口頭答覆 · 2023-04-21 · 屆國會 14
新加坡人工智慧監管框架
質詢方關注新加坡是否借鑑歐盟和中國的AI監管框架，重點領域及立法時間表。政府回應介紹現有的《AI治理模型框架》和AI Verify工具，強調持續審視監管策略，並計劃釋出個人資料保護指導。質詢方進一步關注AI詐騙等具體風險，政府指出AI技術多樣性，強調區別對待不同AI技術的必要性，體現審慎推進監管的態度。
關鍵要點
- • 支援負責任AI發展
- • 已有AI治理框架
- • 關注AI詐騙風險
審慎推進AI監管，持續評估調整
關注AI詐騙等具體保護措施
完善AI倫理與資料保護
“AI is a group of technologies. Currently, there is a lot of excitement around ChatGPT.”
參與人員 (3)
- He Ting Ru
- Janil Puthucheary
- Senior Minister of State for Communications and Information
完整譯文（中文）
Hansard 原始記錄 · 2026-05-02
19 何庭如女士詢問通訊及資訊部長，鑑於歐盟和中國擬議中的人工智慧（AI）治理監管框架，(a) 新加坡目前的人工智慧監管方法是否正在審查中；(b) 目前在該領域是否有任何優先考慮的監管領域；以及 (c) 預計何時會引入相關監管措施。
通訊及資訊高階國務部長（Janil Puthucheary 博士）（代通訊及資訊部長） ：議長先生，新加坡支援負責任地開發和部署人工智慧（AI），以便公眾能夠在值得信賴和安全的環境中享受其帶來的益處。
我們已推出多種工具以幫助實現這些目標。其中一個例子是《人工智慧治理模型框架》。如星展銀行、滙豐銀行、Visa 和微軟等公司已採用該框架，以解決部署人工智慧解決方案時的關鍵倫理和治理問題。另一個工具是 AI Verify，這是一套自我測試框架和工具包，用於展示負責任的人工智慧部署，已吸引超過 500 家公司的關注。[ 請參閱《通訊及資訊高階國務部長澄清》，官方報告，2023 年 4 月 21 日，第 95 卷，第 101 期，書面宣告更正部分。]
個人資料保護委員會將在今年內根據《個人資料保護法》釋出《人工智慧系統中個人資料使用諮詢指南》。
我們通過《人工智慧與資料倫理使用諮詢委員會》以及《全球人工智慧夥伴關係》與業界和國際同行就人工智慧相關問題進行交流。
類似於我們監管資料使用、網路安全、虛假資訊和網路危害的方式，我們將繼續審查技術現狀、監管方法及其有效性，以維護數字發展中的信任與安全。
議長先生：何庭如女士。
何庭如女士（盛港選區）：謝謝議長先生。我有一個簡短的追加問題。鑑於人工智慧的快速發展及其可能不同於傳統技術的特殊性質，我想了解是否有更具體的方案或保護措施，以防範基於人工智慧的詐騙，例如語音克隆？這些措施是否正在考慮中？預計何時實施？
Janil Puthucheary 博士：議長先生，感謝何女士的提問。我藉此機會指出，她的問題中存在一個假設，即人工智慧是“單一事物”，而公眾和評論員常常如此看待它。
人工智慧是一組技術。目前，大家對 ChatGPT 十分關注，它是基於機器學習技術的大型語言模型的一個例子。關於我們應如何應對人工智慧的影響，其影響在不同領域會有很大差異，監管方式也會因人工智慧工具所依賴的不同組成部分而異。
當議員問及我們將如何保護公民免受與人工智慧相關的詐騙時，這不一定需要專門針對人工智慧的監管，而是需要通過我們打擊詐騙、反欺詐、網路安全和刑事活動的努力來應對。我們在議會中的同事們也曾談及此事，我們將繼續努力解決相關問題。
同樣，當我們談論資料、網路安全、網路危害和虛假資訊時，這些並非與人工智慧無關，因為人工智慧相關工具可能會影響這些領域，並可能給公眾帶來危害。
我想向議員保證，我們認同這些關切，我們確實需要應對技術的使用方式，確保技術及其空間值得信賴，並促進有益於所有人的舉措發展，這其中包括保護公民免受詐騙及相關努力，無論是否與人工智慧有關。
英文原文
SPRS Hansard · Fetched: 2026-05-02
19 Ms He Ting Ru asked the Minister for Communications and Information in view of the proposed regulatory frameworks for artificial intelligence (AI) governance in the European Union and China (a) whether the current approach to AI regulation in Singapore is being reviewed; (b) whether there are any areas in the field that are currently being prioritised for regulation; and (c) what is the anticipated timeline for the introduction of any regulation.
The Senior Minister of State for Communications and Information (Dr Janil Puthucheary) (for the Minister for Communications and Information) : Mr Speaker, Singapore supports the responsible development and deployment of artificial intelligence (AI), so that its benefits may be enjoyed in a trusted and safe manner.
We have introduced tools to help us achieve these goals. One example is the Model AI Governance Framework. Companies such as DBS, HSBC, Visa and Microsoft have adopted this framework to address key ethical and governance issues when deploying AI solutions. Another tool is AI Verify, a self-testing framework and toolkit to demonstrate responsible deployment of AI. It has attracted the interest of over 500 companies. [ Please refer to " Clarification by Senior Minister of State for Communications and Information ", Official Report, 21 April 2023, Vol 95, Issue 101, Correction By Written Statement section. ]
The Personal Data Protection Commission will issue Advisory Guidelines on the Use of Personal Data in AI Systems under the Personal Data Protection Act within the year.
We engage our industry and international counterparts on AI-related issues through our Advisory Council on Ethical Use of AI and Data as well the Global Partnership on AI.
Similar to how we regulate data use, cybersecurity, misinformation and online harms, we will continue to review the state of the technology, our regulatory approach and its effectiveness, in order to uphold trust and safety in digital developments.
Mr Speaker : Ms He Ting Ru.
Ms He Ting Ru (Sengkang) : Thank you, Mr Speaker. Just a quick supplementary question. Given the rapid development of AI and the specific nature of AI which might be different from more traditional technologies, I was just wondering whether there was anything more particular or specific schemes or any protections to be put in place to protect citizens against AI-powered scams, for example, voice cloning, and whether these are actually being considered and what is the expected timeline for implementation.
Dr Janil Puthucheary : Sir, I thank Ms He for her questions. I would take this opportunity to point out that in her questions is an assumption that AI is "one thing", and this is something that the public and commentators often treat it as.
AI is a group of technologies. Currently, there is a lot of excitement around ChatGPT, which is an example of a large language model based on machine learning techniques. When it comes to the issues of how we should deal with the impact of AI, its impact is going to be quite different in different domains and the impact is going to be quite different in how we regulate it, depending on the various components of what the AI tool rests on.
When the Member asks about what we will do to protect citizens from scams related to AI, it is not necessarily something that we need to be specific about AI regulation, it is something that we need to deal with in terms of our scam efforts, our initiatives around fraud and cybersecurity and criminal activity. And our colleagues in this House have spoken about that and we will continue to address that.
Similarly, when we talk about what we are doing around data, cybersecurity, online harms and misinformation, it is not that that is separate from what we are doing with AI, because those are things that AI-related tools may influence and may subsequently introduce harms to our public.
I just want to reassure the Member that we agree with the concerns, that we do have to address how technology is being used, make sure that the technology and the technological spaces are trusted and allows the development of initiatives that will benefit all of us and this includes protecting citizens from scams and efforts associated with that, whether AI-related or not.