MDDI 演講稿 · 2026-01-29
部長楊莉明在NTUC LearningHub Human+研討會2026上的演講
要點
- • 新加坡推出《國家人工智慧研發計劃》,資助基礎人工智慧研究,涵蓋「負責任人工智慧」等核心課題。
- • 新加坡資訊通訊媒體發展局《新加坡數字經濟報告》顯示,四分之三受訪勞動者已在職場定期使用人工智慧工具,其中85%反映生產力與工作質量有所提升。
- • 新加坡人在 ChatGPT 等人工智慧平臺上的人均使用率位居全球前列。
- • 谷歌 DeepMind 在新加坡的業務持續擴張,招募了包括參與訓練 Gemini 模型的新加坡人 Yi Tay 博士在內的核心團隊成員。
- • 政府倡導培養「雙語人工智慧人才」:勞動者須將深厚的領域專業知識(「母語」)與指揮人工智慧系統、解讀輸出的能力相結合。
- • 人工智慧應用的重心正從個人生產力工具轉向由人工智慧代理群體代勞,要求勞動者向編排者角色轉型,如同指揮家統籌樂手。
完整譯文(繁體中文)
MDDI 英文原文譯文 · 翻譯日期: 2026-06-21
NTUC學習中心執行長 Jeremy Ong先生
勞工運動的姐妹們、兄弟們
同仁與朋友們,
引言
早上好,感謝邀請我出席Human+研討會。
多年來,NTUC學習中心一直是培訓和提升我國人力資源的重要夥伴,與政府、僱主及職總認可培訓中心(TACs)攜手合作。
我很高興貴方正積極推動Human+計劃,助力新加坡人在人工智慧時代取得成功。
這與政府近年來系統性發展企業和勞動力人工智慧能力的努力高度契合。
許多國家和組織在思考如何應對當前挑戰與機遇時,都對我國的舉措給予了關注。
上週的這個時候,我還在達沃斯出席世界經濟論壇。
當然,毫不意外,地緣政治緊張局勢成為焦點。
但我想與大家分享的是,外界對人工智慧發展以及新加坡務實做法持續保持濃厚興趣,包括我們如何裝備國人以保持競爭力。
我們密切關注新興趨勢及當前對人工智慧影響的各類評估。
其中一場討論引起了我的注意。參與者包括Google DeepMind創始人Demis Hassabis(2024年諾貝爾化學獎得主)以及Anthropic公司創始人Dario Amodei。如有興趣,YouTube上有他們對談的影片。
這兩位創始人兼執行長就人工智慧可能對社會產生的影響展開了辯論。
他們談到了經濟體和勞動力市場保持適應性的重要性。
Demis一年多前曾到訪新加坡,並與總理黃循財會面。在達沃斯,他向我介紹DeepMind在新加坡的業務發展良好。他們已招募了團隊核心成員,其中包括一名新加坡人Dr Yi Tay,他參與訓練貴方組織或許正在使用的Gemini模型。
我也與Dario進行了交流,這次談話讓我豁然開朗。
他告訴我,他利用年末假期撰寫了一篇約兩萬字的文章,探討人工智慧帶來的挑戰,題為"技術的青春期"(The Adolescence of Technology)。
這篇文章是其此前文章"仁愛之機器"(Machines of Loving Grace)的續篇,後者聚焦於強大人工智慧為人類帶來的積極影響。
在這篇新文章中,Dario探討了人工智慧可能存在的陰暗面、相關風險以及我們可能的應對之策。
他提出,理解即將到來的人工智慧進步規模與速度的一種方式,是想象明年世界某處突然出現一個"天才之國"——只不過這個"國家"實實在在地被容納在一座資料中心之內。
這個約有5000萬人口的"國家"裡,每一個人都比任何諾貝爾獎得主、政治家或科技人才更具能力,且運作速度遠超人類。
我認為,這樣的未來即便只是以文字描述,也足以令人既充滿希望,又心生恐懼。
我鼓勵大家閱讀這兩篇文章,或者至少讓Claude或ChatGPT為你做個摘要。
關於超強人工智慧到來時間與風險的辯論,還將持續一段時間。
但有一點已然清晰。
我們必須為人工智慧安全問題找到更好的答案,也必須學會如何以負責任的方式開發和部署人工智慧。
我在此前多個場合談到過新加坡在這方面的努力。
最近一次是上週六晚間,我釋出了國家人工智慧研發計劃,該計劃將支援人工智慧基本問題的研究,包括"負責任的人工智慧"。
我們也迫切需要培育新的勞動力能力,並熟練掌握與"資料中心裡的天才之國"協作的方式。
與 AI 高效協作
我曾多次談到 AI 放大人類能力的潛力,將其視為我們的"隊友"。
我們希望塑造一種未來的工作形態——不是人類與 AI 對立,而是人類藉助 AI 做得更好。
當重心已從個人使用 AI 提取生產力改進,轉向大批 AI 智慧體代表人類執行多項任務的前景時,這一點尤為重要。
當然,人類的角色也將隨之演變。
軟體開發領域已有先例,你們想必都有所耳聞。
如今,許多軟體開發者不再編寫大段程式碼。
取而代之的是,人類軟體開發者以清晰的問題陳述來指揮程式設計助手,以批判性思維驗證智慧體的輸出,並運用設計原則來協調系統。
這就好比一位指揮家站在樂手面前,告訴他們:"這裡加快節奏,這裡放柔音色,讓音樂聽起來舒緩悅耳。"
這些當然需要更深厚的領域理解。正如指揮家未必精通某一具體樂器,但他需要理解音樂原理以及聲音如何融合在一起,開發者同樣需要能夠與 AI 智慧體和系統高效協作。這些領域我們才剛剛開始探索,還需摸索出一條讓它們在未來切實運作的路徑。
這些發展引出了一個問題:我們應當如何看待人類與 AI 高效協作?
