volunteers and NSmen is especially important. Volunteers are subject to a different rank structure, and how they are treated in camp must commensurate with their training and experience. Our NSmen are not going to take lightly to a volunteer "legal specialist staff" being treated in camp as if he is a fully-trained SAF officer or a "medical trainer" who has not gone through the usual Medical Officers' Course being treated like any other MO (Medical Officer) in camp.

If the Government sees SAFVC as a way of getting first-generation Permanent Residents (PRs) and citizens to play a part in the military defence of Singapore, it is important that the Government pays attention to these issues.

Page: 118

New Developments for ACCORD

Mr Ong Teng Koon (Sembawang) : Sir, through an Act of Parliament in 1967, Singapore's Defence Force, consisting of conscripts, was born and organised not without difficulty. The National Service Act requires that all able-bodied and healthy men at the age of 18 are to undergo two years of military life. There was initial resistance from the community. Understandably so, because it essentially meant taking male children away from parents for two years and subjecting them to the unknown perils of military life.

This illustrates the importance of support from the community for the country to organise a standing army. The need for community support and understanding becomes even more critical when our men graduate from full-time National Service training to reservist training. Calling on them and drawing them away from civilian life means disrupting their professional careers and affecting their employers' wherewithal.

The Advisory Council on Community Relations in Defence (ACCORD) was established by MINDEF in 1984 as a channel for the community to provide feedback on issues concerning Singapore's defence. Members of ACCORD have played a significant part in building public acceptance and support for Singapore's security and defence needs over the years.

Although ACCORD has been a useful channel of feedback for MINDEF and on the SAF's policies and programmes, Second Minister for Defence Mr Chan's announcement at COS 2014 on plans to restructure ACCORD to strengthen community support for NS was both timely and a positive step forward, even as support for NS remains high.

Commitment to defence and support for NS from the larger Singaporean community have to be continually reinforced and strengthened, especially in times of peace. It would be too late to only do so in times of crisis.

The restructured ACCORD, with its three Councils, is aimed at strengthening engagement with stakeholders from businesses, educational institutions, families and communities on the importance of defence and the need for NS.

Can MINDEF provide an update on the restructured ACCORD and the progress made over the past year? In particular, can MINDEF provide an update on the work of the various Councils under the newly restructured ACCORD? How are these Councils intending to reach out to stakeholders, such as employers, schools and families?

Page: 119

Commitment to Defence

Mr Alex Yam : Mr Chairman, "The most dependable guarantee of our Independence is a strong SAF. A strong SAF, in turn, depends on the political will to make the effort and pay the price." These are the words of the Father of SAF, the late Dr Goh Keng Swee, in 1984.

Since the formation of the SAF 50 years ago, the defence of Singapore continues to be dependent on the will of Singaporeans to support the policy of having a strong armed forces and taking personal responsibility to be involved in our defence.

The global and local landscape is changing. Our challenges are evolving, too. External challenges have moved on from conventional warfare to asymmetrical threats. Internal challenges have also emerged, key of which is demographic changes in Singapore, a shrinking population and, thus, a shrinking base from which our armed forces can call upon.

The world view of Singaporeans has changed as well. To many, dangers to our sovereignty are less apparent today than in the past. Support for National Service, that rite of passage for Singaporean men, remains high, but we must guard against complacency.

We need to recommit ourselves to the defence of our country, to return to the spirit of our early Independence. We are a country lacking in a real tradition of soldiering and seafaring. Therefore, much more effort is required to re-emphasise the importance of the SAF to Singapore's long-term future.

In the words of Mr Lee Kuan Yew: "Without a strong SAF, there is no economic future, there is no security."

How will the Ministry ensure continued commitment by Singaporeans to defence? What is the Ministry's reading of the long-term prospects? I, therefore, urge the Ministry to fully engage Singaporeans at this important milestone of SG50 and SAF50. There will be challenges but, as we have seen in our history, we can surmount them and come out stronger.

Fair and Equal Deployment

Mr Muhamad Faisal Bin Abdul Manap (Aljunied) : During last year's COS debate, I had requested the expeditious resolution of the issue of the loyalty of Singaporean Malays. The request was made based on the Suara Musyawarah Report. I would like to highlight one of the practices that may have inadvertently given rise to the unhealthy perceptions about the loyalty of Singaporean Malays.

Page: 120

During a recent forum attended by the Minister for Defence, it was reported in The Straits Times that the Minister had been asked a question on perceived bias against Malays

in the SAF and the exclusion of Malays from the Navy. In his response to the question, the Minister had said that there was a practical issue of having halal-certified kitchens on board Navy ships.

