MDDI 演講稿 · 2026-09-23

陳杰豪高階政務部長在 NVIDIA AI Day Singapore 上的演講

Tan Kiat How · MDDI 高階政務部長 · NVIDIA AI Day Singapore

要點

  • • 新加坡開發了NEMOTRON-SEA-LION-V4.8開源模型系列,在七種東南亞語言上效能有所改進,針對地區需求做出適配。
  • • 新加坡國家人工智慧使命在醫療、金融、先進製造和連線領域應用「發現-開發-部署-示範-規模化」框架。
  • • 成功的人工智慧部署需要三個轉變:從使用技術到解決實際問題,從有前景的應用到重新設計的工作流,從部署到可示範的價值。
  • • 新加坡的TIP Alliance+計劃通過在真實組織中建設技術解決方案並與經驗豐富的專業人士協作來培訓年輕人。
  • • 新加坡克服商業化瓶頸的戰略是建立一個生態系統,結合前沿技術與需求客戶、研究人員、工程師、信任機構和真實運營環境。

完整譯文(繁體中文)

MDDI 英文原文譯文 · 翻譯日期: 2026-10-16

大家早上好。

我們正在經歷一個科技發展的非凡時期。

人工智慧模型的能力正在以非凡的速度提升。與此同時,企業正在投入數十億美元用於GPU、資料中心、網路、能源以及支援下一代AI所需的基礎設施。

NVIDIA一直處於這場建設的中心。與此同時,我認為下一階段提出了一個不同的問題:我們能否將所有這些AI容量轉化為AI價值?

最初的瓶頸是技術性的:我們能否構建實現先進AI所需的模型、晶片和計算基礎設施?

另一個瓶頸正在浮現——商業化。科技公司需要持續的企業需求來支援對AI基礎設施的持續投資。企業和政府反過來需要看到有意義的回報,然後才能大規模部署AI。

AI增長的下一個制約因素可能不是AI能做什麼。可能是組織能多快地將AI能做的事轉化為經濟價值。

有一個簡單的區分我覺得很有用。

AI基礎設施為我們提供了容量。

但容量不等於能力。

能力還不等於競爭優勢。

要創造價值,AI必須與資料系統、領域專業知識、人員和業務流程協作。這意味著企業也必須改變。

問題不再簡單地是"我們在哪裡可以使用AI?"更好的問題是"既然AI已經存在,我們應該重新設計什麼?"

這裡有一個進展過程:從工具、到任務、到工作流程、到崗位、最終到組織本身。最大的收益可能不是來自於讓單個任務快20%,而是來自於重新思考當人和AI可以不同方式分工時整個流程如何運作。

我瞭解到來自Sea的Kuangli(注:李寬黎,Sea合作與戰略高階總監)之前談到了Sea從數字原住民到AI原住民的歷程。Sea已經在其業務線上應用AI——Shopee、Monee和Garena。例如,在Shopee中,AI幫助賣家建立更好的產品列表、改進產品發現和做出更明智的決定——為整個地區的中小企業提供企業級AI能力。

重要的不是AI簡單地被使用。而是完成工作的方式正在改變。這是從採納到轉型的轉變。

我看到很多公司構建了令人印象深刻的AI試點。更難的部分隨後而來。它能連線到公司的資料嗎?它能與現有系統協作嗎?它安全嗎?它可靠嗎?人們能信任它嗎?圍繞它的工作流程需要改變嗎?最後,它能創造足夠的價值來證明擴大規模是正當的嗎?

這就是為什麼僅成功的試點不等於成功的轉型。

我認為有三個轉變需要正確把握。

首先:從使用技術轉向解決真實問題。從一個重要的商業或社會問題開始,而不是簡單地渴望使用AI。

其次:從有前景的應用轉向重新設計的工作流程。一個更聰明的模型插入到不變的工作流程中可能只會產生增量收益。更大的機會是圍繞人和AI可以一起做的事重新設計流程。

第三,重要的是,這是我經常看到許多專案失敗的地方:從部署到可證明的價值。我們需要一條線連線AI投資到工作流程變化到可測量的成果——生產率、收入、質量、安全和更好的服務。

然後,我們需要從部署中學習並再次改進。因為模型會改變。成本會改變。客戶期望會改變。持久的優勢將來自不斷學習、改變和適應的能力。

當AI超越螢幕時,這個商業化挑戰將變得更加重要。

我們看到對機器人學、具身AI和連線智慧與物理世界所需的基礎設施的投資不斷增長。

對新加坡來說,這很重要,因為我們許多最困難的制約因素是物理性的——土地、勞動力、能源和老齡化工作隊伍。與此同時,我們擁有複雜的真實世界環境——工廠、港口、機場、物流網路、醫院和城市系統——AI可以在這些地方產生巨大的影響。

第一波生成式AI改變了人與資訊之間的介面。下一波可能會改變智慧與物理世界之間的介面。

測試保持不變:該技術能否充分改進生產率、質量、安全或成果來證明擴大規模是正當的?