這未必總能實現,但作為出發點,我們的取向應當是用 AI 來增強我們的能力,而非取代我們。
雙語型 AI 人才
實現這一目標的方法之一,是熟練掌握與 AI 系統的協作——就像學會在專業領域有效溝通一樣。
我們能貢獻的是我們的"母語"——我們的領域知識,我們所掌握的、對 AI 而言仍具挑戰性的知識與技能。
我們可以列舉幾類"母語"或領域專長——人力資源、製造業、法律和公共政策。精通自己的母語是基本要求。
新的要求是培養對 AI 協作的熟悉度或流利度——理解如何指揮 AI 系統、解讀其輸出,並將其能力融入我們的工作。
在這個意義上實現雙語能力,有助於我們實現藉助 AI 做得更好的目標,而非與之競爭。
價值在於能夠運用 AI 與領域的雙重流利度來變革流程、改善成果。
例如,在製造業中,一名具備足夠資料科學和機器學習知識的工藝工程師,可以利用這些知識提高生產良率、減少材料浪費。
這種習得新流利度的努力並不容易,但也並非不可能。它需要不斷學習與再學習——幸運的是,這對新加坡人來說並非全然陌生的做法。
整個 SkillsFuture 運動正是在這種精神下建立的。
甚至在此之前,新加坡人已經適應了歷次技術主導的工作變革浪潮——計算機化、網際網路、移動網際網路。
同樣,具備雙語能力——兼通 AI 與領域知識——將有助於我們的人民像與隊友協作一樣與 AI 合作。這對新加坡而言可以成為一股強大力量,使我們的勞動力保持競爭力和市場地位。
毫無疑問,這需要付出相當大的努力。但我們的起點相當紮實。
在全球範圍內,新加坡人是 ChatGPT 等 AI 平臺人均使用率最高的群體之一。
這一趨勢延伸至職場。
IMDA 近期釋出的《新加坡數字經濟報告》顯示,受訪工作者中四分之三已在工作中定期使用 AI 工具。
85% 的受訪者表示生產力和工作質量有所提升。我們知道,進一步改善的空間仍相當大。
我們目前已在眾多不同領域設立逾60個AI卓越中心,全面提升各方面的能力。
政府將繼續協助企業和民眾提升自身能力,有效地將AI作為協作夥伴加以運用。
NTUC培訓中心的Human+計劃與我們的規劃高度契合,對此我深表感謝。
結語
如前所述,培訓中心一直是我們在培訓和提升人才技能方面不可或缺的夥伴。在我們致力於助力新加坡人在AI時代取得成功之際,其使命愈發重要。
新成立的領導力學院以及持續擴充套件的合作伙伴關係將是寶貴的資源。我鼓勵工商界充分善用這些資源,以一切可能的方式強化自身的AI能力。
最後,再次感謝各位的邀請。
英文原文
MDDI 官網原始記錄 · 抓取日期: 2026-06-21
CEO, NTUC LearningHub, Mr Jeremy Ong
Sisters and Brothers of the Labour Movement
Colleagues and friends,
Introduction
Good morning and thank you for inviting me to the Human+ Symposium.
For many years now, NTUC LearningHub has been a strong partner in training and upskilling our people – working with the Government, employers, and TACs.
I am glad that you are championing the Human+ initiative to enable Singaporeans to succeed in the age of AI.
This certainly aligns with the Government’s efforts in recent years, to systematically develop AI capabilities in our enterprises and workforce.
Many countries and organisations are taking note of our initiatives, as they consider their own responses to the present challenges and opportunities.
This time last week, I was still in Davos attending the World Economic Forum.
Of course, unsurprisingly, geopolitical tensions took centre stage.
But I should share with you that there was continued strong interest in AI developments and Singapore’s pragmatic approach, including how we equip our people to stay relevant.
We keep a close watch on emerging trends and current assessments of AI’s impact.
One such discussion caught my attention. It involved the founders of Google DeepMind Demis Hassabis (a 2024 Nobel Prize Winner for Chemistry) and the founder of a company Anthropic Dario Amodei. There’s a YouTube video of their exchange, in case you’re interested.
These two founder-CEOs had debated how AI could affect societies.
They spoke on the importance of economies and labour markets remaining adaptable.
