口頭答覆 · 2023-05-09 · 屆國會 14
確保倫理AI標準發展維護
質詢關注如何推動符合人類價值觀的倫理AI發展及其標準維護。政府回應介紹了新加坡已有的AI治理框架、自測工具及個人資料使用指導，強調責任制和資料安全。質詢方關注責任歸屬及AI身份標識，核心爭議在於如何落實責任和透明度。
關鍵要點
- • 推廣負責任AI發展
- • 引入AI治理框架
- • 強調責任與透明
支援負責任且安全的AI發展
關注AI責任與透明度
強化AI責任與資料保護
“Singapore supports the responsible development and deployment of artificial intelligence (AI), so that its benefits may be enjoyed in a trusted and safe manner.”
參與人員 (3)
- Janil Puthucheary
- Senior Minister of State for Communications and Information
- Tan Wu Meng
完整譯文（中文）
Hansard 原始記錄 · 2026-05-02
16 陳武明醫生詢問通訊及資訊部長，鑑於人工智慧（AI）領域的進展，如ChatGPT和GPT-4架構，目前在促進和確保（i）開發符合人類價值觀的倫理AI，以及（ii）在AI的開發、資料集訓練和部署中維護倫理標準方面，給予了哪些關注。
通訊及資訊高階國務部長（陳志南醫生）（代通訊及資訊部長） ：女士，新加坡支援負責任地開發和部署人工智慧（AI），以便公眾能夠在值得信賴和安全的環境中享受其帶來的益處。我們的做法已於2023年4月19日的會議中作出說明。
除其他措施外，我們推出了《人工智慧治理示範框架》和AI Verify自測工具包，以展示負責任的AI部署。今年晚些時候，我們計劃根據《個人資料保護法》釋出《人工智慧系統中個人資料使用的諮詢指南》。我們定期與業界及國際同行交流，例如通過我們的《人工智慧與資料倫理使用諮詢委員會》和《全球人工智慧夥伴關係》，以緊跟最新發展。
在必要和有益的情況下，我們將更新措施，以考慮諸如Chat生成預訓練變換器（ChatGPT）和GPT-4等發展的影響。例如，公共服務部門已為使用類似技術起草檔案的公務員制定了指導方針。該指導方針明確指出，公務員對其工作負有責任，需對AI生成的內容進行事實核查和審查。指導方針還旨在通過提醒公務員不要將敏感資訊輸入這些應用程式來保障資料安全。
副議長女士 ：陳武明醫生。
陳武明醫生（裕廊選區） ：副議長，我感謝高階國務部長的回答。我有兩個追加問題。高階國務部長在舉公共服務部門使用ChatGPT和GPT-4積累經驗的例子時，基本上提到了在AI被用於某一目的時應有責任人的概念。請問高階國務部長，這種做法是否會在其他場合推廣，包括私營部門？例如，如果一家公司使用AI做出人力資源決策，當AI導致對求職者的歧視行為時，是否可以有適當的問責機制。
其次，我也想請教高階國務部長，相關機構是否考慮研究為某些AI應用和平臺設立“人類身份標識”的作用？這樣，新加坡民眾和公眾在使用線上門戶時，可以知道聊天內容是由AI生成還是由真人交流。
陳志南醫生 ：女士，感謝議員的提問。私營部門的角色非常重要。我們的《人工智慧與資料倫理使用諮詢委員會》中有大量私營部門代表。我們希望通過該平臺，公共部門的最佳實踐和舉措也能影響私營部門的標準和做法；反之亦然，我們也會從私營部門學習最佳實踐，以支援公共部門的職責和使命。
關於第二個問題，即“人類身份標識”的作用，我認為值得研究。但我想提醒，這不一定適合作為所有AI機制的普遍規則。議員會理解，有相當多的任務可以安全合理地自動化完成，而無需證明有人類參與。在我們日常工作和與眾多裝置的互動中，我們知道這類技術已被安全有效地部署。
中午12時30分
副議長女士 ：問答時間結束。秩序。問答時間結束。政府法案介紹。
英文原文
SPRS Hansard · Fetched: 2026-05-02
16 Dr Tan Wu Meng asked the Minister for Communications and Information considering the advances in artificial intelligence (AI) with platforms such as ChatGPT and the GPT-4 architecture, what attention is being given to promoting and ensuring (i) the development of ethical AI which responds in a manner consistent with human values and (ii) maintenance of ethical standards in the development, dataset training and deployment of AI.
The Senior Minister of State for Communications and Information (Dr Janil Puthucheary) (for the Minister for Communications and Information) : Madam, Singapore supports the responsible development and deployment of artificial intelligence (AI), so that its benefits may be enjoyed in a trusted and safe manner. Our approach was explained at the 19 April 2023 Sitting.
Among other measures, we introduced the Model AI Governance Framework and AI Verify, a self-testing toolkit to demonstrate responsible deployment of AI. Later this year, we plan to issue the Advisory Guidelines on the Use of Personal Data in AI Systems under the Personal Data Protection Act. We regularly engage industry and international counterparts, such as through our Advisory Council on Ethical Use of AI and Data and the Global Partnership on Artificial Intelligence, to keep abreast of developments.
Where necessary and useful, we will update our measures to take into account the impact of developments like Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer (ChatGPT) and GPT-4. For example, the Public Service has introduced guidelines for public officers using similar technologies to draft documents. These guidelines make clear that public officers are accountable for their work and are responsible for fact-checking and vetting AI-generated content. The guidelines also aim to safeguard data security by reminding officers not to input sensitive information into these applications.
Mdm Deputy Speaker : Dr Tan Wu Meng.
Dr Tan Wu Meng (Jurong) : Deputy Speaker, I thank the Senior Minister of State for his answer. I have got two supplementary questions. The Senior Minister of State, in his example of the Public Service gaining experience with the use of ChatGPT and GPT-4, essentially alluded to the idea of a responsible person when AI is being deployed for a purpose. Can I first ask the Senior Minister of State whether this approach will be encouraged in other settings, including in the private sector? So that, for example, if a firm uses AI to make decisions on human resources, there can be appropriate accountability if the AI results in discriminatory behaviour against job applicants.
Secondly, can I also ask the Senior Minister of State if agencies might wish to study the role of a proof of human marker for certain AI applications and platforms? This is so that Singaporeans and members of the public interacting with an online portal can know whether the chat is being generated by an AI or by a fellow human being.
Dr Janil Puthucheary : Madam, I thank the Member for the questions. The role of the private sector is important. We have significant representation from the private sector in our Advisory Council on the Ethical Use of AI. We hope through that platform, these best practices as well as the moves that the public sector is making can also influence the standards and approaches that occur in the private sector; and vice versa, as we learn best practices from the private sector for our role and mission in the public sector.
On his second question about the role of a proof of human marker, I think it is something worth studying. But I would caveat that it is not necessarily something that you may want to introduce as a general rule across all AI mechanisms. I think the Member would appreciate there are a fair number of tasks which can be very safely and reasonably automated without the need for demonstrating a human in the loop. In our day-to-day work and our interactions with our many devices, we know that this is the type of technology that is being deployed safely and to good effect.
12.30 pm
Mdm Deputy Speaker : We are out of Question Time. Order. End of Question Time. Introduction of Government Bills.