口頭答覆 · 2019-09-02 · 屆國會 13
強化新加坡科技人才核心
質詢方關注在當前經濟形勢下,Tech@SG計劃是否仍需繼續以協助科技企業僱傭外籍人才。政府回應強調科技人才短缺的全球競爭,必須加快培養本地科技人才,同時通過培訓和教育擴大人才池,確保新加坡在全球科技生態中保持競爭力。核心爭議點在於如何平衡引進外籍人才與優先發展本地人才。
關鍵要點
- • 科技人才全球短缺
- • 加速本地人才培養
- • 科技企業需專業人才
加快培養本地科技人才,保持競爭力
質疑是否仍需依賴外籍人才
優先發展本地科技人才
“If Singapore sits back and does nothing, we will almost certainly be left behind.”
參與人員 (5)
完整譯文(中文)
Hansard 原始記錄 · 2026-05-02
13號議員鄭德源先生詢問貿易與工業部長,鑑於當前的經濟狀況以及我們對聘用、培養和強化新加坡核心人才的關注,是否還需要Tech@SG計劃,該計劃旨在協助科技公司聘用外國人才。
貿易與工業部長(陳振聲先生)答:議長先生,深科技產業和公司是未來經濟的關鍵。數字技術已經改變了我們的工作和生活方式。如今,科技公司是全球增長最快的公司之一,並在《財富》500強名單中佔據越來越多的份額。新加坡必須發展我們的科技生態系統,乘勢而上,為新加坡人創造更多機會。
人才是這一努力的關鍵。科技公司需要具備專業技能的專家。越來越多的公司基於人才的可用性而非傳統因素如土地成本和可用性來做出投資決策。不幸的是,全球科技人才短缺,競爭激烈。法國六個月前全面改革了其法國科技簽證,使科技人才更容易在法國工作。更近的例子是泰國今年推出了SMART簽證計劃,吸引高技能科技專業人士。
如果新加坡袖手旁觀,幾乎肯定會被落下。我們只有一個小視窗期來建立高階專業人才、初創企業和公司的關鍵群體。全球此類節點屈指可數。我們今天的表現將決定我們是否能成為科技樞紐。我們必須迅速行動。
不僅公司面臨科技人才短缺,我們政府也在利用科技轉型公共服務,更好地服務企業和市民。政府因此也在利用與公司相同的有限本地科技專業人才池。我們需要緊急擴大這一人才池。
我們正在加快培養科技人才的步伐,同時確保新加坡人始終處於核心地位。自獨立以來,我們人才戰略的第一要務就是發展本地勞動力。人民是我們最重要的資源,我們不遺餘力地培養他們。為擴大科技人才池,我們迅速擴大本地科技專業人才的培養管道。目前,已有超過74,000個培訓名額被TechSkills Accelerator(TeSA)計劃佔用或承諾,這約佔全國ICT專業人員的三分之一。
我們的高等院校目前提供約200個全日制科技相關課程。2018學年,超過63,000名本地學生報名這些科技相關課程,政府投入約11億新元資金。我們也在大力投資建設新能力,如網路安全和人工智慧。這些努力將提升我們的科技技能和能力基礎。
在發展基礎的同時,我們也必須提升新加坡頂尖人才。我們通過全球創新聯盟(GIA)等專案,將新加坡與全球領先的創新生態系統和關鍵市場連線起來。新加坡人和企業可以通過GIA獲得海外經驗,並與海外同行建立聯絡與合作。
但即使如此,科技人才的需求遠遠超過本地供應。這不僅是新加坡的問題,而是全球挑戰。《海峽時報》最近報道,招聘公司Michael Page稱,新加坡科技職位需求在過去12個月增長了20%,但供應短缺。公司也反饋我們缺乏經驗豐富的軟體工程師和產品經理。他們需要能夠負責全球規模數字產品開發和推廣的人才,而非僅負責產品特定元件。這些人才通常兼具技術領導力和商業敏銳度,能管理數百至數千人的大型科技團隊,因稀缺而備受重視。
