MDDI 演講稿 · 2026-02-06

楊莉明部長在微軟 AI QuickStart 計劃啟動儀式上的開幕致辭

Josephine Teo · 數碼發展及新聞部長 · 微軟 AI QuickStart 計劃啟動儀式

要點

  • 新加坡 SME 數字化底子紮實——95% 已使用某種數字技術;但 AI 在企業層面差距明顯:大企業約 60%,SMEs 僅 15%(個人層面則是 75%)。
  • Josephine 不悲觀——SME 在每一波技術浪潮中都跟得上,問題不是「會不會」而是「多快、多深」。
  • SME 落地 AI 三道坎:成本(實驗、整合、算力——通過 Enterprise Compute Initiative 給算力額度);能力(領導層敢夢 + 員工把原型搬到核心流程);信心(看別人成功 + 自己有過小成功 + 「傻瓜級說明書」)。
  • AI QuickStart Programme 由 IMDA、微軟、大華銀行(UOB)合作:微軟提供「IKEA 客服」級技術兜底;UOB 提供網路與融資;IMDA 通過「數碼領袖計劃」(生成式 AI 新軌道)做能力建設。目標先幫 1000 家 SME 成為「AI 節奏帶頭者」(pacesetters)。

完整譯文(繁體中文)

MDDI 英文原文譯文 · 翻譯日期: 2026-05-02

下午好,各位同仁與朋友——Rachel、Tolgar、Kavita、Janet 與 Wee Luen。

感謝邀請我出席「微軟 AI QuickStart 計劃」的啟動儀式——它由微軟與 IMDA、大華銀行(UOB)共同推出。

你們當中有人知道,我職業生涯始於經濟發展局(EDB),專注支援中小企業(SMEs)。那是很久以前的事了;那時候我們在幫 SME 解決融資問題。我們有一項叫「本地企業融資計劃」(LEFS),還有一項叫「本地企業技術援助計劃」(LETAS)。

大約同期,我們也整合出當時所謂的「中小企業總體規劃」與「零售業發展規劃」。這就是我在 1990 年代初期所佔用注意力的事。

我能看到的是——每一波技術浪潮裡,我們都密切關注 SME 的採用。這背後是一種信念:在每一個有活力的經濟生態裡,SME 都有非常重要的份量。它們帶來動能、帶來價值,並且——如果支援方法對頭,它們就能創造出好的就業。

我們之所以認為支援 SME 在技術採用上的努力很重要,還有另一個原因。研究清楚地表明——技術擴散是不均勻的。前沿企業往往能投入資源、組建團隊、動腦實驗,併為自己創造更多競爭優勢。

但「從技術發展中獲益」這件事,往往很難超出前沿企業。一長串其他公司似乎跟不上,這令人憂慮——但並非不可能完成的任務。

看今天的「數字化」——它來自更早的「計算機化」,而計算機化又來自「機械化」。

看新加坡的 SME,紀錄其實相當紮實。今天 95% 的 SME 都在使用某種數字技術——並不一定都同樣精深,但這件事對它們已經不再陌生。

因此,我們認為這件事值得繼續投入。比如,IMDA 是「SMEs Go Digital」計劃的設計者與執行者。

今天擺在我們面前的挑戰是——AI 的採用如何也能在 SME 中更廣泛地獲得。我們一直說 AI 是「民主化」的技術——意思是它能被更多人接入,不只屬於少數。但僅僅因為它是「民主化的」,並不意味著所有人都會以同樣的程度去用它。

我們必須問自己——尤其擋在 SME 面前的挑戰,到底是什麼?

我們對 SME 採用 AI 路上的「絆腳石」有一些線索。看勞動力——根據我們的《數字經濟報告》,每四個員工中就有三個(包括 SME 中的員工)每天都已經在使用一種或多種 AI 工具。

但當我們看「企業級使用」時——畫面完全不同。在大企業,這個數字接近 60%。所以即便個人層面已有 3/4 在使用,大企業層面也只到 60%。SME 呢?接近 15%。大企業在企業級使用 AI 工具的頻度,是 SME 的 4 倍。

但如果你覺得這是悲觀的理由——我會請你不要這樣想。SME 採用技術的紀錄其實相當令人鼓舞。對我而言,更大的問題是——「需要多久?」「我們能多快地加速這一過程?」「AI 使用能走多深?」——所以更多是「需要多久、能多深」,而不是「到底會不會發生」。我相信「大企業 60% / SME 15%」的差距會縮小——只是時間問題。

我相信這個差距會被彌合。問題只是——多久、以及他們能把 AI 用到多深。

於是問題變成——我們能做什麼,讓這一過程加速?讓人們不只在表層使用 AI、而是以一種更有意義的方式,真正改造他們的業務、把效能提到完全不同的層級?

