MDDI 演講稿 · 2026-09-17

代理人力部長兼數字發展與信息部高階政務部長劉潔敏在 SG AI Xchange 啟動儀式上的開幕致辭

Jasmin Lau · 代理人力部長兼數字發展與信息部高階政務部長 · SG AI Xchange 啟動儀式

要點

  • • 新加坡成立了由總理勞倫斯·黃主導的國家人工智慧委員會,擁有約100個人工智慧卓越中心,涵蓋金融、製造、半導體、醫療技術、移動出行、能源和化工等領域。
  • • 新加坡的人工智慧戰略強調追求能為企業創造真實價值、為工人創造優質工作的採用方式,而非為了追求人工智慧本身。
  • • SG AI Xchange是一個共享平臺,允許公司學習同行在不同業務優先順序、系統和約束條件下的人工智慧實施經驗。
  • • 鼓勵業務領導者與員工就人工智慧自動化計劃、再培訓機會和業務前景進行透明溝通,以維持員工信心和企業穩定性。
  • • Google Cloud正在新加坡開設工程中心,Anthropic正在新加坡建立運營,Databricks正在推出舉措以在本地建設人工智慧技能。
  • • 鼓勵公司聘用應屆畢業生並提供培訓和行業實習機會,因為新進入者需要早期職業機會以適應不斷演變的工作角色。

完整譯文(繁體中文)

MDDI 英文原文譯文 · 翻譯日期: 2026-09-28

新加坡科技學院院長朱奇昌教授

格芯新加坡高階副總裁兼總經理陳有光先生

經濟發展局執行副總裁皮炳光先生

各位行業夥伴和同事,

早上好。很高興看到各位在這裡。感謝邀請我來參加新加坡AI交流中心(SG AI Xchange)的啟動儀式。

現在,我日程中每週都要參加至少兩場與人工智慧相關的活動。有時我在與學生或工人交談,試圖理解勞動力的發展方向,也試圖弄清楚僱主對人工智慧的真實想法。有時我在與中小企業領導人接觸,他們中很多人仍然對嘗試持謹慎態度,並擔憂數字化的成本。有時我在與大型公司開會——你們中的一些人今天就在這裡——你們知道自己想要使用人工智慧,但還沒有完全想清楚這對你們的員工意味著什麼——如何重新培養他們,如何讓他們跟上步伐。

實際上還有另一群人——不太常出現在會議室裡——這就是我今天想與各位分享的群體。有一些基層工人和年輕學生對人工智慧持某種程度的反對態度。他們擔心人工智慧會奪走他們的許多工作機會和抱負。他們也把人工智慧的能力與他們在世界各地看到的環境破壞混為一談。這些情緒不應被忽視。它們是真實的情感,我們需要做更多工作來確保我們維持新加坡社會的團結,無論你是僱主、商業領袖、工人還是對自己所處的世界普遍感到焦慮的學生。

我在任何一週的日程安排中所進行的這些接觸描述了我們正在努力解決的挑戰。新加坡希望成為一個地方,在這裡人工智慧不僅得到開發,而且被廣泛採用,為企業創造真實價值,為工人創造好的工作機會。

每個人對人工智慧應該或不應該如何使用有不同的看法。每個人對推進的速度應該快還是慢有不同的看法。我認為在新加坡,我們確實意識到世界在變化,我們希望確保新加坡的人工智慧被廣泛採用,為我們的公司創造真實價值,為我們的工人創造好的工作機會。

我花費大量時間向工人和學生保證,我們在追求人工智慧時並不是盲目的——我們想要將這項技術用於善,歸根結底,這不是為了追求人工智慧的使用本身。如果這意味著給我們的工人提供更好的工作,我們會這樣做;如果這意味著為我們的人民提供更好的服務,我們也會這樣做。

今年早些時候,我們建立了由總理黃循財擔任主席的國家人工智慧理事會,我們在不斷獲得動力。對於我們如何打算追求人工智慧的良好用途有很多興趣,我們現在擁有近100個人工智慧卓越中心,涵蓋從金融到製造業。僅在製造業中,我們就看到半導體、醫療科技、移動出行、能源和化學品等領域的公司正在建立他們的人工智慧能力。