議長先生,這是我們必須面對的現實,否則將失去競爭優勢。我們需要用全球技能人才補充本地人才管道,以滿足已在新加坡及計劃引進的公司激增的需求。來自其他國家和國籍的員工也為新加坡人提供了在全球競爭團隊中工作的機會,共同推動創新前沿。在多部門、跨學科和跨文化團隊日益普遍的世界中,新加坡人必須學會與全球人才合作,這將提升他們作為員工的競爭力,使他們更受僱主青睞。
阿里巴巴、Grab、SAP和Taiger等公司計劃在新加坡大幅擴張。許多公司表示,能夠用全球人才補充本地勞動力對其快速按計劃擴大運營至關重要。
這就是我們推出Tech@SG的原因,幫助快速成長的本地和外國科技公司在新加坡發展。該計劃面向有能力和承諾在新加坡組建團隊和開發產品的公司。公司必須在新加坡註冊,擁有數字或科技產品,或基於專有技術、研究或硬體的商業模式。公司還需累計獲得超過1000萬美元風險投資,並在過去36個月內獲得計劃認可的風險投資機構資助。此舉確保公司具備足夠資源和國際化競爭準備。
Tech@SG將幫助這些公司組建全球競爭力團隊,快速開發產品和國際化。此外,Tech@SG將提升新加坡科技人才質量,為我們的科技專家創造與全球頂尖人才合作的更多機會。
我們必須為這些快速成長的公司招聘所需技能做好準備。短期內,這些技能可能來自全球專業人士。但我們必須採取戰略眼光,為新加坡人贏得長期回報。1960年代,我們對半導體產業採取了類似策略。當時,許多跨國公司來到這裡,組建以外國人為主的核心團隊。隨著公司在新加坡紮根,他們迅速擴大本地員工隊伍。僅三年內,新加坡首批三家半導體公司——國家半導體、飛兆半導體和德州儀器——創造了7000多個就業崗位。他們培養了一代專業人才,奠定了新加坡半導體產業的基礎。
今天,我們有類似機會打造充滿活力的科技行業,為新一代新加坡人創造新的激動人心的就業機會——但時間不多了。
我想舉幾個例子,說明新加坡人已開始受益。Visenze是一家由四位新加坡人創辦的人工智慧和影像識別公司,現僱傭60多名科技專業人士,組成多國團隊開發和改進AI技術。國大計算機學院應屆畢業生Abel Lim從團隊中來自世界各地的同事那裡學習將機器學習應用於現實問題。團隊共同改進Visenze的演算法。
另一個例子是萬事達卡。萬事達卡是一家跨國公司,正在新加坡引領支付解決方案和智慧出行領域的新數字技術創新,依託人工智慧。這些創新活動需要在新加坡團隊中建立新能力。為此,公司推出了萬事達卡畢業生計劃,為新加坡員工提供輪崗、國際工作經驗和導師指導,幫助他們掌握新技能,與全球高階專家共事。Seliyan Silvarajoo是該計劃的參與者,曾是實習生,現為高階數字產品專家。他認為與全球多元團隊合作的經歷對其開發新產品至關重要。
除了萬事達卡和Visenze,我們還有谷歌和臉書等數字巨頭,為新加坡人創造良好機會。我們需要營造環境,讓新加坡人向最優秀的人學習並茁壯成長。我們需要發展科技生態系統,為所有新加坡人創造激動人心的機會。這就是Tech@SG的意義。
議長先生,我想向議會保證,我們深知這一話題容易引發情緒反應,因為它關係到就業和我們希望建設的社會。
同時,政府一貫誠實面對新加坡人,從不迴避解釋挑戰和分享為適應變化所需採取的措施。我們將始終把新加坡人置於一切工作的核心,繼續全力發展每位新加坡人的潛能,使他們實現抱負,抓住新加坡及全球的機會。
然而,我們不能走其他國家設立壁壘、採取內向保護主義路線的老路,不僅在貿易上,在人才方面亦是如此。那樣只會傷害新加坡,而新加坡過去54年的成功正是建立在開放和勇於為國家做必要事情的基礎上。為此,我們將繼續為每位新加坡人盡最大努力,同時不斷努力將新加坡帶入下一個階段,以世界為後盾,拓展貿易和人才。
西海岸選區議員鄭德源:感謝部長的回應和Tech@SG的理由。我有三個追加問題。
首先,Tech@SG計劃中的公司是否仍需遵守公平考慮框架以及人力部三方聯盟(TAFEP)推行的“三弱”審查?