我把「AI Quickstart 計劃」看作我們能推進這一議程的方式之一——把「AI 民主化(包括對 SME)」的遠景與潛力,轉化成現實——因為它現在還沒有變成現實。

在我們與不同公司的互動裡——尤其是資源較少的那些——明顯有幾個缺口、幾個挑戰要克服。

第一是「實驗成本」。做原型要花一點錢。在 AI 時代,這可能沒那麼貴——因為做一個「工作流如何被自動化」的原型,可以用智慧體來支撐。這個過程已經被大幅縮短,並不那麼昂貴。真正的成本,出現在原型如何與現有上線系統並行執行、並接管的整合環節——你的既有裝機基礎、其他系統的整合。這要花點功夫,本身也有一定成本。還有另一個成本——兩年前,「算力成本」是很大的關切,因為 AI 只有當你能訪問到算力容量時才能跑起來。所以我們也嘗試補這塊缺口——微軟是我們的合作伙伴之一。我們有「企業算力倡議」(Enterprise Compute Initiative),為對算力使用密集的企業提供支援,讓他們能拿到額度去嘗試並落地 AI 方案。所以「成本」是必須克服的第一個障礙。

第二是「能力」。能力可能在兩個層面有問題。第一層是領導層——領導定調,也由領導闡明雄心、闡明 AI 改造業務的程度。如果領導沒有雄心,公司就很難做更大的夢。但如果領導有「敢做大夢的能力」——即便沒全部達成,也會更接近突破。但能力不能只停在領導層。領導只在有「跟隨者」的情況下才是領導——如果整個組織沒有與領導願景相稱的能力,AI 採用也走不遠。員工必須具備一種能力——把原本只是「邊緣」的原型,搬到公司的核心、流程的核心、產品與服務交付的核心、與關鍵供應商互動以兌現客戶承諾的核心。把東西從「邊緣」搬到「核心」,這種能力不是一夜之間能建起來的——必須投資去培養。這是第二個挑戰。

第三——這一項是這個計劃真正能幫上忙的——是「信心」。我說信心,是因為在每一次實驗開始時,都有風險。如果你沒有一些信心,就難以想象一次足夠「有分量」的嘗試。

說到這個——我想起兩年前我自己遇到的一件事。當時我想裝一個展示櫃——這並不高科技,就是一個櫃子,但我想自己裝。我決定從 IKEA 買。困難在於——這是個玻璃櫃,我怕有點危險,畢竟在處理玻璃,且我從未做過。給我信心的,有幾個因素。

一個因素是:你去 IKEA 時,看到很多人也把「自己裝」的包裹帶回家。如果別人能自己裝好——也許你也會有些信心,相信自己也能裝好。

信心的另一部分來自——之前我也裝過桌子和抽屜。結果發現這種體驗並不那麼嚇人。這次仍是稍微一躍——畢竟這次是玻璃——但我並非完全沒有經驗。

我和大家分享這件事,是因為我有幾分懷疑——企業級 AI 實驗也需要這幾個要素。你需要從看到別人成功中建立信心;你需要從做過更小的專案並發現「我並沒有慘敗、其實有些小勝利」中建立一點信心。但 IKEA 經驗告訴我們的一個非常重要的點是——你需要「傻瓜式說明書」。我不是貶義——你需要簡化過的說明、產品、工具,讓你即便沒有很高的木工技巧,也能裝出可用、能創造效用的東西。

這是值得為之努力的目標。我希望像 QuickStart 這樣的專案能幫助我們建立起對「AI 採用要前進、需要什麼」的理解。

總結一下——我們採用的方式建立在「合作」之上,建立在我們各自都為 SME 端來一些有用東西的信念之上。

微軟帶來的是技術專長——相當於 IKEA 的客服。萬一你遇到坎,可以打電話說「能不能來幫我搞定」。希望你不必打——但他們在那裡,能在採用、實驗 AI 時增加一份信心。

大華銀行(UOB)作為合作伙伴,也帶來重要的一面——你們的網路、對龐大客戶基礎的觸達、與他們的接觸點;當實驗做大時,你們能提供的融資方案,會幫企業走得更遠。

IMDA 也儘自己的一份力做能力建設。「數碼領袖計劃」(Digital Leaders Programme)已經執行多年,現在新增了一條聚焦生成式 AI 的軌道——專門看生成式 AI 能幫企業做什麼。

