口頭答覆 · 2025-04-08 · 屆國會 14

金融科技平臺消費者保護

AI 治理與監管 AI 安全與倫理 AI 經濟與產業 爭議度 3 · 實質辯論

議員質詢金融管理局(MAS)如何確保金融科技平臺及非銀行機構維持流動性、管理資金提取風險,並加強零售投資者保護。政府回應指出相關投資平臺受資本市場服務牌照監管,客戶資產與平臺資產隔離,提現按規定時間有序進行。政府強調近期提現激增事件中,平臺的風險管理機制發揮了作用,但對部分即時提現及關聯簽帳金融卡功能進行了限制,體現監管靈活性與風險防控的平衡。

關鍵要點

  • 投資平臺受資本市場服務牌照監管
  • 客戶資產與平臺資產嚴格隔離
  • 提現功能受限以防風險擴散
政府立場

強調監管機制有效保障消費者權益

政策訊號

加強金融科技平臺風險監管

“The recent incident involving a surge in withdrawals from an investment platform illustrate that the safeguards worked as intended.”

參與人員 (4)

完整譯文(中文)

Hansard 原始記錄 · 2026-05-02

7 馬克·李先生問總理兼財政部長:(a) 新加坡金融管理局(MAS)如何確保提供高收益投資產品的金融科技平臺和非銀行金融機構維持充足流動性並管理資金提取風險;(b) 鑑於近期金融科技公司面臨的流動性挑戰,MAS是否考慮採取額外保障措施以加強對零售投資者的消費者保護;(c) 有哪些措施確保公眾充分理解使用非銀行實體金融服務的風險,特別是提供投資相關產品的金融科技平臺。

8 薩克蒂安迪·蘇帕特先生問總理兼財政部長:(a) MAS採取了哪些措施確保金融機構和金融科技公司(FIFCs)就其產品和服務的變更提供清晰、準確和及時的溝通;(b) 有哪些措施鼓勵FIFCs採用負責任的營銷策略,避免對回報或利益作出過度承諾,避免向客戶提供過於誘人的促銷優惠;(c) MAS如何確保金融科技公司遵守與銀行相同的風險管理和消費者溝通標準。

貿易與工業國務部長(陳振聲先生)(代表總理兼財政部長) :議長先生,若獲准,我想將第7和第8號問題一併回答,因為它們涉及類似議題。

議長 :請繼續。

陳振聲 :議長先生,作為數字顧問運營的投資平臺,代表客戶管理投資組合,須根據《證券與期貨法》持有資本市場服務牌照(CMSL)。這些平臺提供的投資組合投資於其他持牌基金管理公司的基金。根據法規要求,這些投資平臺必須將客戶資產合法隔離,並由持牌託管人妥善保管。

近期某投資平臺出現大量提款事件,顯示相關保障措施發揮了預期作用。客戶資產與平臺資產適當隔離,提款請求在標準基金贖回時間(三至六個工作日)內有序兌現。客戶在三至六天內獲得其投資的市場價值。

上述案例中,該投資平臺提供了兩個獨特功能,並向客戶重點宣傳。第一,允許客戶即時提款,設有每賬戶限額。第二,允許客戶使用與其投資價值掛鉤的簽帳金融卡消費。當這兩項功能的使用率過高,平臺難以支援時,均已停止。

這些功能的條件和限制,包括平臺變更或停止功能的權利,均在產品條款中披露。然而,這些披露可能未能有效幫助客戶全面理解產品。

雖然產品功能不總需監管審批,但針對影響公司運營的功能,法規要求必須有健全的風險管理和清晰披露。MAS正在根據這些要求審查該案例,並更廣泛地研究如何確保投資平臺有效執行這些要求。

同時,我們敦促客戶在決定投資前,充分了解產品功能(包括關鍵條款和條件)及風險。如對產品功能不清楚,應尋求專業理財建議。我們也鼓勵客戶參考我們的MoneySENSE網站,瞭解投資時應注意事項。

議長 :馬克·李先生。

馬克·李(提名議員) :感謝國務部長陳振聲的詳盡答覆,以及MAS在維護信任同時支援金融生態創新方面的持續努力。我認為近期金融科技事件表明,即使平臺持有MAS牌照,許多零售使用者可能並不清楚監管邊界,甚至不瞭解產品風險,尤其是流動性和提款預期方面。

這不一定是監管失誤,更像是溝通和認知挑戰。正如陳振聲國務部長所言,提供方確實包含免責宣告,但零售使用者仍將其產品與銀行類產品混淆。我理解MAS通過MoneySENSE等舉措推動金融素養。

但隨著金融科技產品演進和營銷策略日益複雜,一些消費者可能被品牌推廣或平臺設計吸引,儘管存在合法準確的披露。為此,我建議財政部考慮:第一,要求投資者在投資前必須閱讀並確認一份強制性的通俗風險摘要;第二,加強公眾對該類產品的教育;第三,鼓勵行業制定更嚴格的營銷和促銷行為準則。