第二,負責推行Tech@SG的機構是否考慮利用人力部的能力轉移計劃,將部分知識轉移、技能轉移和能力轉移給新加坡人?
第三,在就業市場前景不確定且相當黯淡的情況下,我們重點是幫助和支援新加坡人。我想知道是否有或將設立對Tech@SG的控制措施,以確保本地專業人士不會受到損害或不利影響?
陳振聲:議長先生,針對三個問題答覆如下。
第一個問題的答案是肯定的。我們正與人力部密切合作,公平考慮框架適用於新加坡所有公司和個人。
第二個問題:我們確實考慮了能力轉移計劃。這是我們提升專業知識的多種工具之一。我們將繼續使用,並在有機會時加大力度。但正如我所說,儘管我們儘快培養人才,仍不足以滿足增長的需求。我們必須確保不失去專業人才、初創企業和公司,快速形成關鍵群體。
第三點,正因經濟前景不確定,我們加快步伐,確保培育下一代公司。目前,這屬於我們幫助公司轉型和擴大市場的精準措施。雖然整體經濟增長約為0%至1%,但並非所有行業都如此。全球電子業低迷、批發零售和部分精密工程行業拖累了整體數字。
另一方面,金融服務、ICT和許多高科技行業表現良好。這就是為什麼我們在提升底層的同時,絕不能限制頂層。我們必須盡力幫助當前增長最快、受全球科技人才短缺影響的公司,包括許多ICT和人工智慧公司,確保Tech@SG計劃為他們提供最佳成功機會,不讓他們輸給其他國家的競爭者。
鄭德源:請部長澄清。Tech@SG針對科技行業。貿易與工業部是否考慮或正在考慮將類似計劃推廣至其他行業?因為不僅ICT行業需要外國專業人才,金融業或其他專業服務業也需要資料分析、資料科學等專業人才,這些行業對新加坡今年及未來的經濟增長貢獻顯著。
陳振聲:答案是肯定的。我們願意考慮如何與其他全球人才短缺的行業合作。但我要澄清,我們談論的不是S準證持有者,也不是普通EP持有者,而是能夠管理數百至數千程式設計師的人才。這些人具備管理全球數百至數千人團隊的專業知識,且極度短缺。
為了說明競爭有多激烈——中國作為世界人口最多的國家,也有“千人計劃”,吸引全球頂尖人才回國助力。如果中國、法國和泰國都在做,我們可以理解全球人才的極度短缺。因此,儘管各國都在盡力培養人才,也都在爭奪現有的人才。
阿裕尼選區議員Pritam Singh:我有一個追加問題。幾年前,有一項提升新加坡人在金融行業領導職位比例的舉措。政府是否有類似計劃針對Tech@SG?部長提到高等院校的學生人數,但在更上游的崗位任用方面,政府是否有相關規劃?畢竟這是一個長期過程。
陳振聲:感謝Pritam Singh議員提及金融行業。這是我們做事的好例子。發展金融業時,初期確實缺乏專業人才。我們引進了具全球視野和經驗的專家。隨著時間推移,我們逐步實現專業人才本地化,在金融管理局領導下取得顯著成就。我們將繼續努力,絕不滿足於現狀,確保本地人才進入高層領導崗位。
我們對所有新興行業都抱有同樣的精神。這也是我剛才回答鄭德源議員問題時提到公平考慮框架(即“三弱”審查)的原因。我們希望每家公司在成長過程中,意識到本地化人才和能力建設的責任。我們不羞於向全球最佳學習,但同時確保新加坡人有機會向他們學習,掌握技能,甚至超越。這必須繼續是新加坡的方式。這也是我們1960至70年代建設半導體產業的做法,未來不會改變。
英文原文
SPRS Hansard · Fetched: 2026-05-02
13 Mr Patrick Tay Teck Guan asked the Minister for Trade and Industry in light of the current economic conditions and our focus on hiring, developing and strengthening the Singaporean Core, whether there is a need for the Tech@SG programme which facilitates technology firms in the hiring of foreign talent.
The Minister for Trade and Industry (Mr Chan Chun Sing) : Mr Speaker, Sir, deep tech industries and companies are the lynchpin for the future economy. Digital technologies have transformed the way we work and live. Today, technology companies are among the fastest growing in the world and occupy an increasing share of the Fortune 500 list. Singapore must develop our tech ecosystem and ride this growth, to create more opportunities for Singaporeans.