通過這次合作,我們希望把「SME 也能把 AI 從邊緣搬到核心」的設想真正落地——通過克服「成本、能力、信心」三道坎。

我們的雄心是——這個專案能先幫 1000 家 SME。即便它們不是「AI 原生」(AI native),它們也能成為「AI 節奏帶頭者」(AI pacesetters)。

致所有未來的 AI 節奏帶頭者——AI QuickStart 計劃的參與者:我非常有信心,這個計劃會讓我們一起學習,把「AI 民主化與轉型」的潛能轉化為現實。

祝大家一切順利。再次感謝邀請。

英文原文

MDDI 官網原始記錄 · 抓取日期: 2026-05-02

Good afternoon, colleagues and friends, Rachel, Tolgar, Kavita, Janet and Wee Luen.

Thank you for inviting me to be part of the launch of the Microsoft AI Quick Start programme in partnership with the IMDA as well as with UOB.

Some of you know that I started my professional life in the Economic Development Board, focusing on supporting Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs). It was a very long time ago, and in those days, we were trying to help SMEs overcome financing problems . We have a scheme called the Local Enterprise Finance Scheme (LEFS), and we had another scheme called Local Enterprise Technical Assistance Scheme (LETAS).

Around that time, we also put together what was then referred to as an SME master plan and a retail sector development plan. So those were the kinds of things that occupied my attention back in the early 1990s.

What I can see is that with each successive wave of technology development, we've always paid close attention to SMEs’ adoption. This comes from the belief that in every vibrant economic ecosystem, SMEs feature very strongly. That's what we believe at its core. You need to recognise that they add dynamism, they bring a lot of value, and very significantly, they create good employment if we support them in the right way.

There is another reason why we believe that it's important to support SMEs when it comes to technology adoption. The studies and the research show quite clearly that technology diffusion is uneven. Very often companies at the frontier are able to pour in the resources, gather their teams and apply their minds to experiment and then create more competitive advantages for themselves.

But this ability to benefit from technology development very often, does not go beyond the frontier companies. It stays with them and there is a very long tail of a great many other companies that don't seem to be able to catch on. This is something of concern, but not an impossible task.

If you look at digitalisation today, well, it came after computerisation, and computerisation came after mechanisation.

If you look at SMEs in Singapore, the track record is a fairly strong one. Today, amongst SMEs, 95% of them would be using some form of digital technology. Maybe not all equally sophisticated, but it's not such an alien idea to them anymore.

We see this as something that is therefore worth our effort and worth devoting further attention to, and we have done so in different ways. For example, IMDA is the designer and implementer of the SMEs Go Digital programme.

Today, the challenge before us is to think about how AI adoption can also be made more widely available amongst SMEs. After all, we talk about AI as being a democratising technology, and what that means is that many people can access it. It's not confined to a few, but just because it is a democratising technology doesn't mean that it will be used to the same extent.

We have to ask ourselves, what challenges stand in the way of SMEs in particular?

We have some clue as to the impediments, the roadblocks that get in the way of SME adoption. If you look at their workforce today, well, according to our digital economy report, three in four of the members of our workforce, including those in SMEs, already use an AI tool, or maybe more than one on a daily basis.

However, when we look at the enterprise-level usage of AI, it is a completely different picture. For bigger companies, the number is closer to 60%. So even though three quarters of the workforce use it on an individual basis, even amongst larger enterprises, the current figure is about 60%. What about for SMEs? The number is closer to 15%. Large companies use AI tools at an enterprise level, four times as frequently as those among SMEs.

But if you think that this is reason for despair, I would urge you not to think this way. The SME track record in adopting technology is actually quite encouraging. To me, the bigger question is, how long will it take? How fast can we accelerate the process, and how deep can the AI usage go? So it's more a question of how long it takes and how deep it can go, rather than whether it will happen at all. I think it's a matter of time that the gap will close between what you see as the prevalence of AI usage in larger companies today – 60%, SMEs – 15%.

I'm confident that this gap will be closed. It's only a question of how long and how deep each one of them will be able to use AI.

The question then becomes, what we can do to speed up the process and help people to use AI in not just a superficial way, but in a more meaningful way that can help them truly transform their businesses and operate at a completely different level of effectiveness?

I see the AI Quickstart programme as one of the ways in which we can help advance this agenda. To turn this idea, the prospect and potential of AI being democratizing, including for SMEs, into reality, because it is not yet reality.

In our interactions with different companies, including those that are less well-resourced, it's clear that there are several gaps. There are several challenges to overcome.