It is truly disheartening to find out from the Minister's response that Singaporean Malays had, indeed, been excluded from Navy ships all this while. It is also very disappointing to find out that the exclusion of Singaporean Malays from Navy ships is a result of a practical issue. But what is most worrying is that the practice of excluding Singaporean Malays from Navy ships may be wrongly perceived by Singaporeans as evidence that there is bias against Malays in SAF and that there is an issue over the loyalty of Singaporean Malays to this nation.

6.00 pm

It was also reported that the Minister had said that provisions have been made to allow Singaporean Malays to serve onboard Navy ships if they are willing to do so. This is definitely a most welcome change and I applaud MINDEF for taking a step towards a more inclusive SAF. I urge the Minister to seriously consider the possibility of ensuring that all Navy ships are equipped with halal-certified kitchens so that Malays will be allowed to serve freely in the Navy without any constraints. I urge the Minister not to stop there, but also to work towards making the entire SAF an inclusive and open organisation that is fair and just to all Singaporeans regardless of race, language and religion.

My final point is with regard to what the Minister had said during the forum about sensitive positions in the military. The Minister was reported to have said that a person is deployed in a sensitive unit in SAF based on his or her ability and beliefs, and not on his race. Again, I applaud the Minister and MINDEF for their laudable efforts to make SAF an inclusive and open organisation that is fair and just to all Singaporean service persons. However, I note that the Minister advised caution over the fact that "people can be blackmailed". While I agree with the Minister that we have to ensure that the people who are placed in sensitive positions in the military do not compromise our national security, I would like the Minister to clarify what kind of people does he have in mind and how can they be blackmailed?

SAF Pioneers

Mr Alex Yam : Mr Lee Kuan Yew at the 2012 Temasek Society dialogue said, "The SAF has done better than I hoped. That was because the generation that grew up, knew the stakes that were involved."

Page: 121

As the Minister has mentioned, 2015 is significant for two reasons: it is our nation's Golden Jubilee and also the 50th anniversary of the SAF. In 1965, we had the small luxury of still having the British forces stationed in Singapore. But with their accelerated pull-out in 1971, that meant that our early SAF pioneers had to build up a credible defence force in double quick time.

I attended the launch of the SAF50@Vivo with members of the SAF Veterans' League. It was a humbling moment to be in the midst of men like CPT (Ret) Shamsudin bin Shadan, an old friend who, despite his now mellowed years, still displays the tenacity and iron will of the strict Regimental Sergeant Major that he was in 1966.

I welcome and fully support the role of our SAF veterans and pioneers in educating and guiding the next generation of pioneers for SAF. I also look forward to more in SAF50 to commemorate this significant milestone. But more importantly, I hope that we can do more to recognise and honour our pioneers. Some of those who were in the earliest batches of SAF and National Service do not qualify for the Pioneer Generation Package. But serve they did. Would the Ministry consider any way to recognise these stalwarts similarly so that their sacrifices would not be forgotten?

National Day Parade

Ms Ellen Lee : Chairman, the annual National Day Parade (NDP) has been entrenched in the lives of Singaporeans as the signature event in the month of August, alongside other events to mark the nation's birthday. Participants feel the tug of patriotism in their hearts and revel in the uniquely Singaporean flavour of this visual and aural feast by cheering loudly and singing national songs.

Expectations run high this year because it is our 50th birthday and our people have confidence in MINDEF staging a parade that will be remembered for a long time. Minister has just given to us a glimpse of what to expect at the Padang this year. Can Minister give us more information on what else can we expect for the National Day Parade?

Ms Irene Ng Phek Hoong (Tampines) : Listening to the Minister's sneak preview of the NDP, it sounds exciting, but I hope it will not become a grand spectacle, a multimedia concert or just a TV extravaganza with bells and whistles. I feel that this NDP should be unique and special in another way. It should be a real experience for everyone there and everybody watching. It should stir our emotions, inspire our imagination.

Sir, Singapore held her first national day parade in 1966 at the Padang. Although still reeling from the trauma of Separation and anxious over the country's survival, our Pioneers managed to muster the courage and imagination to put up a parade with the theme:

Page: 122

National Pride and Confidence in the Future. One of the highlights was the 19-minute march-pasts of 23,000 men, women and children. The march-pasts was held by six contingents of the volunteer force, People's Defence Force (PDF), which was just formed on 30 December 1965. The PDF, including its women's contingent, were on public parade for the first time. Also in the PDF's contingent were several Ministers and Members of Parliament, all wearing, for the first time, the uniforms of officer cadets.

Our founding Prime Minister, Lee Kuan Yew, recorded in his memoirs: "They put up a brave show and were cheered enthusiastically by those behind the saluting guys and by the crowds lining the streets as they recognise their sun-tanned Ministers and MPs in uniform, eager in their stride if lacking in martial bearing."