Talent is critical in this effort. Tech companies require experts with specialised skills. Increasingly, companies are basing their investment decisions on the availability of talent instead of traditional factors such as the cost and availability of land. Unfortunately, there is a global shortage of tech talent, and competition is intense. France overhauled its French Tech Visa six months ago to make it easier for tech talent to work in France. Closer to home, Thailand introduced a SMART visa programme this year to attract highly skilled tech professionals.
If Singapore sits back and does nothing, we will almost certainly be left behind. We have only a small window to build a critical mass of high-end professionals, start-ups and companies. There will only be a few such nodes globally. How we do today will decide whether we make it as a tech hub, or not. We must move fast and move now.
It is not only companies which are facing a shortage of tech talent. Our Government is also using technology to transform our public services and serve businesses and citizens better. The Government is therefore tapping on the same limited pool of local tech professionals as our companies. We need to urgently expand this pool.
We are accelerating our efforts to develop our tech talent while ensuring that Singaporeans remain at the core of our efforts. The first prong of our talent strategy, ever since we achieved Independence, has been to develop our local workforce. Our people are our most important resource and we spare no effort in nurturing them. In our efforts to widen our tech talent pool, we have been rapidly scaling up our local pipeline of tech professionals. Today, more than 74,000 training places have been taken up or committed under the TechSkills Accelerator (TeSA) and this will amount to about one-third of our ICT professionals across the country.
Our Institutes of Higher Learning offer around 200 full-time tech-related courses today. In Academic Year 2018, there was an enrolment of more than 63,000 locals in these tech-related courses, which received about $1.1 billion in Government funding. We are also investing significantly in building new capabilities such as cybersecurity and artificial intelligence. Together, these efforts will increase our baseline of tech skills and capabilities.
As we develop our base, we must also stretch the top of our Singaporean crop. We have connected Singapore to the world to secure frontier opportunities for Singaporeans through programmes such as the Global Innovation Alliance (GIA). The GIA is a global network connecting Singapore to leading innovation eco-systems and key markets around the world. Singaporeans and businesses will be able to gain overseas experience, and connect and collaborate with their overseas counterparts through the GIA.
But even these efforts are insufficient because the demand for tech talent is far outstripping the local supply. This is not just a Singapore issue; it is a global challenge. The Straits Times recently reported that recruiting firm Michael Page said that the demand for technology jobs in Singapore rose by 20% in the last 12 months but there is a shortage of supply. Companies have also given our agencies feedback that we lack experienced software engineers and product managers. They are looking for people who can take charge of the development and roll-out of digital products at a global scale, instead of only working on specific components of the product. These are often people that can marry both technical leadership and commercial acumen, manage larger tech teams in the hundreds and thousands, and are highly valued because they are in short supply.
Mr Speaker, Sir, this is the reality which we will have to face or we risk diminishing our competitive edge. We need to complement our local pipeline with skilled workers from all around the world to meet the surging demand from companies that are already in Singapore and companies that we want to bring to Singapore. The presence of workers from other countries and nationalities also provides opportunities for Singaporeans to work in globally competitive teams and advance the frontiers of innovation together. In a world where multi-sectoral, cross-discipline and cross-cultural teams are increasingly common, Singaporeans must learn how to work with people from all around the world. This will increase their competitiveness as individual employees and make them more attractive to employers.
Alibaba, Grab, SAP and Taiger are examples of some companies which have plans to expand significantly in Singapore. Many of these companies have shared that the ability to complement their local workforce with global talent is essential for them to quickly scale their operations in accordance to their plans.
This is why we launched Tech@SG to help fast-growth tech companies, both local and foreign, to grow in Singapore. This programme is intended for companies with the commitment and ability to build teams and products in Singapore. They will have to be incorporated in Singapore, have a digital or technology offering or have a business model built around proprietary technologies, research or hardware. Companies would also need to have secured more than US$10 million in Venture Capital (VC) funding cumulatively and have received funding from a Programme-recognised VC in the past 36 months. This will ensure the companies would have sufficient resources and readiness to internationalise and compete.