但這些能力只有在公司和工人知道如何利用它們時才有用。沒有單家公司能夠單獨解決這個問題。

每家公司都有不同的優先事項、系統和制約因素。實際上,許多商業領袖提出的問題是相似的。他們想知道人工智慧在哪裡能發揮最大作用。有時他們問我,我說,你們問的是錯誤的人。你們必須在公司、業務和行業內才能知道人工智慧能在哪裡發揮最大作用。他們也想知道他們是否應該以不同的方式建立資料基礎設施,以及建立不同型別的網路安全能力。

作為後來的想法,他們有時可能會問如何讓他們的員工參與其中。我希望他們能更早地提出這個問題,但在他們的總體計劃中考慮這個問題仍然是好的。現在,所有公司會以相當不同的方式回答這些問題。但像新加坡AI交流中心這樣的東西的好處在於能夠聽到其他人如何處理這個問題,因為這將節省每個人自己解決問題的工作。

不過這僅在公司也願意分享他們沒有做好的地方時才有效。在新加坡,這不是一種常見的文化,因為我們傾向於對自己做得不好的地方較為羞怯,並對彼此分享我們的秘密持保留態度。但我想說,在這個人工智慧時代,如果我們將經濟視為某種程度上容易受傷但有很好機會進行前沿舉措的經濟,那麼我們的公司和商業領袖們有更充分的理由彼此更開放地分享。

你們每個人在公開表達的內容上都會有界限,我理解這一點。但即使在這些界限內,在命名你們試圖解決的問題、證實困難之處、你們必須中途改變的內容以及你們需要不同處理方式的地方,也有很大價值。我要求你們分享這一點,這樣其他人也會分享,有時會帶來你們意想不到的聯絡或解決方案。

格芯在今天第一屆新加坡AI交流中心通過分享其在要求苛刻的製造環境中擴充套件人工智慧的經驗來幫助樹立這個例子。格芯也一直是我們經濟戰略評估工作的有力支持者,我認為他們理解為什麼他們不能單獨進行。這必須是許多更多企業參與的事情——一個許多其他商業領袖參與的分享平臺和社群。

在製造業中,人工智慧必須在工廠車間工作,其中質量、正常執行時間和成本都很重要。但真正的問題從來不是人工智慧解決方案是否可行,而是它是否足夠可靠,可以成為日常運營的一部分。

他們不得不弄清楚的許多事情對其他行業的人來說聽起來也相當熟悉。所以,盡你所能分享,因為新加坡AI交流中心的有用程度取決於人們願意投入其中的程度。所以你們中的那些人,如果你們有故事分享,即使它不是一個完美的故事,也讓組織者知道,我們很樂意讓你們與我們其他人分享。

現在,一次好的對話是有用的,但它只是第一步。如果你們在聽取分享後不在組織中將其轉化為行動,那麼這些都無關緊要。也許已經確定了一個痛點,改進了一個用例,或發現了一個新機會。也許有人也考慮過如何重新組織工作。不要將這僅僅視為一個好故事來聽,然後回去想"嗯,也許這對我不適用"。

所有這些都不應該是一次性或臨時性的練習。我們希望交流和分享的經驗能啟發創意。因為人工智慧將不斷變化,學習也必須不斷進行。如果你們現在還沒有準備好開始,就不要等太久。經濟發展局、新加坡科技學院、Lorong AI和許多其他合作伙伴已準備好幫助支援你們,並彙集從業者來建立更多動力。

將見解轉化為真正的變化也只有在人們具備技能和信心來根據他們聽到的內容採取行動並有效使用新工具時才能奏效。我剛才提到圍繞使用人工智慧存在一些焦慮。不要將沉默的勞動力視為同意的勞動力。你們中許多人有許多員工支援你們的業務。他們沉默並且還沒有反對這一事實並不總是意味著他們對事情的發展方向感到滿意。他們想知道你們的商業領袖真正的想法,你們是否已經在計劃裁員和放緩招聘。

儘可能地,我會鼓勵你們中許多人對你們的勞動力更加透明。如果確實有計劃進行自動化,與他們分享可能會發生什麼,以及什麼樣的再培訓對他們有效。如果業務前景看起來不太好,也與他們分享,因為否則他們會認為你們進行的所有轉變都是因為人工智慧,但有時真的不是這樣。我們認為更多的溝通和透明度將有助於保持我們的工人和公司的聯絡,我們希望你們在其中發揮作用。