In his aural history, Othman Wok, one of the Ministers who marched in that parade, revealed that it was Mr Lee who had gone around persuading the Ministers and Members of Parliaments to take part in the PDF contingent.

The NDP, held at a low point when the people's morale was sliding dangerously low, boosted their faith in the country and its leaders. At that time, Singapore had just two infantry regiments, both under Malaysian command, and no regular army of its own to speak of. Our Pioneer leaders sweated blood to build up SAF from scratch. How far we have come today. Our SAF has proven to be a strong and credible military force and the pride of our nation.

As we celebrate Singapore's 50th year of Independence this year, let us not forget our Pioneer Generation, especially our founding leaders, who have struggled against mighty odds to get us to this point. In the spirit of honouring our Pioneers, we should involve the PDF volunteers who marched in the first NDP if they are still with us and are able to come. We should invite them and give them their due spotlight in our Jubilee parade, now back at the Padang where it all began.

There is also an extra Pioneer leader, whom we must honour: our founding Premier, Lee Kuan Yew. It is also right that we, as a nation, pay him a special tribute in this year's NDP. Without his strong and visionary leadership, without his determination and gumption, Singapore would certainly not be where it is today, a country free and strong, as we often sing in our community song.

I fear that if we let this moment pass, we would become desensitised to the notion of sacrifice and service, and take the tears and sweat of those who have gone before us for granted. To pay tribute is to show the grateful heart of the nation. If there is time for a nation to make room for remembrance and sentimentality, it is this NDP. Even if Mr Lee may not

Page: 123

want it or expect it, I feel it is important that we, as a nation, honour him during this special occasion.

I would like to ask the Minister whether he could consider making this a part of this year's NDP. I would also like to call for the new SAF Volunteer Corps, which is really a reincarnation of the PDF, to take part. It is to show a line of continuity between the Pioneer Generation and the new one and bridge the generation gap.

The Second Minister for Defence (Mr Chan Chun Sing) : Mr Chairman, the cornerstone of our defence is our commitment to defend what is ours. What we cannot defend and what we are not committed to defend will not be ours. This commitment depends not just on the generations of National Servicemen who have served in SAF. It also depends on all Singaporeans who may not directly serve in SAF. It further depends on all institutions and organisations in our society. To engender the commitment of our National Servicemen, we must train our Servicemen well, train them safely, be good stewards of their time and talents and, last but not least, to give due recognition to our National Servicemen where it is due.

Dr Intan asked about our fitness regime. Fitness is the basic building block of our National Servicemen's capabilities. We want our National Servicemen to be fit for their operational duties, for themselves, for their families and for the country. We have announced that, from 1 April 2015, the IPPT system will evolve to a three-station regime to make it easier to train and to encourage our NSmen to excel. Since last year, we have also provided our NSmen more time – 12 months – to train, prepare and meet their fitness requirements. We have since introduced "IPPT in the Park", to make it more convenient for our NSmen to access training. We have also trialled the use of iDAT and Fitbit for NSmen to take greater ownership of their own fitness training. We did all these to partner our NSmen in their fitness journey even as they meet their other family and economic responsibilities. All these measures will also complement the SAF's vocational fitness regime to prepare our NSmen and NSFs for their operational demands.

Dr Intan also asked for an update on our safety system. In the area of training safety, we have made various improvements to our training and medical systems to better take care of our National Servicemen. The SAF medical service is working closely with the National Health Systems to leverage each other's capabilities to care for all Servicemen and for all Singaporeans as a continual. For example, we recently opened the SAF Cardiac Fitness Centre and this is integrated with the National Heart Centre. Such collaboration would allow us to leverage each other's resources and benchmark the SAF's health and medical standards to the wider national system. From January 2015, the SAF has also put in place the Emergency Ambulance Service which works with private ambulance operators to allow serious casualties to be directly evacuated to hospitals while receiving treatment en route.

Page: 124

At the tactical level, we have leveraged the soldier tracker system to keep track of our soldiers on difficult terrain and small unit operations. This system is not just operationally useful; it also provides greater confidence to our evacuation system. The SAF is also working behind the scenes to evolve our work-rest cycle to better manage physical demands on our soldiers. This will regulate their physiological strains while achieving optimal performance in their operational duties. To reduce heat injuries, heat stress monitors have also been introduced to closely monitor localised weather conditions.

To be good stewards of our National Servicemen's time and talents, and, as part of the Committee to Strengthen National Service (CSNC)'s recommendations, MINDEF and the Ministry of Home Affairs will be adjusting our pre-enlistment medical screening and administration schedule. Today, 45% of our pre-enlistees enlist within four months of graduation from their post-secondary education. In future, 90%, double what we have today, will enlist within four months; the rest will enlist within six months. This will impact more than 20,000 enlistees each year.

