口頭答弁 · 2026-05-06 · 議会 15

実在の人物のAI生成偽わいせつ画像の流布に関する警察への通報

ディープフェイクと偽情報 AI ガバナンスと規制 争点度 2 · 軽度質問

労働党の Sylvia Lim 議員は内務省に質問しました:2025年に実在の人物のAI生成偽わいせつ画像の流布に関する警察への通報は何件あったか、そのうち教育機関内の「生徒対生徒」が占める割合はどれくらいか、被害者はどのような後続対応を期待できるか。内務省を代表して答えた Sim Ann 上級政務大臣は率直に述べました:警察はわいせつ物事件のうち実在の人物のAI生成画像が関係する件数を個別に集計していません。通報を受けると警察は通常どおり捜査します——被告と証人の尋問、デジタル・フォレンジック証拠の精査;未成年の被害者の場合は親/保護者に通知し、心理的支援を必要とする被害者には被害者ケアサービスを提供します;偽画像がオンラインで流布している場合、警察は「オンライン犯罪危害法」(OCHA) に基づきオンラインサービス事業者にシンガポールのユーザーのアクセスを遮断するよう指示できます。Lim 議員は3点を追及しました:(1) 被害者が通報後に警察から「ハラスメント防止法」(非逮捕罪)で対処するよう案内されたが、これが警察の既定の立場なのか;(2) 議員が訴えた後に警察が画像の削除を手伝ったが、これは通常の対応なのか;(3) 「刑法」377BD、377BE 等の条項は逮捕可能な罪として扱えるが、いつそのように分類し起訴を視野に捜査するのか。Sim Ann は答えました:「特定の経路を取る既定の立場」はなく、すべては事件の事実次第であり、事実が「刑法」上の私的画像の流布罪を構成すれば警察はそれに従って行動し;オンラインで流布する画像は捜査の過程で把握され次第、警察は事業者に遮断を指示できます。

重要なポイント

  • 警察はAI生成偽画像が関わるわいせつ事件数を個別に集計せず
  • OCHAに基づき事業者へ指示しシンガポールのアクセスを遮断可能
  • 「ハラスメント防止法」か逮捕可能な刑法罪かは事件の事実次第
  • 未成年被害者は親に通知し被害者ケアサービスを提供
政府の立場

事件の事実に応じて罪状と経路を定め、OCHAによる遮断と刑法上の責任追及を併用

質問の立場

警察が非逮捕の「ハラスメント防止法」へ既定で誘導することに疑問を呈し、逮捕可能な罪での起訴を促す

政策シグナル

AIディープフェイク性的画像の取り締まり:専用統計なし・固定の法的経路なし、個別事案の事実に基づき裁量

“AI生成のわいせつ画像がオンラインで流布している場合、警察は「オンライン犯罪危害法」に基づき、オンラインサービス事業者に対しシンガポールのユーザーのアクセスを遮断するよう指示することができます。”

参加者 (2)

英語原文

SPRS Hansard · Fetched: 2026-06-02

1 Ms Sylvia Lim asked the Coordinating Minister for National Security and Minister for Home Affairs (a) how many police reports were received in 2025 concerning the circulation of AI-generated fake obscene images of real persons; (b) what proportion of these cases involved perpetrators and victims who were fellow students in educational institutions; and (c) what can victims or complainants expect in follow-up actions by the police.

The Senior Minister of State for Home Affairs (Ms Sim Ann) (for the Coordinating Minister for National Security and Minister for Home Affairs) : Sir, the Police do not track how many of the obscene materials cases it investigates involve AI-generated images of real persons.

Where there is a report relating to any obscene material, the Police will conduct investigations, including through interviewing the accused and other witnesses, and examining any digital forensic evidence that may be available. For cases involving young victims, the Police may notify the parents or guardians. The Police will also offer victim care services to victims who require psychological support.

If the AI-generated obscene images are circulating online, the Police may issue directions under the Online Criminal Harms Act to online service providers to disable Singapore users’ access to them.

Mr Speaker : Ms Lim.

Ms Sylvia Lim (Aljunied) : Thank you, Sir. I have three supplementary questions for the Senior Minister of State. The first is that in some cases that I have come across, I was told by the victims that they reported to Police that their images had been artificially created and put up on porn websites, and the Police had advised them to take action under the Protection from Harassment Act, as it is a non-arrestable offence. I would like the Senior Minister of State to clarify whether this is actually the default position of the Police in such reports.

Second, to be fair to the Police, in the cases that I know of, after we appealed for the victim, the Police actually assisted to have the images removed. So, that is very helpful and of most concern to the victims. I would like to ask whether that is something that the Police does ordinarily from most of these reports.

The third question is, I believe that under the Penal Code, there are actually some arrestable offences that would actually cover some of the conduct – for example, being in possession of intimate images and so on, under section 377BD and 377BE. So, I would like to ask when the Police would classify the case under these arrestable offences and investigate with the view to prosecution.

Ms Sim Ann : Sir, I believe that the first and the third supplementary questions from the Member are related. I would say that if the facts of the case are such that it warrants taking action under the Penal Code for offences relating to the circulation of intimate images, the Police will do so. So, it is not that there is a default position to go a certain route – everything depends on the facts of the case as disclosed.

In terms of what happens to the images that are, say, circulating online, as I have also shared in the main reply, where there are obscene images circulating online, and which, in the course of investigation, or due to the report, it is known, the Police may issue directions to the online service providers to block access of Singapore users to them.