Oral Answer · 2023-04-21 · Parliament 14

Regulatory Framework for Artificial Intelligence Governance in Singapore

AI Governance & RegulationAI Safety & EthicsAI Economy & IndustryAI & National Security 争点度 2 · Mild query

質疑方は、シンガポールが欧州連合と中国のAI規制フレームワークを参考にしているか、重点領域および立法タイムテーブルに関心を持っています。政府の回応は、既存の「AI統治モデルフレームワーク」とAI Verifyツールを紹介し、規制戦略の継続的な審視を強調し、個人データ保護ガイダンスの発布を計画しています。質疑方はさらにAI詐欺などの具体的なリスクに関心を持ち、政府はAI技術の多様性を指摘し、異なるAI技術を区別して対応する必要性を強調し、規制を慎重に推進する態度を体現しています。

重要なポイント

  • Supports responsible AI development
  • Existing AI governance framework
  • Focus on AI-enabled scam risk
政府の立場

AI規制の審慎な推進、継続的な評価・調整

質問の立場

AI詐欺などの具体的な保護措置に注目する

政策シグナル

柔軟な就業と技能トレーニングを推進します

“AI is a group of technologies. Currently, there is a lot of excitement around ChatGPT.”

参加者 (3)

英語原文

SPRS Hansard · Fetched: 2026-05-02

19 Ms He Ting Ru asked the Minister for Communications and Information in view of the proposed regulatory frameworks for artificial intelligence (AI) governance in the European Union and China (a) whether the current approach to AI regulation in Singapore is being reviewed; (b) whether there are any areas in the field that are currently being prioritised for regulation; and (c) what is the anticipated timeline for the introduction of any regulation.

The Senior Minister of State for Communications and Information (Dr Janil Puthucheary) (for the Minister for Communications and Information) : Mr Speaker, Singapore supports the responsible development and deployment of artificial intelligence (AI), so that its benefits may be enjoyed in a trusted and safe manner.

We have introduced tools to help us achieve these goals. One example is the Model AI Governance Framework. Companies such as DBS, HSBC, Visa and Microsoft have adopted this framework to address key ethical and governance issues when deploying AI solutions. Another tool is AI Verify, a self-testing framework and toolkit to demonstrate responsible deployment of AI. It has attracted the interest of over 500 companies. [ Please refer to " Clarification by Senior Minister of State for Communications and Information ", Official Report, 21 April 2023, Vol 95, Issue 101, Correction By Written Statement section. ]

The Personal Data Protection Commission will issue Advisory Guidelines on the Use of Personal Data in AI Systems under the Personal Data Protection Act within the year.

We engage our industry and international counterparts on AI-related issues through our Advisory Council on Ethical Use of AI and Data as well the Global Partnership on AI.

Similar to how we regulate data use, cybersecurity, misinformation and online harms, we will continue to review the state of the technology, our regulatory approach and its effectiveness, in order to uphold trust and safety in digital developments.

Mr Speaker : Ms He Ting Ru.

Ms He Ting Ru (Sengkang) : Thank you, Mr Speaker. Just a quick supplementary question. Given the rapid development of AI and the specific nature of AI which might be different from more traditional technologies, I was just wondering whether there was anything more particular or specific schemes or any protections to be put in place to protect citizens against AI-powered scams, for example, voice cloning, and whether these are actually being considered and what is the expected timeline for implementation.

Dr Janil Puthucheary : Sir, I thank Ms He for her questions. I would take this opportunity to point out that in her questions is an assumption that AI is "one thing", and this is something that the public and commentators often treat it as.

AI is a group of technologies. Currently, there is a lot of excitement around ChatGPT, which is an example of a large language model based on machine learning techniques. When it comes to the issues of how we should deal with the impact of AI, its impact is going to be quite different in different domains and the impact is going to be quite different in how we regulate it, depending on the various components of what the AI tool rests on.

When the Member asks about what we will do to protect citizens from scams related to AI, it is not necessarily something that we need to be specific about AI regulation, it is something that we need to deal with in terms of our scam efforts, our initiatives around fraud and cybersecurity and criminal activity. And our colleagues in this House have spoken about that and we will continue to address that.

Similarly, when we talk about what we are doing around data, cybersecurity, online harms and misinformation, it is not that that is separate from what we are doing with AI, because those are things that AI-related tools may influence and may subsequently introduce harms to our public.

I just want to reassure the Member that we agree with the concerns, that we do have to address how technology is being used, make sure that the technology and the technological spaces are trusted and allows the development of initiatives that will benefit all of us and this includes protecting citizens from scams and efforts associated with that, whether AI-related or not.