口頭答弁 · 2026-05-07 · 議会 15

データセンター・都市拡大・気候変動による需要増を踏まえたシンガポールの水の安全保障の見直し

AI インフラと研究 争点度 2 · 軽度質問

労働党のヘ・ティンルー議員が、データセンター・都市拡大・気候変動が水需要を押し上げる中、特に2061年のジョホール水協定の失効を前にしたシンガポールの水の不安定リスクの最新評価と、食料生産や家庭への供給を圧迫せずに「4つの国家蛇口」が将来需要を満たせるよう加速する措置を、持続可能性・環境省に尋ねた。グレース・フー大臣は、公益事業庁(PUB)が経済・人口成長と気候変動を考慮して水インフラを先取りして計画・投資し、海水淡水化やNEWaterなど気候耐性のある水源で供給を多様化していると答えた。ヘ議員は2点を追及した。第一に、世界銀行が水を「背景資源」から「拘束的制約」へ変わるとした点と、水危機が2050年までにGDPの最大6%の損失をもたらしうる点を挙げ、データバンク建設を含む需要増という系統的リスクをいかに財政・インフラの将来推計に組み込むか。第二に、中東紛争がエネルギー価格を押し上げる中、エネルギー集約的な海水淡水化コストへの影響と、長期的なエネルギー価格変動への対応である。フー大臣は、気候変動を長期の水計画に反映してきたこと、エネルギーコストは常に注視する要因であること、PUBが新技術でエネルギーを含む生産コストを下げ続けていること、中東情勢がコスト圧力を強めたが長期的なコスト削減の方向は変わらないことを改めて述べた。

重要なポイント

  • 計算インフラとしてのデータセンターが水の安全保障への系統的圧力の一つに挙げられる
  • 大臣は「4つの国家蛇口」と気候耐性のある淡水化・NEWaterで対応し、先取り計画を強調
  • 議員は世界銀行の「拘束的制約」論と2050年までのGDP最大6%影響で系統的リスクを枠づけ
  • 淡水化はエネルギー集約的で、中東紛争がコスト圧力を強めるが長期的なコスト削減方針は不変
政府の立場

「4つの国家蛇口」による先取り計画と気候耐性のある水源で水の安全保障を維持し、新技術でエネルギーを含む生産コストを継続的に削減

質問の立場

データセンター等による需要増を系統的リスクとして財政・インフラの将来推計に明示的に組み込み、中東のエネルギー変動が淡水化コストに与える影響の定量化を要求

政策シグナル

データセンターの計算需要が国家の水の安全保障リスクに組み込まれる一方、政府は既存の「4つの国家蛇口」枠組みとコスト削減技術で対応し、新規の専用措置は約束せず

“世界銀行は最近、水が「背景的な資源」から「拘束的な制約」へと変わると述べました。”

参加者 (2)

英語原文

SPRS Hansard · Fetched: 2026-06-02

16 Ms He Ting Ru asked the Minister for Sustainability and the Environment with rising water demands from data centres, urban expansion and climate variability affecting local reservoirs (a) what is the latest assessment of Singapore's water insecurity risks, particularly ahead of the 2061 Johor Water Agreement expiry; and (b) what accelerated measures are being planned to ensure the Four National Taps meet future needs without compromising food production or household supply.

The Minister for Sustainability and the Environment (Ms Grace Fu Hai Yien) : Mr Speaker, PUB continues to plan ahead and invest in water infrastructure to meet future demand, taking into account economic and population growth as well as the impact of climate change. We have diversified our water supply through the "Four National Taps". These include desalinated water and NEWater, which are weather-resilient sources that strengthen our water security amid the effects of climate change.

Mr Speaker : Ms He.

Ms He Ting Ru (Sengkang) : Thank you, Mr Speaker. I have two buckets of supplementary questions.

With the background that water scarcity has been intensified by climate change and the estimate is that there would be possible implications of up to 6% of gross domestic product (GDP) by 2050, an impact on the GDP, and also, given that the World Bank has recently stated that the water will shift from a background resource to a binding constraint, then also, bearing in mind that if there is not good water management, there will also be constriction or a negative impact on the economic growth and given our expected increase in demands, including plans to build databanks and climate change driven increases, how is this systemic risk framing being incorporated into our fiscal and also forward estimates for public infrastructure demand planning parameters?

And the second supplementary question relates to the current Middle East conflict and the war in the Middle East. The current one in the Middle East has driven up the cost of energy, and the cost of oil and natural gas has been extremely volatile. Given that a lot of our water supply comes from very energy-intensive sources, like desalination, what is the impact that that increase in energy cost have had on the cost of our desalinated water? And how are we responding to this prolonged energy price volatility, to moderate impact that the energy cost is having on our desalination cost modelling?

Ms Grace Fu Hai Yien : Mr Speaker, I believe that my question has addressed the first part of Ms He's supplementary questions, which is, really, the impact of climate change resulting in global water scarcity and its impact on water supply. In Singapore, I would like to think that we have planned ahead, and we are always looking at the impact of climate change, as I have mentioned in my answer, and incorporating the impact of climate change in our long-term planning for our water infrastructure.

With regard to cost of energy, it is definitely a driver that we have always paid attention to. We have looked at ways to reduce our energy efficiency for water treatment. In fact, we set that as our goal so that our PUB colleagues will focus their attention on always searching for new technology that will reduce the overall costs of producing water, including energy. And, of course, it has been exacerbated by recent events in Middle East, but that does not change our long-term focus on bringing down the costs of producing water, including the use of energy.