Let me now touch on time management. The learning style of our youths has changed. We must similarly evolve our training pedagogy. MINDEF will continue to widen the use of LEARNet to save an estimated 15% to 20% of training time to be reinvested into hands-on practice for our soldiers. We are also redesigning our training equipping system to allow our National Servicemen to focus more time on their training, rather than on administrative duties.

For example, we are currently building a new tactical engagement system equipping station that will come online this year. This new station will allow us to fully equip an infantry or armour battalion with the tactical engagement system for training within half a day, much less than the 24 hours required previously. For mobilisation and equipping, I have shared last year that what used to take 24 hours to equip a brigade size force will now take much less time than that. And the time saved can be used by the soldiers to conduct their refresher training as their commanders get their battle plans ready.

MINDEF also engenders commitment in our people by being good stewards of our Servicemen's talents and energies. SAF works on the principle of meritocracy, we deploy soldiers to vocations based on merit and that which best makes use of their capabilities, aptitude and commitment. It does not make sense for us to do otherwise because people are the most precious resource that we have.

MINDEF and MHA will continue to recognise our National Servicemen. The NS Recognition Award, or NSRA, will now evolve into the NS HOME Awards. "HOME" stands for

Page: 125

"Housing", "Medical" and "Education".

Previously, a National Serviceman would receive $9,000 to $10,500 across the three milestones in his NS journey. Going forward, he will receive an additional $6,000 for MediSave grants. From September 2015 this year, we will advance part of this additional grant to help cover our NSmen's MediShield Life premiums while they are serving full-time National Service.

Since implementation in September 2014, more than 56,000 National Servicemen have benefited and about $270 million has been disbursed under this scheme.

Mr Sitoh Yih Pin, Mr Low Thia Khiang and Mr Alex Yam asked about the Volunteer Corps. Mr Chairman, let me now touch on engendering the commitment of Singaporeans for those who do not directly serve in the SAF.

Actually, to be frank, all Singaporean families contribute to SAF directly and indirectly. Generations of parents, spouses, girlfriends who have encouraged and supported their sons, husbands and boyfriends in National Service have contributed directly and indirectly to our defence.

Come March, another group of people will demonstrate their commitment to our defence in a different way. They will form the SAF Volunteer Corps, or SAFVC, as we call them, continuing the proud tradition of the Singapore Volunteer Corps way before the SAF was even in existence.

The first intake of the SAF Volunteer Corps will begin training in March 2015, and it is this month. Since recruitment started last October, we have close to 900 applicants. We expect to take in 100 to 150 volunteers this year. They are a good mix of Singapore Citizens and first-generation Permanent Residents. They will also serve in a variety of roles alongside our National Servicemen. What they bring to the table is not just operational capabilities for the defence of this country. As importantly, if not more, they bring a new dimension of commitment to defence of our country. Through their actions, they have demonstrated their willingness to go the extra mile to defend what is ours.

In response to Mr Low Thia Khiang's question, different SAFVCs will have different capabilities and they will be matched according to their capabilities where their deployment is effective and safe. We will also security-clear all SAFVCs, as what we will do for all our National Servicemen. No difference.

Page: 126

Mr Ong Teng Koon asked about ACCORD. Societal support forms the final pillar in our commitment to defence. Since last August, we have revamped ACCORD to form three Councils – the Employer and Business Council; the Family and Community Council and the Educational Institutions Council. This is to provide greater representation across different sectors in society and to tap their ideas and network to strengthen our commitment to defence.

Let me also at this juncture thank the three co-chairs – Mr Tony Chew, Ms Claire Chiang and Ms Indranee – and their many sub-committees who have worked very hard over the last few months to come up with the many recommendations that we have before us today. MINDEF has accepted all their recommendations for this year. We will progressively put in place the many good ideas that they have recommended.

Let me provide some updates on the Employer and Business Council while Minister of State Maliki will provide updates for the other two Councils subsequently.

The Employer and Business Council has recommended that we revamp the Total Defence Awards to recognise more people and organisations across different sectors who have contributed to the defence of Singapore. For example, instead of just recognising the employers and companies, we should also recognise the colleagues and immediate superiors who have been supportive and who have made a difference to the National Servicemen when they answer the call of duty.

Another example – we know that different industries and different sectors face different challenges in supporting the National Servicemen. Somebody in the trade sector will need quite different support from somebody in a factory. We also know that the challenges of the small and medium enterprises (SMEs) and the big multinational corporations (MNCs) are quite different. Hence, we will work with the respective trade associations and business chambers to revamp their awards and to recognise more from the different sectors and different sizes of companies.