這將我的思路帶回到新加坡。我們不能超支最大的經濟體,我們也不需要這樣做。

我們的機會是在將技術從可能性、到證明、到擴充套件方面變得異常出色。我們可以將前沿技術與挑剔的使用者、研究人員、工程師、監管者、資本和真實世界的操作環境結合在一起。

一個例子是我們與NVIDIA在SEA-LION上的合作,這是為東南亞語言和文化設計的新加坡開放模型系列。新加坡人工智慧已納入NVIDIA的模型和工具來開發NEMOTRON-SEA-LION-V4.8,改進了七種東南亞語言的效能。

這就是領先市場的作用。我們能將技術適配到我們地區的語言、背景和需求,在實際場景中測試,從使用中學習,並構建能超越新加坡的產品。

這是我們想鼓勵的模式——不是孤立的技術,而是幫助公司從實驗走向部署、從新加坡走向整個地區的生態系統。

我們的國家AI任務在醫療、金融、先進製造和連線領域應用同樣的原則。目標不是建立數百個示範。我們的目標是發現重要的東西,與使用者共同開發,安全部署,評估價值,學習,推廣有效的方案。

在這裡發現。在這裡開發。在這裡部署。

在這裡展示價值。從這裡擴充套件。

還有一個勞動力維度。隨著AI承擔越來越複雜的任務,人所帶來的價值向問題框架、領域專業知識、判斷、系統思維和跨界協作能力轉變。

AI越來越能生成和除錯程式碼,承擔軟體開發生命週期的其他環節。技術專業人員的價值不能僅是生成更多程式碼的能力。價值越來越在於應用技術解決恰當的問題。

讓我分享一個例子。Ryan是淡馬錫理工學院應用AI專業學生,曾在新加坡航空公司基地維修部門實習。他參與一個專案,旨在縮短員工在賬單流程中手動檢查記錄的時間。他利用自然語言處理(NLP)和機器學習,結合對現有工作流程的理解,開發了一個預審工具來簡化其中一些檢查。

Ryan所學的和他所建的一樣重要。僅有技術知識是不夠的。他必須聽取經驗豐富的同事的意見,理解業務需求,提出恰當的問題,並調整他的技術知識來開發有用的工具。他開發的工具現在正在部門的日常運營中使用。

這就是為什麼TIP Alliance+這樣的專案很重要。我們不僅希望年輕人學習技術,更希望他們通過實際應用來學習——解決真實問題,在真實組織中,與經驗更豐富的人並肩工作。

能力通過實踐來建立。這在商業上很重要,因為學習速度更快的組織能從相同的基礎技術中獲取更多價值。

AI投資週期將繼續保持巨大規模。但要維持這一週期,技術能力必須轉化為經濟價值。

這是我們需要解決的商業化挑戰。

NVIDIA和這個生態系統中的公司正在幫助構建使當今AI成為可能的基礎設施。下一個挑戰是開啟應用、工作流程和業務模式,使這些投資發揮效能。

新加坡想要幫助應對這一挑戰。我們將建立一個地方,使前沿技術與苛刻的使用者相遇,困難的問題可以與研究人員和工程師協力解決,部署得到可信機構的支援,成果可以在真實世界中展示。

因為在AI時代,優勢不僅屬於能獲得最強大智慧的人。它將屬於最能把那種智慧投入使用的人。

我祝各位會議圓滿。我想感謝各位參與這個生態系統。非常感謝。

英文原文

MDDI 官網原始記錄 · 抓取日期: 2026-10-16

Good morning.

We are living through an extraordinary period in technology.

AI models are becoming more capable at remarkable speed. At the same time, companies are investing billions of dollars in GPUs, data centres, networks, energy and the infrastructure needed to support the next generation of AI.

NVIDIA has been at the centre of this build-out. At the same time, I think the next phase raises a different question: Can we turn all this AI capacity into AI value?

The first bottlenecks were technological: Can we build the models, chips and computing infrastructure needed to make advanced AI possible?

Increasingly, another bottleneck is emerging – commercialisation. Technology companies need sustained enterprise demand to support continued investment in AI infrastructure. Enterprises and the government, in turn, need to see meaningful returns before they deploy AI at scale.

The next constraint on AI growth may not be what AI can do. It may be about how quickly organisations can turn what AI can do into economic value.

There is a simple distinction that I find useful.

AI infrastructure gives us capacity .

But capacity is not the same as capability .

And capability is not yet competitive advantage .

To create value, AI has to work with data systems, domain expertise, people and business processes. That means enterprises have to change too.

The question is no longer simply: “Where can we use AI?” A better question is: “What should we redesign, now that AI exists?”

There is a progression here: from tools, to tasks, to workflows, to jobs, and eventually to the organisation itself. The biggest gains may come not from making an individual task 20 per cent faster, but from rethinking how an entire process works when people and AI can divide the work differently.

