書面答覆 · 2025-09-24 · 屆國會 15
版權法防範深度偽造
議員質詢新加坡是否借鑑丹麥利用版權法打擊深度偽造。政府回應表示重視深度偽造帶來的網路傷害，將通過新立法增強受害者救濟權利。強調版權法主要支援創新創作，不適用於規制技術濫用，相關侵權行為可通過其他智慧財產權法律處理。核心爭議在於版權法是否適合用於深度偽造治理。
關鍵要點
- • 深度偽造引發網路傷害
- • 版權法支援創新非規制
- • 其他智慧財產權可補充治理
版權法非治理深度偽造主途徑
借鑑丹麥版權法加強保護
擬推新法增強網路安全
“The primary purpose of our copyright law is to support innovation and incentivise creativity.”
參與人員 (2)
完整譯文（中文）
Hansard 原始記錄 · 2026-05-02
40號議員鄭德源先生詢問法律部長，新加坡是否正在研究丹麥利用版權法加強對深度偽造的保護，通過為個人提供法律依據，要求技術平臺刪除非法數字仿製品的決定。
唐振輝先生：世界各國對深度偽造問題有不同的應對方式。新加坡同樣高度重視這一問題。
政府認識到深度偽造技術可能被濫用，用於騷擾或對個人造成其他網路傷害。為此，法律部和數字發展與信息部將推出新的立法和措施，以增強網路安全。這些措施包括賦予網路傷害受害者（包括因深度偽造產生的傷害）獲得救濟和追究相關責任人的權力。
在新加坡，我們版權法的主要目的是支援創新和激勵創造，通過賦予創作者一系列權利來控制其作品的使用和傳播，而不是規範導致網路傷害的技術濫用。除版權法外，當深度偽造導致特定的法律損害時，我們的智慧財產權法的其他方面也可適用。這包括普通法中的冒充行為訴訟，適用於未經同意使用可識別個人特徵的數字複製品所引發的虛假陳述案件。
英文原文
SPRS Hansard · Fetched: 2026-05-02
40 Mr Patrick Tay Teck Guan asked the Minister for Law whether Singapore is studying Denmark’s decision to use copyright law to strengthen protection against deepfakes, by providing individuals with a legal basis to demand illegal digital imitations be removed from tech platforms.
Mr Edwin Tong Chun Fai : Countries around the world have different approaches to dealing with the issue of deepfakes. Singapore similarly takes the issue seriously.
The Government recognises that deepfake technology can be misused to harass or cause other online harm to individuals. In this regard, the Ministry of Law and Ministry of Digital Development and Information will be introducing new legislation and measures to enhance online safety. These include empowering victims of online harms, including those arising from deepfakes, to obtain relief and seek accountability from those responsible for such harms.
In Singapore, the primary purpose of our copyright law is to support innovation and incentivise creativity, by granting creators a bundle of rights to control the use and dissemination of their works, rather than regulate the misuse of technology that gives rise to online harms. Beyond copyright, other aspects of our intellectual property laws may be used where deepfakes result in specific harms under those laws. These include the common law action of passing off, in cases involving misrepresentation arising from digital replicas of identifiable individual traits without consent.