The Employer and Business Council also recognises that many skills – especially leadership, organisation and management skills – picked up by our NSmen are invaluable to their business operations. The performance of our NSmen in the SAF also provides valuable signals to the companies on the potential, the energies, the capabilities and the commitment of their employees. Hence, MINDEF and the employers have agreed to work together to let the employers better know the talent and attributes of our NSmen, who are their employees, so that they can better appreciate the talent of their employees – our NSmen – and better make use of those talents within their organisations.

Page: 127

The Employer and Business Council has also recommended for MINDEF to work closer with the employers to keep them informed of their employees' upcoming in-camp training schedules. This will allow employers to better forecast their employees' work responsibilities to afford our NSmen peace of mind in preparing the discharge of their National Service duties.

The outreach done by the Employer and Business Council has also provided many employers fresh perspectives on the work of our National Servicemen. Many of them have given me positive feedback on what they have learnt about their employees – our NSmen – what they do in camp, the level of commitment that they demonstrate in their recall exercises and so forth. All these have generated a fresh sense of commitment towards our national defence because now our employers better understand how their employees – our Servicemen – work not just for their respective companies in peacetime, but also for the collective defence of our country, without which, their businesses would not be able to flourish.

Knowledge and understanding are the first steps in our societal support. We will continue to strengthen this partnership with the employers and businesses to provide the strongest support possible for our National Servicemen in the discharge of their duties to the nation.

Mr Chairman, the most powerful weapon of the SAF lies in the commitment of our people. I once met a young soldier from another country. His military did not have the advanced technology that we have. He knew that his military is not as capable as ours. But he looked me in the eye and told me that should anyone dare to come into his motherland uninvited and mean them harm, he will personally chase them out – even if he has only a bamboo spear in his hand. I respect this young soldier's spirit and determination. I think there is much that we can learn from this young soldier.

Yes, today, the SAF is a capable military and we can defend what is ours. But this capable military will come to naught if we do not have the gumption, will, determination or unity to defend what is ours.

On the other hand, if we can couple our advanced military capabilities with steely determination, if we can engender the commitment of our people, our entire society – our NSmen, all Singaporeans, businesses and social civic organisations – then I must say we have a formidable, if not invincible, defence machine.

Mr Chairman, let me now invite Minister of State Maliki to provide further updates on the work of ACCORD.

Page: 128

The Minister of State for Defence (Dr Mohamad Maliki Bin Osman) : Mr Chairman, ACCORD is an important platform that encourages ground-up initiatives to strengthen support for National Service. Minister Chan spoke about ACCORD and its renewed direction and structure to help deepen appreciation for our Servicemen. I co-chair the Family and Community (F&C) Council with the Senior Vice President of Banyan Tree, Ms Claire Chiang,

and the Educational Institutions (EI) Council with Senior Minister of State for Education Ms Indranee Rajah. Through these two Councils, we hope to reach out to schools and institutions of higher learning (IHLs) as well as strengthen family and community support for National Services. We have invited members of the community to serve on the Councils. Since being appointed, the members have worked very hard and have proposed many fruitful initiatives. Let me share a few of them.

The EI Council, for example, brings together members from educational institutions and other stakeholders to look at ways to strengthen support for National Service. For example, currently, NSmen can enrol for special enrichment and refresher modules before the start of their university studies. These programmes help ease NSmen's transition back to university, especially if they are embarking on a new course of study, and may also contribute to their university credits. The Council will explore how these existing modules can be enhanced to better meet the learning needs of the students and explore other efforts which could support our NSmen.

The members of the F&C Council have also engaged our communities to develop good ideas to strengthen support for NS and defence. Every year, during SAF Day, we receive strong support from merchants and businesses who provide discounts to our Servicemen and Servicewomen. Last year, a total of 151 retailers, in sectors ranging from fashion to food and beverages to electronics, came on board to show their appreciation to the SAF by offering discounts and deals. This was a strong show of support from our community. We want to encourage more visible and sustained ground-up support for our Servicemen and Servicewomen.

In this regard, we will collaborate with the People's Association (PA) and SAFRA to garner community and local businesses' support. PA is looking at how they can offer privileges for use of facilities at community centres to Servicemen and Servicewomen, including NSmen and NSFs. SAFRA is also looking at enhancing their membership privileges. We hope that, through their partnerships and networks with various merchants, they can offer more benefits and discounts to Servicemen in recognition of their service.

The F&C Council also felt that it was important to reach out to women and help them better understand national defence, given the important support they provide to their sons, husbands or brothers serving their National Service. The Council, therefore, recommended that we partner the Singapore Council of Women's Organisations and PA's Women

Page: 129

Integration Network to conduct sessions for mothers to share their experiences in supporting their children through National Service. We are also looking into conducting engagement sessions with wives of NSmen and young women.