The first is the issue of cost of experimentation. Building prototypes, these cost a little bit of money. Though in the AI age, this may not be so expensive, because to build a prototype about how your work processes can be automated, this can be supported in the use of agents. That process has now been shortened considerably, and it's not that costly. The real cost comes in how the prototype can run alongside and take over a currently live system for you, the integration with your installed base and other systems. That takes a bit of effort and that itself carries some cost. There is another cost of course. Two years ago, there was a big concern about the cost of compute, because AI is something that works only if you are able to access the compute capacity. So we've tried to plug this gap, and Microsoft is one of our partners in doing so. We have the Enterprise Compute Initiative that supports companies if they have an intensive use of compute capacity. This programme enables them to get credits in order to try out and implement their AI-enabled solutions. So cost is one impediment that we have to overcome.

The second is capacity. Capacity is potentially an issue at two levels. One is at the leadership level, because it is leaders that set the tone, and it is also leaders that articulate the ambitions, the extent to which they hope to see AI transform their business. If the leaders are not ambitious, then it's quite unlikely and difficult for the company to dream bigger. But if the leaders have the capacity to dream bigger, then even if they did not achieve all of their goals, they come closer to breakthroughs. But the capacity cannot remain only at the leader level. Leaders are only leaders if they have followers, so if the entire organisation does not have a complementary capacity to help fulfil a vision that has been articulated by the leaders, then the AI adoption will also not go very far. The staff must have is the ability to bring what was just a prototype, something more likely to be at the fringe, to the core of the company, the core of their processes, the core of how they deliver products and services to their customers, the core of how they interact with their key suppliers in order to fulfil their promise to their customers. So bringing things from the fringe to the core is not a capacity that gets built overnight. You need to invest in growing it. So that's the second thing, the challenge of capacity.

The third, and this is the one that we really stand a good chance of building up through this programme, is confidence. I say confidence because at the start of every experimentation, there is risk. So if you don't have some confidence, it will be hard to imagine an attempt that is significant enough.

Speaking of this, I was reminded of something that I was confronted with about two years ago. I was trying to put in place a display cabinet. This is nothing very high tech, it's just a display cabinet, but I was attempting to do it myself. I decided that getting something from Ikea might help me do the trick. The difficulty for me is that it is a glass cabinet, so I thought it's a bit dangerous, because we're dealing with glass, and I've not done it before. What gave me the confidence are a few factors.

One factor is that when you go to Ikea, you see lots of other people bringing home packages. So if you see other people being able to do assemble things themselves, maybe you have some confidence that you can do it well too.

Part of the confidence also comes from the fact that on previous occasions I have assembled tables and drawers. It turns out the experience is not so frightening. It is still a bit of a leap, because now I'm trying to deal with glass, but it's not as though I have no experience.

I share this with you because I half suspect that AI experimentation on an enterprise level requires a few of these elements. You need to build confidence seeing other people succeed in their endeavour. You need to build a little bit of confidence by having attempted smaller projects yourself and realising that you don't actually fail so miserably. In fact, you can have small successes. But I think also very importantly, what the IKEA experience tells us is that you need dummy proof instructions. I don't say this in a pejorative sense. You need instructions, you need products, you need tools that have been simplified so that even if you don't have very sophisticated skills as a carpenter or assembling things, you can still put together something workable, functional that actually creates utility for you.

That is the goal worth working towards, and something I hope programmes like QuickStart will help us to build up an understanding of what it takes to make progress with AI adoption.

I want to just sum up by saying that the approach we are taking is based on partnerships. It is based on the belief that we each bring something to the table that is helpful to the SMEs.

With Microsoft, we bring technical expertise. It's the equivalent of the IKEA customer service. If all else fails, you call them and you say, can you please come and fix it up for me? Hopefully you don't have to call them, but if you need to, they're there, and that helps to build a degree of confidence in proceeding with AI adoption, with AI experimentation.

UOB, as a partner, also bring something important to the table – your networks, your reach to a very wide base of customers, your touch points with them. When the experimentation gets big enough, your ability to offer financing solutions that will help the businesses go further.

IMDA also tries to do its part in capacity building. The Digital Leaders Programme, which has been running for some years now, has now got a new track focusing on Generative AI, specifically what Generative AI can help businesses do.

With this partnership, we hope to bring to life the idea that AI adoption for SMEs can move from the fringe to the core by overcoming the challenges of cost, capacity and confidence.

Our ambition is that for a start, we would like this programme to be able to help 1,000 SMEs, so that even if these businesses are not AI native, they can be AI pacesetters.

To all our prospective AI pacesetters, participants in the AI QuickStart Programme, I am very confident that this is a programme that will enable us all to learn together and turn the potential of AI being democratising and transformative into reality.

On that note, all the best. Thank you again for inviting me.