我們知道業界在這裡的表現相當強勁。谷歌雲本週在新加坡開設其工程中心,Anthropic已宣佈將在新加坡建立業務。Databricks已宣佈了在本地建立人工智慧技能的新舉措。這些都是好訊息。我們希望更多公司將跟進與政府和我們的機構合作,發展該人才。

那些對接納新畢業生猶豫不決的人,請這樣做,因為他們確實需要職業生涯的第一步來開始他們的職業旅程。如果你們不太確定工作角色將如何改變,要相信他們也可以與工作角色一起改變。但將他們帶入你們所在的公司,給他們一些培訓和行業經驗,這樣他們也可以成為未來更強大勞動力的一部分。

所以,繼續在這裡投資你們的人工智慧能力,並繼續將你們學到的東西付諸實踐。我們希望新加坡成為一個地方,公司可以在這裡安全地構建、部署和擴充套件人工智慧,背後有所有強大的合作伙伴和人才的支援。

這就是新加坡AI交流中心的目的。我希望你們每個人都能帶著值得分享給團隊的東西離開。

非常感謝。

英文原文

MDDI 官網原始記錄 · 抓取日期: 2026-09-28

Professor Chua Kee Chaing, President of Singapore Institute of Technology

Mr Tan Yew Kong, Senior Vice President and General Manager Singapore at GlobalFoundries

Mr Pee Beng Kong, Executive Vice President of Economic Development Board

Industry partners and colleagues,

Good morning and it is good to see all of you here. Thank you having me at the launch of SG AI Xchange.

Now, not a week goes by in my schedule without at least two AI-related events. Sometimes I am speaking with students or workers, trying to make sense of where the workforce is going and also trying to figure out what the employers really think about AI. Sometimes, I am engaging SME leaders, many of whom are still hesitant to try and worried about the cost of digitalising. Sometimes, I am meeting with larger companies – some of you are here today – you know that you want to use AI, but have not quite worked out what it means for your people – how to reskill them and how to bring them along.

There is actually one more group – not quite often in the room – and this is the group that I thought I would share with all of you today. There is some groundswell of workers and younger students who are somewhat anti-AI. They fear how it will be taking away many of their jobs and aspirations. They also conflate what AI can do with the environmental damage that they are seeing around the world. These sentiments are not meant to be ignored. They are real sentiments and emotions, and there is a lot more we then need to do to ensure that we hold the Singapore society together, regardless whether you are an employer, a business leader, a worker, or a student who is generally anxious about the world that you are in today.

The description of my engagements across any week of my life describes the challenge we are trying to address. Singapore wants to be a place where AI is not just developed, but adopted widely enough to create real value for enterprises, and good jobs for workers.

Everybody has a different view of how AI should or should not be used. Everybody has a different view of how fast or slow the pace ought to be. I think in Singapore, we do realise that the world is changing, and we want to make sure that AI in Singapore is adopted widely enough to create real value for our companies and good jobs for our workers.

I spend a lot of time assuring workers and students that we are not blind in our pursuit for AI – that we want to use the technology for good, and at the end of the day, it is not about chasing the use of AI in itself. We will do so if it means giving our workers better jobs, and we will do so if it means providing better services for our people.

Earlier this year, we set up the National AI Council, chaired by Prime Minister Lawrence Wong, and we are gaining momentum. There are a lot of interest in how we intend to pursue the good use of AI, and we have now close to 100 AI Centres of Excellence spanning from finance to manufacturing. Within manufacturing alone, we are seeing companies in semiconductors, medtech, mobility, energy, and chemicals building up their AI capabilities.

But the capabilities are only useful if the companies and the workers know what to do with them. And no single company has worked that out alone.

Every company has different priorities, systems and constraints. Actually, many of the questions that business leaders ask are similar. They want to know where AI can make the biggest difference. Sometimes they ask me, and I say, you’re asking the wrong person. You have to be in the company, business, and sector to know where AI can make the biggest difference. They also want to know if they should set up their data infrastructure differently, and build different types of cybersecurity capabilities.