Mr Chairman, the restructured ACCORD and its three Councils have taken a more proactive approach, compared to its predecessor. The members are actively leading in various initiatives and such ground-up efforts will have a significant impact on our outreach and engagement with various stakeholders to increase commitment to defence and support for National Service.

Mr Sitoh Yih Pin and Mr Alex Yam asked how we are intending to mark SAF50. I am pleased to report that the SAF has planned a series of SAF50 events this year under the theme "Our SAF: Giving Strength to our Nation". These events recognise and honour the contributions of all the men and women who have served in the defence of our country. Indeed, SAF50 is our way of saying "thank you" to all who dedicated themselves to preserving our sovereignty and defending our way of life, especially our Pioneers.

What SAF lacked in resources in the early years, our Pioneers made up for with their fortitude and determination. Mr Chairman, with your permission, I would like to show some pictures of these Pioneers.

The Chairman : Yes, please. [ Slides were shown to hon Members .]

Dr Mohamad Maliki Bin Osman : These Pioneers range from the soldiers of the 1st and 2nd Singapore Infantry Regiment; volunteers from the Singapore Volunteer Corps, Singapore Naval Volunteer Force and Singapore Women's Auxiliary Naval Service, and other volunteer forces, many of whom became members of the SAF when it was formed in 1965. These Pioneers were the early batches of officers, as well as National Servicemen who responded to the call after National Service was instituted in 1967.

Last month, we organised the first SAF50 public event – SAF50@Vivo. Held from 12 to 15 February, the four-day event attracted more than 87,000 visitors. While it had the usual displays of military hardware and fun activities, SAF50@Vivo was anchored on an exhibition that featured SAF stories. These were stories of our Pioneers, and their convictions and sacrifices. Stories of men and women who supported the SAF, whether from within the SAF or from the larger Singapore community. One Pioneer featured in our stories was LTC (Ret) Timothy De Souza. He was part of the RSAF's first aerobatic team in 1973. Another Pioneer was LTC (Ret) Syed Ibrahim. He was involved in Konfrontasi operations and later became an instructor who trained the first batch of our Officer Cadets.

Page: 130

Another of these stories featured Eliza Heng, a volunteer counsellor and a mother of two sons. She spoke of how, through National Service, her sons "gained maturity in their outlook on life, and had become less self-centered and are more accepting of the little inconveniences in life". I am very heartened that many Singaporeans connected with and learnt a lot from the stories shared at the exhibition.

6.30pm

Mdm Hani, in her 40s who visited the SAF50@Vivo said that the exhibition helped her to relate personally to our Servicemen whom she spoke to at the SAF50 booth. She said, "Through them, I know what my son does and goes through during National Service". Another visitor is Ms Theresa Chua, 24 years old, who said that the event reminded her that "it takes the whole community to come together to defend and protect the welfare and sovereignty of our nation".

I am gratified by these comments. They remind me that because of the SAF, we have common space for Singaporeans of all backgrounds to interact, train together and forge enduring friendships. As a result, we have built a deep pool of social capital that gives strength to our nation. Through efforts, such as SAF50@Vivo and the outreach efforts of the ACCORD Councils, we will continue to engage the community and groups such as women and schools, so that we deepen the social capital and goodwill that the SAF has built over the years. We will continue to commemorate SAF50 over the course of the year.

To expand our outreach, the SAF50 exhibition will travel to various public venues, including regional libraries across Singapore, till October 2015. Stories on the exhibition will be put up on the SAF50 website and in a commemorative book, as well as adapted into short videos. The commemorative book, which will be launched in July this year, will be a collection of more than 70 stories that will allow us to see the SAF through the range of lenses – from diplomacy, defence technology, operations, to family and community support, media and entertainment.

Mr Sitoh Yih Pin and Mr Alex Yam also asked if our SAF Pioneers will be involved in the SAF50 events. I am happy that many Pioneers came to the SAF50@Vivo exhibition and many others will be at other key events such as the SAF50 Parade, SAF50 Commemoration Dinner and SAF50 at Istana Presidential Garden reception. SAF Pioneers invited to these events include officers and warrant officers from the first batch of National Servicemen, first batch of officer cadets, Pioneers who served before 1965, and Servicemen who contributed to significant local and overseas SAF missions and operations.

Page: 131

Some of these personalities will include our longest serving Chief of Defence Force Brigadier-General (Ret) Winston Choo, legendary Regimental Sergeant Majors, such as Captain (Ret) Hong Seng Mak – also known as "Tiger Hong" – and Captain (Ret) Shamsudin bin Shadan, and many more.

