MDDI 演講稿 · 2025-10-15

Josephine Teo 部長在 Meta Llama 孵化器演示日的開場致辭

Josephine Teo · 數碼發展及新聞部長 · Meta Llama孵化器演示日

要點

  • Meta 駱駝孵化器計劃(Llama Incubator Programme)為參與者提供先進語言模型的訪問許可權及 Meta 與合作伙伴的工程資源和專業知識,以降低新加坡企業開展 AI 實驗的門檻。
  • 新加坡《國家 AI 戰略》於 2019 年首次釋出,從供需兩端確立了推動工業界、政府與研究界 AI 採用的抓手,AI 的普及程度已從小眾領域走向社會主流。
  • 陸路交通管理局(LTA)開發了符合《指令手冊 8》(IM8)要求的漏洞評估與滲透測試報告工具,使資訊安全人員得以專注於威脅獵取,且該工具可在各政府機構複用。
  • 政府的開源貢獻包括完全開源的 AI 測試框架與軟體工具包 AI Verify,以及向合作國家分享新加坡數字經濟與數字社會建設經驗的「新加坡數字門戶」(Singapore Digital Gateway)。
  • 部長張思樂歸納出五類高價值 AI 應用場景:「三個 P」——個性化(personalisation)、規劃(planning)、預測(prediction);以及「兩個 A」——自動化(automation)與異常檢測(anomaly detection)。
  • 「廊 AI」(Lorong AI)是每週三定期聚會的 AI 從業者社群,被列為從業者共享經驗、縮短學習曲線的重要平臺資源。

完整譯文(繁體中文)

MDDI 英文原文譯文 · 翻譯日期: 2026-06-21

早上好。祝賀所有在Meta Llama孵化器計劃中獲獎及參與的人士順利完成課程。同時也感謝Meta與我們合作,共同推動新加坡的AI應用。

在參觀展臺、聆聽演講的過程中,我不禁感受到一種進步的氣息。AI在新加坡曾經還是邊緣話題,如今已日益融入主流。

讓我解釋一下為何我認為這一點如此重要。

在我過去擔任人力部或財政部職務期間,我們關注的問題之一,是如何讓技術滲透到整個經濟活動的各個層面。

除非技術能夠真正滲入社會的每一個角落,否則受益者只會是少數群體。前沿企業總能善用新技術,而經濟體系中最邊遠的部分往往會被落下。

一旦發生這種情況,經濟雖然仍在運轉,卻無法發揮其全部潛力;它無法像漲潮託舉所有船隻那樣,同等地提振所有企業。

然而,技術擴散說起來容易,做起來難。要使AI這樣的通用技術得以廣泛擴散,需要許多深思熟慮的干預舉措。

這也是我和我的團隊在主管新加坡國家AI戰略時的優先事項之一。我們確定了一系列推動因素,以啟用產業、政府和研究社群的活動,因為歸根結底需要有需求存在。我們不能只做供給側的事,卻沒有人真正使用現有的資源。

《國家AI戰略》第一版釋出於2019年。但如果回顧其釋出後所展開的各類活動,可以說當時的AI應用仍相當小眾。我們看到醫療、金融服務、交通及物流領域出現了局部應用,但並不普遍,尚未進入主流。

時至今日,AI已成為主流,這一事實難以忽視。幾乎找不到哪個場合完全不提"AI"這個詞。

就連幾周前我在勿洛心臟地帶參加的社群駭客馬拉松上,基層志願者們也在嘗試運用AI,為居民帶來更好的惠民服務,並協助他們處理日常生活事務。

無論是在中央商業區還是心臟地帶,AI已成為新加坡不可或缺的一部分。

我們能走到今天,有賴於像你們這樣擁抱這一理念的開發者,以及Meta和其他在新加坡建立戰略佈局的公司所形成的夥伴關係。

除了進入主流,AI的應用型別也愈加多樣。今天展示的案例彰顯了AI運用方式日益深入的成熟度——提升企業實力、滿足合規要求,以及幫助他人。

例如,Straits Interactive構建了一套產品,賦能非技術專業人員從AI技術中獲益,旨在實現技術的民主化,惠及更廣泛的生態系統。

另一個例子是LTA開發了一款漏洞評估與滲透測試報告工具——該工具符合《指令手冊第8冊》(IM8)¹的要求——從而使資訊安全人員能夠將精力集中於威脅狩獵等更重要的工作,進而更好地保障系統安全。同樣的工具也可供其他政府機構的同事使用,因為他們都必須遵從IM8。