陳振聲 :先生,感謝馬克·李先生的補充問題。他提出了繼續培育信任和維護創新的關鍵點,這正是我們對金融科技行業的努力方向。

這次事件表明,企業必須遵守監管要求:首先,建立健全的風險管理體系;其次,妥善披露產品及其對公司運營的影響。我們將詳細審查該案例,並與平臺及行業合作,確保更好地落實這些要求。

此外,關於金融產品的理解,隨著市場推出更多產品,客戶提升認知同樣重要。我們將繼續與各平臺合作,促進產品理解;同時,敦促企業提高披露的清晰度和透明度,雖然已有披露,但仍可改進。

議長 :薩克蒂安迪·蘇帕特先生。

薩克蒂安迪·蘇帕特(碧山-大巴窯) :謝謝議長。我有兩點補充問題,補充馬克·李先生的發言。感謝國務部長和馬克·李先生強調我們希望在金融領域鼓勵創新和信任。

第一,MAS還能做些什麼加強消費者金融素養?正如國務部長剛才提到,隨著金融創新推進,類似情況會增多,是否可以簡化零售投資者的投訴渠道,尤其是針對金融科技相關投訴?因為隨著創新空間擴大,問題可能更復雜。

第二,隨著金融機構和金融科技公司越來越多使用數字平臺和基於人工智慧(AI)的營銷,MAS如何加強監管,確保這些技術不會被用來利用消費者偏見或掩蓋風險?我認為這將變得更復雜。國務部長剛才提及部分內容,但針對金融科技領域的AI營銷,我們如何加強監管?

陳振聲 :先生,我們會採取上述所有措施。首先,消費者教育是重點。關於客戶投訴,我鼓勵消費者如有投訴,向MAS反映,MAS會全面處理。

其次,我們與行業緊密合作,例如金融科技公司和新加坡金融科技協會。我們有空間與他們合作,鼓勵平臺提升標準,更好披露產品特徵。

第三,關於技術應用,我們需在金融創新與監管行為之間取得平衡。重要的保障措施之一是,該案例中的公司持有CMSL基金管理牌照。消費者可查閱金融機構目錄,瞭解哪些公司受監管,也可參考投資者警示名單。

針對該公司及其CMSL牌照,法規要求客戶資金與公司資金隔離。這意味著客戶投資受到保護,客戶提款請求能有序處理,因為客戶資金由獨立託管人保管,必須保持完整,且不得用於償付公司債務。

因此,我們有教育、有良好的監管框架和執行措施,這將幫助我們培育充滿活力的金融科技生態,同時確保保護消費者利益。

英文原文

SPRS Hansard · Fetched: 2026-05-02

7 Mr Mark Lee asked the Prime Minister and Minister for Finance (a) how does MAS ensure that financial technology platforms and non-bank financial institutions offering high-yield investment products maintain sufficient liquidity and manage fund withdrawal risks; (b) whether MAS is considering additional safeguards to enhance consumer protection for retail investors engaging with such platforms, given recent liquidity challenges faced by fintech firms; and (c) what measures are in place to ensure that the public fully understands the risks of using financial services from non-bank entities, particularly fintech platforms offering investment-linked products.

8 Mr Saktiandi Supaat asked the Prime Minister and Minister for Finance (a) what steps is MAS taking to ensure financial institutions and fintech companies (FIFCs) provide clear, accurate and timely communication regarding changes to their products and services; (b) what measures are in place to encourage FIFCs to adopt responsible marketing strategies, avoid overpromising on returns or benefits and avoid offering overly attractive promotional offers to customers; and (c) how does MAS ensure that fintech companies adhere to the same standards of risk management and consumer communications as banks.

The Minister of State for Trade and Industry (Mr Alvin Tan) (for the Prime Minister and Minister for Finance) : Mr Speaker, with your permission, may I take Question Nos 7 and 8 together please, as they touch on similar issues.

Mr Speaker : Please go ahead.

Mr Alvin Tan : Mr Speaker, investment platforms operating as digital advisers that manage investment portfolios on behalf of customers are licensed as Capital Markets Services Licensees (CMSLs) under the Securities and Futures Act. They offer portfolios which are invested into funds managed by other licensed fund management companies. These investment platforms are required by regulation to keep customers' assets legally separate and safekept by licensed custodians.

The recent incident involving a surge in withdrawals from an investment platform illustrate that the safeguards worked as intended. Customers' assets were properly segregated from the platform and requests for withdrawal were redeemed in an orderly manner, within the standard fund redemption timeframe of three to six working days. Customers received the market value of their investments within the typical three to six days.

In the specific case I mentioned above, the investment platform offered two unique features, which they marketed prominently to customers. First, it offered instant withdrawals for customers, up to a limit per account. Second, it allowed customers to spend on a debit card that was linked to the value of their underlying investments. The platform stopped both these features when the high usage of both these features became unsustainable for it to support.

The conditions and limitations of these features, including the ability of the investment platform to vary or stop these features, were disclosed in the product terms and conditions. However, these disclosures may not have been effective in providing customers a full understanding of the product.