[Mdm Speaker in the Chair]

SAF formations and units will also engage their own Pioneers as part of their celebrations. Here, I also note Mr Seah Kian Peng's suggestion for MINDEF to support Unit Alumni Reunions. Indeed, we want to bring our Pioneers and previous batches of ex-Servicemen closer to our younger generation. They inspire us with their experiences, memories and motivations.

Mdm Chairman, with your permission, I would like to show a few more pictures of our Pioneers.

The Chairman : Yes, please. [ Slides were shown to hon Members .]

Dr Mohamad Maliki Bin Osman : SAF Pioneers like Colonel (Ret) Goh Lye Choon, Lieutenant Colonel (Ret) Syed Ibrahim and Lieutenant Colonel (Ret) Daljeet Singh were involved in Konfrontasi operations. They fought for their comrades, families and for the security of our country at a difficult period of Singapore's history.

We have Navy Pioneers like Lieutenant Colonel (Ret) Jaswant Singh Gill and Senior Warrant Officer (Ret) Wee Cheng Leong who saw the development of the navy from its formative years to become what it is today. Major (Ret) Agnes Fong from RSAF was amongst the first batch of female officers. She later blazed the trail to become the first female commanding officer in SAF. They will continue to inspire us and the next generation.

Mr Alex Yam also asked how MINDEF engaged Singaporeans to strengthen the public's commitment to defence. Our starting point is a simple one. We believe that everyone has a part to play in defence. All stakeholders can and should take a personal responsibility in defence, whether you are a mother, employer, teacher or student. This is why we work through ACCORD where different stakeholders from businesses, schools and the community have come forward to contribute and demonstrate their support for National Service.

Besides ACCORD, we have also been actively engaging grassroots leaders, employers, trade union leaders, overseas Singaporeans, Permanent Residents, new citizens, women's organisations and others through visits to SAF units and other activities to keep them informed and updated on National Service and defence-related issues. We aim to be as

Page: 132

inclusive as possible.

In collaboration with MOE under the SAF-Schools Partnership Programme, 33 post-secondary education institutions have paired with 47 SAF units to co-organise activities, such as unit visits, for their students.

We need to keep up such efforts to engage our public, because Singapore's defence can only be as strong as our people's will to defend Singapore. This is why we launched the Commitment to Defence Ambassadors programme this year during the SAF50@Vivo on 13 February, through which, some of our Pioneers and ex-Servicemen will engage our younger Singaporeans and share with them our early struggles, experiences, and accomplishments in the face of adversity. I hope that these stories will inspire younger Singaporeans and give them the spirit and strength to do their part for Singapore.

Indeed, Madam, as we celebrate SG50 and SAF50 this year, we must remember the spirit and strength exemplified by our Pioneers. We must harness it and work towards building a more secure and prosperous future for Singapore.

The Chairman : We have some time for clarification. Anyone wants to raise any issue? Ms Chia Yong Yong.

Ms Chia Yong Yong (Nominated Member) : Madam, thank you. I have heard our Ministers speak about the commitment, the importance of the heart and also of how people have spoken about how they are very proud and committed to be soldiers. In my own experience, I have spoken with many people and it is refreshing to hear those who say positive things about National Service because the majority of the people I have spoken with have very negative views about National Service. Many of them are cynical and I have heard people who say, "I do not see any reason why I should defend the country". There are people who have said, "We have not been trained well enough".

I would like to ask the Minister how we would want to address those. I think we may have certain generations who have passed, but for the younger ones who are coming into National Service, how are we going to build up that heart of passion and love for the country, so that regardless of the people and circumstances, they will want to train because they believe in defending the country?

Dr Ng Eng Hen : Madam, I thank the Nominated Member for the remarks. She is right. The SAF is a microcosm of society. You cannot expect everyone to hold the same view, same commitment. And I will tell you, as the betting average goes, we are fighting against the

Page: 133

trend.

We have a chart about the number of countries that have conscription over the last few years. It is coming down. In Asia, it is really Korea and us, because national service to protect your country is a difficult enterprise. And I would say to that, more an answer that is rose-tinted or even unrealistic, that you have to continue. We have tried in various ways – which the Second Minister and Minister of State have said – whether it is Commitment to Defence Ambassadors, or whether it is through our SAF50 exhibitions or our NDP which we talked about, it is a continuing process.

But I believe that on the whole, Singaporeans will defend Singapore when it comes to the crunch. I believe we have built enough goodwill and belief. I acknowledge what Ms Chia said, that there are those who feel that they do not feel that they have the heart or great commitment to defend Singapore; they exist. We will continue to work. But whether or not they do, each one recognises that you have to do National Service, and during the time that we have, we will continue to plod on and to continue to help them to understand why we have to defend our country.