MyRepublic的AI協作員也對智慧體系統進行了探索,用於跟進銷售線索、拓展業務範圍,同時保持人工監督,而非取代人類。

這些都是應對現實問題的理念付諸實踐的有益案例。它們標誌著我們AI應用之旅中一個極為重要的拐點——AI應用已從邊緣走向主流。

維護一個開放原始碼觸手可及的環境同樣至關重要,因為並非所有機構都擁有相同的資源來開展實驗。

實驗需要勇氣,但更重要的是,需要資源。Llama孵化器計劃提供的不僅是進入先進模型的通道,還有Meta及其合作伙伴所帶來的工程資源、知識與洞見。

政府在開放原始碼方面必須言行一致。

我們的貢獻包括AI Verify。這是一個完全開源的測試框架與軟體工具包。下載次數越多、使用越廣泛,我們積累的知識與理解就越豐富,改進空間也就越大。

最近,我還發布了新加坡數字閘道器(Singapore Digital Gateway)。這是一種將新加坡建設數字經濟與數字社會的經驗向世界各地同行開放共享的方式,因為我們常常被邀請分享這些經驗。

最後,我想回應我們時不時會遇到的一些論調。我們偶爾會看到一些給AI應用潑冷水的報告,例如,一些知名機構談論AI實驗如何失敗,以及AI未能產生企業所期望的回報。這些意見有其公正之處,但也反映出實驗本身有多麼不易。

然而與此同時,我們必須不斷學習,必須積累能力。即便是通用技術,其效益的實現也需要時間。

有一句話常被提及——電氣化技術在19世紀末就已出現,但工廠直到20世紀20年代才真正用上電力。為何需要這麼長時間?

原因在於工廠內建了使用舊技術的系統,需要圍繞這些系統尋找出路。他們還需要在每個關鍵節點上找到新的突破。我相信AI也會經歷同樣的過程。

當研究表明AI應用被視為徒勞無益之舉時,我們也能從中汲取重要教訓。我們需要找到實驗方式的最佳平衡點,以建立長期能力,並建立一種信念——實驗是認真嚴肅的,不應輕易放棄。

縱觀通過此類孵化器以及我們的AI卓越中心湧現出的應用案例,它們大致歸屬於五個類別——即我所稱的"三個P"和"兩個A"。

AI可以大展身手的三個P是:個性化(personalisation)、規劃(planning)和預測(prediction)。

兩個A分別是自動化(automation)與異常檢測(anomaly detection),即AI掃遍海量資料、從中識別可疑專案的能力。

如果我們能夠建立共識,接受實驗並不總能產生我們期望的結果,但我們將在理解問題方面不斷精進,並積累能力,使各組織未來在AI領域取得成功,那麼我們終究有所收穫。

我並不因為那些表明AI應用不會產生成效的研究而感到悲觀。這些研究說明,我們達到理想效果的次數還不夠多。但這不是放棄的理由,而是加倍投入的理由。

最後,在所有這些實驗過程中,我們不獨自前行至關重要。積極與社群中的人互動非常重要,因為你將從他們的經驗中汲取大量養分。

例如,我們有Lorong AI——一個每週三聚會的AI從業者社群。社群中的某位成員或許已經比你更接近答案。通過融入AI社群,你可以大幅縮短自己的學習曲線。

隨著這一AI社群不斷壯大,我們將更有把握鞏固整體經驗,使AI應用不再侷限於邊緣地帶,而是進入主流,成為我們提振經濟、保持新加坡競爭力的核心所在。

謝謝。

¹《指令手冊第8號》(IM8)是指一套供所有政府機構使用的政府政策,旨在保護資訊通訊技術與智慧系統(ICT and SS)資產。

英文原文

MDDI 官網原始記錄 · 抓取日期: 2026-06-21

Good morning. Congratulations to all winners and participants on completing Meta’s Llama Incubator Programme. I also want to thank Meta for partnering with us to promote AI adoption in Singapore.

As I was going through the exhibition booths and listening to the presentations, I couldn't help but feel a sense of progress. AI, which used to be on the fringe in Singapore, is increasingly in the mainstream.

Let me explain why I think this is so important.

In my previous roles, be it in the Manpower or Finance Ministry, one of our concerns was how technology could be diffused into the whole spectrum of economic activities.

Unless technologies percolate into the corners of society, only a narrow group will benefit. Frontier companies can always be expected to make the most of new technologies, and it is always the far reaches of the economy that get left behind.

When that happens, the economy continues to chug along, but it does not realise its full potential; it does not uplift all companies the same way as the rising tide lifts all boats.

But diffusion of technology is easier said than done. For a general-purpose technology like AI to be diffused, many thoughtful interventions are required.

That was one of our priorities for my team and me looking after the National AI Strategy in Singapore. We identified a suite of enablers to drive activity in the industry, government and research communities because ultimately there needs to be demand. We can’t just do things on the supply side but no one is really using what’s available.

