서면 답변 · 2025-09-24 · 국회 15

저작권법을 통한 딥페이크 방지

AI 거버넌스 및 규제 AI 안전 및 윤리 AI 경제 및 산업 AI 인프라 및 연구 논쟁도 3 · 실질적 토론

의원들은 싱가포르가 덴마크의 저작권법을 이용하여 딥페이크에 대처하는 방식을 참고하고 있는지 질의했습니다. 정부는 딥페이크로 인한 온라인 피해를 중시하며, 신규 법안을 통해 피해자의 구제 권리를 강화할 것이라고 답변했습니다. 저작권법은 주로 혁신과 창작을 지원하기 위한 것으로, 기술 남용을 규제하기에는 적합하지 않으며, 관련 침해 행위는 다른 지식재산권법으로 처리할 수 있다고 강조했습니다. 핵심 쟁점은 저작권법이 딥페이크 규제에 적합한지 여부입니다.

핵심 요점

  • Deepfakes cause online harm
  • Copyright law supports innovation, not regulation of abuse
  • Other IP laws can supplement governance
정부 입장

저작권법은 딥페이크 거버넌스의 주된 경로가 아님

질의 입장

덴마크 저작권법을 참고하여 보호 강화

정책 신호

신규 법안 추진으로 네트워크 보안 강화

“The primary purpose of our copyright law is to support innovation and incentivise creativity.”

참여자 (2)

영어 원문

SPRS Hansard · Fetched: 2026-05-02

40 Mr Patrick Tay Teck Guan asked the Minister for Law whether Singapore is studying Denmark’s decision to use copyright law to strengthen protection against deepfakes, by providing individuals with a legal basis to demand illegal digital imitations be removed from tech platforms.

Mr Edwin Tong Chun Fai : Countries around the world have different approaches to dealing with the issue of deepfakes. Singapore similarly takes the issue seriously.

The Government recognises that deepfake technology can be misused to harass or cause other online harm to individuals. In this regard, the Ministry of Law and Ministry of Digital Development and Information will be introducing new legislation and measures to enhance online safety. These include empowering victims of online harms, including those arising from deepfakes, to obtain relief and seek accountability from those responsible for such harms.

In Singapore, the primary purpose of our copyright law is to support innovation and incentivise creativity, by granting creators a bundle of rights to control the use and dissemination of their works, rather than regulate the misuse of technology that gives rise to online harms. Beyond copyright, other aspects of our intellectual property laws may be used where deepfakes result in specific harms under those laws. These include the common law action of passing off, in cases involving misrepresentation arising from digital replicas of identifiable individual traits without consent.