Demis was in Singapore a little over a year ago and met Prime Minister Lawrence Wong. At Davos, he updated me that DeepMind’s presence in Singapore was growing well. They have recruited key members of their team. It includes a Singaporean, Dr Yi Tay, who helps to train the Gemini models, your organisations may be using.
I also caught up with Dario, and the conversation with him crystallised something for me.
He told me that he spent his year-end vacation writing a 20,000-word essay on the challenges brought about by AI, titled “The Adolescence of Technology”.
This is a follow-up to his previous essay “Machines of Loving Grace”, which focused on the upsides of powerful AI for humanity.
In this recent essay, Dario deals with the possible dark sides of AI, the risks, and our possible defences.
He suggests that one way to understand the scale and speed of upcoming AI progress is to imagine that a “country of geniuses” materialises somewhere in the world next year. Except that this “country” is contained in a data centre, literally.
Everyone in this “country” of around 50 million would be more capable than any Nobel Prize winner, statesman, or technologist, and operate much faster than humans.
I think, such a future, even if described only in words, inspires both hope and fear.
I would encourage you to read both essays, or minimally to get Claude or ChatGPT to summarise them for you.
The debate on the imminence and risks of very powerful AI will continue a while more.
But one thing is already clear.
We must find better answers to questions about AI safety. We must also learn how to develop and deploy AI in responsible ways.
I have on previous occasions spoken on Singapore’s efforts on this front.
Most recently, last Saturday evening, I launched the National AI R&D Plan, which will support research in fundamental issues in AI, including ‘Responsible AI’.
There is also urgency for us to grow new workforce capabilities, and become adept at partnering with “country of geniuses in a datacentre”.
Working Effectively with AI
I have spoken in the past about the potential of AI to amplify human capabilities, acting as our ‘teammate’.
We want to shape a future of work that is not about humans versus AI, but about humans doing better with AI.
This is especially relevant when the centre of gravity has shifted from extracting productivity improvements through individual use of AI, to the prospect of contingents of AI agents carrying out multiple tasks on behalf of humans.
Naturally, the role of humans will evolve.
There are already examples from the field of software development. You must have heard of them.
Many software developers today no longer write long chunks of code.
Instead, human software developers direct coding assistants with clear problem statements, validate output from agents with critical thinking, and use design principles to orchestrate systems.
It’s like a conductor standing in front of musicians, telling them “Here is where you increase the tempo, here is where you soften the tone, so that the music comes across as soothing and melodious.”
These, of course, require a deeper domain understanding. Just as a conductor does not necessarily play any particular instrument very well, he needs to understand the principles of music and how the sounds come together, Developers will need to be able to collaborate effectively with AI agents and systems too. These are fields that we are only beginning to discover, and have to figure a way out to make them work in the future.
Such developments lead to the question of how we should think of humans working effectively with AI?
It may not always be possible, but as a starting point, our orientation should be to use AI to augment our capabilities, rather than replace us.
Bilingual AI Talents
One way of achieving this is becoming fluent in working with AI systems – just like learning how to communicate effectively in a specialised domain.
What we bring to the table is our “mother tongue” – our domain knowledge, what we know and can do that remains challenging for AI.
We can point to several types of “mother tongues” or domain expertise – HR, manufacturing, law, and public policy. Being good in our mother tongue is a baseline requirement.
The new requirement is developing familiarity or fluency in AI collaboration – understanding how to direct AI systems, interpret their outputs, and integrating their capabilities into our work.
Becoming bilingual in this sense helps us achieve our aim of doing better with AI, instead of competing against it.
The value comes from being able to use fluency in AI and domains to transform processes and improve outcomes.
For example, in manufacturing, a process engineer who knows enough data science and machine learning, can use them to increase production yields and reduce material wastage.
This effort of acquiring new fluency is not easy but neither is it impossible. It requires learning and re-learning, a practice that is, fortunately, not entirely new to Singaporeans.
The entire SkillsFuture movement is built in this spirit.
Even before that, Singaporeans had adjusted to previous waves of technology-led changes to work – computerisation, the internet, mobile.
Being bilingual – with fluency in AI and domains – will similarly help our people work with AI like teammates. This can be a formidable force for Singapore, to remain relevant and competitive as a workforce.
Undoubtedly, this will take considerable effort. But we are working from fairly good foundations.
Globally, Singaporeans are one of the highest per capita users of AI platforms like ChatGPT.
This extends to the workplace.
IMDA’s recent Singapore Digital Economy Report showed that three in four workers surveyed are already using AI tools regularly at work.
85% reported improvements in productivity and work quality. We know the headroom for further improvements is quite high.
We now have more than 60 AI Centres of Excellence uplifting our capabilities across many different sectors.
The Government will continue to help our businesses and people upgrade themselves and utilise AI effectively as a teammate.
NTUC LearningHub’s Human+ initiative is very much aligned with our plans, and I thank you for it.
Conclusion
As noted earlier, LearningHub has been an invaluable partner in training and upskilling our people. Its mission is even more important now as we seek to enable Singaporeans to succeed in the age of AI.
The new Leadership Academy and expanded partnerships will be useful resources. I encourage our business community to take full advantage of them to strengthen your AI capabilities in every possible way.
On that note, thank you once again for inviting me.