Madam, with your permission, I also want to respond to some queries, since we have a few minutes in clarification.

One was what Member Irene Ng asked about in terms of whether those who marched in the first NDP will also be marching in our 50th Golden Jubilee. They will be slightly older now, but those that are around will, as she says in her words "some of them will come back". Indeed. And not only the first NDP contingent, but the first few, if not marching, then as spectators. The NDP Organising Committee thought that it would be useful to reprise or to bring back the old NDP marching contingents. So, there will be a vintage parade, which means nurses in their old costumes, policemen in their shorts. They would not be the people who marched in the first NDP; they will be younger ones but wearing the same costumes as the vintage parade.

But I agree absolutely with the Member that it is not just a show, and I agree with her. If that is all it is, then we have failed. We have to have a touch point, as the member has rightly pointed out, to explain or to impress on people, to celebrate together, to review what we have accomplished together as a nation and to look forward.

Another point that I want to respond to is the one by the Member Mr Faisal Manap. Let me thank him for his support for our policy on Malays in the SAF. As I have said and other Defence Ministers before me have said, the SAF's deployment of our National Service soldiers is based on their aptitude, abilities and commitment to Singapore. If you are

Page: 134

committed to Singapore and have the abilities, we will put you in the best possible position.

He asked some of the comments I have made in a session with Yale-NUS and Law. The context has to be correct. One question was asked, "Can you deploy them? How do you deploy them when it came to sensitive positions?" I made the point about security clearance, and that is routine for these positions. I think Members would find the SAF remiss if, for sensitive positions, we did not do our security clearance. You know what happened in other countries. Snowden is a classic example where your secrets are all out, and you put your people in danger. So, that is routine.

We will continue to commit to make sure that every Singaporean in National Service is put into the best use, as we have done in CSNS as we engage them. And with the support of Members of the House, I believe that we can continue to have a strong defence.

The Chairman : Mr Faisal Manap.

Mr Muhamad Faisal Bin Abdul Manap : Madam, just to give my point of view. My impression was that when the Minister mentioned about sensitive areas, it relates back to my own personal experience that I had when I was serving in National Service. So, I would like to ask the Minister; is there any sensitive area that is actually out of bounds for the Malays, because I kind of assumed that the experience that I had may be due to that.

Dr Ng Eng Hen : Madam, there are sensitive units within MINDEF that are out of bounds to Chinese, to Indians. Race is not a factor. It is an issue about commitment and, as you can well imagine, that they are even out of bounds to people who are senior, depending what is the sensitivity is. That is how you run militaries. You have to keep your secrets.

You know the slogan "Loose lips sink ships". Those who are in security understand it. And that is routine for militaries, for security agencies. It is common; it is applied; and we have to protect and make sure that the information we have is secure, and it is restricted based on security clearance.

The Chairman : Ms Irene Ng.

6.45 pm

Ms Irene Ng Phek Hoong : I just thought that I should make clear that when I said to involve the PDF volunteers who marched in the first NDP in this year's NDP, I did not mean to ask them to march. I meant to invite them and to give them the due spotlight so that they

Page: 135

will feel that they are being appreciated.

Dr Ng Eng Hen : We are inviting those that we can find. So, yes, some of them will be involved. But the larger picture is that we plan a good celebration that all Singaporeans can come together. The Member's point is that really, at the end of it, will Singaporeans feel as one, more united, more optimistic about the future, more determined to forge a better future for all of us? That we will need the help of all Singaporeans.

The NDP Organising Committee knows that it has a very onerous task and very high standards for it because there are many requests. They will do their best possible. But I would like us all to enjoy the NDP show come 9 August. And, as I said, make sure that after the NDP show, keep our streets clean, be safe, and I believe that if we put our minds to it and if we use that occasion to see how far we have come as a nation, to use that occasion to come together closer, and to use that occasion to look forward to our future, I believe that the NDP would have served its purpose. And I hope that it will serve its purpose.

The Chairman : If there are no other clarifications, Mr Sitoh Yih Pin, would you like to withdraw your amendment?

Mr Sitoh Yih Pin : Yes, Madam. Once again, Madam, I thank our Members for their contributions and our Ministers and Minister of State for their responses. With that, Madam, I beg leave to withdraw my amendment.

[(proc text) Amendment, by leave, withdrawn. (proc text)]

[(proc text) The sum of $12,691,000,000 for Head J ordered to stand part of the Main Estimates. (proc text)]

[(proc text) The sum of $431,000,000 for Head J ordered to stand part of the Development Estimates. (proc text)]

Page: 136