While product features do not always require regulatory approval, there are regulatory requirements in place for robust risk management and clear disclosures, especially where they impact a firm's operations. The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) is reviewing this particular case against these requirements, as well as, more generally, how to ensure investment platforms implement these requirements effectively.

At the same time, we urge customers to fully understand the features, including key terms and conditions, and risks of a financial product, before deciding to invest in it. Customers should also seek professional financial advice on the suitability of a product if they are unclear of its features. We also encourage customers to refer to our MoneySENSE website to learn more about what to look out for in an investment.

Mr Speaker : Mr Mark Lee.

Mr Mark Lee (Nominated Member) : I thank the Minister of State Alvin Tan for the detailed reply and MAS' ongoing efforts to uphold trust while supporting innovation in our financial ecosystem. I think the recent fintech incident illustrates that even when a platform is MAS-licensed, many retail users may not clearly understand the regulatory boundaries or even the product risk, particularly in relation to liquidity and withdrawal expectations.

It is not necessarily a regulatory lapse, but I think a communication and perception challenge. And like what the Minister of State Alvin Tan has said, the provider did include disclaimers, but retail users still conflated the offering with bank-like products. And I understand, like what the Minister of State Alvin Tan has said, MAS has worked through initiatives, like MoneySENSE, to promote financial literacy.

But as fintech products evolve and marketing strategies become more sophisticated, some consumers may be drawn in by branding promotional hooks or platform design despite the presence of legally accurate disclosure. To address this, can I suggest the Ministry consider the following: first, requiring a mandatory plain language risk summary before investors proceed and with the user's acknowledgement; second, strengthening public education on such products; and third, encouraging perhaps tighter industry-led codes of conduct on marketing and promotions?

Mr Alvin Tan : Sir, I thank Mr Mark Lee for his supplementary question. I think he made a really good point about the need to continue to foster trust and also to uphold innovation – and that is what we are trying to do with the fintech sector.

I think this particular episode has shown, in fact, that it is important for companies, and in fact, there are regulatory requirements, as I mentioned in my original reply for companies: first, to put in place these robust risk management practices; and second, to properly disclose their products and the features of their products as they impact the firm's operations.

So, we will do that. We will review this particular case in detail and work with platforms, work with the industry to ensure how to better implement these within these requirements that we have set out earlier on.

The additional part is also with regard to financial understanding of these products. And I think as more products are being introduced to the market, it is equally important for customers to be savvy about these. And we will continue to work with different platforms to promote the understanding of these products; but at the first base, to work with firms like the ones that I mentioned, the broader industry, to say, I think you need to make your disclosure just a little bit clearer and upfront. It is already there, but I think they can do more.

Mr Speaker : Mr Saktiandi Supaat.

Mr Saktiandi Supaat (Bishan-Toa Payoh) : Thank you, Mr Speaker. I just have two supplementary questions to add to what Member Mr Mark Lee has spoken about. I thank the Minister of State and also Member Mark Lee for highlighting the innovation that we want to encourage in Singapore in the financial sector and the trust element.

The first supplementary question is, what more can MAS do to strengthen consumer financial literacy, which was highlighted just now by the Minister of State. But I think my question is, there is going to be more of these going forward as we push towards innovation in the financial sector, so whether we can streamline the complaints channel for retail investors and especially for fintech-related grievances. Because this is going to get a bit more complex as we allow some innovation space.

Second, in terms of the increasing use of digital platforms and artificial intelligence (AI)-based marketing by financial institutions and fintech companies, is there a way that MAS can share how it can enhance its oversight to ensure such technologies are not used to exploit consumer biases or obscure risks going forward? I think it is going to get a bit more complex. The Minister of State shared it somewhat just now, but I think with AI-based marketing, especially on the fintech side, how can we enhance our oversight?

Mr Alvin Tan : Sir, we will do, I think, all of the above. Primarily, I think, consumer education is one. For customer complaints, I encourage the consumers and customers, if you do have complaints, to please raise them with MAS. MAS looks into these complaints holistically.

Second, we work very closely with the industry, for example, the fintech firms and the Singapore FinTech Association. I think there is scope for us to work closely with them to see how we can encourage these platforms, as I mentioned in my early reply to Member Mark Lee, to raise the standards and also to better disclose these product features.

Thirdly, I think with regard to more implementation of technology, I think we need to balance between financial innovation as well as regulatory conduct. And I think what is also important is one particular safeguard in this space. If you look at some of the safeguards for this particular case, this particular firm had a CMSL licence for fund management. Consumers can also look into the financial institutions directory to look at which firms and which financial institutions are regulated, and also, consult the Investor Alert List.

But with regard to this particular firm and the CMSL licence, if you look at it carefully, there is a requirement for the segregation of customer funds. So, a segregation of customer funds from the company's money. And that means that there is a segregation where customers' investments are safeguarded. And that is why when customers are requesting for withdrawal, there is an orderly withdrawal because these customer funds are placed under independent custody. They must remain intact – it is a requirement under the CMSL licence – and they cannot be used to meet the firm's liability at any point of time.

So, we have education, we have a good regulatory framework and also implementation. I think these will help us to foster a vibrant fintech ecosystem while making sure that we protect consumers' interests.