I understand that Kuangli from Sea (Note: Li Kuangli, Senior Director of Partnership and Strategy, Sea) spoke earlier about Sea’s journey from being digitally natives to becoming AI-natives. Sea is already applying AI across its business lines – Shopee, Monee and Garena. In Shopee, for example, AI is helping sellers create better product listings, improve product discovery and make better-informed decisions — bringing enterprise-grade AI capabilities to SMEs across the region.

What matters is not simply that AI is being used. It is that the way work is done is changing. That is the shift from adoption to transformation.

I have seen so many companies build impressive AI pilots. The harder part comes afterwards. Can it connect to the company’s data? Can it work with existing systems? Is it secure? Is it reliable? Can people trust it? Does the workflow around it need to change? And ultimately, does it create enough value to justify scaling it?

This is why a successful pilot alone is not a successful transformation.

I think there are three transitions to get right.

First: From using technology to solving a real problem. Start with an important business or societal problem, not simply a desire to use AI.

Second: From a promising application to a redesigned workflow. A smarter model inserted into an unchanged workflow may produce only incremental gains. The larger opportunity is to redesign the process around what people and AI can do together.

Third, importantly, where I often see many projects fail: From deployment to demonstrable value. We need a line that connects AI investment to workflow change to measurable outcomes — productivity, revenue, quality, safety, and better services.

Then, we need to learn from deployment and improve again. Because models will change. Costs will change. Customer expectations will change. Lasting advantage will come from the ability to keep learning, changing and adapting.

This commercialisation challenge will become even more important as AI moves beyond the screen.

We are seeing growing investment in robotics, embodied AI and the infrastructure needed to connect intelligence with the physical world.

For Singapore, this matters because many of our hardest constraints are physical – land, labour, energy and an ageing workforce. At the same time, we have sophisticated real-world environments – factories, ports, airports, logistics networks, hospitals and urban systems – where AI can make a tremendous difference.

The first wave of generative AI transformed the interface between humans and information. The next may transform the interface between intelligence and the physical world.

The test remains the same: Does the technology improve productivity, quality, safety or outcomes enough to justify scaling it?

This brings me to Singapore. We cannot outspend the largest economies, and we do not need to.

Our opportunity is to become exceptionally good at moving technologies from possibility, to proof, to scale. We can bring frontier technology together with demanding users, researchers, engineers, regulators, capital and real-world operating environments.

One example is our work with NVIDIA on SEA-LION, Singapore’s open-model family designed for the languages and cultures of Southeast Asia. AI Singapore has incorporated NVIDIA’s models and tools to develop NEMOTRON-SEA-LION-V4.8, improving performance across seven Southeast Asian languages.

This is what a lead market can do. We can adapt technology to the languages, contexts and needs of our region, test it in real settings, learn from use, and build something that can travel beyond Singapore.

This is the model we want to encourage – not technology in isolation, but an ecosystem that helps companies move from experimentation to deployment, and from Singapore into the region.

Our National AI Missions apply the same principle in healthcare, finance, advanced manufacturing and connectivity. The objective is not to create hundreds of demonstrations. It is to discover what matters, develop it with users, deploy it safely, measure the value, learn, and scale what works.

Discover here. Develop here. Deploy here.

Demonstrate value here. Scale from here.

There is also a workforce dimension. As AI takes on increasingly complex tasks, the value people bring shifts towards problem framing, domain expertise, judgement, systems thinking and the ability to work across boundaries.

AI can increasingly generate and debug code and take on other parts of the software-development lifecycle. The value of a technology professional cannot simply be the ability to produce more code. The value is increasingly in applying technology to solve the right problem.

Let me share an example. Ryan, a student at Temasek Polytechnic studying Applied AI, interned with Singapore Airlines’ Base Maintenance Division. He worked on a project to reduce the time employees spent manually checking records in the billing process. Using Natural Language Processing (NLP) and machine learning, together with an understanding of the existing workflow, he developed a pre-vetting tool to streamline some of those checks.

What Ryan learnt was as important as what he built. Technical knowledge was not enough. He had to listen to experienced colleagues, understand operational needs, ask the right questions and adapt his technical knowledge to make something useful. The tool he developed is now being used in the division’s daily operations.

That is why programmes like TIP Alliance+ matter. We want our young people not simply to learn about technology, but to learn by building with it – on real problems, in real organisations, alongside people with deeper experience.

Capability is built by doing. This matters commercially, because organisations that learn faster can capture more value from the same underlying technology.

The AI investment cycle will continue to be enormous. But to sustain it, technological capability has to translate into economic value.

That is the commercialisation challenge we need to unlock.

NVIDIA and companies across this ecosystem are helping to build the infrastructure that makes today’s AI possible. The next challenge is to unlock the applications, workflows and business models that make those investments productive.

Singapore wants to help with that challenge, by creating a place where frontier technologies meet demanding users, where difficult problems can be tackled with researchers and engineers, where deployment is supported by trusted institutions, and where outcomes can be demonstrated in the real world.

Because the advantage in the AI era will not belong simply to those with access to the most powerful intelligence. It will belong to those best able to put that intelligence to work.

I wish all of you a fruitful session. I'd like to thank all of you for being part of this ecosystem. Thank you very much.