The first edition of the National AI Strategy was in 2019. But if we were to look at the kind of activities that took place after its publication, it is fair to say that AI adoption then was still quite niche. We saw pockets of adoption in healthcare, financial services, transport and logistics, but it was not widespread. It hadn't entered the mainstream.

Fast forward to today. it is hard to ignore the fact that AI has become very mainstream. There are very few gatherings that you would go to that the term “AI” is not mentioned at all.

Even in the community hackathon that I attended in a few weeks ago in the heartlands at Bedok, the grassroots volunteers were also experimenting with the use of AI to bring about better benefits for the residents and help them with their day-to-day lives.

It has become very much a part of the Singapore landscape, whether you are in the Central Business District or the heartlands.

The fact that we have come this far is thanks to developers like you, who have embraced the idea, and because of the partnerships with Meta and other companies that have grown a strategic presence in Singapore.

Beyond going mainstream, there are also many different kinds of AI applications. The examples we see today show the growing sophistication in how AI can be used - to uplift businesses, fulfil compliance requirements, and help others.

For example, Straits Interactive built a suite of offerings to empower non-tech professionals to benefit from AI technology, which is meant to be democratising and useful to the wider ecosystem.

Another example is how LTA built a tool on vulnerability assessment and penetration testing reporting - which complies with the Instruction Manual 8 (IM8)¹ - thus enabling information security staff to focus on more important work like proper threat hunting and to secure our systems better. The same tool can be used to help colleagues in other government agencies, because they all have to comply with IM8.

MyRepublic’s AI Co-worker also experimented with agentic systems to follow up on sales leads and broaden its business base, while at the same time while keeping the human in the loop, not replace them.

These are good examples of ideas that are being implemented to deal with real-world issues. They signal a very important point of inflection in our AI adoption journey, where AI adoption has gone from the fringe to mainstream.

It is also still important for us to uphold an environment where open source is available because not all organisations will have the same access to resources to experiment.

Experimentation takes courage, but very importantly, it takes resources. The Llama incubator programme makes available not just access to an advanced model, but also the engineering resources, knowledge and insight that Meta, together with your partners, have brought to the table.

The Government has to walk the talk when it comes to open source.

Our contribution includes AI Verify. It is a testing framework and software toolkit that is completely open source. The more it is downloaded, the more it is used, the more knowledge and understanding that we have, and the more it can be improved.

Recently, I also launched the Singapore Digital Gateway. This is a way of open sourcing Singapore’s experiences in building up a digital economy and digital society with our colleagues around the world, as we are often asked to share our experiences.

Finally, I'd just like to respond to readings that we may encounter from time to time. Every now and then, we would come across a report that pours cold water on AI adoption. For example, distinguished organisations talking about how AI experimentation is failing, and AI is not producing the returns that the companies would like to see. These are fair comments, but they also reflect just how difficult experiments could be.

Yet at the same time, we have to learn. We have to acquire capability. Even for a general-purpose technology, it takes time for its benefit to be realised.

It's been often said – electrification was available from the late 1800s, but factories did not really use electricity until the 1920s. Why did it take so long?

It's because factories had embedded systems using older technology; they need to work around these systems. They also needed to find new breakthroughs at each juncture. I believe this will be the same for AI.

There are also important lessons to be taken away when studies show that AI adoption seen as a fool's errand. We need to find the sweet spot in the way we experiment, to build long term capabilities, and a sense of trust that the experimentations are serious and should not be given up on easily.

Looking at the use cases that have emerged through incubators like this and through our AI Centres of Excellence, they fall broadly into five categories - what I call the three P's and two A's.

The three Ps where AI can be put to very good use are personalisation, planning and prediction.

The two A's are automation and anomaly detection, that is the ability for AI to trawl through tons of data to find items that seem suspicious.

If we could build a case to accept that the experimentation may not always produce the results that we want, but we will get better at understanding the problem and build capabilities that enable the organisations to achieve success in AI in the future, we will still have gained something.

I'm not pessimistic because of all the studies that suggest that AI adoption will not yield results. It means that we haven't gotten it right as many times as we would like. But it is not a reason to give up. It is a reason to double down.

Finally, in all of these experimentations, it is important that we do not journey alone. It is important to engage people who are in the community because you will learn so much from their experiences.

For example, we have Lorong AI which is a community of AI practitioners that gathers every Wednesday. It's possible that someone in the community has gotten a closer answer than you have. You can then shorten your learning curve by being plugged into an AI community.

As this AI community continues to strengthen, we have a much better chance of solidifying this whole experience and making AI adoption not just at the fringe but in the mainstream, at the front and centre of how we uplift our economy and keep Singapore competitive.

Thank you.

¹Instruction Manual 8 (IM8) refers to a set of government policies used by all government agencies to safeguard Infocomm Technology and Smart Systems (ICT and SS) assets.