Tech@SG will enable such companies to put together globally competitive teams to develop their products and internationalise quickly. In addition, Tech@SG will raise the quality of tech talent in Singapore and create more opportunities for our tech experts to team up with the best from around the world.
We must be prepared for these fast-growth companies to recruit the skills they most require. In the short term, these skills may come from global professionals. But, we must take a strategic view on this to reap the long-term rewards for Singaporeans. We did so for the semi-conductor industry in the 1960s. At that time, many multinationals in the industry came here and set up their core team which comprised mainly foreigners. Over time, as these companies anchored themselves in Singapore, they began to rapidly grow their local pool of employees. In a span of just three years, the first three semiconductor companies in Singapore – National Semiconductor, Fairchild and Texas Instruments – created more than 7,000 jobs. They have also grown an entire generation of specialists and professionals in this area that enabled the semi-conductor industry of Singapore today.
Today, we have a similar opportunity to create a vibrant and dynamic tech sector, generating new and exciting job opportunities for yet another generation of Singaporeans – but time is running out.
I would like to highlight some examples where we can already see the benefits to Singaporeans. Visenze, an AI and image recognition company founded by four Singaporeans, now hires more than 60 tech professionals to form multinational teams that develop and improve their AI technology. Abel Lim, a recent graduate from NUS' School of Computing, learns about applying machine learning to real-life problems from colleagues in his team who come from around the world. Together, their team makes improvements to Visenze’s algorithms.
Another example would be Mastercard. Mastercard is an MNC currently spearheading the creation of new digital technologies in payment solutions and smart mobility in Singapore, powered by artificial intelligence. These innovative activities require new capabilities that would need to be built up in the Singapore team. To that end, the company introduced the Mastercard Graduate Programme that offers Singaporean employees a structured programme of rotations, international work experience and mentorship opportunities. These equip them with new skills and allow them to work alongside senior experts from around the world. Seliyan Silvarajoo is one such Singaporean who has undergone this programme. He started out as an intern at Mastercard and is now a senior digital product specialist. Seliyan counts his experience learning from and working with a global and diverse team as critical to preparing him for his role in developing new and exciting products.
Besides companies like Mastercard and Visenze, we have a good stable of companies like the digital giants Google and Facebook that create good opportunities for Singaporeans. We need to be able to create an environment for Singaporeans to learn from the best and to thrive. We need to grow our tech ecosystem and create exciting opportunities for all Singaporeans. This is what Tech@SG is about.
Mr Speaker, Sir, I would like to assure the House that we are deeply cognisant of the fact that this topic can be easily stirred up because of the emotions involved and because it concerns the jobs and the kind of society we want to build in Singapore.
At the same time, this is a Government that has always sought to be honest with Singaporeans and has never shied away from explaining our challenges and sharing what needs to be done in order for us to grow and adjust to changing realities. We will never stop putting Singaporeans at the heart of everything we do and will continue to develop every Singaporean to their fullest potential so that they can fulfil their aspirations and seize opportunities in Singapore and beyond.
However, we must not go down the path of other countries who have started to put up barriers and take an inward-looking, protectionist approach, not just to trade but including talent. Doing so, we will only hurt Singapore whose success over the last 54 years has been built on our openness and courage to do what is necessary for our country. To this end, we will continue to do our best for each and every Singaporean while continuously building on our efforts to take Singapore into the next lap with the world as our hinterland for trade and talent.
Mr Patrick Tay Teck Guan (West Coast) : I thank the Minister for his response and the rationale of Tech@SG. I have three supplementary questions for the Minister.
Firstly, whether such companies in the Tech@SG programme will still be subjected to the Fair Consideration Framework as well as the triple-weak scrutiny which the Tripartite Alliance for Fair and Progressive Employment Practices (TAFEP) by MOM is rolling out.
The second question: whether the agencies concerned – rolling out Tech@SG – considered leveraging on MOM's Capability Transfer Programme to roll out some of these knowledge transfer, skills transfer and capability transfer to Singaporeans?
Thirdly, amidst this sense of uncertainty and quite dismal outlook in terms of the employment and job market, I think our focus is on helping, supporting and assisting fellow Singaporeans. I just wonder whether there are controls in place or will there be controls that will be instituted on Tech@SG to make sure that our local PMEs are not compromised or prejudiced against?
