口頭答覆 · 2026-05-06 · 屆國會 15
針對傳播 AI 偽造真人淫穢影像的報警情況
工人黨 Sylvia Lim 詢問內政部:2025 年收到多少宗關於傳播 AI 偽造真人淫穢影像的報警、其中多少涉及教育機構內"同學對同學"、以及受害者能期待怎樣的後續處理。代表內政部答覆的高階政務部長 Sim Ann 坦言:警方並不單獨統計淫穢物品案件中有多少涉及 AI 偽造真人影像。警方接報後會照常偵查——訊問被告與證人、檢視數字鑑證證據;涉及未成年受害者會通知家長/監護人,並向需要心理支援的受害者提供受害者關懷服務;若偽造影像在網上流傳,警方可依據《線上刑事危害法令》(OCHA) 向網路服務商發出指令,封鎖新加坡使用者訪問。Lim 追問三點:(1) 受害者反映報警後被警方建議改走《防止騷擾法令》(非逮捕性罪行),這是否警方預設做法;(2) 經議員申訴後警方協助下架影像,這是否常規;(3) 《刑事法典》377BD、377BE 等條文本可作為逮捕性罪行處理,何時會這樣定性並以起訴為目標偵辦。Sim Ann 答:沒有"預設走某條路"一說,一切視案情事實而定,若事實構成《刑事法典》下傳播私密影像的罪行,警方就會據此行動;網上流傳的影像在偵查中一旦掌握,警方可向服務商發指令封鎖。
關鍵要點
- • 警方不單獨統計涉 AI 偽造真人淫穢影像的案件數
- • 可依 OCHA 向網路服務商發指令封鎖新加坡使用者訪問
- • 走《防止騷擾法令》還是《刑事法典》逮捕性罪行視案情而定
- • 未成年受害者通知家長並提供受害者關懷服務
按案情事實定罪定路徑,依 OCHA 封鎖 + 刑事法典追責並行
質疑警方預設引導走非逮捕性的《防止騷擾法令》,促請按逮捕性罪行起訴
AI 深偽性影像執法:無統計專項、無固定法律路徑,依個案事實裁量
“If the AI-generated obscene images are circulating online, the Police may issue directions under the Online Criminal Harms Act to online service providers to disable Singapore users' access to them.”
參與人員 (2)
完整譯文(中文)
Hansard 原始記錄 · 2026-06-02
工人黨 Sylvia Lim 詢問內政部:2025 年收到多少宗關於傳播 AI 偽造真人淫穢影像的報警、其中多少涉及教育機構內"同學對同學"、以及受害者能期待怎樣的後續處理。代表內政部答覆的高階政務部長 Sim Ann 坦言:警方並不單獨統計淫穢物品案件中有多少涉及 AI 偽造真人影像。
警方接報後會照常偵查——訊問被告與證人、檢視數字鑑證證據;涉及未成年受害者會通知家長/監護人,並向需要心理支援的受害者提供受害者關懷服務;若偽造影像在網上流傳,警方可依據《線上刑事危害法令》(OCHA) 向網路服務商發出指令,封鎖新加坡使用者訪問。
Lim 追問三點:(1) 受害者反映報警後被警方建議改走《防止騷擾法令》(非逮捕性罪行),這是否警方預設做法;(2) 經議員申訴後警方協助下架影像,這是否常規;(3) 《刑事法典》377BD、377BE 等條文本可作為逮捕性罪行處理,何時會這樣定性並以起訴為目標偵辦。
Sim Ann 答:沒有"預設走某條路"一說,一切視案情事實而定,若事實構成《刑事法典》下傳播私密影像的罪行,警方就會據此行動;網上流傳的影像在偵查中一旦掌握,警方可向服務商發指令封鎖。
英文原文
SPRS Hansard · Fetched: 2026-06-02
1 Ms Sylvia Lim asked the Coordinating Minister for National Security and Minister for Home Affairs (a) how many police reports were received in 2025 concerning the circulation of AI-generated fake obscene images of real persons; (b) what proportion of these cases involved perpetrators and victims who were fellow students in educational institutions; and (c) what can victims or complainants expect in follow-up actions by the police.
The Senior Minister of State for Home Affairs (Ms Sim Ann) (for the Coordinating Minister for National Security and Minister for Home Affairs) : Sir, the Police do not track how many of the obscene materials cases it investigates involve AI-generated images of real persons.
Where there is a report relating to any obscene material, the Police will conduct investigations, including through interviewing the accused and other witnesses, and examining any digital forensic evidence that may be available. For cases involving young victims, the Police may notify the parents or guardians. The Police will also offer victim care services to victims who require psychological support.
If the AI-generated obscene images are circulating online, the Police may issue directions under the Online Criminal Harms Act to online service providers to disable Singapore users’ access to them.
Mr Speaker : Ms Lim.
Ms Sylvia Lim (Aljunied) : Thank you, Sir. I have three supplementary questions for the Senior Minister of State. The first is that in some cases that I have come across, I was told by the victims that they reported to Police that their images had been artificially created and put up on porn websites, and the Police had advised them to take action under the Protection from Harassment Act, as it is a non-arrestable offence. I would like the Senior Minister of State to clarify whether this is actually the default position of the Police in such reports.
Second, to be fair to the Police, in the cases that I know of, after we appealed for the victim, the Police actually assisted to have the images removed. So, that is very helpful and of most concern to the victims. I would like to ask whether that is something that the Police does ordinarily from most of these reports.
The third question is, I believe that under the Penal Code, there are actually some arrestable offences that would actually cover some of the conduct – for example, being in possession of intimate images and so on, under section 377BD and 377BE. So, I would like to ask when the Police would classify the case under these arrestable offences and investigate with the view to prosecution.
Ms Sim Ann : Sir, I believe that the first and the third supplementary questions from the Member are related. I would say that if the facts of the case are such that it warrants taking action under the Penal Code for offences relating to the circulation of intimate images, the Police will do so. So, it is not that there is a default position to go a certain route – everything depends on the facts of the case as disclosed.
In terms of what happens to the images that are, say, circulating online, as I have also shared in the main reply, where there are obscene images circulating online, and which, in the course of investigation, or due to the report, it is known, the Police may issue directions to the online service providers to block access of Singapore users to them.