As a later thought, they may sometimes ask how to bring their people along. I wish they brought that question a lot further upfront, but it is still good that they consider it in their overall plan. Now, all companies will answer these questions quite differently. But the benefit of something like SG AI Xchange is from hearing how others have approached it because it will save everyone from working it out by themselves.

That only works, though, if companies are also willing to share what they have not done well. In Singapore, that is not a common culture because we tend to be quite shy about where we have not done well and reserved about sharing our secrets with each other. But I would say that in this age of AI, if we consider our economy as one that is somewhat vulnerable but standing a good chance of making frontier moves, then there is a lot more reason for our companies and business leaders here to share a little bit more openly with each other.

You will each have boundaries on what you can say openly, and I understand that. But even inside those boundaries, there is a lot of value in naming what you were trying to solve, what proved difficult, what you had to change mid-course, and what you needed to do differently. I ask that you share that, so that others will share back, sometimes with a connection or a solution you did not expect.

GlobalFoundries is helping to set this example at today’s first SG AI Xchange, by sharing its experience of scaling AI in a demanding manufacturing environment. GlobalFoundries has also been very strong supporter of our Economic Strategy Review work, and I think they understand why they cannot go it for it alone. It has to be something that many more businesses are involved in – a sharing platform and community that many other business leaders are involved in.

In manufacturing, AI has to work on the factory floor, where quality, uptime, and cost all matter. But the real question was never whether an AI solution could work, but whether it could be relied upon enough to become part of daily operations.

A lot of what they had to figure out will sound quite familiar to people in other sectors as well. So, share what you can, because the SG AI Xchange is only as useful as what people are willing to put into it. So those of you today, if you have a story to share, even if it is not a perfect one, let the organisers know and we will be happy for you to share it with the rest of us.

Now, a good conversation is useful, but it is only the first step. None of these matters if you do not turn it into action in your organisation after listening to the sharing. Maybe a pain point had been identified, a use case improved, or a new opportunity spotted. Maybe someone also thought about how work could be reorganised. Don’t take this as just a good story to hear, then go back and think “Well, perhaps this doesn’t work for me”.

All of these should not be a one-time or one-off exercise. We hope that the exchange and the lessons that are shared spark off ideas. Because AI will keep changing, the learning will have to keep going too. If you are not ready to start now, don’t wait too long. EDB, SIT, Lorong AI, and many other partners are ready to help support you and bring practitioners together to build more momentum.

Translating the insights into real change will also work only if people have the skills and confidence to act on what they hear and use the new tools effectively. I mentioned just now that there is some anxiety around using AI. Don't take a quiet workforce for an agreeable workforce. Many of you have many workers that are supporting your businesses. The fact that they are quiet and not pushing back yet doesn't always mean that they are happy with where things are going. They want to know what their business leaders are really thinking, whether you are already planning retrenchments and slowdown in hiring.

As far as possible, I would encourage many of you to be a lot more transparent with your workforce. If there is indeed a plan to automate, share with them what could happen, and what kind of retraining would work for them. If business outlook is not looking too good, share that with them too, because otherwise they are going to think all the transformation you make is because of AI, and sometimes it really isn't. We think that a lot more communication and transparency will help keep our workers and our companies together, and we hope that you play a part in it.

We know that the industry is stepping up here pretty strongly. We have Google Cloud opening its Singapore Engineering Centre this week and Anthropic has announced that it is setting up in Singapore. Databricks has announced new efforts to build AI skills locally. These are all good news. We hope that more companies will follow to work with government and our institutions to grow that talent.

Those of you hesitating to take on new young graduates, please do so because they do need that first step in their career ladder to start their career journeys. If you're not quite sure how the job roles will change, have faith that they can also change together with the job roles. But bring them on board the companies that you are in, give them a bit of that training and industry exposure, so that they can also be part of a stronger workforce in future.

So, keep investing in your AI capabilities here, and keep putting what you learn into practice. We want Singapore to be a place where companies can safely build, deploy and scale AI, with all our strong partners and talents behind them.

That's what SG AI Xchange is for. I hope each of you will walk out with something worth bringing back to your teams.

Thank you very much.