Mr Chan Chun Sing : Mr Speaker, Sir, let me respond to the three questions.
The answer to the first question is a definite yes. We are working closely with MOM, the Fair Consideration Framework applies to everyone and every firm in Singapore.
The second question: did we consider the Capability Transfer Programme? Yes, that is one of the various instruments that we use to level up our own professional knowledge. We will continue to do that and where there are opportunities, we will even step up our gear to do that. But having said that, as I have explained, even though we are churning out as many people as we can, as fast as we can, it is still not sufficient to meet the growing demand. We must make sure that we do not miss the boat by losing the professionals, the start-ups and the companies for us to form a critical mass quickly.
On the third point, it is precisely because of the uncertainties with the economic outlook that we have stepped up our gear to make sure that we build the next generation of companies in this sector. At this point in time, I would say that this forms part of our overall surgical measures to help our companies transform and expand their market presence. At this point in time, the average of the economy may be about 0% to 1% percent growth but that does not mean that every sector is between 0% and 1% percent growth. We know that the current numbers are dragged down by the global electronics downturn, the wholesale and retail trade, and some of the precision engineering sectors.
On the other hand, our economy is growing well in the financial services, the ICT and many of the high-tech industries. This is why we must make sure that while we try to lift the bottom, we must never cap the top. We must make sure that we can do all we can to help those companies that are growing the fastest at this point in time, suffering from the global shortage of tech talent, including many of our ICTs and AI companies, to make sure that the Tech@SG programme will give them the best chance possible to succeed and will not make them lose out to other companies from other countries who are competing for the global talent at this point in time.
Mr Patrick Tay Teck Guan : I would like to ask the Minister for a clarification. Now, we are doing Tech@SG for the tech sector. Will MTI consider or is it in the works to considering other sectors as well? Because it is not just the ICT sector that needs foreign expertise or even data analytics, data science expertise; it could be the financial sector or many other professional services, and all these contribute quite significantly this year and, moving forward, to the economic growth of Singapore.
Mr Chan Chun Sing : The answer is yes. We are open to considering how we can work with the other sectors who are short of these talent at the global level. But I want to clarify. We are not talking about S Pass holders, we are not even talking about the average EP holders. We are talking about people who can manage programmers by the hundreds and thousands. These are the people who know and have the expertise to manage global teams of the hundreds and thousands of people, and these are in critical shortage.
Just to put in context how tough this competition is – China, the most populous country in the world, even China has a 千人计划 to attract the best from around the world to go back to China and help. If China, France and Thailand are all doing this, we can understand how critically short we are at the global level. So, while everybody is trying to churn out as many as they possibly can within the time, everyone is also fighting for the available talent at this point in time.
Mr Pritam Singh (Aljunied) : Just one supplementary question for the Minister. A few years ago, there was an initiative to increase the number of Singaporeans or work towards increasing the number of Singaporeans in leadership positions in the financial sector. Is there a similar parallel initiative that the Government has in mind for Tech@SG? I think the Minister raised some numbers about the number of students in our Institutions of Higher Learning. But more upstream, in terms of taking on roles, since this is a long runway that we are looking at, does the Government have any plans in that regard?
Mr Chan Chun Sing : I thank Mr Pritam Singh for raising the financial sector. In fact, that is a very good example of how we do business. When we grew our financial sector, there will obviously be areas where we initially lack the expertise. We brought in people and experts who are globally attuned and have the exposure. Over time, we progressively make sure that those expertise is localised and we have achieved much in the financial sector, under the leadership of MAS. We will continue to do this because we will never stay static and we will never say that we have done enough to get our locals into the top leadership positions.
This is exactly the same spirit that we intend to do for all the new sectors. That is why, just now, in answering Mr Patrick Tay's question, I talked about the Fair Consideration Framework – what Mr Patrick Tay called the "triple-weak". We want to make sure that every company, as they grow, are conscious of their responsibility to localise the talent and also to build up the capabilities within Singapore. That is how, progressively, we are not shy to learn from the best in the world. But as we learn from the best in the world, we want to make sure that our people have the best opportunities to learn from them, acquire those skills and maybe even go beyond. This must continue to be the Singapore way. This was how we built up the semi-conductor industry in the 1960s and 1970s and that will not change.